Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Precedent-Setting Injunctive Relief Standards under 49 U.S.C § 11503(c) for Railroads

Precedent-Setting Injunctive Relief Standards under 49 U.S.C § 11503(c) for Railroads

Date: Jan 24, 1981
Precedent-Setting Injunctive Relief Standards under 49 U.S.C § 11503(c) for Railroads Introduction The landmark decision in THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.,...
Mandamus Relief and Disclosure Obligations: An Analysis of United States v. Winner

Mandamus Relief and Disclosure Obligations: An Analysis of United States v. Winner

Date: Jan 22, 1981
Mandamus Relief and Disclosure Obligations: An Analysis of United States v. Winner Introduction The case of United States of America v. Honorable Fred M. Winner (641 F.2d 825) adjudicated by the...
Reversal of Attorney’s Fees Award in Title VII Case: Upholding the McDonnell Douglas Framework in Nulf v. International Paper Co.

Reversal of Attorney’s Fees Award in Title VII Case: Upholding the McDonnell Douglas Framework in Nulf v. International Paper Co.

Date: Jan 6, 1981
Reversal of Attorney’s Fees Award in Title VII Case: Upholding the McDonnell Douglas Framework in Nulf v. International Paper Co. Introduction Nulf v. International Paper Co. is a significant...
Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Laboratories: Clarifying Pleading Standards in Antitrust Litigation

Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Laboratories: Clarifying Pleading Standards in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Oct 3, 1980
Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Laboratories: Clarifying Pleading Standards in Antitrust Litigation Introduction Mountain View Pharmacy et al. v. Abbott Laboratories et al., 630 F.2d 1383 (10th Cir....
Ramos v. Lamm: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Prison Conditions

Ramos v. Lamm: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Prison Conditions

Date: Sep 26, 1980
Ramos v. Lamm: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Prison Conditions Introduction Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559 (10th Cir. 1980), is a seminal case that significantly impacted the standards...
Reinforcing the Standing Doctrine: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Citizens Concerned v. City of Denver

Reinforcing the Standing Doctrine: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Citizens Concerned v. City of Denver

Date: Sep 5, 1980
Reinforcing the Standing Doctrine: Tenth Circuit's Decision in Citizens Concerned v. City of Denver Introduction In the landmark case of Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church and State v. The...
EEOC v. Sandia Corporation: Affirmation of Age Discrimination in Employment Practices

EEOC v. Sandia Corporation: Affirmation of Age Discrimination in Employment Practices

Date: Aug 14, 1980
EEOC v. Sandia Corporation: Affirmation of Age Discrimination in Employment Practices Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Sandia Corporation (639 F.2d 600)...
Classification of Real Estate Sales as Securities and Strict Adherence to ILSFDA Statute of Limitations: Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties

Classification of Real Estate Sales as Securities and Strict Adherence to ILSFDA Statute of Limitations: Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties

Date: Aug 6, 1980
Classification of Real Estate Sales as Securities and Strict Adherence to ILSFDA Statute of Limitations: Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties Introduction Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc. is a...
Enhancing Transparency in Expert Testimony: Implications of Smith v. Ford Motor Company on Pretrial Discovery Procedures

Enhancing Transparency in Expert Testimony: Implications of Smith v. Ford Motor Company on Pretrial Discovery Procedures

Date: Jul 18, 1980
Enhancing Transparency in Expert Testimony: Implications of Smith v. Ford Motor Company on Pretrial Discovery Procedures Introduction Smith v. Ford Motor Company is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Government Immunity and the Colorado Sightseer Statute: Insights from Otteson v. United States

Government Immunity and the Colorado Sightseer Statute: Insights from Otteson v. United States

Date: Jun 12, 1980
Government Immunity and the Colorado Sightseer Statute: Insights from Otteson v. United States Introduction The case of Jerome Otteson, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus the United States of America,...
Limits on Attorney’s Fees Awards in Commercial Contract Disputes: Thompson Theaters v. Paramount Pictures

Limits on Attorney’s Fees Awards in Commercial Contract Disputes: Thompson Theaters v. Paramount Pictures

Date: Jun 3, 1980
Limits on Attorney’s Fees Awards in Commercial Contract Disputes: Thompson Theaters v. Paramount Pictures Introduction The case of Paramount Pictures Corporation et al. v. Thompson Theaters, Inc. et...
Discovery of Non-Witness Experts in Litigation: Insights from EMILY AGER v. STORMONT-VAIL HOSPITAL

Discovery of Non-Witness Experts in Litigation: Insights from EMILY AGER v. STORMONT-VAIL HOSPITAL

Date: Jun 3, 1980
Discovery of Non-Witness Experts in Litigation: Insights from EMILY AGER v. STORMONT-VAIL HOSPITAL Introduction The case of Emily Ager, an Incompetent, by Law Lamar Ager, her father and duly...
Reinsurance Treaty Liability Clarified: Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Century Casualty Co.

Reinsurance Treaty Liability Clarified: Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Century Casualty Co.

Date: May 13, 1980
Reinsurance Treaty Liability Clarified: Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Century Casualty Co. Introduction The case of Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Century Casualty Company adjudicated by the...
Precedent on Enlistment Contract Breaches: Lundgrin v. Secretary of the Navy

Precedent on Enlistment Contract Breaches: Lundgrin v. Secretary of the Navy

Date: Apr 9, 1980
Precedent on Enlistment Contract Breaches: Lundgrin v. Secretary of the Navy Introduction Case: Daryl B. Lundgrin v. W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy of the United States, and the United...
10th Circuit Establishes Clarification on Lesser Included Offenses in Drug Distribution Cases

10th Circuit Establishes Clarification on Lesser Included Offenses in Drug Distribution Cases

Date: Apr 1, 1980
10th Circuit Establishes Clarification on Lesser Included Offenses in Drug Distribution Cases Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Michael Henry Burns, Vincent M. Andrade,...
Clarifying Corporate Liability and Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Bethlehem Steel v. Luckett

Clarifying Corporate Liability and Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Bethlehem Steel v. Luckett

Date: Mar 22, 1980
Clarifying Corporate Liability and Personal Jurisdiction: Insights from Bethlehem Steel v. Luckett Introduction In the landmark case of Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Luckett, adjudicated by the...
Conspiring with an Immune State Official Under Color of Law: Norton v. Liddel

Conspiring with an Immune State Official Under Color of Law: Norton v. Liddel

Date: Mar 7, 1980
Conspiring with an Immune State Official Under Color of Law: Norton v. Liddel Introduction Norton v. Liddel, 620 F.2d 1375 (10th Cir. 1980), is a pivotal case addressing the scope of liability under...
Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege: Sealing of Appellate Records in Crystal Grower's Corporation v. Dobbins et al.

Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege: Sealing of Appellate Records in Crystal Grower's Corporation v. Dobbins et al.

Date: Feb 26, 1980
Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege: Sealing of Appellate Records in Crystal Grower's Corporation v. Dobbins et al. Introduction Crystal Grower's Corporation v. Dobbins et al. is a pivotal case...
Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Summary Judgment in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad

Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Summary Judgment in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad

Date: Feb 23, 1980
Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Summary Judgment in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad Introduction Abraisto Vincent Romero, a Mexican-American citizen,...
Waiver of Arbitration Rights in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Reid Burton Construction, Inc. v. Carpenters District Council of Southern Colorado

Waiver of Arbitration Rights in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Reid Burton Construction, Inc. v. Carpenters District Council of Southern Colorado

Date: Feb 1, 1980
Waiver of Arbitration Rights in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Reid Burton Construction, Inc. v. Carpenters District Council of Southern Colorado Introduction Reid Burton Construction, Inc. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert