Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Federal Courts Lack Jurisdiction to Enforce Private Settlement Agreements Arising from Title VII Discrimination Suits

Federal Courts Lack Jurisdiction to Enforce Private Settlement Agreements Arising from Title VII Discrimination Suits

Date: Nov 5, 1994
Federal Courts Lack Jurisdiction to Enforce Private Settlement Agreements Arising from Title VII Discrimination Suits Introduction In the case of Louie Morris v. City of Hobart, the United States...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Public Officials in §1985 Claims - Tenth Circuit Decision

Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Public Officials in §1985 Claims - Tenth Circuit Decision

Date: Nov 4, 1994
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Public Officials in §1985 Claims - Tenth Circuit Decision Introduction The case of Kenneth L. Bisbee v. John Bey, James Johnson, E.E. VanBuskirk, and Converse County...
Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on §1983 Sexual Harassment Claim in Noland v. McAdoo

Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on §1983 Sexual Harassment Claim in Noland v. McAdoo

Date: Nov 3, 1994
Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on §1983 Sexual Harassment Claim in Noland v. McAdoo A Comprehensive Commentary on the 1994 Tenth Circuit Decision 1. Introduction In the landmark case of...
ERISA Anti-Alienation Limitation on Garnishment and the Preservation of State Exemptions: Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers

ERISA Anti-Alienation Limitation on Garnishment and the Preservation of State Exemptions: Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers

Date: Nov 2, 1994
ERISA Anti-Alienation Limitation on Garnishment and the Preservation of State Exemptions: Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers Introduction The case of Curtis GUIDRY v. SHEET METAL WORKERS NATIONAL PENSION...
Clarifying Felony Firearm Possession: Insights from United States v. Fisher

Clarifying Felony Firearm Possession: Insights from United States v. Fisher

Date: Oct 29, 1994
Clarifying Felony Firearm Possession: Insights from United States v. Fisher Introduction The case of United States of America v. Damon Keith Fisher, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Fero v. Kerby: Balancing Brady Obligations, Prosecutorial Conduct, and Judicial Impartiality in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Fero v. Kerby: Balancing Brady Obligations, Prosecutorial Conduct, and Judicial Impartiality in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Oct 29, 1994
Fero v. Kerby: Balancing Brady Obligations, Prosecutorial Conduct, and Judicial Impartiality in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction In the landmark case O.C. Chick Fero v. Dareld Kerby, decided by...
Affirmation of Dirden's Conviction: Insights into Speedy Trial Act and Severance Motions

Affirmation of Dirden's Conviction: Insights into Speedy Trial Act and Severance Motions

Date: Oct 28, 1994
Affirmation of Dirden's Conviction: Insights into Speedy Trial Act and Severance Motions Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Roderick K. Dirden, 38 F.3d 1131 (10th Cir....
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Lepiscopo v. Tansy

Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Lepiscopo v. Tansy

Date: Oct 26, 1994
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Lepiscopo v. Tansy Introduction Lepiscopo v. Tansy (38 F.3d 1128) is a pivotal case heard by the United States Court of Appeals...
Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Denver’s Race-and-Gender Conscious Contract Program

Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Denver’s Race-and-Gender Conscious Contract Program

Date: Oct 18, 1994
Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Denver’s Race-and-Gender Conscious Contract Program Introduction In the landmark case Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. Denver, City and County of Denver,...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of Brecheen v. Reynolds

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of Brecheen v. Reynolds

Date: Oct 15, 1994
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of Brecheen v. Reynolds Introduction Robert A. Brecheen v. Dan Reynolds, Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, 41 F.3d 1343 (10th...
Qualified Immunity and Restoration of Employment in Due Process Claims: WORKMAN v. JORDAN

Qualified Immunity and Restoration of Employment in Due Process Claims: WORKMAN v. JORDAN

Date: Oct 12, 1994
Qualified Immunity and Restoration of Employment in Due Process Claims: WORKMAN v. JORDAN Introduction WORKMAN v. JORDAN is a notable case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Oct 12, 1994
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Dever v. Kansas State Penitentiary Introduction Don Michael Dever, a Vietnam veteran, was convicted of first-degree murder...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Wood v. Eli Lilly: Oklahoma's Stance on Alternative and Market Share Liability

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Wood v. Eli Lilly: Oklahoma's Stance on Alternative and Market Share Liability

Date: Oct 12, 1994
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Wood v. Eli Lilly: Oklahoma's Stance on Alternative and Market Share Liability Introduction The case of Debbie Wood and Roger Wood v. Eli Lilly Company and others,...
Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc.: Establishing Limits on ADA Disability Claims

Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc.: Establishing Limits on ADA Disability Claims

Date: Sep 22, 1994
Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc.: Establishing Limits on ADA Disability Claims Introduction Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc., 36 F.3d 939 (10th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case addressing the boundaries of disability...
Application of MICHIGAN v. SUMMERS in Detention During Warrant Execution: United States v. Ritchie

Application of MICHIGAN v. SUMMERS in Detention During Warrant Execution: United States v. Ritchie

Date: Sep 22, 1994
Application of MICHIGAN v. SUMMERS in Detention During Warrant Execution: United States v. Ritchie Introduction In United States v. Robert James Ritchie, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Nondelegable Duties and Insurance Coverage of Punitive Damages: Insights from Magnum Foods v. Continental Casualty Company

Nondelegable Duties and Insurance Coverage of Punitive Damages: Insights from Magnum Foods v. Continental Casualty Company

Date: Sep 17, 1994
Nondelegable Duties and Insurance Coverage of Punitive Damages: Insights from Magnum Foods v. Continental Casualty Company Introduction In the landmark case of Magnum Foods, Inc. d/b/a Little...

        **Gagan v. Norton & Ritz: Clarifying the Scope of Prosecutorial Immunity in Judicial Processes**

**Gagan v. Norton & Ritz: Clarifying the Scope of Prosecutorial Immunity in Judicial Processes**

Date: Sep 17, 1994
Gagan v. Norton & Ritz: Clarifying the Scope of Prosecutorial Immunity in Judicial Processes Introduction In the landmark case of Cary James Gagan v. Gale Norton & Wendy Ritz, heard by the United...
Enhancing Disability Determinations: Washington Jr. v. Shalala Establishes Rigorous Evaluation Standards for Residual Functional Capacity

Enhancing Disability Determinations: Washington Jr. v. Shalala Establishes Rigorous Evaluation Standards for Residual Functional Capacity

Date: Sep 16, 1994
Enhancing Disability Determinations: Washington Jr. v. Shalala Establishes Rigorous Evaluation Standards for Residual Functional Capacity Introduction The case of George Washington Jr. v. Donna...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Stafford v. Saffle

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Stafford v. Saffle

Date: Sep 13, 1994
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Stafford v. Saffle Introduction Rodger Dale Stafford, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted of three counts of first-degree murder...
10th Circuit Reaffirms the 'Substantially Prevailed' Standard for Attorneys' Fees under § 16 of the Clayton Act

10th Circuit Reaffirms the 'Substantially Prevailed' Standard for Attorneys' Fees under § 16 of the Clayton Act

Date: Sep 9, 1994
10th Circuit Reaffirms the 'Substantially Prevailed' Standard for Attorneys' Fees under § 16 of the Clayton Act Introduction The case of City of Chanute, Kansas; City of Auburn, Kansas; City of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert