Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

admissibility-of-metadata-evidence-post-smyth:-a-new-precedent-in-irish-supreme-court Case Commentaries

R v Johnstone [2025] EWCA Crim 1470: Targeted Vulnerability, Category 2 Harm, and a Structured Totality Uplift for Concurrent Penetrative Offences

R v Johnstone [2025] EWCA Crim 1470: Targeted Vulnerability, Category 2 Harm, and a Structured Totality Uplift for Concurrent Penetrative Offences

Date: Oct 30, 2025
R v Johnstone [2025] EWCA Crim 1470: Targeted Vulnerability, Category 2 Harm, and a Structured Totality Uplift for Concurrent Penetrative Offences Court: England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
State Consent to Termination of Pregnancy for an Incapacitated Minor under Article 42A and Section 9 of the 2018 Act: Commentary on DE (A Minor) [2025] IEHC 604

State Consent to Termination of Pregnancy for an Incapacitated Minor under Article 42A and Section 9 of the 2018 Act: Commentary on DE (A Minor) [2025] IEHC 604

Date: Oct 30, 2025
State Consent to Termination of Pregnancy for an Incapacitated Minor under Article 42A and Section 9 of the 2018 Act: Commentary on DE (A Minor) [2025] IEHC 604 1. Introduction 1.1. The case in...
R v Khan [2025] EWCA Crim 1477: Procedural Safeguards and Substantive Limits on Compensation Orders in the Crown Court

R v Khan [2025] EWCA Crim 1477: Procedural Safeguards and Substantive Limits on Compensation Orders in the Crown Court

Date: Oct 30, 2025
R v Khan [2025] EWCA Crim 1477: Procedural Safeguards and Substantive Limits on Compensation Orders in the Crown Court 1. Introduction R v Khan [2025] EWCA Crim 1477 is a Court of Appeal decision of...
Abuse of Process Precludes Public‑Interest Costs Relief: Commentary on Browne v Registrar General of Fishing Boats & Ors [No. 2] [2025] IEHC 553

Abuse of Process Precludes Public‑Interest Costs Relief: Commentary on Browne v Registrar General of Fishing Boats & Ors [No. 2] [2025] IEHC 553

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Abuse of Process Precludes Public‑Interest Costs Relief: Browne v The Registrar General of Fishing Boats & Ors [No. 2] [2025] IEHC 553 Introduction This High Court costs judgment, delivered by...
Summary possession must be precisely grounded: credible mis‑selling set‑off and arguable CCMA coverage require remittal to plenary

Summary possession must be precisely grounded: credible mis‑selling set‑off and arguable CCMA coverage require remittal to plenary

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Summary possession must be precisely grounded: credible mis‑selling set‑off and arguable CCMA coverage require remittal to plenary Introduction In Allied Irish Banks plc v The Dragon’s Head Ltd...
Clarifying the Threshold for Pre‑Action Inspection under s.12 PIAB Act 2003: Commentary on M v T [2025] IEHC 623

Clarifying the Threshold for Pre‑Action Inspection under s.12 PIAB Act 2003: Commentary on M v T [2025] IEHC 623

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Clarifying the Threshold for Pre‑Action Inspection under s.12 of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003: Commentary on M v T [2025] IEHC 623 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
F v F and A [2025] CSOH 99: The Section 18 Tripartite Test Confirmed, and a Fair‑Value Transfer Method for Part‑Inherited Homes

F v F and A [2025] CSOH 99: The Section 18 Tripartite Test Confirmed, and a Fair‑Value Transfer Method for Part‑Inherited Homes

Date: Oct 28, 2025
F v F and A [2025] CSOH 99: The Section 18 Tripartite Test Confirmed, and a Fair‑Value Transfer Method for Part‑Inherited Homes Introduction In F against F and A [2025] CSOH 99, Lord Stuart (Outer...
Base Offence Must Be Identified for Unlawful Act Manslaughter; Minimum Terms for Immature Adult Murderers May Fall Below the 30‑Year “Double Murder” Starting Point — Commentary on R v Bukhari & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 1353

Base Offence Must Be Identified for Unlawful Act Manslaughter; Minimum Terms for Immature Adult Murderers May Fall Below the 30‑Year “Double Murder” Starting Point — Commentary on R v Bukhari & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 1353

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Base Offence Must Be Identified for Unlawful Act Manslaughter; Minimum Terms for Immature Adult Murderers May Fall Below the 30‑Year “Double Murder” Starting Point Introduction This commentary...
Early Conciliation Is a Jurisdictional Precondition—But Not for Amendments: Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1357

Early Conciliation Is a Jurisdictional Precondition—But Not for Amendments: Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1357

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Early Conciliation Is a Jurisdictional Precondition—But Not for Amendments: Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1357 Court: Court of Appeal (Civil Division), England and Wales Date: 27...
Late s208 Notifications Are Collateral and Do Not Invalidate Suitability Reviews: A Flexible, Policy-Led Approach to Out-of-Borough Homelessness Placements (London Borough of Enfield v A [2025] EWCA Civ 1355)

Late s208 Notifications Are Collateral and Do Not Invalidate Suitability Reviews: A Flexible, Policy-Led Approach to Out-of-Borough Homelessness Placements (London Borough of Enfield v A [2025] EWCA Civ 1355)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Late s208 Notifications Are Collateral and Do Not Invalidate Suitability Reviews: A Flexible, Policy-Led Approach to Out-of-Borough Homelessness Placements Case: London Borough of Enfield v A [2025]...
Clarifying s.49 Solicitors Act Appeals: No Oral Renewal After Paper Refusal; SDT May Revoke Certification for Fundamental Mistake — Commentary on Hinkel v Gheissari & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1351

Clarifying s.49 Solicitors Act Appeals: No Oral Renewal After Paper Refusal; SDT May Revoke Certification for Fundamental Mistake — Commentary on Hinkel v Gheissari & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1351

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Clarifying s.49 Solicitors Act Appeals: No Oral Renewal After Paper Refusal; SDT May Revoke Certification for Fundamental Mistake Case: Hinkel v Gheissari & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1351 (Court of...
Prerogative Policy-Making for Post–Data Breach Relocation Upheld: No Fettering, Rational Limitation to High‑Profile Roles

Prerogative Policy-Making for Post–Data Breach Relocation Upheld: No Fettering, Rational Limitation to High‑Profile Roles

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Prerogative Policy-Making for Post–Data Breach Relocation Upheld: No Fettering, Rational Limitation to High‑Profile Roles Introduction In AFA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for...
Police Gang Officers as Expert Witnesses and Youth Sentencing in Serious Gang Violence: Commentary on R v Edokpolo & Alexander [2025] EWCA Crim 1534

Police Gang Officers as Expert Witnesses and Youth Sentencing in Serious Gang Violence: Commentary on R v Edokpolo & Alexander [2025] EWCA Crim 1534

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Police Gang Officers as Expert Witnesses and Youth Sentencing in Serious Gang Violence: Commentary on R v Edokpolo & Alexander [2025] EWCA Crim 1534 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
Costs follow the event after consent to certiorari on fair procedures grounds, even absent fault by the decision‑maker

Costs follow the event after consent to certiorari on fair procedures grounds, even absent fault by the decision‑maker

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Costs follow the event after consent to certiorari on fair procedures grounds, even absent fault by the decision‑maker Case: Y.A.M v International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2025] IEHC 596...
Premature Judicial Review of an Erroneous Deportation Proposal: No Costs and a Narrow Jurisdictional Exception (F.A.A. v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 614)

Premature Judicial Review of an Erroneous Deportation Proposal: No Costs and a Narrow Jurisdictional Exception (F.A.A. v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 614)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Premature Judicial Review of an Erroneous Deportation Proposal: No Costs and a Narrow Jurisdictional Exception Case Note on F.A.A. v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 614 (High Court of Ireland, 24...
Position Marks Must Be a Single, Precisely Delineated Sign: Non‑limiting Descriptions Creating Indeterminate Variations Fail Registrability (Thom Browne Inc & Anor v Adidas AG [2025] EWCA Civ 1340)

Position Marks Must Be a Single, Precisely Delineated Sign: Non‑limiting Descriptions Creating Indeterminate Variations Fail Registrability (Thom Browne Inc & Anor v Adidas AG [2025] EWCA Civ 1340)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Position Marks Must Be a Single, Precisely Delineated Sign: Non‑limiting Descriptions Creating Indeterminate Variations Fail Registrability Case: Thom Browne Inc & Anor v Adidas AG [2025] EWCA Civ...
IRH is not a shortcut: Court of Appeal mandates necessary evidence, Article 6 fairness, and explicit welfare and contact analysis before making final care orders

IRH is not a shortcut: Court of Appeal mandates necessary evidence, Article 6 fairness, and explicit welfare and contact analysis before making final care orders

Date: Oct 24, 2025
IRH is not a shortcut: Court of Appeal mandates necessary evidence, Article 6 fairness, and explicit welfare and contact analysis before making final care orders Case: H, Re (Final Care Orders at...
No AoS or CPR 11 application is required where service of the claim form was invalid and time has not been extended; “left for DX collection” is not service under CPR 7.5 — Bellway Homes Ltd v The Occupiers of Samuel Garside House [2025] EWCA Civ 1347

No AoS or CPR 11 application is required where service of the claim form was invalid and time has not been extended; “left for DX collection” is not service under CPR 7.5 — Bellway Homes Ltd v The Occupiers of Samuel Garside House [2025] EWCA Civ 1347

Date: Oct 24, 2025
No AoS or CPR 11 application is required where service of the claim form was invalid and time has not been extended; “left for DX collection” is not service under CPR 7.5 Commentary on Bellway Homes...
Figurative Trade Marks: Where the Picture and Description Align, the Image Defines the Sign — Independence of the Sieckmann Conditions Reaffirmed

Figurative Trade Marks: Where the Picture and Description Align, the Image Defines the Sign — Independence of the Sieckmann Conditions Reaffirmed

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Figurative Trade Marks: Where the Picture and Description Align, the Image Defines the Sign — Independence of the Sieckmann Conditions Reaffirmed Introduction In Babek International Ltd v Iceland...
Personal Motive Is Not a Convention Nexus; Displacing a Safe‑Country Presumption Does Not Foreclose State Protection: Commentary on N.S. & T.S. v IPAT & Minister [2025] IEHC 578

Personal Motive Is Not a Convention Nexus; Displacing a Safe‑Country Presumption Does Not Foreclose State Protection: Commentary on N.S. & T.S. v IPAT & Minister [2025] IEHC 578

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Personal Motive Is Not a Convention Nexus; Displacing a Safe‑Country Presumption Does Not Foreclose State Protection: Commentary on N.S. & T.S. v International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Minister...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert