Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Context Over Grammar: Tenth Circuit clarifies that AD&D “medical treatment of sickness” exclusions reach prescription‑drug deaths, and the “unless prescribed” drug‑ingestion carveout preserves coverage only for medications treating accidental injuries

Context Over Grammar: Tenth Circuit clarifies that AD&D “medical treatment of sickness” exclusions reach prescription‑drug deaths, and the “unless prescribed” drug‑ingestion carveout preserves coverage only for medications treating accidental injuries

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Context Over Grammar: Tenth Circuit clarifies that AD&D “medical treatment of sickness” exclusions reach prescription‑drug deaths, and the “unless prescribed” drug‑ingestion carveout preserves...
Defining “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” for Compassionate Release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. Davis

Defining “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” for Compassionate Release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. Davis

Date: Apr 4, 2025
Defining “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” for Compassionate Release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A): United States v. Davis Introduction In United States v. Davis (10th Cir. 2025), the Court of...
United States v. Davis: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Post‑2023 Compassionate Release — Current Outbreak Required for COVID-19 Risk; Non‑Retroactive Youthful‑Offender Amendments Are Not “Extraordinary and Compelling”

United States v. Davis: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Post‑2023 Compassionate Release — Current Outbreak Required for COVID-19 Risk; Non‑Retroactive Youthful‑Offender Amendments Are Not “Extraordinary and Compelling”

Date: Apr 4, 2025
United States v. Davis: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Post‑2023 Compassionate Release — Current Outbreak Required for COVID-19 Risk; Non‑Retroactive Youthful‑Offender Amendments Are Not “Extraordinary and...
Authorized Technical Assistance and the Boundaries of the Remmer Presumption

Authorized Technical Assistance and the Boundaries of the Remmer Presumption

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Authorized Technical Assistance and the Boundaries of the Remmer Presumption Introduction United States v. Briscoe, 10th Cir. (April 2, 2025) marks a significant clarification of how the Sixth...
No Exception for Prosecutorial Eavesdropping: Guilty-Plea Challenges Must Proceed via Ineffective Assistance (United States v. Jordan, 10th Cir. 2025)

No Exception for Prosecutorial Eavesdropping: Guilty-Plea Challenges Must Proceed via Ineffective Assistance (United States v. Jordan, 10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 3, 2025
No Exception for Prosecutorial Eavesdropping: Guilty-Plea Challenges Must Proceed via Ineffective Assistance (United States v. Jordan, 10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Jordan, the...
United States v. Jordan: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel as the Exclusive Remedy for Pre-Plea Constitutional Violations

United States v. Jordan: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel as the Exclusive Remedy for Pre-Plea Constitutional Violations

Date: Apr 3, 2025
United States v. Jordan: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel as the Exclusive Remedy for Pre-Plea Constitutional Violations Introduction United States v. Jordan, decided by the Tenth Circuit on April...
No Remmer Presumption for Court‑Authorized IT Help During Deliberations: United States v. Briscoe (10th Cir. 2025)

No Remmer Presumption for Court‑Authorized IT Help During Deliberations: United States v. Briscoe (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 3, 2025
No Remmer Presumption for Court‑Authorized IT Help During Deliberations: United States v. Briscoe (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth Circuit’s Order and Judgment in...
Ward v. Fisher: Extension of Quasi-Judicial Immunity to Court-Appointed Actors and Clarification of Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Oklahoma

Ward v. Fisher: Extension of Quasi-Judicial Immunity to Court-Appointed Actors and Clarification of Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Oklahoma

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Extension of Quasi-Judicial Immunity to Court-Appointed Actors and Clarification of Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Oklahoma Introduction In Ward v. Fisher, 10th Cir. No. 24-5083 (Apr. 1,...
Clarifying the Final Conviction Rule for §2255 Statute of Limitations

Clarifying the Final Conviction Rule for §2255 Statute of Limitations

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Clarifying the Final Conviction Rule for §2255 Statute of Limitations Introduction United States v. Platt (10th Cir. Apr. 1, 2025) addresses a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by...
Ruling on Cumulative Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2: No Double Counting for Strangulation and Life-Threatening Injury in United States v. Chavez

Ruling on Cumulative Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2: No Double Counting for Strangulation and Life-Threatening Injury in United States v. Chavez

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Ruling on Cumulative Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2: No Double Counting for Strangulation and Life-Threatening Injury 1. Introduction United States v. Theodore Ian Chavez, IV was...
Ward v. Fisher: Tenth Circuit Persuasively Affirms Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Court‑Appointed Custody Evaluators and Guardians ad Litem; Legal Malpractice in Oklahoma Sounds in Tort Absent Specific Contractual Promises

Ward v. Fisher: Tenth Circuit Persuasively Affirms Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Court‑Appointed Custody Evaluators and Guardians ad Litem; Legal Malpractice in Oklahoma Sounds in Tort Absent Specific Contractual Promises

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Ward v. Fisher: Tenth Circuit Persuasively Affirms Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Court‑Appointed Custody Evaluators and Guardians ad Litem; Legal Malpractice in Oklahoma Sounds in Tort Absent Specific...
No COA Without Confronting the Procedural Ruling: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Exhaustion and Issue Preservation in § 2241 Parole-Eligibility Challenges

No COA Without Confronting the Procedural Ruling: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Exhaustion and Issue Preservation in § 2241 Parole-Eligibility Challenges

Date: Apr 2, 2025
No COA Without Confronting the Procedural Ruling: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Exhaustion and Issue Preservation in § 2241 Parole-Eligibility Challenges Introduction In Medina v. Bauby, No. 24-1495 (10th...
Cumulative Sentencing Enhancements for Strangulation and Life-Threatening Injury under U.S.S.G. §2A2.2

Cumulative Sentencing Enhancements for Strangulation and Life-Threatening Injury under U.S.S.G. §2A2.2

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Cumulative Sentencing Enhancements for Strangulation and Life-Threatening Injury under U.S.S.G. §2A2.2 Introduction United States v. Chavez, 24-2090 (10th Cir. April 1, 2025), addresses whether two...
Medina v. Bauby: Reinforcing the Exhaustion Imperative for Federal Habeas Corpus under § 2241

Medina v. Bauby: Reinforcing the Exhaustion Imperative for Federal Habeas Corpus under § 2241

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Medina v. Bauby: Reinforcing the Exhaustion Imperative for Federal Habeas Corpus under § 2241 Introduction Case Name: Delano Medina v. August Bauby & Jennifer Hansen Court: United States Court of...
Limitation and Equitable Tolling of § 2255 Habeas Petitions: Supreme Court Precedent and Actual Innocence Requirement

Limitation and Equitable Tolling of § 2255 Habeas Petitions: Supreme Court Precedent and Actual Innocence Requirement

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Limitation and Equitable Tolling of § 2255 Habeas Petitions: Supreme Court Precedent and Actual Innocence Requirement Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Firm Resettlement Requires State-Imposed Restrictions to Avoid the Bar; Private Threats and Meeting Disruptions in Third Countries Are Insufficient — Perez‑Mavarez v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025)

Firm Resettlement Requires State-Imposed Restrictions to Avoid the Bar; Private Threats and Meeting Disruptions in Third Countries Are Insufficient — Perez‑Mavarez v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Firm Resettlement Requires State-Imposed Restrictions to Avoid the Bar; Private Threats and Meeting Disruptions in Third Countries Are Insufficient — Perez‑Mavarez v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025) Court:...
Reaffirming Firm Resettlement for Third‑Country Permanent Residents and the “Threats Rarely Equal Persecution” Principle: Perez‑Mavarez v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Firm Resettlement for Third‑Country Permanent Residents and the “Threats Rarely Equal Persecution” Principle: Perez‑Mavarez v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Reaffirming Firm Resettlement for Third‑Country Permanent Residents and the “Threats Rarely Equal Persecution” Principle: Perez‑Mavarez v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction This commentary...
Plain-Error Prong Three Controls: Tenth Circuit Affirms and Reiterates § 922(g)(1)’s Validity Post‑Bruen in United States v. Redfoot

Plain-Error Prong Three Controls: Tenth Circuit Affirms and Reiterates § 922(g)(1)’s Validity Post‑Bruen in United States v. Redfoot

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Plain-Error Prong Three Controls: Tenth Circuit Affirms and Reiterates § 922(g)(1)’s Validity Post‑Bruen in United States v. Redfoot Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Date: March 31,...
Resubmitting Inconsistent Special Verdicts and New Preservation Duties in the Tenth Circuit: Culp v. Remington of Montrose Golf Club

Resubmitting Inconsistent Special Verdicts and New Preservation Duties in the Tenth Circuit: Culp v. Remington of Montrose Golf Club

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Resubmitting Inconsistent Special Verdicts and New Preservation Duties in the Tenth Circuit Culp v. Remington of Montrose Golf Club, LLC (10th Cir. Mar. 31, 2025) Introduction In this published...
Plain-Error Review’s “Substantial Rights” Gatekeeper and the Post‑Bruen Status of § 922(g)(1): United States v. Redfoot (10th Cir. 2025)

Plain-Error Review’s “Substantial Rights” Gatekeeper and the Post‑Bruen Status of § 922(g)(1): United States v. Redfoot (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Plain-Error Review’s “Substantial Rights” Gatekeeper and the Post‑Bruen Status of § 922(g)(1): United States v. Redfoot (10th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Date: March...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert