Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Full Faith and Credit Clause Requires Oklahoma to Recognize Same-Sex Out-of-State Adoptions

Full Faith and Credit Clause Requires Oklahoma to Recognize Same-Sex Out-of-State Adoptions

Date: Aug 4, 2007
Full Faith and Credit Clause Requires Oklahoma to Recognize Same-Sex Out-of-State Adoptions Introduction In the landmark case of Heather Finstuen et al. v. Dr. Mike Crutcher et al., the United States...
Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Procedural Due Process: Darr v. Town of Telluride

Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Procedural Due Process: Darr v. Town of Telluride

Date: Aug 4, 2007
Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Procedural Due Process: Darr v. Town of Telluride Introduction In Michael Andrew Darr v. Town of Telluride, Colorado, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Competitive Injury Requirement for 'Unfair Practices' under Packers and Stockyards Act

Tenth Circuit Establishes Competitive Injury Requirement for 'Unfair Practices' under Packers and Stockyards Act

Date: Aug 1, 2007
Tenth Circuit Establishes Competitive Injury Requirement for 'Unfair Practices' under Packers and Stockyards Act Introduction In Charles Been et al. v. OK Industries, Inc. et al. (495 F.3d 1217, 10th...
Procedural Standards and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in §1983 Appeals: The Wallin Case

Procedural Standards and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in §1983 Appeals: The Wallin Case

Date: Jul 28, 2007
Procedural Standards and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in §1983 Appeals: The Wallin Case Introduction The case of Oloyea D. Wallin v. Multiple Defendants (244 F. App'x 214) adjudicated by the United States...
Mootness in Student Press Litigation: Lane and Rice v. Simon and White

Mootness in Student Press Litigation: Lane and Rice v. Simon and White

Date: Jul 27, 2007
Mootness in Student Press Litigation: Lane and Rice v. Simon and White Introduction The case of Katie Lane and Sarah Rice v. Todd F. Simon and Stephen E. White addresses critical issues concerning...
Affirmation of Federal Death Sentence and Upholding Juror Selection Procedures in United States v. Barrett

Affirmation of Federal Death Sentence and Upholding Juror Selection Procedures in United States v. Barrett

Date: Jul 26, 2007
Affirmation of Federal Death Sentence and Upholding Juror Selection Procedures in United States v. Barrett Introduction The case of United States v. Kenneth Eugene Barrett presents a comprehensive...
Establishing Federal Court Jurisdiction for Enforcement of FCC Payphone Orders: TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation

Establishing Federal Court Jurisdiction for Enforcement of FCC Payphone Orders: TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation

Date: Jul 24, 2007
Establishing Federal Court Jurisdiction for Enforcement of FCC Payphone Orders: TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation Introduction The case of TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation, adjudicated...
BECKER v. KROLL: Tenth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Malicious Prosecution and Retaliation Claims

BECKER v. KROLL: Tenth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Malicious Prosecution and Retaliation Claims

Date: Jul 20, 2007
BECKER v. KROLL: Tenth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Malicious Prosecution and Retaliation Claims Introduction In BECKER v. KROLL, 494 F.3d 904 (10th Cir. 2007), Dr. Taj Becker, a neurologist from St....
Limits on Tribal Judicial Enforcement: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Montana's Jurisdictional Constraints

Limits on Tribal Judicial Enforcement: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Montana's Jurisdictional Constraints

Date: Jul 19, 2007
Limits on Tribal Judicial Enforcement: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Montana's Jurisdictional Constraints Introduction In the landmark case of Ste v. MacArthur et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Balancing Privacy and First Amendment Rights: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Alvarado v. KOB-TV

Balancing Privacy and First Amendment Rights: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Alvarado v. KOB-TV

Date: Jul 14, 2007
Balancing Privacy and First Amendment Rights: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Alvarado v. KOB-TV Introduction The case of Vicente Alvarado, Yvette Alvarado, Steve Flores, Priscilla Flores, Thomas...
Retaliation Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter Academy

Retaliation Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter Academy

Date: Jul 13, 2007
Retaliation Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter Academy Introduction In the landmark case Brammer-Hoelter et al. v. Twin Peaks Charter Academy et...
Younger Abstention and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Re v. Edward Allan Buck

Younger Abstention and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Re v. Edward Allan Buck

Date: Jul 11, 2007
Younger Abstention and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Re v. Edward Allan Buck Introduction The case of Re v. Edward Allan BUCK (244 F. App'x 193) adjudicated by the...
Judicial Review of Arbitration Venue Determination: Insights from The Ridge at Red Hawk v. Schneider

Judicial Review of Arbitration Venue Determination: Insights from The Ridge at Red Hawk v. Schneider

Date: Jul 10, 2007
Judicial Review of Arbitration Venue Determination: Insights from The Ridge at Red Hawk v. Schneider Introduction The Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. (“The Ridge”) appealed the dismissal of its complaint...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Swackhammer v. Sprint: Pretext and Differential Treatment under McDonnell Douglas

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Swackhammer v. Sprint: Pretext and Differential Treatment under McDonnell Douglas

Date: Jul 10, 2007
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Swackhammer v. Sprint: Pretext and Differential Treatment under McDonnell Douglas Introduction The case of Dena Swackhammer v. Sprint/United Management Co.,...
Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Eastman v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Eastman v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Date: Jul 7, 2007
Judicial Estoppel in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Eastman v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. Introduction In Eastman v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 493 F.3d 1151 (10th Cir. 2007), the United States Court of...
Qualified Immunity Upholds Use of 'Twist Lock' in Community Caretaking: Novitsky v. City of Aurora Analysis

Qualified Immunity Upholds Use of 'Twist Lock' in Community Caretaking: Novitsky v. City of Aurora Analysis

Date: Jul 6, 2007
Qualified Immunity Upholds Use of 'Twist Lock' in Community Caretaking: Novitsky v. City of Aurora Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of Sergey G. Novitsky v. City of Aurora et al., the...
John Nasious v. Two Unknown ICE Agents: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent on Dismissing Pro Se Complaints under Rule 8

John Nasious v. Two Unknown ICE Agents: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent on Dismissing Pro Se Complaints under Rule 8

Date: Jul 4, 2007
John Nasious v. Two Unknown ICE Agents: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent on Dismissing Pro Se Complaints under Rule 8 Introduction In the landmark case of John Nasious v. Two Unknown ICE Agents, the...
Tenth Circuit Affirms No Duty of Care for Railroad Company in Employee Injury During Crossing Gate Operations

Tenth Circuit Affirms No Duty of Care for Railroad Company in Employee Injury During Crossing Gate Operations

Date: Jul 4, 2007
Tenth Circuit Affirms No Duty of Care for Railroad Company in Employee Injury During Crossing Gate Operations Introduction The case of Da v. d BEUGLER and Diana Beugler, decided by the United States...
Establishing Participant Inclusion Standards under ERISA: Flinders & Brown v. Workforce Stabilization Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company

Establishing Participant Inclusion Standards under ERISA: Flinders & Brown v. Workforce Stabilization Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company

Date: Jul 4, 2007
Establishing Participant Inclusion Standards under ERISA: Flinders & Brown v. Workforce Stabilization Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company Introduction In the landmark case of Flinders & Brown v....
Procedural Objections and Plain Error Review in Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Romero

Procedural Objections and Plain Error Review in Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Romero

Date: Jun 30, 2007
Procedural Objections and Plain Error Review in Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Romero Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Romero,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert