Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Commentary on NAS & Co Ltd v. Revenue & Customs ([2014] UKFTT 50 (TC))

Comprehensive Commentary on NAS & Co Ltd v. Revenue & Customs ([2014] UKFTT 50 (TC))

Date: Jan 7, 2014
Deeming Seizure Decisions Unreasonable: Insights from NAS & Co Ltd v. Revenue & Customs ([2014] UKFTT 50 (TC)) Introduction The case of NAS & Co Ltd v. Revenue & Customs ([2014] UKFTT 50 (TC))...
Upper Tribunal Clarifies 'Trade' Status for Limited Liability Partnerships in Eclipse Film Partners (No. 35) LLP v HMRC

Upper Tribunal Clarifies 'Trade' Status for Limited Liability Partnerships in Eclipse Film Partners (No. 35) LLP v HMRC

Date: Dec 21, 2013
Upper Tribunal Clarifies 'Trade' Status for Limited Liability Partnerships in Eclipse Film Partners (No. 35) LLP v HMRC Introduction The case of Eclipse Film Partners (No. 35) LLP v HMRC ([2014] BTC...
G v. Scottish Ministers & Anor (2014) SC: Clarifying the Right to Appeal Against Excessive Security Detention under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003

G v. Scottish Ministers & Anor (2014) SC: Clarifying the Right to Appeal Against Excessive Security Detention under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003

Date: Dec 19, 2013
G v. Scottish Ministers & Anor (2014) SC: Clarifying the Right to Appeal Against Excessive Security Detention under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 Introduction The case G...
AA v Entry Clearance Officer: Defining Parental Responsibility Under Kafala for Immigration Purposes

AA v Entry Clearance Officer: Defining Parental Responsibility Under Kafala for Immigration Purposes

Date: Dec 19, 2013
AA v Entry Clearance Officer: Defining Parental Responsibility Under Kafala for Immigration Purposes Introduction The case AA v. Entry Clearance Officer (Addis Ababa) ([2014] 1 WLR 43) before the...
Reinforcing the Integrity of Disciplinary Investigations in NHS Employment Contracts: West London Mental Health NHS Trust v. Chhabra

Reinforcing the Integrity of Disciplinary Investigations in NHS Employment Contracts: West London Mental Health NHS Trust v. Chhabra

Date: Dec 19, 2013
Reinforcing the Integrity of Disciplinary Investigations in NHS Employment Contracts: West London Mental Health NHS Trust v. Chhabra Introduction The case of West London Mental Health NHS Trust v....
Interplay of Regulations 29 and 35 in ESA Assessments: JS v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Interplay of Regulations 29 and 35 in ESA Assessments: JS v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Date: Dec 18, 2013
Interplay of Regulations 29 and 35 in ESA Assessments: JS v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Introduction The case of JS v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA) ([2013] UKUT 635...
Interpretation of VAT Exemptions for Private Niche Dance Tuition: Cheruvier v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 7 (TC) Analysis

Interpretation of VAT Exemptions for Private Niche Dance Tuition: Cheruvier v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 7 (TC) Analysis

Date: Dec 18, 2013
Interpretation of VAT Exemptions for Private Niche Dance Tuition: Cheruvier v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 7 (TC) Analysis Introduction The case of Cheruvier (t/a Fleur Estelle Belly Dance School) v. Revenue &...
Christoforou v Standard Apartments Ltd: Upholding Indemnity Covenants for Tribunal Costs

Christoforou v Standard Apartments Ltd: Upholding Indemnity Covenants for Tribunal Costs

Date: Dec 18, 2013
Christoforou v Standard Apartments Ltd: Upholding Indemnity Covenants for Tribunal Costs Introduction Christoforou & Anor v. Standard Apartments Ltd ([2013] UKUT 0586 (LC)) is a pivotal case...
Defining Separation in Tax Credits: Insights from DG v. HMTC (TC) [2013]

Defining Separation in Tax Credits: Insights from DG v. HMTC (TC) [2013]

Date: Dec 14, 2013
Defining Separation in Tax Credits: Insights from DG v. HMTC (TC) [2013] Introduction The case of DG v. HMTC (TC) [2013] UKUT 631 (AAC) is a landmark decision by the Upper Tribunal (Administrative...
Presumption of Continuity and Burden of Proof: Insights from Newell v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 742 (TC)

Presumption of Continuity and Burden of Proof: Insights from Newell v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 742 (TC)

Date: Dec 14, 2013
Presumption of Continuity and Burden of Proof: Insights from Newell & Anor (t/a Tanya's Takeaway) v. Revenue & Customs ([2013] UKFTT 742 (TC)) Introduction The case of Newell & Anor (t/a Tanya's...
Edwards v Environment Agency: Defining Prohibitively Expensive Costs under the Aarhus Convention

Edwards v Environment Agency: Defining Prohibitively Expensive Costs under the Aarhus Convention

Date: Dec 12, 2013
Edwards v Environment Agency: Defining Prohibitively Expensive Costs under the Aarhus Convention Introduction The case of Edwards & Anor v. Environment Agency & Ors (No 2) ([2014] Env LR 17)...
Expansion of "Religious Worship" under PWRA: Hodkin v Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages

Expansion of "Religious Worship" under PWRA: Hodkin v Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages

Date: Dec 12, 2013
Expansion of "Religious Worship" under PWRA: Hodkin & Anor v Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages ([2014] 2 WLR 23) Introduction The landmark case Hodkin & Anor v Registrar-General of...
Conway v. Jam Factory Freehold Ltd: Service Charge Recovery and Section 20C Implications

Conway v. Jam Factory Freehold Ltd: Service Charge Recovery and Section 20C Implications

Date: Dec 11, 2013
Conway v. Jam Factory Freehold Ltd: Service Charge Recovery and Section 20C Implications Introduction Conway & Ors v. Jam Factory Freehold Ltd ([2013] UKUT 592 (LC)) is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Discovery Assessments Under Section 29 TMA: Insights from Sanderson v HMRC [2013] UKUT 623 (TCC)

Discovery Assessments Under Section 29 TMA: Insights from Sanderson v HMRC [2013] UKUT 623 (TCC)

Date: Dec 7, 2013
Discovery Assessments Under Section 29 TMA: Insights from Sanderson v HMRC [2013] UKUT 623 (TCC) Introduction The case of David Stephen Sanderson v. HMRC ([2013] UKUT 623 (TCC)) addresses the...
Iveco Ltd v Revenue & Customs: Extending VAT Recovery through Conformity with EU Directive

Iveco Ltd v Revenue & Customs: Extending VAT Recovery through Conformity with EU Directive

Date: Dec 7, 2013
Iveco Ltd v Revenue & Customs: Extending VAT Recovery through Conformity with EU Directive Introduction The case of Iveco Ltd v Revenue & Customs ([2013] UKFTT 763 (TC)) addresses pivotal issues...
Upper Tribunal Sets Precedent on Tribunal Jurisdiction and Procedural Time Limits in Council Tax Benefit Appeals

Upper Tribunal Sets Precedent on Tribunal Jurisdiction and Procedural Time Limits in Council Tax Benefit Appeals

Date: Dec 7, 2013
Upper Tribunal Sets Precedent on Tribunal Jurisdiction and Procedural Time Limits in Council Tax Benefit Appeals Introduction The case of DTM v. Kettering Borough Council (CTB) ([2013] UKUT 625...
Fonecomp Ltd v. HMRC: Upholding the Kittel Principle in MTIC VAT Fraud Cases

Fonecomp Ltd v. HMRC: Upholding the Kittel Principle in MTIC VAT Fraud Cases

Date: Dec 6, 2013
Fonecomp Ltd v. HMRC: Upholding the Kittel Principle in MTIC VAT Fraud Cases Introduction The case of Fonecomp Ltd v. HMRC ([2013] UKUT 599 (TCC)) addresses significant issues related to Value Added...
Strict Liability on Operators for Continuation Fee Compliance: McKee Homes Ltd v. Department of the Environment

Strict Liability on Operators for Continuation Fee Compliance: McKee Homes Ltd v. Department of the Environment

Date: Dec 6, 2013
Strict Liability on Operators for Continuation Fee Compliance: McKee Homes Ltd v. Department of the Environment Introduction McKee Homes Ltd v. Department of the Environment in Northern Ireland...
Defining Habitual Residence in International Child Abduction: Insights from KL (A Child) Re [2014] AC 1017

Defining Habitual Residence in International Child Abduction: Insights from KL (A Child) Re [2014] AC 1017

Date: Dec 5, 2013
Defining Habitual Residence in International Child Abduction: Insights from KL (A Child) Re [2014] AC 1017 Introduction The case of KL (A Child) Re [2014] AC 1017 represents a significant judicial...
Establishing Standards for Competition Remedies: Groupe Eurotunnel SA v. Competition Commission [2013] CAT 30

Establishing Standards for Competition Remedies: Groupe Eurotunnel SA v. Competition Commission [2013] CAT 30

Date: Dec 5, 2013
Establishing Standards for Competition Remedies: Groupe Eurotunnel SA v. Competition Commission [2013] CAT 30 Introduction The case of Groupe Eurotunnel SA v. Competition Commission & Ors ([2013] CAT...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert