Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Gang Membership Evidence: Insights from United States v. Elkins

Admissibility of Gang Membership Evidence: Insights from United States v. Elkins

Date: Nov 7, 1995
Admissibility of Gang Membership Evidence: Insights from United States v. Elkins Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Douglas Elkins, 70 F.3d 81 (10th Cir. 1995), the United States...
Cantrell v. IBEW Local 2021: Redefining Prevailing Party Status Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)

Cantrell v. IBEW Local 2021: Redefining Prevailing Party Status Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)

Date: Oct 31, 1995
Cantrell v. IBEW Local 2021: Redefining Prevailing Party Status Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d) Introduction Cantrell v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 2021 is a landmark case...
Randle v. City of Aurora: Refining Municipal Liability and Final Policymaker Standards

Randle v. City of Aurora: Refining Municipal Liability and Final Policymaker Standards

Date: Oct 27, 1995
Randle v. City of Aurora: Refining Municipal Liability and Final Policymaker Standards Introduction Randle v. City of Aurora (69 F.3d 441, 10th Cir., 1995) represents a significant appellate decision...
Reaffirming Standards for Wiretap Jurisdiction and Conspiracy Charges in United States v. Edwards et al.

Reaffirming Standards for Wiretap Jurisdiction and Conspiracy Charges in United States v. Edwards et al.

Date: Oct 25, 1995
Reaffirming Standards for Wiretap Jurisdiction and Conspiracy Charges in United States v. Edwards et al. Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Milton Edwards, decided by the...
Scrivner v. Tansy: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation of Armed Robbery Conviction and Jurisdictional Analysis

Scrivner v. Tansy: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation of Armed Robbery Conviction and Jurisdictional Analysis

Date: Oct 19, 1995
Scrivner v. Tansy: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation of Armed Robbery Conviction and Jurisdictional Analysis Introduction Scrivner v. Tansy is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Hobbs Act Jurisdiction Confirmed Post-Lopez: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Bolton

Hobbs Act Jurisdiction Confirmed Post-Lopez: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Bolton

Date: Oct 18, 1995
Hobbs Act Jurisdiction Confirmed Post-Lopez: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Bolton Introduction The case of United States of America v. John W. Bolton, a/k/a Gino, adjudicated by the...
Enhanced Requirements for Credibility Determinations in Disability Claims: Kepler v. Chater

Enhanced Requirements for Credibility Determinations in Disability Claims: Kepler v. Chater

Date: Oct 18, 1995
Enhanced Requirements for Credibility Determinations in Disability Claims: Kepler v. Chater Introduction Kepler v. Chater is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Adherence to Pretrial Order and 'Loss of Chance' Doctrine in Rios v. F. Cal

Adherence to Pretrial Order and 'Loss of Chance' Doctrine in Rios v. F. Cal

Date: Oct 18, 1995
Adherence to Pretrial Order and 'Loss of Chance' Doctrine in Rios v. F. Cal Introduction Gloria Rios, the plaintiff-appellant, pursued a medical malpractice claim against F. Calvin Bigler, M.D., and...
Deghand v. Wal-Mart: Upholding Strict Standards for Amending Complaints After Scheduling Order

Deghand v. Wal-Mart: Upholding Strict Standards for Amending Complaints After Scheduling Order

Date: Oct 13, 1995
Deghand v. Wal-Mart: Upholding Strict Standards for Amending Complaints After Scheduling Order Introduction The case of Peggy Deghand v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., adjudicated in the United States...
Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights and Compliance with Wiretap Sealing Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Lupe Gomez

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights and Compliance with Wiretap Sealing Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Lupe Gomez

Date: Oct 11, 1995
Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights and Compliance with Wiretap Sealing Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Lupe Gomez Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Lupe Gomez,...
Class Action Standards, Protective Orders, and Corporate Veil Piercing: Insights from Boughton v. Cotter Corporation

Class Action Standards, Protective Orders, and Corporate Veil Piercing: Insights from Boughton v. Cotter Corporation

Date: Sep 7, 1995
Class Action Standards, Protective Orders, and Corporate Veil Piercing: Insights from Boughton v. Cotter Corporation 1. Introduction Boughton v. Cotter Corporation, 65 F.3d 823 (10th Cir. 1995), is a...
Ripeness of First Amendment Challenges in Campaign Finance Law: New Precedent Set by New Mexicans for Bill Richardson v. Stephanie Gonzales

Ripeness of First Amendment Challenges in Campaign Finance Law: New Precedent Set by New Mexicans for Bill Richardson v. Stephanie Gonzales

Date: Sep 7, 1995
Ripeness of First Amendment Challenges in Campaign Finance Law: New Precedent Set by New Mexicans for Bill Richardson v. Stephanie Gonzales Introduction New Mexicans for Bill Richardson, Bill...
Res Judicata Precludes Re-litigation of Damages in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In re MARTHA S. GRIEGO v. Raymond E. PADILLA

Res Judicata Precludes Re-litigation of Damages in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In re MARTHA S. GRIEGO v. Raymond E. PADILLA

Date: Sep 2, 1995
Res Judicata Precludes Re-litigation of Damages in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In re MARTHA S. GRIEGO v. Raymond E. PADILLA Introduction The case of In re MARTHA S. GRIEGO, Debtor versus Raymond E....
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in §1983 Due Process Claims: Uhlrig v. Harder

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in §1983 Due Process Claims: Uhlrig v. Harder

Date: Aug 31, 1995
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in §1983 Due Process Claims: Uhlrig v. Harder Introduction Uhlrig v. Harder, 64 F.3d 567 (10th Cir. 1995), is a significant case in the realm of civil rights...
Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Barred Under Rule 9(b): Hawkins v. Evans

Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Barred Under Rule 9(b): Hawkins v. Evans

Date: Aug 23, 1995
Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Barred Under Rule 9(b): Hawkins v. Evans Introduction Hawkins v. Evans, 64 F.3d 543 (10th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case in the realm of federal habeas corpus...
Establishing Procedural Requirements for Eighth Amendment Claims in Transsexual Inmate Cases

Establishing Procedural Requirements for Eighth Amendment Claims in Transsexual Inmate Cases

Date: Aug 19, 1995
Establishing Procedural Requirements for Eighth Amendment Claims in Transsexual Inmate Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Josephine Brown v. Aristedes Zavaras, Robert Furlong, 63 F.3d 967...
JANE L. v. BANGERTER: Tenth Circuit Refines Attorney's Fees Allocation in Abortion Rights Litigation

JANE L. v. BANGERTER: Tenth Circuit Refines Attorney's Fees Allocation in Abortion Rights Litigation

Date: Aug 3, 1995
JANE L. v. BANGERTER: Tenth Circuit Refines Attorney's Fees Allocation in Abortion Rights Litigation Introduction The case of JANE L. v. BANGERTER represents a pivotal moment in the adjudication of...
Judicial Conduct in Plea Negotiations: Tenth Circuit Upholds Voluntary Plea in Vernard Miles, Jr. v. Dorsey

Judicial Conduct in Plea Negotiations: Tenth Circuit Upholds Voluntary Plea in Vernard Miles, Jr. v. Dorsey

Date: Aug 2, 1995
Judicial Conduct in Plea Negotiations: Tenth Circuit Upholds Voluntary Plea in Vernard Miles, Jr. v. Dorsey Introduction In the case of Vernard Miles, Jr. v. Donald A. Dorsey, the United States Court...
Panis v. Mission Hills Bank: Affirming Non-Discriminatory Termination Practices

Panis v. Mission Hills Bank: Affirming Non-Discriminatory Termination Practices

Date: Aug 1, 1995
Panis v. Mission Hills Bank: Affirming Non-Discriminatory Termination Practices Introduction In Robin Floyd Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, N.A., 60 F.3d 1486 (10th Cir. 1995), the United States Court...
Admissibility of Hearsay in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from United States v. Tome

Admissibility of Hearsay in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from United States v. Tome

Date: Aug 1, 1995
Admissibility of Hearsay in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from United States v. Tome Introduction United States v. Tome, 61 F.3d 1446 (10th Cir. 1995), represents a pivotal case in the realm of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert