Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Actual Knowledge Requirement Under EMTALA Established in Urban v. Central Kansas Medical Center

Actual Knowledge Requirement Under EMTALA Established in Urban v. Central Kansas Medical Center

Date: Dec 21, 1994
Actual Knowledge Requirement Under EMTALA Established in Urban v. Central Kansas Medical Center Introduction Urban v. Central Kansas Medical Center is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Reckless Indifference Standard in § 1983 Police Pursuit Cases: Webber v. Mefford et al.

Reckless Indifference Standard in § 1983 Police Pursuit Cases: Webber v. Mefford et al.

Date: Dec 20, 1994
Reckless Indifference Standard in § 1983 Police Pursuit Cases: Webber v. Mefford et al. Introduction Webber and Terhune v. Mefford et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Limitations of Judicial Review under FISA: Upholding 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i)(1) in Henry v. OTS

Limitations of Judicial Review under FISA: Upholding 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i)(1) in Henry v. OTS

Date: Dec 17, 1994
Limitations of Judicial Review under FISA: Upholding 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i)(1) in Henry v. OTS Introduction Henry v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 43 F.3d 507 (10th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case that...
Good Faith Requirement in Prosecutorial Threats: USA v. Wright

Good Faith Requirement in Prosecutorial Threats: USA v. Wright

Date: Dec 15, 1994
Good Faith Requirement in Prosecutorial Threats: USA v. Wright Introduction United States of America v. Harvey Russell Wright, Jr. (43 F.3d 491) is a significant appellate decision from the United...
Establishing the Boundaries of Implied Contracts and Retaliation Claims under ADEA: Insights from Ingels v. Thiokol Corporation

Establishing the Boundaries of Implied Contracts and Retaliation Claims under ADEA: Insights from Ingels v. Thiokol Corporation

Date: Dec 13, 1994
Establishing the Boundaries of Implied Contracts and Retaliation Claims under ADEA: Insights from Ingels v. Thiokol Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Roland T. Ingels v. Thiokol...
Reversal of Lodestar Methodology in Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from GOTTLIEB v. WILES

Reversal of Lodestar Methodology in Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from GOTTLIEB v. WILES

Date: Dec 10, 1994
Reversal of Lodestar Methodology in Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from GOTTLIEB v. WILES Introduction GOTTLIEB v. WILES, 43 F.3d 474 (10th Cir. 1994), is a landmark appellate decision by the United...
Admissibility of Similar Act Evidence and Miranda Rights in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Analysis of United States v. Johnson

Admissibility of Similar Act Evidence and Miranda Rights in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Analysis of United States v. Johnson

Date: Dec 7, 1994
Admissibility of Similar Act Evidence and Miranda Rights in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Analysis of United States v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Anthony Dean...
Materiality of False Entries in Bank Records: Evans v. United States

Materiality of False Entries in Bank Records: Evans v. United States

Date: Dec 6, 1994
Materiality of False Entries in Bank Records: Evans v. United States Introduction Evans v. United States, 42 F.3d 586 (10th Cir. 1994), addresses significant issues concerning the materiality of...
Henderson v. Inter-Chem Coal Co.: Reaffirming the Economic Reality Test for Employee Classification under FLSA

Henderson v. Inter-Chem Coal Co.: Reaffirming the Economic Reality Test for Employee Classification under FLSA

Date: Dec 6, 1994
Henderson v. Inter-Chem Coal Co.: Reaffirming the Economic Reality Test for Employee Classification under FLSA Introduction Henderson v. Inter-Chem Coal Co., 41 F.3d 567 (10th Cir. 1994), is a...
FDIC v. Oldenburg: Defining Manifest Intent and Fidelity Bond Coverage under 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e)

FDIC v. Oldenburg: Defining Manifest Intent and Fidelity Bond Coverage under 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e)

Date: Dec 3, 1994
FDIC v. Oldenburg: Defining Manifest Intent and Fidelity Bond Coverage under 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e) Introduction The case Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. J. William Oldenburg et al.,...
Employment Retaliation and Immunity: A Landmark Tenth Circuit Decision

Employment Retaliation and Immunity: A Landmark Tenth Circuit Decision

Date: Nov 29, 1994
Employment Retaliation and Immunity: A Landmark Tenth Circuit Decision Introduction In the case of Dr. Rodrigo Ramirez and Barbara Snow v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health et al. (41 F.3d 584,...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Precedent for Overcoming Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in Whistleblower Retaliation Claims

Tenth Circuit Establishes Precedent for Overcoming Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in Whistleblower Retaliation Claims

Date: Nov 23, 1994
Tenth Circuit Establishes Precedent for Overcoming Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in Whistleblower Retaliation Claims Introduction The case of Jacqueline Margaret Brever and Karen Alane Pitts v....
Voluntariness of Post-Miranda Statements After Unwarned Detention: Insights from McCurdy v. USA

Voluntariness of Post-Miranda Statements After Unwarned Detention: Insights from McCurdy v. USA

Date: Nov 22, 1994
Voluntariness of Post-Miranda Statements After Unwarned Detention: Insights from McCurdy v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Maurice McCurdy, 40 F.3d 1111 (10th Cir. 1994),...
Abstention Doctrine Affirmed in Oltremari v. Kansas Social Rehabilitative Service

Abstention Doctrine Affirmed in Oltremari v. Kansas Social Rehabilitative Service

Date: Nov 22, 1994
Abstention Doctrine Affirmed in Oltremari v. Kansas Social Rehabilitative Service Introduction In Lynn Christine Oltremari v. Kansas Social Rehabilitative Service (1994), the United States District...
Sanctions in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in In Re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc.

Sanctions in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in In Re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc.

Date: Nov 19, 1994
Sanctions in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in In Re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc. Introduction In Re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc., 40 F.3d 1084 (10th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case...
Reinforcing Rule 41(b) Standards for Involuntary Dismissal: Mobley v. U.S. West

Reinforcing Rule 41(b) Standards for Involuntary Dismissal: Mobley v. U.S. West

Date: Nov 15, 1994
Reinforcing Rule 41(b) Standards for Involuntary Dismissal: Mobley v. U.S. West Introduction In the landmark case of Terry W. Mobley v. U.S. West, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
10th Circuit Limits LMRDA Jurisdiction to Private Sector Unions in Celli v. Shoell

10th Circuit Limits LMRDA Jurisdiction to Private Sector Unions in Celli v. Shoell

Date: Nov 10, 1994
10th Circuit Limits Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) Jurisdiction to Private Sector Unions in Celli v. Shoell Introduction In the landmark case Celli v. Shoell (40 F.3d 324, 10th...
No Protected Property Interest in At-Will Public Employment: Farthing v. City of Shawnee Analysis

No Protected Property Interest in At-Will Public Employment: Farthing v. City of Shawnee Analysis

Date: Nov 9, 1994
No Protected Property Interest in At-Will Public Employment: Farthing v. City of Shawnee Analysis Introduction The case of James R. Farthing v. City of Shawnee, Kansas, decided by the United States...
Mandatory Arbitration of Title VII Claims and Waiver of Arbitration Rights: Insights from Metz v. Merrill Lynch

Mandatory Arbitration of Title VII Claims and Waiver of Arbitration Rights: Insights from Metz v. Merrill Lynch

Date: Nov 9, 1994
Mandatory Arbitration of Title VII Claims and Waiver of Arbitration Rights: Insights from Metz v. Merrill Lynch Introduction The case of Kelli Lyn Metz v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc....
Proving the Existence and Terms of Lost Insurance Policies: Insights from Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co.

Proving the Existence and Terms of Lost Insurance Policies: Insights from Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co.

Date: Nov 8, 1994
Proving the Existence and Terms of Lost Insurance Policies: Insights from Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case of The Servants of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert