Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Establishing Benchmarks for the Reasonable Time Requirement under Article 6(1) in Cases Involving Police Officers and Juveniles: Commentary on Procurator Fiscal, Linlithgow v. Watson & Anor (2002) SLT 229

Establishing Benchmarks for the Reasonable Time Requirement under Article 6(1) in Cases Involving Police Officers and Juveniles: Commentary on Procurator Fiscal, Linlithgow v. Watson & Anor (2002) SLT 229

Date: Jan 30, 2002
Establishing Benchmarks for the Reasonable Time Requirement under Article 6(1) in Cases Involving Police Officers and Juveniles: Commentary on Procurator Fiscal, Linlithgow v. Watson & Anor (2002)...
Confiscation Orders under the Criminal Justice Act 1988: Compatibility with Human Rights - R v Rezvi [2002] UKHL 1

Confiscation Orders under the Criminal Justice Act 1988: Compatibility with Human Rights - R v Rezvi [2002] UKHL 1

Date: Jan 25, 2002
Confiscation Orders under the Criminal Justice Act 1988: Compatibility with Human Rights Introduction The case of Regina v. Rezvi [2002] UKHL 1 presents pivotal considerations regarding the...
R v Benjafield [2002] UKHL 2: Upholding Confiscation Orders under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 in Alignment with ECHR Rights

R v Benjafield [2002] UKHL 2: Upholding Confiscation Orders under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 in Alignment with ECHR Rights

Date: Jan 25, 2002
R v Benjafield [2002] UKHL 2: Upholding Confiscation Orders under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 in Alignment with ECHR Rights Introduction The case of R v Benjafield [2002] UKHL 2 is a pivotal...
Absence of Legitimate Expectation in Asylum Certificates: Zeqiri v Home Department [2002]

Absence of Legitimate Expectation in Asylum Certificates: Zeqiri v Home Department [2002]

Date: Jan 25, 2002
Absence of Legitimate Expectation in Asylum Certificates: Zeqiri v Home Department [2002] Introduction The case of Zeqiri, R (on the Application of) v. Secretary of State For The Home Department...
Clarifying the Application of Paragraph 9(4)(b) and Article 3 in UK Asylum Law: SC v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKIAT 00054

Clarifying the Application of Paragraph 9(4)(b) and Article 3 in UK Asylum Law: SC v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKIAT 00054

Date: Jan 24, 2002
Clarifying the Application of Paragraph 9(4)(b) and Article 3 in UK Asylum Law: SC v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKIAT 00054 Introduction The case of SC v. Secretary of State...
Enforcement of Statutory Holiday Pay Under Employment Rights Act 1996: Insights from List Design Group Ltd v. Douglas & Ors

Enforcement of Statutory Holiday Pay Under Employment Rights Act 1996: Insights from List Design Group Ltd v. Douglas & Ors

Date: Jan 23, 2002
Enforcement of Statutory Holiday Pay Under Employment Rights Act 1996: Insights from List Design Group Ltd v. Douglas & Ors Introduction The case of List Design Group Ltd v. Douglas & Ors ([2003]...
Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v. Office of Communications: Establishing Abuse of Dominant Position through Strategic Pricing

Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v. Office of Communications: Establishing Abuse of Dominant Position through Strategic Pricing

Date: Jan 16, 2002
Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v. Office of Communications: Establishing Abuse of Dominant Position through Strategic Pricing Introduction The case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd & Ors v....
Determining the Status of Undertakings under the Competition Act 1998: BetterCare Group Ltd v. Director General of Fair Trading

Determining the Status of Undertakings under the Competition Act 1998: BetterCare Group Ltd v. Director General of Fair Trading

Date: Dec 21, 2001
Determining the Status of Undertakings under the Competition Act 1998: BetterCare Group Ltd v. Director General of Fair Trading Introduction The case of BetterCare Group Ltd v. The Director General...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 65 Appeals Under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999: Insights from STARRED Kehinde Case

Clarifying the Scope of Section 65 Appeals Under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999: Insights from STARRED Kehinde Case

Date: Dec 20, 2001
Clarifying the Scope of Section 65 Appeals Under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999: Insights from STARRED Kehinde Case Introduction The landmark case of STARRED Kehinde (Appeal, Section 65 1999...
Gupta v. GMC: Clarifying the Duty to Provide Reasons in Professional Conduct Proceedings

Gupta v. GMC: Clarifying the Duty to Provide Reasons in Professional Conduct Proceedings

Date: Dec 19, 2001
Gupta v. General Medical Council (GMC): Clarifying the Duty to Provide Reasons in Professional Conduct Proceedings Introduction Gupta v. General Medical Council (GMC) ((2002) 64 BMLR 56) is a pivotal...
STARRED Z v. Secretary Of State [2002] UKIAT 232: Clarifying Appeals for Incorrect Removal Directions

STARRED Z v. Secretary Of State [2002] UKIAT 232: Clarifying Appeals for Incorrect Removal Directions

Date: Dec 19, 2001
STARRED Z v. Secretary Of State [2002] UKIAT 232: Clarifying Appeals for Incorrect Removal Directions Introduction STARRED Z v. Secretary Of State For The Home Department ([2002] UKIAT 232) is a...
Jurisdiction in Extradition: House of Lords Confirms Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Re Al-Fawwaz

Jurisdiction in Extradition: House of Lords Confirms Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Re Al-Fawwaz

Date: Dec 18, 2001
Jurisdiction in Extradition: House of Lords Confirms Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Re Al-Fawwaz Introduction In the landmark case of Al-Fawwaz, Re ([2002] 2 WLR 101), the United Kingdom House of...
Exceptional Circumstances for Sole Adoption Under Section 15(3) of the Adoption Act 1976: A Comprehensive Commentary on B (A Minor), Re [2002] WLR 258

Exceptional Circumstances for Sole Adoption Under Section 15(3) of the Adoption Act 1976: A Comprehensive Commentary on B (A Minor), Re [2002] WLR 258

Date: Dec 18, 2001
Exceptional Circumstances for Sole Adoption Under Section 15(3) of the Adoption Act 1976: A Comprehensive Commentary on B (A Minor), Re [2002] WLR 258 Introduction The case of B (A Minor), Re [2002]...
Establishing Origin Mark Requirements for Imported Citrus Fruits: Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Ex P S P Anastasiou (Pissouri) Limited and Others

Establishing Origin Mark Requirements for Imported Citrus Fruits: Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Ex P S P Anastasiou (Pissouri) Limited and Others

Date: Dec 18, 2001
Establishing Origin Mark Requirements for Imported Citrus Fruits: Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Ex P S P Anastasiou (Pissouri) Limited and Others Introduction The case of Minister of...
Donohue v. Armco Inc and Others: Enforcement of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in International Litigation

Donohue v. Armco Inc and Others: Enforcement of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in International Litigation

Date: Dec 14, 2001
Donohue v. Armco Inc and Others: Enforcement of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in International Litigation Introduction Donohue v. Armco Inc and Others ([2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep 425) is a landmark case...
Smith v. [2001] UKHL 68: Defining Pecuniary Advantage in Criminal Confiscation

Smith v. [2001] UKHL 68: Defining Pecuniary Advantage in Criminal Confiscation

Date: Dec 14, 2001
Smith v. [2001] UKHL 68: Defining Pecuniary Advantage in Criminal Confiscation Introduction Smith v. [2001] UKHL 68 is a pivotal judgment delivered by the United Kingdom House of Lords on December...
Turner v Grovit: Upholding English Anti-Suit Injunctions under the Brussels Convention

Turner v Grovit: Upholding English Anti-Suit Injunctions under the Brussels Convention

Date: Dec 14, 2001
Turner v Grovit: Upholding English Anti-Suit Injunctions under the Brussels Convention Introduction Turner v Grovit and Others ([2002] ICR 94) is a landmark case adjudicated by the House of Lords in...
Magill v Porter [2001]: House of Lords Prohibits Misuse of Local Authority Powers for Electoral Advantage

Magill v Porter [2001]: House of Lords Prohibits Misuse of Local Authority Powers for Electoral Advantage

Date: Dec 14, 2001
Magill v Porter [2001]: House of Lords Prohibits Misuse of Local Authority Powers for Electoral Advantage Introduction Magill v Porter [2001] UKHL 67 is a landmark judgment delivered by the House of...
Interpreting Joint Mortgages and Joint and Several Liability: Insights from AIB Group (UK) Plc v. Martin [2001] UKHL 63

Interpreting Joint Mortgages and Joint and Several Liability: Insights from AIB Group (UK) Plc v. Martin [2001] UKHL 63

Date: Dec 14, 2001
Interpreting Joint Mortgages and Joint and Several Liability: Insights from AIB Group (UK) Plc v. Martin [2001] UKHL 63 Introduction AIB Group (UK) Plc v. Martin and Another is a seminal case decided...
Pendleton v. Regina: Clarifying the Test for Fresh Evidence in Criminal Appeals

Pendleton v. Regina: Clarifying the Test for Fresh Evidence in Criminal Appeals

Date: Dec 14, 2001
Pendleton v. Regina: Clarifying the Test for Fresh Evidence in Criminal Appeals Introduction Pendleton v. Regina [2001] UKHL 66 is a landmark decision delivered by the House of Lords on December 13,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert