Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fraudulent Conduct by a Fiduciary Contractor: Implications of Romero v. Allen and Ashcroft Realty

Fraudulent Conduct by a Fiduciary Contractor: Implications of Romero v. Allen and Ashcroft Realty

Date: May 12, 1976
Fraudulent Conduct by a Fiduciary Contractor: Implications of Romero v. Allen and Ashcroft Realty Introduction The case of Jose Leon Romero, AKA Joe L. Romero, AKA Buddy Romero, et al., Bankrupts....
Materiality in False Medicare Claims: An Analysis of United States v. Radetsky

Materiality in False Medicare Claims: An Analysis of United States v. Radetsky

Date: Mar 30, 1976
Materiality in False Medicare Claims: An Analysis of United States v. Radetsky Introduction United States of America v. Louis Martin Radetsky is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Establishing Discretionary Authority in Prisoner Classification: Marchesani v. McCune

Establishing Discretionary Authority in Prisoner Classification: Marchesani v. McCune

Date: Feb 18, 1976
Establishing Discretionary Authority in Prisoner Classification: Marchesani v. McCune Introduction Bernard Marchesani, the appellant, challenged the classification imposed upon him by the Bureau of...
Procedural Rights in Injunctive Relief and Class Actions: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Penn v. San Juan Hospital

Procedural Rights in Injunctive Relief and Class Actions: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Penn v. San Juan Hospital

Date: Jan 1, 1976
Procedural Rights in Injunctive Relief and Class Actions: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Penn v. San Juan Hospital Introduction Penn et al. v. San Juan Hospital, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the...
Clarification on Hybrid Self-Representation and Judicial Discretion in Psychiatric Evaluations: United States v. Hill

Clarification on Hybrid Self-Representation and Judicial Discretion in Psychiatric Evaluations: United States v. Hill

Date: Dec 16, 1975
Clarification on Hybrid Self-Representation and Judicial Discretion in Psychiatric Evaluations: United States v. Hill Introduction In United States of America v. Alf Hill, Jr., 526 F.2d 1019 (10th...
R.E.B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.: Ruling Against Double Recovery in UCC Warranty Claims

R.E.B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.: Ruling Against Double Recovery in UCC Warranty Claims

Date: Oct 22, 1975
R.E.B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.: Ruling Against Double Recovery in UCC Warranty Claims Introduction R.E.B., Inc., a plaintiff-appellee operating a hog ranch, engaged in the production of purebred...
Independence of Section 1981 and Strict Class Action Typicality in Employment Discrimination: Safeway Stores v. Taylor

Independence of Section 1981 and Strict Class Action Typicality in Employment Discrimination: Safeway Stores v. Taylor

Date: Oct 4, 1975
Independence of Section 1981 and Strict Class Action Typicality in Employment Discrimination: Safeway Stores v. Taylor Introduction In Samuel Taylor v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 524 F.2d 263 (10th Cir....
Enhanced Scope for Class Actions under Rule 23 in Employment Discrimination Cases: Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.

Enhanced Scope for Class Actions under Rule 23 in Employment Discrimination Cases: Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.

Date: Aug 2, 1975
Enhanced Scope for Class Actions under Rule 23 in Employment Discrimination Cases: Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp. Introduction The case of Jewel C. Rich et al. v. Martin Marietta Corporation (522 F.2d...
Establishing Consistency in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases: PIERCE v. COOK CO. and the Application of Rule 60(b)(6)

Establishing Consistency in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases: PIERCE v. COOK CO. and the Application of Rule 60(b)(6)

Date: Jun 25, 1975
Establishing Consistency in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases: PIERCE v. COOK CO. and the Application of Rule 60(b)(6) Introduction PIERCE v. COOK CO. is a landmark 1975 decision by the United States...
Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.: Clarifying Express and Implied Warranties in Product Liability Cases

Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.: Clarifying Express and Implied Warranties in Product Liability Cases

Date: May 8, 1975
Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.: Clarifying Express and Implied Warranties in Product Liability Cases Introduction Mustang Fuel Corporation (hereafter "Mustang") v. Youngstown Sheet...
Reevaluation of Antitrust Standards: Telex Corp. v. IBM (1975)

Reevaluation of Antitrust Standards: Telex Corp. v. IBM (1975)

Date: Mar 28, 1975
Reevaluation of Antitrust Standards: Telex Corp. v. IBM (1975) Introduction The case of The Telex Corporation, and Telex Computer Products, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM),...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.

Date: Mar 7, 1975
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. Introduction The case of James Allen Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., d/b/a Kentron...
Establishing Probable Cause for Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Rahn

Establishing Probable Cause for Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Rahn

Date: Mar 1, 1975
Establishing Probable Cause for Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Rahn Introduction United States of America v. Calvin D. Rahn, 511 F.2d 290 (10th Cir. 1975), addresses critical issues...
Title VII Precedent on Discriminatory Promotion Policies: Muller v. U.S. Steel

Title VII Precedent on Discriminatory Promotion Policies: Muller v. U.S. Steel

Date: Jan 15, 1975
Title VII Precedent on Discriminatory Promotion Policies: Muller v. United States Steel Corporation Introduction Muller v. United States Steel Corporation is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Liability for Defective Design in Product-Related Fatalities: Gardner v. General Motors Corp.

Establishing Liability for Defective Design in Product-Related Fatalities: Gardner v. General Motors Corp.

Date: Dec 17, 1974
Establishing Liability for Defective Design in Product-Related Fatalities: Gardner v. General Motors Corp. Introduction The case of Gardner v. General Motors Corporation serves as a pivotal judicial...
Reversing Mail Fraud Conviction: Enhancing Indictment Specificity under Rule 7(c), Fed.R.Cr.P.

Reversing Mail Fraud Conviction: Enhancing Indictment Specificity under Rule 7(c), Fed.R.Cr.P.

Date: Dec 11, 1974
Reversing Mail Fraud Conviction: Enhancing Indictment Specificity under Rule 7(c), Fed.R.Cr.P. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Louis Rex Curtis (506 F.2d 985) adjudicated by the...
Equitable Ownership and Rule 25 Substitution in Tax Lien Foreclosure: Insights from United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways Inc. (1974)

Equitable Ownership and Rule 25 Substitution in Tax Lien Foreclosure: Insights from United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways Inc. (1974)

Date: Nov 14, 1974
Equitable Ownership and Rule 25 Substitution in Tax Lien Foreclosure: Insights from United States v. Miller Brothers Construction Company, Rapidways Inc. (1974) Introduction The case of United States...
Maintaining Corporate Separation and Personal Jurisdiction Limits: Fuqua Industries v. Herman Quarles

Maintaining Corporate Separation and Personal Jurisdiction Limits: Fuqua Industries v. Herman Quarles

Date: Nov 6, 1974
Maintaining Corporate Separation and Personal Jurisdiction Limits: Fuqua Industries v. Herman Quarles Introduction The case of Herman Quarles et al. v. Fuqua Industries, Inc. et al. (504 F.2d 1358)...
Defining Compulsory Counterclaims and Ancillary Jurisdiction in Civil Rights Actions: Pipeliners Local Union No. 798 v. EllerD

Defining Compulsory Counterclaims and Ancillary Jurisdiction in Civil Rights Actions: Pipeliners Local Union No. 798 v. EllerD

Date: Oct 3, 1974
Defining Compulsory Counterclaims and Ancillary Jurisdiction in Civil Rights Actions: Pipeliners Local Union No. 798 v. EllerD Introduction The case of Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa,...
Establishing Liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5: Insights from Kerbs v. Fall River Industries

Establishing Liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5: Insights from Kerbs v. Fall River Industries

Date: Sep 7, 1974
Establishing Liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5: Insights from Kerbs v. Fall River Industries Introduction The case Jack Kerbs v. Fall River Industries, Inc., 502 F.2d 731 (10th Cir. 1974),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert