Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Declaratory Judgment in Insurance Liability: Tenth Circuit Affirms Federal Jurisdiction and Summary Judgment

Declaratory Judgment in Insurance Liability: Tenth Circuit Affirms Federal Jurisdiction and Summary Judgment

Date: Feb 23, 1978
Declaratory Judgment in Insurance Liability: Tenth Circuit Affirms Federal Jurisdiction and Summary Judgment Introduction In the case of Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Alan Jones and...
Emphasizing Substantial Compliance in Priority of Lode Mining Claims: Rasmussen v. Kerr-McGee

Emphasizing Substantial Compliance in Priority of Lode Mining Claims: Rasmussen v. Kerr-McGee

Date: Jan 19, 1978
Emphasizing Substantial Compliance in Priority of Lode Mining Claims: Rasmussen v. Kerr-McGee Introduction The case of Rasmussen Drilling, Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corporation, adjudicated by the...
Retaliatory Discrimination Extends to Former Employees Under Title VII – Rutherford v. American Bank of Commerce

Retaliatory Discrimination Extends to Former Employees Under Title VII – Rutherford v. American Bank of Commerce

Date: Nov 22, 1977
Retaliatory Discrimination Extends to Former Employees Under Title VII – Rutherford v. American Bank of Commerce Introduction Bertha M. Rutherford v. American Bank of Commerce is a pivotal civil...
Establishing Limits on Religious Defense in Federal Counterfeiting Cases: UNITED STATES v. GRISMORE

Establishing Limits on Religious Defense in Federal Counterfeiting Cases: UNITED STATES v. GRISMORE

Date: Nov 5, 1977
Establishing Limits on Religious Defense in Federal Counterfeiting Cases: UNITED STATES v. GRISMORE Introduction In United States of America v. John F. Grismore (564 F.2d 929, 1977), the United...
Unconstitutional Overcrowding in Oklahoma Prisons: Analysis of Battle v. Anderson

Unconstitutional Overcrowding in Oklahoma Prisons: Analysis of Battle v. Anderson

Date: Oct 27, 1977
Unconstitutional Overcrowding in Oklahoma Prisons: Analysis of Battle v. Anderson Introduction Battle v. Anderson (564 F.2d 388, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, 1977) is a landmark...
Recognizing First Amendment Protections for Non-party Witnesses in Pretrial Discovery: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee

Recognizing First Amendment Protections for Non-party Witnesses in Pretrial Discovery: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee

Date: Sep 24, 1977
Recognizing First Amendment Protections for Non-party Witnesses in Pretrial Discovery: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Introduction Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corporation, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Reaffirmation of Strict Liability in Manufacturers' Products Liability: Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.

Reaffirmation of Strict Liability in Manufacturers' Products Liability: Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.

Date: Sep 3, 1977
Reaffirmation of Strict Liability in Manufacturers' Products Liability: Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Introduction The case of Mustang Fuel Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and...
Big O Tire Dealers v. Goodyear: Recognizing Reverse Confusion and Expanding Trademark Infringement Protections

Big O Tire Dealers v. Goodyear: Recognizing Reverse Confusion and Expanding Trademark Infringement Protections

Date: Sep 3, 1977
Big O Tire Dealers v. Goodyear: Recognizing Reverse Confusion and Expanding Trademark Infringement Protections Introduction In the landmark case of Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. The Goodyear Tire...
Reinforcing Standards for Civil Rights Claims on Prison Medical Care: McCracken v. Jones

Reinforcing Standards for Civil Rights Claims on Prison Medical Care: McCracken v. Jones

Date: Aug 30, 1977
Reinforcing Standards for Civil Rights Claims on Prison Medical Care: McCracken v. Jones Introduction The case of Leo McCracken and Park Anderson v. Riley Mitchell Jones adjudicated by the United...
United States v. Thomas Allen: Upholding Mail Fraud Convictions Amid Challenges on Statute of Limitations and Counsel Effectiveness

United States v. Thomas Allen: Upholding Mail Fraud Convictions Amid Challenges on Statute of Limitations and Counsel Effectiveness

Date: Apr 27, 1977
United States v. Thomas Allen: Upholding Mail Fraud Convictions Amid Challenges on Statute of Limitations and Counsel Effectiveness Introduction United States v. Thomas Allen (554 F.2d 398) is a...
Discretionary Function Exception Reinforced in Federal Tort Claims Act: Huckleby Case Analysis

Discretionary Function Exception Reinforced in Federal Tort Claims Act: Huckleby Case Analysis

Date: Mar 25, 1977
Discretionary Function Exception Reinforced in Federal Tort Claims Act: Huckleby Case Analysis Introduction The case of First National Bank in Albuquerque v. United States of America, adjudicated by...
Harmless Error in Confrontation Clause: Lloyd Stevenson Bond v. State of Oklahoma

Harmless Error in Confrontation Clause: Lloyd Stevenson Bond v. State of Oklahoma

Date: Dec 21, 1976
Harmless Error in Confrontation Clause: Lloyd Stevenson Bond v. State of Oklahoma Introduction Lloyd Stevenson Bond v. State of Oklahoma, 546 F.2d 1369 (10th Cir. 1976), is a pivotal case addressing...
Judicial Impartiality and Procedural Integrity in Tax Evasion Litigation: Analyzing United States v. Bray

Judicial Impartiality and Procedural Integrity in Tax Evasion Litigation: Analyzing United States v. Bray

Date: Dec 7, 1976
Judicial Impartiality and Procedural Integrity in Tax Evasion Litigation: Analyzing United States v. Bray Introduction United States of America v. Karl J. Bray is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Respondeat Superior in Federal Civil Rights Litigation: Kite v. Kelley

Respondeat Superior in Federal Civil Rights Litigation: Kite v. Kelley

Date: Nov 30, 1976
Respondeat Superior in Federal Civil Rights Litigation: Kite v. Kelley Introduction Kite v. Kelley, 546 F.2d 334 (10th Cir. 1976) is a pivotal case that delves into the application of the doctrine of...
Affirmation of Colorado Jury Selection Plan's Compliance with Fair Cross Section Standards: Commentary on United States of America v. Test et al. (550 F.2d 577)

Affirmation of Colorado Jury Selection Plan's Compliance with Fair Cross Section Standards: Commentary on United States of America v. Test et al. (550 F.2d 577)

Date: Nov 13, 1976
Affirmation of Colorado Jury Selection Plan's Compliance with Fair Cross Section Standards Commentary on United States of America v. Test et al. (550 F.2d 577) Introduction The case of United States...
Bennett v. Passic: Establishing Criteria for Frivolous Civil Rights Claims and In Forma Pauperis Proceedings

Bennett v. Passic: Establishing Criteria for Frivolous Civil Rights Claims and In Forma Pauperis Proceedings

Date: Sep 30, 1976
Bennett v. Passic: Establishing Criteria for Frivolous Civil Rights Claims and In Forma Pauperis Proceedings Introduction The case of Howard Smith Bennett v. Albert Passic et al. (545 F.2d 1260)...
Equitable Tolling of Notice Period Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Dartt v. Shell Oil Company

Equitable Tolling of Notice Period Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Dartt v. Shell Oil Company

Date: Jul 23, 1976
Equitable Tolling of Notice Period Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Dartt v. Shell Oil Company Introduction Dartt v. Shell Oil Company, 539 F.2d 1256 (10th Cir. 1976), is a pivotal...
Limitations on Self-Representation and Admissibility of Mental Capacity Defenses: Bennett v. United States

Limitations on Self-Representation and Admissibility of Mental Capacity Defenses: Bennett v. United States

Date: Jun 29, 1976
Limitations on Self-Representation and Admissibility of Mental Capacity Defenses: Bennett v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Odell Bennett is a significant appellate case...
Affirmation of Governors' Unfettered Removal Power Over Appointed Policy-Making Officials

Affirmation of Governors' Unfettered Removal Power Over Appointed Policy-Making Officials

Date: Jun 23, 1976
Affirmation of Governors' Unfettered Removal Power Over Appointed Policy-Making Officials Introduction The case of John A. Mitchell v. Bruce King, Governor of the State of New Mexico, et al. (537...
Establishing Surplusage in Indictment Amendments: Commentary on United States v. Hall and Taylor

Establishing Surplusage in Indictment Amendments: Commentary on United States v. Hall and Taylor

Date: May 13, 1976
Establishing Surplusage in Indictment Amendments: Commentary on United States v. Hall and Taylor Introduction United States of America v. David Hall and W. W. Taylor, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir. 1976),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert