Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

AJ (s 94B: Kiarie and Byndloss questions) Nigeria [2018] UKUT 115 (IAC): A Landmark in Immigration Law

AJ (s 94B: Kiarie and Byndloss questions) Nigeria [2018] UKUT 115 (IAC): A Landmark in Immigration Law

Date: Mar 1, 2018
AJ (s 94B: Kiarie and Byndloss questions) Nigeria [2018] UKUT 115 (IAC): A Landmark in Immigration Law Introduction The case of AJ (s 94B: Kiarie and Byndloss questions) Nigeria [2018] UKUT 115 (IAC)...
Assumption of Responsibility and Solicitors' Duty of Care: Steel & Anor v. NRAM Ltd Analysis

Assumption of Responsibility and Solicitors' Duty of Care: Steel & Anor v. NRAM Ltd Analysis

Date: Mar 1, 2018
Assumption of Responsibility and Solicitors' Duty of Care: Steel & Anor v. NRAM Ltd Introduction The landmark case of Steel & Anor v. NRAM Ltd (formerly NRAM Plc) (Scotland) ([2018] 1 WLR 1190)...
Directors as Trustees under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1980: Burnden Holdings v. Fielding & Anor

Directors as Trustees under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1980: Burnden Holdings v. Fielding & Anor

Date: Mar 1, 2018
Directors as Trustees under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1980: Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd v. Fielding & Anor Introduction The case of Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd v. Fielding & Anor ([2018] WLR(D)...
Leeks v. Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Procedural Fairness in Disability Discrimination Claims

Leeks v. Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Procedural Fairness in Disability Discrimination Claims

Date: Feb 28, 2018
Leeks v. Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Procedural Fairness in Disability Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Leeks v. Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital...
Ensuring Judicial Independence: Insights from Almazeedi v. Penner and Anor (Cayman Islands) [2018] UKPC 3

Ensuring Judicial Independence: Insights from Almazeedi v. Penner and Anor (Cayman Islands) [2018] UKPC 3

Date: Feb 27, 2018
Ensuring Judicial Independence: Insights from Almazeedi v. Penner and Anor ([2018] UKPC 3) Introduction Almazeedi v. Penner and Anor is a significant judgment delivered by the Privy Council on...
Upper Tribunal Rules That Failure to Offer a Review Under s83A VATA Does Not Invalidate HMRC's Penalty Assessments: Revenue and Customs v NT ADA Ltd [2018] UKUT 59 (TCC)

Upper Tribunal Rules That Failure to Offer a Review Under s83A VATA Does Not Invalidate HMRC's Penalty Assessments: Revenue and Customs v NT ADA Ltd [2018] UKUT 59 (TCC)

Date: Feb 23, 2018
Upper Tribunal Rules That Failure to Offer a Review Under s83A VATA Does Not Invalidate HMRC's Penalty Assessments: Revenue and Customs v NT ADA Ltd [2018] UKUT 59 (TCC) Introduction Revenue and...
Metropolitan Police Investigative Duty under Article 3 ECHR: A Landmark Ruling

Metropolitan Police Investigative Duty under Article 3 ECHR: A Landmark Ruling

Date: Feb 22, 2018
Metropolitan Police Investigative Duty under Article 3 ECHR: A Landmark Ruling Introduction In the seminal case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v. DSD & Anor (Rev 1) ([2018] 2 WLR 895),...
Validation of Electronic Service: Barton v Wright Hassal LLP Reaffirms Strict Compliance for Litigants In Person

Validation of Electronic Service: Barton v Wright Hassal LLP Reaffirms Strict Compliance for Litigants In Person

Date: Feb 22, 2018
Validation of Electronic Service: Barton v Wright Hassal LLP Reaffirms Strict Compliance for Litigants In Person Introduction In the landmark case of Barton (Appellant) v. Wright Hassal LLP ([2018]...
Moss v. The Information Commissioner: Clarifying FOIA's Cost Limit Exemption and Scope of Requests

Moss v. The Information Commissioner: Clarifying FOIA's Cost Limit Exemption and Scope of Requests

Date: Feb 17, 2018
Moss v. The Information Commissioner: Clarifying FOIA's Cost Limit Exemption and Scope of Requests Introduction The case of Moss v. The Information Commissioner ([2018] UKFTT 2017_0056 (GRC))...
Expanding Disability Discrimination Claims: Insights from Reuters Ltd v. Cole

Expanding Disability Discrimination Claims: Insights from Reuters Ltd v. Cole

Date: Feb 17, 2018
Expanding Disability Discrimination Claims: Insights from Reuters Ltd v. Cole Introduction The case of Reuters Ltd v. Cole ([2018] UKEAT 0258_17_1602) addresses pivotal issues surrounding the...
Establishing Repudiatory Retention under the Hague Abduction Convention: Insights from C (Children) Re (Rev 1) [2018] UKSC 1

Establishing Repudiatory Retention under the Hague Abduction Convention: Insights from C (Children) Re (Rev 1) [2018] UKSC 1

Date: Feb 15, 2018
Establishing Repudiatory Retention under the Hague Abduction Convention: Insights from C (Children) Re (Rev 1) [2018] UKSC 1 Introduction The case C (Children) Re (Rev 1) ([2018] 2 WLR 683),...
Recognition of Kefalah-Based Guardianship Under EU Free Movement Laws

Recognition of Kefalah-Based Guardianship Under EU Free Movement Laws

Date: Feb 15, 2018
Recognition of Kefalah-Based Guardianship Under EU Free Movement Laws Introduction In the landmark case of SM (Algeria) v. Entry Clearance Officer, UK Visa Section ([2018] UKSC 9), the United Kingdom...
Mott v Environment Agency: Balancing Environmental Protection and Property Rights under A1P1

Mott v Environment Agency: Balancing Environmental Protection and Property Rights under A1P1

Date: Feb 15, 2018
Mott v Environment Agency: Balancing Environmental Protection and Property Rights under A1P1 Introduction The case of Mott v Environment Agency ([2018] WLR(D) 86) is a seminal judgment by the United...
Upper Tribunal Sets Aside HMRC’s Strike Out of Excise Duty Appeal in Revenue and Customs v Hill

Upper Tribunal Sets Aside HMRC’s Strike Out of Excise Duty Appeal in Revenue and Customs v Hill

Date: Feb 15, 2018
Upper Tribunal Sets Aside HMRC’s Strike Out of Excise Duty Appeal in Revenue and Customs v Hill Introduction The case of Revenue and Customs v. Hill ([2018] UKUT 45 (TCC)) presents a significant...
Wood v. Revenue and Customs: Essential Notice Requirement for Schedule 55 Penalties

Wood v. Revenue and Customs: Essential Notice Requirement for Schedule 55 Penalties

Date: Feb 14, 2018
Wood v. Revenue and Customs: Essential Notice Requirement for Schedule 55 Penalties Introduction Wood v. Revenue and Customs ([2018] UKFTT 74 (TC)) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the First-tier...
Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd v. HMRC: Establishing Employment Status Under IR35 Legislation

Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd v. HMRC: Establishing Employment Status Under IR35 Legislation

Date: Feb 11, 2018
Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd v. HMRC: Establishing Employment Status Under IR35 Legislation Introduction The case of Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd v. Revenue and Customs ([2018] UKFTT 69 (TC)) examines the...
Limits on Immigration Bail: The Supreme Court's Decision in B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Limits on Immigration Bail: The Supreme Court's Decision in B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Date: Feb 9, 2018
Limits on Immigration Bail: The Supreme Court's Decision in B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Introduction The case of B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department...
Establishing Inviolability of Diplomatic Documents and Its Implications: Commentary on R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2018]

Establishing Inviolability of Diplomatic Documents and Its Implications: Commentary on R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2018]

Date: Feb 9, 2018
Establishing Inviolability of Diplomatic Documents and Its Implications: Commentary on R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2018] Introduction The case of Bancoult,...
Chevron North Sea Ltd v HM Inspector of Health and Safety: Expanding the Scope of Section 24 Appeals under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

Chevron North Sea Ltd v HM Inspector of Health and Safety: Expanding the Scope of Section 24 Appeals under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

Date: Feb 9, 2018
Chevron North Sea Ltd v HM Inspector of Health and Safety: Expanding the Scope of Section 24 Appeals under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 Introduction In the landmark case of HM...
The Advocate General for Scotland v. Romein: A Landmark Decision on British Citizenship by Descent Through the Female Line

The Advocate General for Scotland v. Romein: A Landmark Decision on British Citizenship by Descent Through the Female Line

Date: Feb 9, 2018
Expanding British Citizenship: The Advocate General for Scotland v. Romein and Its Implications Introduction The case of The Advocate General for Scotland v. Romein (Scotland) (Rev 1) ([2018] UKSC 6)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert