Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Constructive Termination in Academic Employment: Lighton v. University of Utah

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Constructive Termination in Academic Employment: Lighton v. University of Utah

Date: Apr 25, 2000
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Constructive Termination in Academic Employment: Lighton v. University of Utah Introduction JOHN LIGHTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF UTAH; KAREN...
Interpreting "Properly Filed" in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Habteselassie v. Novak

Interpreting "Properly Filed" in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Habteselassie v. Novak

Date: Apr 22, 2000
Interpreting "Properly Filed" in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Habteselassie v. Novak Introduction Habteselassie v. Novak, 209 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2000), addresses the...
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Seizure in Police Pursuits: Tenth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of §1983 Claims in Childress v. City of Arapaho

Clarifying Fourth Amendment Seizure in Police Pursuits: Tenth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of §1983 Claims in Childress v. City of Arapaho

Date: Apr 19, 2000
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Seizure in Police Pursuits: Tenth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of §1983 Claims in Childress v. City of Arapaho 1. Introduction The case of GENA CHILDRESS and DUANE CHILDRESS,...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Tenth Circuit Case Involving Investigative Stop Triggered by External Alarm and Refusal to Identify

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Tenth Circuit Case Involving Investigative Stop Triggered by External Alarm and Refusal to Identify

Date: Apr 18, 2000
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Tenth Circuit Case Involving Investigative Stop Triggered by External Alarm and Refusal to Identify Introduction In the case of Bruce Oliver v. James Woods; Dale Scow,...
Haugh v. Booker: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Procedures Under AEDPA

Haugh v. Booker: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Procedures Under AEDPA

Date: Apr 13, 2000
Haugh v. Booker: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Procedures Under AEDPA Introduction In the landmark case of Haugh v. Booker, 210 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000), the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Single Supervisory Comments Do Not Suffice to Prove Age Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force Cases: Stone v. Autoliv

Single Supervisory Comments Do Not Suffice to Prove Age Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force Cases: Stone v. Autoliv

Date: Apr 12, 2000
Single Supervisory Comments Do Not Suffice to Prove Age Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force Cases: Stone v. Autoliv Introduction The case of James Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc. (210 F.3d 1132, 2000)...
Affirmation of the Feres Doctrine in Pringle v. United States of America

Affirmation of the Feres Doctrine in Pringle v. United States of America

Date: Apr 6, 2000
Affirmation of the Feres Doctrine in Pringle v. United States of America Introduction In the landmark case of Julius Pringle v. United States of America, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Standing Requirements under the Lanham Act: Hutchinson v. Pfeil et al.

Affirmation of Standing Requirements under the Lanham Act: Hutchinson v. Pfeil et al.

Date: Apr 5, 2000
Affirmation of Standing Requirements under the Lanham Act: Hutchinson v. Pfeil et al. Introduction In Thomas R. Hutchinson v. Mary Joan Pfeil; Art Services International, Inc.; William H. Gerdts;...
Mandatory Certificate of Appealability for State Prisoners in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Lorenzo Montez v. Mark McKinna

Mandatory Certificate of Appealability for State Prisoners in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Lorenzo Montez v. Mark McKinna

Date: Apr 4, 2000
Mandatory Certificate of Appealability for State Prisoners in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Lorenzo Montez v. Mark McKinna Introduction Lorenzo Montez, an incarcerated individual in a private correctional...
Corporate Liability Through Agents: Insights from Heno v. Sprint

Corporate Liability Through Agents: Insights from Heno v. Sprint

Date: Apr 4, 2000
Corporate Liability Through Agents: Insights from Heno v. Sprint Introduction The case of Andrea Opal Heno v. Sprint/United Management Company serves as a significant judicial decision in the realm...
Cumulative Error and Evidentiary Standards in Medical Manslaughter: United States v. Wood

Cumulative Error and Evidentiary Standards in Medical Manslaughter: United States v. Wood

Date: Mar 30, 2000
Cumulative Error and Evidentiary Standards in Medical Manslaughter: United States v. Wood Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. C. Douglas Wood, the United States Court of...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Public Exposure During Identity Verification

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Public Exposure During Identity Verification

Date: Mar 24, 2000
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Public Exposure During Identity Verification Introduction The case Dorothy J. Nelson v. Helen McMullen (207 F.3d 1202) adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirming Administrative Law Judge’s Discretion in Disability Determinations: Qualls v. Apfel

Affirming Administrative Law Judge’s Discretion in Disability Determinations: Qualls v. Apfel

Date: Mar 23, 2000
Affirming Administrative Law Judge’s Discretion in Disability Determinations: Qualls v. Apfel Introduction Edmond L. Qualls v. Kenneth S. Apfel, 206 F.3d 1368 (10th Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case...
Protection of Student Free Speech Rights in Athletics: SEAMONS v. SNOW

Protection of Student Free Speech Rights in Athletics: SEAMONS v. SNOW

Date: Mar 21, 2000
Protection of Student Free Speech Rights in Athletics: SEAMONS v. SNOW Introduction The case of SEAMONS v. SNOW, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in 2000, addresses...
Section 230 Immunity Affirmed in Ben Ezra v. America Online Inc.

Section 230 Immunity Affirmed in Ben Ezra v. America Online Inc.

Date: Mar 15, 2000
Section 230 Immunity Affirmed in Ben Ezra v. America Online Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Ben Ezra, Weinstein, and Company, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., the United States Court of...
AEDPA Standards and Harmless Error in Death Penalty Sentencing: Pickens v. Gibson

AEDPA Standards and Harmless Error in Death Penalty Sentencing: Pickens v. Gibson

Date: Mar 15, 2000
AEDPA Standards and Harmless Error in Death Penalty Sentencing: Pickens v. Gibson Introduction Darrin Lynn Pickens, the petitioner-appellant, appealed his conviction and death sentence in the United...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Routing Disputes: Insights from Intercon, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions, Inc.

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Routing Disputes: Insights from Intercon, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions, Inc.

Date: Mar 10, 2000
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Routing Disputes: Insights from Intercon, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Internet Solutions, Inc. Introduction The case of Intercon, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic...
Liberty Interests and Prisoner Classification: Insights from Chambers v. Colorado Department of Corrections

Liberty Interests and Prisoner Classification: Insights from Chambers v. Colorado Department of Corrections

Date: Mar 8, 2000
Liberty Interests and Prisoner Classification: Insights from Chambers v. Colorado Department of Corrections Introduction Chambers v. Colorado Department of Corrections, 205 F.3d 1237 (10th Cir....
Nationwide Personal Jurisdiction in ERISA Cases: Tenth Circuit Establishes New Precedent

Nationwide Personal Jurisdiction in ERISA Cases: Tenth Circuit Establishes New Precedent

Date: Mar 7, 2000
Nationwide Personal Jurisdiction in ERISA Cases: Tenth Circuit Establishes New Precedent 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Robert Peay, as guardian of minor child Jennifer McCluskey; TEEN HELP,...
Evaluating Attorney Fees and Punitive Damages under the Lanham Act: Insights from United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.

Evaluating Attorney Fees and Punitive Damages under the Lanham Act: Insights from United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.

Date: Mar 7, 2000
Evaluating Attorney Fees and Punitive Damages under the Lanham Act: Insights from United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc. Introduction The case of United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert