Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Rios v. United States: Reinforcing Protections on Coconspirator Statements and Prosecutorial Conduct

Rios v. United States: Reinforcing Protections on Coconspirator Statements and Prosecutorial Conduct

Date: Dec 22, 1979
Rios v. United States: Reinforcing Protections on Coconspirator Statements and Prosecutorial Conduct Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Juan G. Rios, decided on December...
Direct Liability of Police Chiefs under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from McClelland v. Facteau et al.

Direct Liability of Police Chiefs under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from McClelland v. Facteau et al.

Date: Nov 20, 1979
Direct Liability of Police Chiefs under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Insights from McClelland v. Facteau et al. Introduction In the landmark case Cecil E. McClelland v. Jonathan B. Facteau et al., decided by...
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Testimony and Single Conspiracy Doctrine: Insights from United States v. Petersen et al.

Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Testimony and Single Conspiracy Doctrine: Insights from United States v. Petersen et al.

Date: Nov 16, 1979
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Testimony and Single Conspiracy Doctrine: Insights from United States v. Petersen et al. Introduction United States of America v. Ronald K. Petersen, et al. (611 F.2d...
Brinlee v. Crisp (10th Cir. 1979): Upholding Fair Trial Standards in the Face of Procedural and Evidentiary Challenges

Brinlee v. Crisp (10th Cir. 1979): Upholding Fair Trial Standards in the Face of Procedural and Evidentiary Challenges

Date: Nov 2, 1979
Brinlee v. Crisp (10th Cir. 1979): Upholding Fair Trial Standards in the Face of Procedural and Evidentiary Challenges Introduction Garland Rex Brinlee, Jr. v. Richard A. Crisp, Warden, and the State...
Perington Wholesale v. Burger King: Establishing Standards for Antitrust Pleadings and Summary Judgments

Perington Wholesale v. Burger King: Establishing Standards for Antitrust Pleadings and Summary Judgments

Date: Nov 1, 1979
Perington Wholesale v. Burger King: Establishing Standards for Antitrust Pleadings and Summary Judgments Introduction Perington Wholesale, Inc. v. Burger King Corporation, Davmor Industries, Inc.,...
Intent in Partnership Formation Governs Judgment Lien Attachments: Buell Cabinet Co. v. Sudduth

Intent in Partnership Formation Governs Judgment Lien Attachments: Buell Cabinet Co. v. Sudduth

Date: Oct 30, 1979
Intent in Partnership Formation Governs Judgment Lien Attachments: Buell Cabinet Co. v. Sudduth Introduction The case of Buell Cabinet Company, Inc. v. Richard S. Sudduth and Steven H. Janco...
Application of Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Summary Judgment: Temple v. FDIC

Application of Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Summary Judgment: Temple v. FDIC

Date: Sep 20, 1979
Application of Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Summary Judgment: Temple v. FDIC Introduction The case of St. Louis Baptist Temple, Inc. ("Temple") versus the Federal Deposit Insurance...
United States v. Gibbons: Establishing Precedents in Fourth Amendment Protections and Grand Jury Proceedings

United States v. Gibbons: Establishing Precedents in Fourth Amendment Protections and Grand Jury Proceedings

Date: Sep 12, 1979
United States v. Gibbons: Establishing Precedents in Fourth Amendment Protections and Grand Jury Proceedings Introduction The case of United States of America v. Clifton Gene Gibbons, adjudicated by...
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Prisoners' Constitutional Claims

Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Prisoners' Constitutional Claims

Date: Aug 28, 1979
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Prisoners' Constitutional Claims Introduction In the landmark cases of Ted Brice v. Warden I. Day and Wayne Ray Gowler v. Warden I. Day, decided by...
Establishing Post-Filing Removal under 28 U.S.C. §1446(b): Insights from DeBry v. Transamerica

Establishing Post-Filing Removal under 28 U.S.C. §1446(b): Insights from DeBry v. Transamerica

Date: Jun 1, 1979
Establishing Post-Filing Removal under 28 U.S.C. §1446(b): Insights from DeBry v. Transamerica Introduction In the landmark case of DeBry v. Transamerica Corporation, decided on May 31, 1979, by the...
Interpretation of Point Sources in Mining Under FWPCA: United States v. Earth Sciences, Inc.

Interpretation of Point Sources in Mining Under FWPCA: United States v. Earth Sciences, Inc.

Date: May 24, 1979
Interpretation of Point Sources in Mining Under FWPCA: United States of America v. Earth Sciences, Inc. (599 F.2d 368) Introduction The case of United States of America v. Earth Sciences, Inc....
Admissibility of Wiretapped Evidence and Conspiratorial Liability under 21 U.S.C. § 846: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Watson, Maxwell, and Brown

Admissibility of Wiretapped Evidence and Conspiratorial Liability under 21 U.S.C. § 846: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Watson, Maxwell, and Brown

Date: May 2, 1979
Admissibility of Wiretapped Evidence and Conspiratorial Liability under 21 U.S.C. § 846: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Watson, Maxwell, and Brown Introduction In the landmark case...
Enhancing Judicial Enforcement of Consent Decrees in Patent-Related Injunctions: Insights from V.T.A. Inc. v. Airco, Inc.

Enhancing Judicial Enforcement of Consent Decrees in Patent-Related Injunctions: Insights from V.T.A. Inc. v. Airco, Inc.

Date: Apr 20, 1979
Enhancing Judicial Enforcement of Consent Decrees in Patent-Related Injunctions: Insights from V.T.A. Inc. v. Airco, Inc. Introduction The case of V.T.A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc., 597 F.2d 220 (10th Cir....
Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation: Ragan Doctrine Reaffirmed in Statute of Limitations Context

Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation: Ragan Doctrine Reaffirmed in Statute of Limitations Context

Date: Feb 6, 1979
Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation: Ragan Doctrine Reaffirmed in Statute of Limitations Context Introduction Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Limitations on Lay Opinion Testimony in Product Liability Cases: Randolph v. Collectramatic

Limitations on Lay Opinion Testimony in Product Liability Cases: Randolph v. Collectramatic

Date: Jan 16, 1979
Limitations on Lay Opinion Testimony in Product Liability Cases: Randolph v. Collectramatic Introduction Randolph v. Collectramatic, Inc., 590 F.2d 844, is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Stoddard v. School District No. 1: Establishing Liability for Impermissible Non-Renewal of Employment Contracts under Section 1983

Stoddard v. School District No. 1: Establishing Liability for Impermissible Non-Renewal of Employment Contracts under Section 1983

Date: Jan 6, 1979
Stoddard v. School District No. 1: Establishing Liability for Impermissible Non-Renewal of Employment Contracts under Section 1983 Introduction Annabel Stoddard, a nontenured teacher employed by...
Clarifying Fiduciary Duties under ERISA §404(a)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of Eaves v. Penn (1978)

Clarifying Fiduciary Duties under ERISA §404(a)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of Eaves v. Penn (1978)

Date: Nov 22, 1978
Clarifying Fiduciary Duties under ERISA §404(a)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of Eaves v. Penn (1978) Introduction The case of GLEN R. EAVES et al. v. RALPH W. PENN et al., decided by the United...
Establishing Meritorious Defense and Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Default Judgments: Insights from In re Joseph Robert Stone, 588 F.2d 1316

Establishing Meritorious Defense and Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Default Judgments: Insights from In re Joseph Robert Stone, 588 F.2d 1316

Date: Nov 21, 1978
Establishing Meritorious Defense and Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Default Judgments: Insights from In re Joseph Robert Stone, 588 F.2d 1316 Introduction The case of In re Joseph Robert Stone,...
Establishing Repetition and Class Action Requirements in Commitment Statutes: Insights from MacArthur Sylvester Rex v. Charles Owens

Establishing Repetition and Class Action Requirements in Commitment Statutes: Insights from MacArthur Sylvester Rex v. Charles Owens

Date: Oct 5, 1978
Establishing Repetition and Class Action Requirements in Commitment Statutes: Insights from MacArthur Sylvester Rex v. Charles Owens Introduction The case of MacArthur Sylvester Rex v. Charles Owens,...
Establishing Enhanced Standards for Fourth Amendment Litigation: GAMBLE v. STATE of Oklahoma

Establishing Enhanced Standards for Fourth Amendment Litigation: GAMBLE v. STATE of Oklahoma

Date: Sep 21, 1978
Establishing Enhanced Standards for Fourth Amendment Litigation: GAMBLE v. STATE of Oklahoma Introduction GAMBLE v. STATE of Oklahoma is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert