Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Jury Selection Standards and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of COLEMAN v. BROWN

Jury Selection Standards and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of COLEMAN v. BROWN

Date: Oct 1, 1986
Jury Selection Standards and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of COLEMAN v. BROWN Introduction The case of Charles Troy Coleman v. John N. Brown, decided by the United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Rule 9(b) Particularity Requirement in Securities Fraud Counterclaims

Tenth Circuit Affirms Rule 9(b) Particularity Requirement in Securities Fraud Counterclaims

Date: Sep 9, 1986
Tenth Circuit Affirms Rule 9(b) Particularity Requirement in Securities Fraud Counterclaims Introduction The case of Seattle-First National Bank v. Carlstedt et al. (800 F.2d 1008) presents a pivotal...
Caldo Mares v. Credit Bureau of Raton: Refining Standards for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees Under Consumer Protection Acts

Caldo Mares v. Credit Bureau of Raton: Refining Standards for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees Under Consumer Protection Acts

Date: Sep 9, 1986
Caldo Mares v. Credit Bureau of Raton: Refining Standards for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees Under Consumer Protection Acts Introduction Caldo Mares and Sally Mares, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants v....
Clarifying the 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc.

Clarifying the 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc.

Date: Aug 27, 1986
Clarifying the 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc. Introduction In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc., a case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Raul Reyes: Establishing Standards for Co-Conspirator Testimony

Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Raul Reyes: Establishing Standards for Co-Conspirator Testimony

Date: Jul 30, 1986
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Raul Reyes: Establishing Standards for Co-Conspirator Testimony Introduction In United States of America v. Raul Reyes, 798 F.2d 380 (10th...
Establishing Due Process in Medicare Reimbursement Exclusions: Koerpel v. Heckler

Establishing Due Process in Medicare Reimbursement Exclusions: Koerpel v. Heckler

Date: Jul 24, 1986
Establishing Due Process in Medicare Reimbursement Exclusions: Koerpel v. Heckler 1. Introduction The case of Barry J. Koerpel, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health...
Scope of Employment in Federal Torts: Nichols v. United States Establishes Critical Precedent

Scope of Employment in Federal Torts: Nichols v. United States Establishes Critical Precedent

Date: Jul 19, 1986
Scope of Employment in Federal Torts: Nichols v. United States Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction The case of Randol Nichols v. United States of America, decided by the United States Court...
FRANKS v. NIMMO: Affirming Probationary Termination Procedures and Limiting Constitutional Claims in VA Employment

FRANKS v. NIMMO: Affirming Probationary Termination Procedures and Limiting Constitutional Claims in VA Employment

Date: Jul 8, 1986
FRANKS v. NIMMO: Affirming Probationary Termination Procedures and Limiting Constitutional Claims in VA Employment Introduction FRANKS v. NIMMO, 796 F.2d 1230 (10th Cir. 1986), is a pivotal case...
Bowen v. Maynard: Affirming Prosecutorial Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence under Brady

Bowen v. Maynard: Affirming Prosecutorial Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence under Brady

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Bowen v. Maynard: Affirming Prosecutorial Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence under Brady Introduction Bowen v. Maynard is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Constructive Discharge and Title VII: Insights from the Tenth Circuit in Gail Derr v. Gulf Oil Corporation

Constructive Discharge and Title VII: Insights from the Tenth Circuit in Gail Derr v. Gulf Oil Corporation

Date: Jun 26, 1986
Constructive Discharge and Title VII: Insights from the Tenth Circuit in Gail Derr v. Gulf Oil Corporation Introduction The case of Gail Derr v. Gulf Oil Corporation addresses critical issues...
Limits on Sua Sponte Dismissal for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction: Williams v. Life Savings and Loan

Limits on Sua Sponte Dismissal for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction: Williams v. Life Savings and Loan

Date: Jun 24, 1986
Limits on Sua Sponte Dismissal for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction: Williams v. Life Savings and Loan Introduction Pamela Williams v. Life Savings and Loan, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Program Specificity and State Action in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of Niehaus & Neumann v. Kansas Bar Association

Program Specificity and State Action in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of Niehaus & Neumann v. Kansas Bar Association

Date: Jun 14, 1986
Program Specificity and State Action in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of Niehaus & Neumann v. Kansas Bar Association Introduction The case of Jane Niehaus and Joyce Neumann v. Kansas Bar...
Limiting Res Judicata in Federal §1983 Actions: Insights from Morgan v. City of Rawlins and DeHerrera

Limiting Res Judicata in Federal §1983 Actions: Insights from Morgan v. City of Rawlins and DeHerrera

Date: Jun 4, 1986
Limiting Res Judicata in Federal §1983 Actions: Insights from Morgan v. City of Rawlins and DeHerrera Introduction In the landmark case of Morgan v. City of Rawlins and Abe DeHerrera, 792 F.2d 975...
Prevailing Party Determination under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Analysis of SUPRE v. RICKETTS

Prevailing Party Determination under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Analysis of SUPRE v. RICKETTS

Date: Jun 3, 1986
Prevailing Party Determination under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Analysis of SUPRE v. RICKETTS Introduction SUPRE v. RICKETTS, 792 F.2d 958 (10th Cir. 1986), is a landmark case addressing the standards for...
Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in Frivolous Litigation: Van Sickle v. Tenth Circuit

Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in Frivolous Litigation: Van Sickle v. Tenth Circuit

Date: May 29, 1986
Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in Frivolous Litigation: Van Sickle v. Tenth Circuit Introduction Van Sickle v. Tenth Circuit is a pivotal case in the realm of judicial immunity and the dismissal of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Shar-Alan Oil Co. v. Lear Petroleum: Implications for Joint Operating Agreements and Mutual Mistake Doctrine

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Shar-Alan Oil Co. v. Lear Petroleum: Implications for Joint Operating Agreements and Mutual Mistake Doctrine

Date: May 9, 1986
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Shar-Alan Oil Co. v. Lear Petroleum: Implications for Joint Operating Agreements and Mutual Mistake Doctrine Introduction The case of Irving Pasternak, d/b/a...
Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination: Analysis of Mangels v. Pena

Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination: Analysis of Mangels v. Pena

Date: Apr 26, 1986
Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination: Analysis of Mangels v. Pena Introduction The case of Douglas C. Mangels and Randal K. Mangels v. Federico Pena et al., decided by the United States...
Reasonableness of Easement Restrictions: Analysis of Freeport West v. Freeport Center Associates

Reasonableness of Easement Restrictions: Analysis of Freeport West v. Freeport Center Associates

Date: Apr 18, 1986
Reasonableness of Easement Restrictions: Analysis of Freeport West v. Freeport Center Associates Introduction The case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, KERN W. SCHUMACHER AND MORRIS...
Strict Standards Affirmed for Bankruptcy Debt Discharge Exceptions in In re Black

Strict Standards Affirmed for Bankruptcy Debt Discharge Exceptions in In re Black

Date: Mar 20, 1986
Strict Standards Affirmed for Bankruptcy Debt Discharge Exceptions in In re Black Introduction The case In re Gerald T. Black and Denise B. Black, Debtors; Garth L. Driggs, Plaintiff-Appellant, v....
Jurisdictional Precedence of Bankruptcy Courts Over Common Law Claims: Delgado Oil Co. v. Cleveland

Jurisdictional Precedence of Bankruptcy Courts Over Common Law Claims: Delgado Oil Co. v. Cleveland

Date: Mar 6, 1986
Jurisdictional Precedence of Bankruptcy Courts Over Common Law Claims: Analysis of Delgado Oil Co. v. Cleveland Introduction The case of Delgado Oil Company, Inc. v. James R. Cleveland, adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert