Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Conflict of Interest in ERISA Plan Administration Affirmed: PITMAN v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD of Oklahoma

Conflict of Interest in ERISA Plan Administration Affirmed: PITMAN v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD of Oklahoma

Date: Jul 8, 2000
Conflict of Interest in ERISA Plan Administration Affirmed: PITMAN v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD of Oklahoma Introduction PITMAN v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD of Oklahoma (217 F.3d 1291, 10th Cir. 2000) is a...
State Action and Absolute Immunity in Civil Commitment Proceedings: Scott v. Hern

State Action and Absolute Immunity in Civil Commitment Proceedings: Scott v. Hern

Date: Jul 7, 2000
State Action and Absolute Immunity in Civil Commitment Proceedings: Scott v. Hern Introduction In the case of Kenneth Tyler Scott v. Warren Hern, M.D., decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Through Federal Court Removal: McLaughlin v. Board of Trustees of State Colleges of Colorado

Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Through Federal Court Removal: McLaughlin v. Board of Trustees of State Colleges of Colorado

Date: Jun 27, 2000
Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Through Federal Court Removal: McLaughlin v. Board of Trustees of State Colleges of Colorado Introduction The case of John P. McLaughlin v. Board of Trustees of...
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Defaults in Habeas Corpus: Beavers v. Saffle (10th Cir. 2000)

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Defaults in Habeas Corpus: Beavers v. Saffle (10th Cir. 2000)

Date: Jun 17, 2000
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Defaults in Habeas Corpus: Beavers v. Saffle (10th Cir. 2000) Introduction Beavers v. Saffle, 216 F.3d 918 (10th Cir. 2000), is a significant case that...
Establishing Specific Intent in Medicare Antikickback Cases: McClatchey v. USA

Establishing Specific Intent in Medicare Antikickback Cases: McClatchey v. USA

Date: Jun 14, 2000
Establishing Specific Intent in Medicare Antikickback Cases: McClatchey v. USA Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Dennis McClatchey, 217 F.3d 823 (10th Cir. 2000), the...
Reaffirmation of AEDPA's Presumption of Correctness and Standards for Ineffective Assistance in Habitual Offender Sentencing: Romero v. Salazar

Reaffirmation of AEDPA's Presumption of Correctness and Standards for Ineffective Assistance in Habitual Offender Sentencing: Romero v. Salazar

Date: Jun 14, 2000
Reaffirmation of AEDPA's Presumption of Correctness and Standards for Ineffective Assistance in Habitual Offender Sentencing: Romero v. Salazar Introduction Eugene Romero v. Robert Furlong and Ken...
Reaffirming the Gatekeeper Role: Daubert Standards in Expert Testimony Admissibility – Goebel v. Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.

Reaffirming the Gatekeeper Role: Daubert Standards in Expert Testimony Admissibility – Goebel v. Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.

Date: Jun 13, 2000
Reaffirming the Gatekeeper Role: Daubert Standards in Expert Testimony Admissibility – Goebel v. Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. Introduction The case of Richard W. Goebel v. Denver and...
Clarifying Standards for Jury Exposure to Extrinsic Materials in Product Liability: Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand

Clarifying Standards for Jury Exposure to Extrinsic Materials in Product Liability: Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand

Date: Jun 8, 2000
Clarifying Standards for Jury Exposure to Extrinsic Materials in Product Liability: Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand Introduction In the landmark case of Ron Smith and Lucy Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand Company,...
Gatekeeping Reinforced: Ensuring Reliability of Expert Testimony in Criminal Proceedings

Gatekeeping Reinforced: Ensuring Reliability of Expert Testimony in Criminal Proceedings

Date: Jun 3, 2000
Gatekeeping Reinforced: Ensuring Reliability of Expert Testimony in Criminal Proceedings Introduction The case of United States of America v. Mel Lambert Velarde serves as a pivotal moment in the...
Williams v. Board of County Commissioners: Reinforcing Discovery Protocols and Privacy Protections in Civil Litigation

Williams v. Board of County Commissioners: Reinforcing Discovery Protocols and Privacy Protections in Civil Litigation

Date: May 20, 2000
Williams v. Board of County Commissioners: Reinforcing Discovery Protocols and Privacy Protections in Civil Litigation Introduction In the case of Robin Tamara Williams v. Board of County...
Implied Certification Under the False Claims Act: Analysis of Debra A. Shaw v. AAA Engineering Drafting, Inc.

Implied Certification Under the False Claims Act: Analysis of Debra A. Shaw v. AAA Engineering Drafting, Inc.

Date: May 19, 2000
Implied Certification Under the False Claims Act: Analysis of Debra A. Shaw v. AAA Engineering Drafting, Inc. Introduction The case of Debra A. Shaw v. AAA Engineering Drafting, Inc. examined...
Insufficient Evidence of Disability Under ADA: Tenth Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Carol Doyal v. Oklahoma Heart, Inc.

Insufficient Evidence of Disability Under ADA: Tenth Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Carol Doyal v. Oklahoma Heart, Inc.

Date: May 18, 2000
Insufficient Evidence of Disability Under ADA: Tenth Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Carol Doyal v. Oklahoma Heart, Inc. Introduction The case of Carol Doyal v. Oklahoma Heart, Inc. (213 F.3d...
Extension of Grace Periods in Bankruptcy: In re Durability Inc. Case Analysis

Extension of Grace Periods in Bankruptcy: In re Durability Inc. Case Analysis

Date: May 9, 2000
Extension of Grace Periods in Bankruptcy: In re Durability Inc. Case Analysis Introduction The case of In re Durability Inc., Debtor. Scott P. Kirtley, Appellant, v. Sovereign Life Insurance Company...
Strengthening the Right to Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Mayes v. Gibson

Strengthening the Right to Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Mayes v. Gibson

Date: May 5, 2000
Strengthening the Right to Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Mayes v. Gibson Introduction William Raymond Mayes, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder and conspiracy...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Under AEDPA: Analyzing Van Woudenberg v. Gibson

Affirmation of Death Sentence Under AEDPA: Analyzing Van Woudenberg v. Gibson

Date: May 3, 2000
Affirmation of Death Sentence Under AEDPA: Analyzing Van Woudenberg v. Gibson Introduction In the landmark case of Van Woudenberg v. Gibson (211 F.3d 560, 10th Circuit, 2000), the United States Court...
Balancing Probative Value vs. Prejudicial Impact: Tenth Circuit Rules on Grand Jury Evidence in Ocrant v. Gates

Balancing Probative Value vs. Prejudicial Impact: Tenth Circuit Rules on Grand Jury Evidence in Ocrant v. Gates

Date: May 2, 2000
Balancing Probative Value vs. Prejudicial Impact: Tenth Circuit Rules on Grand Jury Evidence in Ocrant v. Gates Introduction The case of Sara Stump; Sylvie Ocrant, as Executrix of the Estate of...
Recognition of Oral Investment Options as Securities under Section 10(b): Commentary on United International Holdings, Inc. v. The Wharf (Holdings) Limited

Recognition of Oral Investment Options as Securities under Section 10(b): Commentary on United International Holdings, Inc. v. The Wharf (Holdings) Limited

Date: Apr 29, 2000
Recognition of Oral Investment Options as Securities under Section 10(b): Commentary on United International Holdings, Inc. v. The Wharf (Holdings) Limited Introduction The case of United...
Retaliatory Termination under Title VII: The Moses Pastran v. K-Mart Corporation Decision

Retaliatory Termination under Title VII: The Moses Pastran v. K-Mart Corporation Decision

Date: Apr 29, 2000
Retaliatory Termination under Title VII: The Moses Pastran v. K-Mart Corporation Decision Introduction The case of Moses Pastran v. K-Mart Corporation, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Miranda Rights and Border Checkpoints: Establishing Non-Custodial Encounters in U.S. v. Hudson and Riness

Miranda Rights and Border Checkpoints: Establishing Non-Custodial Encounters in U.S. v. Hudson and Riness

Date: Apr 26, 2000
Miranda Rights and Border Checkpoints: Establishing Non-Custodial Encounters in United States of America v. Hudson and Riness Introduction United States of America v. Peter Paul Hudson and Tammy Mae...
Affirmation of Three Strikes Statute Application and Competency Determination in Mackovich Case

Affirmation of Three Strikes Statute Application and Competency Determination in Mackovich Case

Date: Apr 26, 2000
Affirmation of Three Strikes Statute Application and Competency Determination in Mackovich Case Introduction The case of United States of America v. John Vincent Mackovich, adjudicated by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert