Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Gang Evidence and Motive: Insights from Myers v. The Queen (Bermuda) [2015] UKPC 40

Admissibility of Gang Evidence and Motive: Insights from Myers v. The Queen (Bermuda) [2015] UKPC 40

Date: Oct 7, 2015
Admissibility of Gang Evidence and Motive: Insights from Myers v. The Queen (Bermuda) [2015] UKPC 40 Introduction Myers v. The Queen is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Privy Council on October 6,...
CTB v. White: Upholding Fairness in Public Tender Processes

CTB v. White: Upholding Fairness in Public Tender Processes

Date: Oct 7, 2015
CTB v. White: Upholding Fairness in Public Tender Processes Introduction The Central Tenders Board & Anor v White (t/a White Construction Services) (Montserrat) ([2015] UKPC 39) is a pivotal case...
Mohammed & Ors v Newcastle City Council ([2015] UKUT 439 (LC)) – A New Precedent on Lease Validity and Compensation in Compulsory Purchase Cases

Mohammed & Ors v Newcastle City Council ([2015] UKUT 439 (LC)) – A New Precedent on Lease Validity and Compensation in Compulsory Purchase Cases

Date: Oct 7, 2015
Mohammed & Ors v Newcastle City Council ([2015] UKUT 439 (LC)) – A New Precedent on Lease Validity and Compensation in Compulsory Purchase Cases Introduction The case of Mohammed & Ors v Newcastle...
Cain v. Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Islington: Establishing Limits on Challenging Service Charges

Cain v. Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Islington: Establishing Limits on Challenging Service Charges

Date: Sep 26, 2015
Cain v. Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Islington: Establishing Limits on Challenging Service Charges Introduction The case of Cain v. Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of...
Upper Tribunal Establishes Balanced Approach to 'Unduly Harsh' in Deportation Cases under Section 117

Upper Tribunal Establishes Balanced Approach to 'Unduly Harsh' in Deportation Cases under Section 117

Date: Sep 26, 2015
Upper Tribunal Establishes Balanced Approach to 'Unduly Harsh' in Deportation Cases under Section 117 Introduction The case of KMO ([2015] UKUT 543 (IAC)) represents a significant legal decision by...
Continuity of Residence for Pregnant EEA Nationals: Insights from Weldemichael and St Prix

Continuity of Residence for Pregnant EEA Nationals: Insights from Weldemichael and St Prix

Date: Sep 24, 2015
Continuity of Residence for Pregnant EEA Nationals: Insights from Weldemichael and St Prix Introduction The Upper Tribunal's decision in Weldemichael and another (St Prix C-507/12; effect) ([2015]...
Upper Tribunal Establishes Legal Boundaries of the Restrictive Leave to Remain (RLR) Policy

Upper Tribunal Establishes Legal Boundaries of the Restrictive Leave to Remain (RLR) Policy

Date: Sep 23, 2015
Upper Tribunal Establishes Legal Boundaries of the Restrictive Leave to Remain (RLR) Policy Introduction The case of MS, R (on the application of) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department...
Cozens v. Revenue & Customs: Invalidity of Global Excise Duty Assessment Due to Limitation Period

Cozens v. Revenue & Customs: Invalidity of Global Excise Duty Assessment Due to Limitation Period

Date: Sep 22, 2015
Cozens v. Revenue & Customs: Invalidity of Global Excise Duty Assessment Due to Limitation Period Introduction The case of Cozens v. Revenue & Customs ([2015] UKFTT 482 (TC)) addresses a pivotal...
Unfettered Tax Enquiry Powers Affirmed: Qualapharm Ltd v Revenue & Customs

Unfettered Tax Enquiry Powers Affirmed: Qualapharm Ltd v Revenue & Customs

Date: Sep 19, 2015
Unfettered Tax Enquiry Powers Affirmed: Qualapharm Ltd v Revenue & Customs Introduction The case of Qualapharm Ltd v. Revenue & Customs ([2015] UKFTT 479 (TC)) was adjudicated by the First-tier...
Expulsion from Membership as a Breach of Tenancy: Vine Housing Co-Operative Ltd v. Smith ([2015] UKUT 501 (LC))

Expulsion from Membership as a Breach of Tenancy: Vine Housing Co-Operative Ltd v. Smith ([2015] UKUT 501 (LC))

Date: Sep 16, 2015
Expulsion from Membership as a Breach of Tenancy: Vine Housing Co-Operative Ltd v. Smith ([2015] UKUT 501 (LC)) Introduction The case of Vine Housing Co-Operative Ltd v. Smith ([2015] UKUT 501 (LC))...
Recasting of the Essa Principles: Rehabilitation in EEA Deportation Appeals

Recasting of the Essa Principles: Rehabilitation in EEA Deportation Appeals

Date: Sep 12, 2015
Recasting of the Essa Principles: Rehabilitation in EEA Deportation Appeals Introduction The case of MC (Essa principles recast) ([2016] INLR 427) adjudicated by the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and...
PML Accounting Ltd v. Revenue & Customs: A Landmark Decision on Information Notices and Article 8 ECHR

PML Accounting Ltd v. Revenue & Customs: A Landmark Decision on Information Notices and Article 8 ECHR

Date: Sep 11, 2015
PML Accounting Ltd v. Revenue & Customs: A Landmark Decision on Information Notices and Article 8 ECHR Introduction PML Accounting Limited ("PML") mounted an appeal against penalty notices issued by...
Upper Tribunal's Interpretation of Saint Prix Rights in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. SFF & Ors [2015]

Upper Tribunal's Interpretation of Saint Prix Rights in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. SFF & Ors [2015]

Date: Sep 11, 2015
Upper Tribunal's Interpretation of Saint Prix Rights in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. SFF & Ors [2015] Introduction The case of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors v. SFF &...
Establishing VAT Repayment Protocols in Silent Periods: A Comprehensive Analysis of Why Pay More For Cars Ltd v. Revenue And Customs ([2015] STI 2686)

Establishing VAT Repayment Protocols in Silent Periods: A Comprehensive Analysis of Why Pay More For Cars Ltd v. Revenue And Customs ([2015] STI 2686)

Date: Sep 9, 2015
Establishing VAT Repayment Protocols in Silent Periods: A Comprehensive Analysis of Why Pay More For Cars Ltd v. Revenue And Customs ([2015] STI 2686) Introduction In the case of Why Pay More For...
Huitson v Revenue & Customs (2015): Reinforcing Anti-Tax Avoidance through Retrospective Legislation

Huitson v Revenue & Customs (2015): Reinforcing Anti-Tax Avoidance through Retrospective Legislation

Date: Sep 4, 2015
Huitson v Revenue & Customs (2015): Reinforcing Anti-Tax Avoidance through Retrospective Legislation Introduction Huitson v Revenue & Customs ([2015] STI 3587) is a pivotal case decided by the...
Upper Tribunal Upholds 'Same Roof Rule' in CICS 2012: Implications for Indirect Discrimination Claims

Upper Tribunal Upholds 'Same Roof Rule' in CICS 2012: Implications for Indirect Discrimination Claims

Date: Sep 2, 2015
Upper Tribunal Upholds 'Same Roof Rule' in CICS 2012: Implications for Indirect Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of JT v. First-tier Tribunal & Anor (Criminal Injuries Compensation:...
Lane v. Revenue & Customs: Establishing Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Excise Duty and Penalty Appeals

Lane v. Revenue & Customs: Establishing Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Excise Duty and Penalty Appeals

Date: Aug 27, 2015
Lane v. Revenue & Customs: Establishing Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Excise Duty and Penalty Appeals Introduction The case of Lane v. Revenue & Customs ([2015] UKFTT 423 (TC)) is a pivotal decision...
Degorce v HMRC [2015]: Defining the Boundaries of Trade in Tax Avoidance Schemes

Degorce v HMRC [2015]: Defining the Boundaries of Trade in Tax Avoidance Schemes

Date: Aug 25, 2015
Degorce v HMRC [2015]: Defining the Boundaries of Trade in Tax Avoidance Schemes Introduction The case of Degorce v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs ([2015] UKUT 447 (TCC))...
Limitation of the Zambrano Principle in Derivative Residence Claims: Ayinde and Thinjom v. Upper Tribunal

Limitation of the Zambrano Principle in Derivative Residence Claims: Ayinde and Thinjom v. Upper Tribunal

Date: Aug 14, 2015
Limitation of the Zambrano Principle in Derivative Residence Claims: Ayinde and Thinjom v. Upper Tribunal Introduction The case of Ayinde and Thinjom (Carers - Reg.15A - Zambrano) ([2015] UKUT 560...
Issue Estoppel and Abuse of Process in VAT Misdeclaration Penalties: Insights from Foneshops Ltd v. Revenue & Customs

Issue Estoppel and Abuse of Process in VAT Misdeclaration Penalties: Insights from Foneshops Ltd v. Revenue & Customs

Date: Aug 14, 2015
Issue Estoppel and Abuse of Process in VAT Misdeclaration Penalties: Insights from Foneshops Ltd v. Revenue & Customs Introduction The case of Foneshops Ltd v. Revenue & Customs (VAT - Penalties:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert