Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Ors v Neuberger: Clarifying Insolvency Tests under the Insolvency Act 1986

BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Ors v Neuberger: Clarifying Insolvency Tests under the Insolvency Act 1986

Date: May 10, 2013
BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Ors v Neuberger: Clarifying Insolvency Tests under the Insolvency Act 1986 Introduction The case of BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Ors v Neuberger ([2013]...
Clarifying 'Care and Attention' under the National Assistance Act 1948: SL v. Westminster City Council

Clarifying 'Care and Attention' under the National Assistance Act 1948: SL v. Westminster City Council

Date: May 10, 2013
Clarifying 'Care and Attention' under the National Assistance Act 1948: SL v. Westminster City Council Introduction The case of SL v. Westminster City Council ([2013] 16 CCL Rep 161) represents a...
Elisabeth Moyne Ramsay v HMRC: Defining 'Business' under s 162 TCGA

Elisabeth Moyne Ramsay v HMRC: Defining 'Business' under s 162 TCGA

Date: May 9, 2013
Elisabeth Moyne Ramsay v HMRC: Defining 'Business' under s 162 TCGA Introduction Elisabeth Moyne Ramsay v HMRC ([2013] UKUT 226 (TCC)) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Upper Tribunal (Tax and...
Single Exempt Supply Principle in VAT: Nuffield Health v. Revenue & Customs

Single Exempt Supply Principle in VAT: Nuffield Health v. Revenue & Customs

Date: May 9, 2013
Single Exempt Supply Principle in VAT: Nuffield Health v. Revenue & Customs Introduction The case of Nuffield Health v. Revenue & Customs ([2013] UKFTT 291 (TC)) addresses a critical issue in the...
VAT Exemption for Payment Processing Booking Fees: NEC v Revenue & Customs [2014] SFTD 107

VAT Exemption for Payment Processing Booking Fees: NEC v Revenue & Customs [2014] SFTD 107

Date: May 8, 2013
VAT Exemption for Payment Processing Booking Fees: National Exhibition Centre Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2014] SFTD 107 Introduction The case of National Exhibition Centre Ltd v Revenue & Customs...
Singh v Belgium Reaffirmed: Tanveer Ahmed Principles Remain Unaffected in Asylum Documentation Assessment

Singh v Belgium Reaffirmed: Tanveer Ahmed Principles Remain Unaffected in Asylum Documentation Assessment

Date: May 2, 2013
Singh v Belgium Reaffirmed: Tanveer Ahmed Principles Remain Unaffected in Asylum Documentation Assessment Introduction The case of MJ (Singh v. Belgium: Tanveer Ahmed unaffected) heard by the Upper...
VAT Treatment of Insurance Claims Handling: Supremacy of Economic Reality in WHA Ltd & Anor v. Revenue and Customs [2013] UKSC 24

VAT Treatment of Insurance Claims Handling: Supremacy of Economic Reality in WHA Ltd & Anor v. Revenue and Customs [2013] UKSC 24

Date: May 2, 2013
VAT Treatment of Insurance Claims Handling: Supremacy of Economic Reality in WHA Ltd & Anor v. Revenue and Customs [2013] UKSC 24 Introduction The case of WHA Ltd & Anor v. Revenue and Customs...
ClientEarth v. Secretary of State for Environment: UK’s Breach of EU Air Quality Directive

ClientEarth v. Secretary of State for Environment: UK’s Breach of EU Air Quality Directive

Date: May 2, 2013
ClientEarth v. Secretary of State for Environment: UK’s Breach of EU Air Quality Directive Introduction The case of ClientEarth, R (on the application of) v. The Secretary of State for the...
Interpretation of 'Payable' in Child Support Law: JF v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ([2014] AACR 3)

Interpretation of 'Payable' in Child Support Law: JF v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ([2014] AACR 3)

Date: May 2, 2013
Interpretation of 'Payable' in Child Support Law: JF v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ([2014] AACR 3) Introduction The case of JF v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CSM) ([2014]...
Actionable Post-Termination Victimisation Affirmed under Equality Act 2010 in Akwiwu & Anor v. Onu

Actionable Post-Termination Victimisation Affirmed under Equality Act 2010 in Akwiwu & Anor v. Onu

Date: May 2, 2013
Actionable Post-Termination Victimisation Affirmed under Equality Act 2010 in Akwiwu & Anor v. Onu Introduction The case of Akwiwu & Anor v. Onu ([2013] ICR 1039) was adjudicated by the United...
Faulkner v Secretary of State for Justice: Defining Damages for Breaches of Article 5(4)

Faulkner v Secretary of State for Justice: Defining Damages for Breaches of Article 5(4)

Date: May 2, 2013
Faulkner v Secretary of State for Justice: Defining Damages for Breaches of Article 5(4) Introduction The case of Faulkner v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor ([2013] 2 WLR 1157) heard by the...
First-tier Tribunal Affirms Strict Criteria for Allowable CGT Losses Against Income

First-tier Tribunal Affirms Strict Criteria for Allowable CGT Losses Against Income

Date: May 1, 2013
First-tier Tribunal Affirms Strict Criteria for Allowable CGT Losses Against Income Introduction The case of Price & Ors v. Revenue & Customs ([2013] UKFTT 297 (TC)) adjudicated by the First-tier...
Affirming the Necessity of Natural Justice in Tribunal Proceedings: GA v. London Borough of Southwark [2013] UKUT 170 (AAC)

Affirming the Necessity of Natural Justice in Tribunal Proceedings: GA v. London Borough of Southwark [2013] UKUT 170 (AAC)

Date: May 1, 2013
Affirming the Necessity of Natural Justice in Tribunal Proceedings: GA v. London Borough of Southwark [2013] UKUT 170 (AAC) Introduction The case of GA v. London Borough of Southwark ([2013] UKUT 170...
Systemic Abuse of Licensing Regulations in Taz Distribution Ltd & Anor Judgment

Systemic Abuse of Licensing Regulations in Taz Distribution Ltd & Anor Judgment

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Systemic Abuse of Licensing Regulations in Taz Distribution Ltd & Anor Judgment Introduction The case of Taz Distribution Ltd & Anor v The Upper Tribunal ([2013] UKUT 198 (AAC)) brings to the...
Limitation on Extension of Appeal Time Limits under Tax Credits Act 2002: JI v. Revenue & Customs

Limitation on Extension of Appeal Time Limits under Tax Credits Act 2002: JI v. Revenue & Customs

Date: Apr 27, 2013
Limitation on Extension of Appeal Time Limits under Tax Credits Act 2002: JI v. Revenue & Customs Introduction The case of JI v. Revenue & Customs (TC) ([2013] UKUT 199 (AAC)) presents a significant...
Clarifying Worker and Employee Status: Insights from Dakin v Brighton Marina Residential Management Co Ltd [2013] UKEAT 0380_12_2604

Clarifying Worker and Employee Status: Insights from Dakin v Brighton Marina Residential Management Co Ltd [2013] UKEAT 0380_12_2604

Date: Apr 27, 2013
Clarifying Worker and Employee Status: Insights from Dakin v Brighton Marina Residential Management Co Ltd [2013] UKEAT 0380_12_2604 Introduction The case of Dakin v. Brighton Marina Residential...
Pearson v Revenue & Customs: VAT Zero-Rating Affirmed for Integrated Live-Work Residential Conversions

Pearson v Revenue & Customs: VAT Zero-Rating Affirmed for Integrated Live-Work Residential Conversions

Date: Apr 27, 2013
Pearson v Revenue & Customs: VAT Zero-Rating Affirmed for Integrated Live-Work Residential Conversions Introduction Parties Involved: Appellant: Lady Henrietta Pearson Respondent: Revenue & Customs...
Interpretation of 'Subjected to' in Protected Disclosures Claims under Employment Rights Act 1996: Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board v. Ferguson

Interpretation of 'Subjected to' in Protected Disclosures Claims under Employment Rights Act 1996: Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board v. Ferguson

Date: Apr 25, 2013
Interpretation of 'Subjected to' in Protected Disclosures Claims under Employment Rights Act 1996 Introduction The case of Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board v. Ferguson ([2013] ICR 1108)...
Incompatibility of Section 72 of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 with ECHR Convention Rights

Incompatibility of Section 72 of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 with ECHR Convention Rights

Date: Apr 25, 2013
Incompatibility of Section 72 of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 with ECHR Convention Rights Introduction The case of Salvesen and Riddell & Anor v. The Lord Advocate (Scotland) ([2013]...
Balancing Development and Landscape Protection: Ministerial Reasoning Standards in Uprichard v Scottish Ministers

Balancing Development and Landscape Protection: Ministerial Reasoning Standards in Uprichard v Scottish Ministers

Date: Apr 25, 2013
Balancing Development and Landscape Protection: Ministerial Reasoning Standards in Uprichard v. Scottish Ministers Introduction The case of Uprichard v. Scottish Ministers & Anor (Scotland) ([2013]...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert