Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Constructive Possession and Firearm 'Use' under 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1): Insights from United States v. Miller and Hicks, 84 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir. 1996)

Clarifying Constructive Possession and Firearm 'Use' under 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1): Insights from United States v. Miller and Hicks, 84 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir. 1996)

Date: May 21, 1996
Clarifying Constructive Possession and Firearm 'Use' under 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1): Insights from United States v. Miller and Hicks, 84 F.3d 1244 (10th Cir. 1996) Introduction United States v. Miller...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Addresses Sentencing Guidelines

Tenth Circuit Affirms Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Addresses Sentencing Guidelines

Date: May 11, 1996
Tenth Circuit Affirms Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Addresses Sentencing Guidelines Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Tracy Dinah Ivy et al., the United States Court of...
Seamons v. Dually: Tenth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections in School Settings

Seamons v. Dually: Tenth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections in School Settings

Date: May 9, 1996
Seamons v. Dually: Tenth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections in School Settings Introduction Seamons v. Dually, 84 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 1996), is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Probable Cause Independent of Thermal Imager Use: Insights from United States v. Cusumano

Establishing Probable Cause Independent of Thermal Imager Use: Insights from United States v. Cusumano

Date: May 9, 1996
Establishing Probable Cause Independent of Thermal Imager Use: Insights from United States v. Cusumano Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Christopher Paul Cusumano, decided...
Establishing Fourth Amendment Protections in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Analysis of Taylor v. Meacham

Establishing Fourth Amendment Protections in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Analysis of Taylor v. Meacham

Date: May 8, 1996
Establishing Fourth Amendment Protections in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Analysis of Taylor v. Meacham Introduction Taylor v. Meacham and Uintah County, 82 F.3d 1556 (10th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal...
Admissibility of Rule 404(b) and Coccapistrator Statements in Conspiracy Convictions: U.S. v. Lopez-Gutierrez

Admissibility of Rule 404(b) and Coccapistrator Statements in Conspiracy Convictions: U.S. v. Lopez-Gutierrez

Date: May 8, 1996
Admissibility of Rule 404(b) and Coccapistrator Statements in Conspiracy Convictions: U.S. v. Lopez-Gutierrez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jesus J. Lopez-Gutierrez presents a...
Allowance of 28 U.S.C. §2255 Relief to Reopen Sentences Following Invalidated Prior Convictions: United States v. Cox

Allowance of 28 U.S.C. §2255 Relief to Reopen Sentences Following Invalidated Prior Convictions: United States v. Cox

Date: May 4, 1996
Allowance of 28 U.S.C. §2255 Relief to Reopen Sentences Following Invalidated Prior Convictions: United States v. Cox Introduction United States of America v. Richard Bruce Cox, 83 F.3d 336 (10th...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Non-Preemption of Oklahoma Antitrust Claims in Copyright Infringement

Tenth Circuit Upholds Non-Preemption of Oklahoma Antitrust Claims in Copyright Infringement

Date: May 4, 1996
Tenth Circuit Upholds Non-Preemption of Oklahoma Antitrust Claims in Copyright Infringement Introduction In the case of Harold's Stores, Inc. & CMT Enterprises, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores,...
Refining Standards for Sanctions in Spoliation Cases: Analysis of Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries

Refining Standards for Sanctions in Spoliation Cases: Analysis of Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries

Date: May 2, 1996
Refining Standards for Sanctions in Spoliation Cases: Analysis of Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries Introduction The case of The Gates Rubber Company v. Bando Chemical Industries, Limited...
Age Discrimination in Employment: Analysis of Furr v. Seagate Technology

Age Discrimination in Employment: Analysis of Furr v. Seagate Technology

Date: May 2, 1996
Age Discrimination in Employment: Analysis of Furr v. Seagate Technology Introduction In the case of Robert S. Furr, Leslie Woosley, Bernard E. Ozinga v. Seagate Technology, Inc., the plaintiffs...
Affirmation of State Criminal Jurisdiction over Nonmember Indian Retailers on Reservations

Affirmation of State Criminal Jurisdiction over Nonmember Indian Retailers on Reservations

Date: May 1, 1996
Affirmation of State Criminal Jurisdiction over Nonmember Indian Retailers on Reservations Introduction The case Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney General (83 F.3d 1208) adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony Based on General Engineering Principles in Product Liability Cases

Admissibility of Expert Testimony Based on General Engineering Principles in Product Liability Cases

Date: May 1, 1996
Admissibility of Expert Testimony Based on General Engineering Principles in Product Liability Cases Introduction In the case of Steven D. Compton v. Subaru of America, Inc.; Fuji Heavy Industries,...
Restricting Recoupment in Bankruptcy to Same Transaction: Tenth Circuit in Conoco Inc. v. Harriet E. Styler

Restricting Recoupment in Bankruptcy to Same Transaction: Tenth Circuit in Conoco Inc. v. Harriet E. Styler

Date: May 1, 1996
Restricting Recoupment in Bankruptcy to Same Transaction: Tenth Circuit in Conoco Inc. v. Harriet E. Styler Introduction The case of IN RE: PETERSON DISTRIBUTING, INC., Debtor, CONOCO, INC., v....
Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Standards in Prisoners' Claims: Riddle v. Mondragon

Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Standards in Prisoners' Claims: Riddle v. Mondragon

Date: Apr 30, 1996
Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Standards in Prisoners' Claims: Riddle v. Mondragon Introduction In the landmark case Riddle v. Mondragon, heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
State Sovereign Immunity and ADA Limitations in §1983 Claims: Insights from White v. Colorado

State Sovereign Immunity and ADA Limitations in §1983 Claims: Insights from White v. Colorado

Date: Apr 25, 1996
State Sovereign Immunity and ADA Limitations in §1983 Claims: Insights from White v. Colorado Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Lucius White v. State of Colorado, decided by the United...
Reasonable Suspicion and Traffic Stops: Insights from McRae v. United States

Reasonable Suspicion and Traffic Stops: Insights from McRae v. United States

Date: Apr 20, 1996
Reasonable Suspicion and Traffic Stops: Insights from McRae v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Franchot Forsythe McRae, Jr. (81 F.3d 1528, 10th Cir. 1996) serves as...
Jenkins v. Wood & Sabel: Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in §1983 and Monell Claims

Jenkins v. Wood & Sabel: Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in §1983 and Monell Claims

Date: Apr 17, 1996
Jenkins v. Wood & Sabel: Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in §1983 and Monell Claims Introduction James C. Jenkins and Lula M. Jenkins (hereafter "the Jenkinses") filed a lawsuit against Colin...
Reinforcing Standards for Rebuttal Witness Admission Following Sequestration Order Violations: Insights from Burks v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.

Reinforcing Standards for Rebuttal Witness Admission Following Sequestration Order Violations: Insights from Burks v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.

Date: Apr 16, 1996
Reinforcing Standards for Rebuttal Witness Admission Following Sequestration Order Violations: Insights from Burks v. Oklahoma Publishing Co. Introduction In the case of Vurla B. Burks v. The...
Affirming Summary Judgment in Retaliation Claims: Insights from Hom v. Squires

Affirming Summary Judgment in Retaliation Claims: Insights from Hom v. Squires

Date: Apr 13, 1996
Affirming Summary Judgment in Retaliation Claims: Insights from Hom v. Squires Introduction The case of Michael Hom v. A. Roland Squires, Arthur J. Hudachko, and Douglas Bodrero, decided by the...
Clarification of "Use" Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Post-Bailey: The Tenth Circuit’s Interpretation and Its Implications

Clarification of "Use" Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Post-Bailey: The Tenth Circuit’s Interpretation and Its Implications

Date: Apr 13, 1996
Clarification of "Use" Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Post-Bailey: The Tenth Circuit’s Interpretation and Its Implications Introduction The case of United States of America v. Souphaphone Lang and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert