Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Enhanced Enforcement of Consumer Fee Transparency: Camden v. Foxtons Ltd

Enhanced Enforcement of Consumer Fee Transparency: Camden v. Foxtons Ltd

Date: Aug 26, 2017
Enhanced Enforcement of Consumer Fee Transparency: Camden v. Foxtons Ltd Introduction The case of London Borough of Camden v. Foxtons Ltd ([2017] UKUT 349 (AAC)) marks a significant development in...
Saimon [2017]: Clarifying Abandonment of Immigration Appeals Upon Appellant's Departure

Saimon [2017]: Clarifying Abandonment of Immigration Appeals Upon Appellant's Departure

Date: Aug 26, 2017
Saimon [2017]: Clarifying Abandonment of Immigration Appeals Upon Appellant's Departure Introduction The case of Md Jakir Hussan Saimon versus the Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017]...
Authoritative Country Guidance as Binding in Upper Tribunal Reviews: Adam [2017] UKUT 370 (IAC)

Authoritative Country Guidance as Binding in Upper Tribunal Reviews: Adam [2017] UKUT 370 (IAC)

Date: Aug 26, 2017
Authoritative Country Guidance as Binding in Upper Tribunal Reviews: Adam [2017] UKUT 370 (IAC) 1. Introduction The case of Meid Omar Adam versus the Secretary of State for the Home Department,...
Arranz v Secretary of State: New Precedents on Burden of Proof and Bouchereau Exception under EEA Regulations

Arranz v Secretary of State: New Precedents on Burden of Proof and Bouchereau Exception under EEA Regulations

Date: Aug 23, 2017
Arranz v Secretary of State: New Precedents on Burden of Proof and Bouchereau Exception under EEA Regulations Introduction The case of Antonio Troitino Arranz versus the Secretary of State for the...
Resulting Trusts and Consideration in Share Ownership: Insights from Chen v. Ng (British Virgin Islands) [2017] UKPC 27

Resulting Trusts and Consideration in Share Ownership: Insights from Chen v. Ng (British Virgin Islands) [2017] UKPC 27

Date: Aug 18, 2017
Resulting Trusts and Consideration in Share Ownership: Insights from Chen v. Ng (British Virgin Islands) [2017] UKPC 27 Introduction Chen v. Ng (British Virgin Islands) [2017] UKPC 27 is a pivotal...
Upper Tribunal Upholds Distinction Between Tier 2 and Tier 4 Visa Applicants Regarding 60-Day Grace Period

Upper Tribunal Upholds Distinction Between Tier 2 and Tier 4 Visa Applicants Regarding 60-Day Grace Period

Date: Aug 18, 2017
Upper Tribunal Upholds Distinction Between Tier 2 and Tier 4 Visa Applicants Regarding 60-Day Grace Period Introduction The case of R (on the application of Islam and Pathan) v Secretary of State for...
Establishing 'New Matters' in Immigration Appeals: Insights from Mahmud [2017] UKUT 488 (IAC)

Establishing 'New Matters' in Immigration Appeals: Insights from Mahmud [2017] UKUT 488 (IAC)

Date: Aug 17, 2017
Establishing 'New Matters' in Immigration Appeals: Insights from Mahmud [2017] UKUT 488 (IAC) Introduction The case of Mahmud [2017] UKUT 488 (IAC) serves as a pivotal judicial decision in the realm...
Procedural Fairness in Entrepreneur Visa Assessments Established in Anjum v Entry Clearance Officer [2017] UKUT 406

Procedural Fairness in Entrepreneur Visa Assessments Established in Anjum v Entry Clearance Officer [2017] UKUT 406

Date: Aug 17, 2017
Procedural Fairness in Entrepreneur Visa Assessments Established in Anjum v Entry Clearance Officer [2017] UKUT 406 Introduction The case of R (on the application of Anjum) v. Entry Clearance...
Comprehensive Commentary on Hull City AFC (Tigers) Ltd v. Revenue and Customs (2017)

Comprehensive Commentary on Hull City AFC (Tigers) Ltd v. Revenue and Customs (2017)

Date: Aug 15, 2017
Determining the Burden of Proof in Tax Appeals: An Analysis of Hull City AFC (Tigers) Ltd v. Revenue and Customs ([2017] UKFTT 629 (TC)) Introduction This commentary delves into the landmark decision...
Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd: Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 136 of the Equality Act 2010

Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd: Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 136 of the Equality Act 2010

Date: Aug 11, 2017
Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd: Clarifying the Burden of Proof under Section 136 of the Equality Act 2010 Introduction Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd (Race Discrimination) ([2017] IRLR 956) is a pivotal...
Reasonableness in HMRC Closure Notices: Frosh & Ors v. Revenue and Customs (SDLT) [2017] BTC 530

Reasonableness in HMRC Closure Notices: Frosh & Ors v. Revenue and Customs (SDLT) [2017] BTC 530

Date: Aug 9, 2017
Reasonableness in HMRC Closure Notices: Frosh & Ors v. Revenue and Customs (SDLT) [2017] BTC 530 Introduction The case Frosh & Ors v. Revenue and Customs (Stamp Duty Land Tax) ([2017] BTC 530) was...
Upper Tribunal Clarifies Article 3 Application: Paposhvili Test Not Permissible in UK Jurisprudence

Upper Tribunal Clarifies Article 3 Application: Paposhvili Test Not Permissible in UK Jurisprudence

Date: Aug 8, 2017
Upper Tribunal Clarifies Article 3 Application: Paposhvili Test Not Permissible in UK Jurisprudence Introduction The case EA & Ors (Article 3 medical cases - Paposhvili not applicable: Afghanistan)...
Corbelli Wines v. HMRC: Establishing Rigorous Standards for "Fit and Proper" Registrations under ALDA 1979

Corbelli Wines v. HMRC: Establishing Rigorous Standards for "Fit and Proper" Registrations under ALDA 1979

Date: Aug 8, 2017
Corbelli Wines v. HMRC: Establishing Rigorous Standards for "Fit and Proper" Registrations under ALDA 1979 Introduction The case of Corbelli & Anor (t/a Corbelli Wines) v. Revenue and Customs (EXCISE...
Upper Tribunal Establishes Right to Appeal for Late Mandatory Reconsideration Requests in ESA Cases

Upper Tribunal Establishes Right to Appeal for Late Mandatory Reconsideration Requests in ESA Cases

Date: Aug 4, 2017
Upper Tribunal Establishes Right to Appeal for Late Mandatory Reconsideration Requests in ESA Cases Introduction The case of R(CJ) and SG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA) ([2017] UKUT...
R v. M & Ors [2017] 1 WLR 3006: Clarifying Criminal Liability for Grey Market Goods Under the Trade Marks Act 1994

R v. M & Ors [2017] 1 WLR 3006: Clarifying Criminal Liability for Grey Market Goods Under the Trade Marks Act 1994

Date: Aug 4, 2017
R v. M & Ors [2017] 1 WLR 3006: Clarifying Criminal Liability for Grey Market Goods Under the Trade Marks Act 1994 Introduction The case of R v. M & Ors ([2017] 1 WLR 3006) adjudicated by the United...
MT Hojgaard AS v. EON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd & Anor: Enforceability of Technical Contract Terms in Offshore Wind Farm Projects

MT Hojgaard AS v. EON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd & Anor: Enforceability of Technical Contract Terms in Offshore Wind Farm Projects

Date: Aug 4, 2017
MT Hojgaard AS v. EON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd & Anor: Enforceability of Technical Contract Terms in Offshore Wind Farm Projects Introduction The case of MT Hojgaard AS v. EON...
Forge Care Homes Ltd v Cardiff and Vale UHB [2017] UKSC 56: Defining NHS Funding Responsibilities for Nursing Care in Social Settings

Forge Care Homes Ltd v Cardiff and Vale UHB [2017] UKSC 56: Defining NHS Funding Responsibilities for Nursing Care in Social Settings

Date: Aug 3, 2017
Forge Care Homes Ltd v Cardiff and Vale UHB [2017] UKSC 56: Defining NHS Funding Responsibilities for Nursing Care in Social Settings Introduction The case of Forge Care Homes Ltd & Ors v Cardiff and...
Clerical Errors in HMRC Enquiry Notices and the Application of Section 114 TMA – Revenue and Customs v. Michael Mabbutt

Clerical Errors in HMRC Enquiry Notices and the Application of Section 114 TMA – Revenue and Customs v. Michael Mabbutt

Date: Aug 3, 2017
Clerical Errors in HMRC Enquiry Notices and the Application of Section 114 TMA – Revenue and Customs v. Michael Mabbutt Introduction The case Revenue and Customs v. Michael Mabbutt ([2017] UKUT 289...
Employment Tribunals Empowered to Appoint Litigation Friends: Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Ltd

Employment Tribunals Empowered to Appoint Litigation Friends: Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Ltd

Date: Aug 1, 2017
Employment Tribunals Empowered to Appoint Litigation Friends: Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Ltd Introduction The case of Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Ltd & Ors ([2017] WLR(D) 613) addressed a critical...
FOIA Section 1 Cost Estimations Include Compliance with Separate Legal Obligations: Comprehensive Commentary on CFI v Information Commissioner ([2017] UKUT 318 (AAC))

FOIA Section 1 Cost Estimations Include Compliance with Separate Legal Obligations: Comprehensive Commentary on CFI v Information Commissioner ([2017] UKUT 318 (AAC))

Date: Aug 1, 2017
FOIA Section 1 Cost Estimations Include Compliance with Separate Legal Obligations: Comprehensive Commentary on CFI v Information Commissioner ([2017] UKUT 318 (AAC)) Introduction The case of Cruelty...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert