Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Dow Chemical v. Cook Class Action: A Comprehensive Analysis

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Dow Chemical v. Cook Class Action: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Dec 8, 2006
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Dow Chemical v. Cook Class Action: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Merilyn Cook, et al. v. Rockwell International Corporation and the Dow...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies False Claims Act Immunity and 'Causing to be Presented' Standard

Tenth Circuit Clarifies False Claims Act Immunity and 'Causing to be Presented' Standard

Date: Dec 6, 2006
Tenth Circuit Clarifies False Claims Act Immunity and 'Causing to be Presented' Standard Introduction In United States ex rel. Sikkenga v. Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, the United States...
Upholding Prison Mail Regulations: Analysis of Wardell v. Maggard

Upholding Prison Mail Regulations: Analysis of Wardell v. Maggard

Date: Dec 1, 2006
Upholding Prison Mail Regulations: Analysis of Wardell v. Maggard Introduction The case Wendel R. Wardell, Jr. v. Sandra Maggard (470 F.3d 954) adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reasonable Detention Under the Fourth Amendment and Sentencing Guidelines for Minor Participants: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mendoza v. United States

Reasonable Detention Under the Fourth Amendment and Sentencing Guidelines for Minor Participants: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mendoza v. United States

Date: Nov 16, 2006
Reasonable Detention Under the Fourth Amendment and Sentencing Guidelines for Minor Participants: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mendoza v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United...
De Novo Review Not Triggered by Delegation to Non-Fiduciary Administrators: Insights from Geddes v. United Staffing Alliance

De Novo Review Not Triggered by Delegation to Non-Fiduciary Administrators: Insights from Geddes v. United Staffing Alliance

Date: Nov 16, 2006
De Novo Review Not Triggered by Delegation to Non-Fiduciary Administrators: Insights from Geddes v. United Staffing Alliance Introduction The case of Michael Geddes and Kari Geddes, individually and...
Affirmation of Privacy Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Anderson v. Blake

Affirmation of Privacy Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Anderson v. Blake

Date: Nov 15, 2006
Affirmation of Privacy Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Anderson v. Blake Introduction Anderson v. Blake, 469 F.3d 910 (10th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case addressing the balance between an...
Interpretation of FMLA's 50/75 Provision: Surface Miles Standard Affirmed

Interpretation of FMLA's 50/75 Provision: Surface Miles Standard Affirmed

Date: Nov 15, 2006
Interpretation of FMLA's 50/75 Provision: Surface Miles Standard Affirmed Introduction Kelly Hackworth v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, 468 F.3d 722 (10th Cir. 2006), addresses the...
Proper Scope of Filing Restrictions Orders: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Association

Proper Scope of Filing Restrictions Orders: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Association

Date: Nov 15, 2006
Proper Scope of Filing Restrictions Orders: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Association Introduction Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Association is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
E v. rett YOUNG: Establishing Standards for Pretext in Title VII Claims

E v. rett YOUNG: Establishing Standards for Pretext in Title VII Claims

Date: Nov 10, 2006
E v. rett YOUNG: Establishing Standards for Pretext in Title VII Claims Introduction In the landmark case E v. rett YOUNG (468 F.3d 1243), the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Nationwide Jurisdiction under RICO: Insights from Cory v. Aztec Steel Building, Inc.

Nationwide Jurisdiction under RICO: Insights from Cory v. Aztec Steel Building, Inc.

Date: Nov 9, 2006
Nationwide Jurisdiction under RICO: Insights from Cory v. Aztec Steel Building, Inc. Introduction In Bill J. Cory v. Aztec Steel Building, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Clarifying the Interaction between Federal Rules of Evidence and State Law in Diversity Jurisdiction: Sims v. Great American

Clarifying the Interaction between Federal Rules of Evidence and State Law in Diversity Jurisdiction: Sims v. Great American

Date: Nov 8, 2006
Clarifying the Interaction between Federal Rules of Evidence and State Law in Diversity Jurisdiction: Sims v. Great American Introduction Sims v. Great American Life Insurance Company is a pivotal...
Exclusion of Unincorporated Associations Under Section 1983 – Lippoldt v. Dually; Operation Sa

Exclusion of Unincorporated Associations Under Section 1983 – Lippoldt v. Dually; Operation Sa

Date: Nov 8, 2006
Exclusion of Unincorporated Associations Under Section 1983 – Lippoldt v. Dually; Operation Sa Introduction Lippoldt v. Dually; Operation Sa is a significant case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of 'Knock and Talk' and Consent Standards under the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Cruz-Mendez

Affirmation of 'Knock and Talk' and Consent Standards under the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Cruz-Mendez

Date: Nov 7, 2006
Affirmation of 'Knock and Talk' and Consent Standards under the Fourth Amendment: United States v. Cruz-Mendez Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Cruz-Mendez, the United States...
ERISA's Comprehensive Preemption of State Law Claims: Insights from Lind v. Aetna Health

ERISA's Comprehensive Preemption of State Law Claims: Insights from Lind v. Aetna Health

Date: Nov 1, 2006
ERISA's Comprehensive Preemption of State Law Claims: Insights from Lind v. Aetna Health Introduction The case of James D. Lind and Linda Stillwell-Lind v. Aetna Health, Inc., adjudicated by the...
Ensuring Specificity in §1983 Claims: Insights from Johnson v. MCPD

Ensuring Specificity in §1983 Claims: Insights from Johnson v. MCPD

Date: Nov 1, 2006
Ensuring Specificity in §1983 Claims: Insights from Johnson v. MCPD Introduction In the case of Edward Arlen Johnson v. Arlen Johnson, et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Tenth Circuit Reinforces Strict Compliance with Rule 11 in Civil Rights Litigation

Tenth Circuit Reinforces Strict Compliance with Rule 11 in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Oct 31, 2006
Strict Adherence to Rule 11 Sanctions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Roth and Gumeson v. Defendants Introduction In the landmark case of Stephen C. Roth and Jean E. Gumeson v. Multiple Defendants,...
Competency and Waiver of Counsel in Maynard v. Boone: A Comprehensive Analysis

Competency and Waiver of Counsel in Maynard v. Boone: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Oct 27, 2006
Competency and Waiver of Counsel in Maynard v. Boone: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Maynard v. Boone, 468 F.3d 665 (10th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case that delves into the intricate issues of...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Protections for Aggrieved Employees against Release Form Waivers under the WARN Act

Tenth Circuit Establishes Protections for Aggrieved Employees against Release Form Waivers under the WARN Act

Date: Oct 26, 2006
Tenth Circuit Establishes Protections for Aggrieved Employees against Release Form Waivers under the WARN Act Introduction In the landmark case of Julie Allen et al. v. Sybase, Inc. et al. (468 F.3d...
Enhancing Disability Onset Determinations and Lay Testimony Considerations under Social Security Law: Insights from Blea v. Barnhart

Enhancing Disability Onset Determinations and Lay Testimony Considerations under Social Security Law: Insights from Blea v. Barnhart

Date: Oct 24, 2006
Enhancing Disability Onset Determinations and Lay Testimony Considerations under Social Security Law: Insights from Blea v. Barnhart Introduction Blea v. Barnhart, 466 F.3d 903 (10th Cir. 2006),...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Diminished Value Claims Under Colorado's No Fault Act

Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Diminished Value Claims Under Colorado's No Fault Act

Date: Oct 19, 2006
Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Diminished Value Claims Under Colorado's No Fault Act Introduction The case of Lois Lovell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert