Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limitations on Clean Water Act Applicability and Preliminary Injunctions in Chemical Weapons Disposal: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation

Limitations on Clean Water Act Applicability and Preliminary Injunctions in Chemical Weapons Disposal: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation

Date: Apr 23, 1997
Limitations on Clean Water Act Applicability and Preliminary Injunctions in Chemical Weapons Disposal: Tenth Circuit's Affirmation Introduction The case of Chemical Weapons Working Group, Inc....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Seymore v. Shawver Sons, Inc.: Limiting Union Liability under Title VII

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Seymore v. Shawver Sons, Inc.: Limiting Union Liability under Title VII

Date: Apr 19, 1997
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Seymore v. Shawver Sons, Inc.: Limiting Union Liability under Title VII Introduction The case of Lou Ella Seymore versus Shawver Sons, Inc. and the International...
T.A.O., Inc. v. Towerridge, Inc.: Defining the Limits of the Bad-Faith Exception under the Miller Act

T.A.O., Inc. v. Towerridge, Inc.: Defining the Limits of the Bad-Faith Exception under the Miller Act

Date: Apr 16, 1997
T.A.O., Inc. v. Towerridge, Inc.: Defining the Limits of the Bad-Faith Exception under the Miller Act Introduction The case of T.A.O., Inc. v. Towerridge, Inc. (111 F.3d 758) adjudicated by the...
United States v. Simmonds: Precedents on Certificate of Appealability and Civil Action Definitions under 28 U.S.C.

United States v. Simmonds: Precedents on Certificate of Appealability and Civil Action Definitions under 28 U.S.C.

Date: Apr 15, 1997
United States v. Simmonds: Precedents on Certificate of Appealability and Civil Action Definitions under 28 U.S.C. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Christopher Simmonds,...
Aerotech Inc. v. Estes: Clarifying the Awarding of Costs under Federal Rule 54(d)

Aerotech Inc. v. Estes: Clarifying the Awarding of Costs under Federal Rule 54(d)

Date: Apr 12, 1997
Aerotech Inc. v. Estes: Clarifying the Awarding of Costs under Federal Rule 54(d) Introduction The legal landscape surrounding the awarding of costs and attorneys' fees in civil litigation underwent...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: The Williamson v. Ward Precedent

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: The Williamson v. Ward Precedent

Date: Apr 11, 1997
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: The Williamson v. Ward Precedent Introduction Ronald Keith Williamson v. Ronald Ward is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Qualified Immunity and Due Process in Protective Order Enforcement: Hollingsworth v. Hill

Qualified Immunity and Due Process in Protective Order Enforcement: Hollingsworth v. Hill

Date: Apr 5, 1997
Qualified Immunity and Due Process in Protective Order Enforcement: Hollingsworth v. Hill Introduction Patricia A. Hollingsworth v. Arnold Hill is a significant case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Perjury and Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from United States v. Sinclair

Affirmation of Perjury and Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from United States v. Sinclair

Date: Mar 27, 1997
Affirmation of Perjury and Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from United States of America v. Michael Sinclair Introduction In United States of America v. Michael Paul Dale Sinclair, 109 F.3d 1527...
Enhanced Mootness Doctrine in ESA Consultations: Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Smith

Enhanced Mootness Doctrine in ESA Consultations: Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Smith

Date: Mar 26, 1997
Enhanced Mootness Doctrine in ESA Consultations: Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Smith Introduction The case of Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) v. Verlin Smith et al., adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in ADA Discrimination: Morgan v. Hilti Inc.

Affirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in ADA Discrimination: Morgan v. Hilti Inc.

Date: Mar 19, 1997
Affirmation of Summary Judgment Standards in ADA Discrimination: Morgan v. Hilti Inc. Introduction In the case of Tanya Morgan v. Hilti, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Excessive Force and Medical Indifference under the Eighth Amendment

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Excessive Force and Medical Indifference under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Mar 15, 1997
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Excessive Force and Medical Indifference under the Eighth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case Rickke L. Green v. Charlie Branson, et al., decided on...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Denying Bankruptcy Discharge in Brown v. Gullickson

Tenth Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Denying Bankruptcy Discharge in Brown v. Gullickson

Date: Mar 13, 1997
Tenth Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Denying Bankruptcy Discharge in Brown v. Gullickson Introduction The case of In re Guy Benny Brown revolves around the denial of bankruptcy discharge...
Rodriguez-Aguirre: Affirming Double Jeopardy Boundaries and Upholding Jury Selection Procedures

Rodriguez-Aguirre: Affirming Double Jeopardy Boundaries and Upholding Jury Selection Procedures

Date: Mar 12, 1997
Rodriguez-Aguirre: Affirming Double Jeopardy Boundaries and Upholding Jury Selection Procedures Introduction The case of United States of America v. Gabriel Rodriguez-Aguirre (108 F.3d 1228) presents...
Hoxsie v. Kerby: Clarifying Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Effective Counsel in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Hoxsie v. Kerby: Clarifying Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Effective Counsel in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Mar 12, 1997
Hoxsie v. Kerby: Clarifying Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Effective Counsel in Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Gary Randall Hoxsie, an inmate at the Central New Mexico...
Enhanced Due Process in Administrative Forfeiture: US v. Joe Earl Rodgers

Enhanced Due Process in Administrative Forfeiture: US v. Joe Earl Rodgers

Date: Mar 12, 1997
Enhanced Due Process in Administrative Forfeiture: United States v. Joe Earl Rodgers Introduction United States of America v. Joe Earl Rodgers, 108 F.3d 1247 (10th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case...
Establishing Precedent on Gender-Plus Discrimination under Title VII

Establishing Precedent on Gender-Plus Discrimination under Title VII

Date: Mar 11, 1997
Establishing Precedent on Gender-Plus Discrimination under Title VII Introduction The case of Stephanie Coleman v. B-G Maintenance Management of Colorado, Inc. addresses critical issues of employment...
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in FTCA Claims: Tippett v. United States

Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in FTCA Claims: Tippett v. United States

Date: Mar 11, 1997
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in FTCA Claims: Tippett v. United States Introduction In FRANK TIPPETT and JUDY RAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT LOWE, dba Best Adventures, the...
Affirmation of District Courts' Authority to Issue Certificates of Appealability under AEDPA: Houchin v. Zavaras

Affirmation of District Courts' Authority to Issue Certificates of Appealability under AEDPA: Houchin v. Zavaras

Date: Feb 28, 1997
Affirmation of District Courts' Authority to Issue Certificates of Appealability under AEDPA: Houchin v. Zavaras Introduction Houchin v. Zavaras, 107 F.3d 1465 (10th Cir. 1997), presents a pivotal...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion and Valid Waiver of Miranda Rights in Traffic Stops: Analysis of United States v. Toro-Pelaez

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion and Valid Waiver of Miranda Rights in Traffic Stops: Analysis of United States v. Toro-Pelaez

Date: Feb 27, 1997
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion and Valid Waiver of Miranda Rights in Traffic Stops: Analysis of United States v. Toro-Pelaez Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Delfin Eduardo...
Defining the Limits of Consent Searches in Traffic Stops: Elliott v. United States

Defining the Limits of Consent Searches in Traffic Stops: Elliott v. United States

Date: Feb 25, 1997
Defining the Limits of Consent Searches in Traffic Stops: Elliott v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Asta M. Elliott, 107 F.3d 810 (10th Cir. 1997), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert