Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Barker v. Corus (UK) Plc: Apportionment of Liability under the Fairchild Exception

Barker v. Corus (UK) Plc: Apportionment of Liability under the Fairchild Exception

Date: May 4, 2006
Barker v. Corus (UK) Plc: Apportionment of Liability under the Fairchild Exception Introduction Barker v. Corus (UK) Plc ([2006] 2 AC 572) is a landmark decision by the United Kingdom House of Lords...
Ensuring Legal Compliance in Immigration Appeals: Insights from CP v Dominica

Ensuring Legal Compliance in Immigration Appeals: Insights from CP v Dominica

Date: May 4, 2006
Ensuring Legal Compliance in Immigration Appeals: Insights from CP v Dominica Introduction The case of CP v Dominica ([2006] UKAIT 00040) presents a significant judicial examination of the...
Boulding v. Land Securities Trillium: A Landmark Judgment on Whistle-Blowing and Unfair Dismissal

Boulding v. Land Securities Trillium: A Landmark Judgment on Whistle-Blowing and Unfair Dismissal

Date: May 4, 2006
Boulding v. Land Securities Trillium: A Landmark Judgment on Whistle-Blowing and Unfair Dismissal Introduction The case of Boulding v. Land Securities Trillium (Media Services) Ltd ([2006] UKEAT...
Age-Based Employment Legislation and Indirect Sex Discrimination: Analysis of Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v. Rutherford & Ors ([2006] 4 All ER 577)

Age-Based Employment Legislation and Indirect Sex Discrimination: Analysis of Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v. Rutherford & Ors ([2006] 4 All ER 577)

Date: May 4, 2006
Age-Based Employment Legislation and Indirect Sex Discrimination: Analysis of Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v. Rutherford & Ors ([2006] 4 All ER 577) Introduction Secretary of State for...
Surrey County Council v. Hay: Redefining Reasonable Adjustments in Disability Discrimination Law

Surrey County Council v. Hay: Redefining Reasonable Adjustments in Disability Discrimination Law

Date: Apr 29, 2006
Surrey County Council v. Hay: Redefining Reasonable Adjustments in Disability Discrimination Law Introduction Surrey County Council v. Hay ([2006] UKEAT 0710_05_2804) is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Moyhing v Barts and London NHS Trust: Establishing Detriment in Direct Sex Discrimination Cases

Moyhing v Barts and London NHS Trust: Establishing Detriment in Direct Sex Discrimination Cases

Date: Apr 29, 2006
Moyhing v Barts and London NHS Trust: Establishing Detriment in Direct Sex Discrimination Cases Introduction Moyhing v Barts and London NHS Trust ([2006] IRLR 860) is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Individual Assessment Required for Baha'i Asylum Claims - SH (Baha'is) Iran CG

Individual Assessment Required for Baha'i Asylum Claims - SH (Baha'is) Iran CG

Date: Apr 28, 2006
Individual Assessment Required for Baha'i Asylum Claims - SH (Baha'is) Iran CG Introduction The case of SH (Baha'is) Iran CG ([2006] UKAIT 00041) presents a critical examination of asylum claims made...
Judicial Oversight of Executive Decisions in Constitutional Crises: Insights from Bobb & Anor v. Manning

Judicial Oversight of Executive Decisions in Constitutional Crises: Insights from Bobb & Anor v. Manning

Date: Apr 26, 2006
Judicial Oversight of Executive Decisions in Constitutional Crises: Insights from Bobb & Anor v. Manning Introduction The case Bobb & Anor v. Manning ([2006] UKPC 22) serves as a pivotal judicial...
Judicial Review of Director of Public Prosecutions' Decisions in Mauritius: Mohit v DPP

Judicial Review of Director of Public Prosecutions' Decisions in Mauritius: Mohit v DPP

Date: Apr 26, 2006
Judicial Review of Director of Public Prosecutions' Decisions in Mauritius: Mohit v DPP Introduction The case of Mohit v. The Director of Public Prosecutions of Mauritius ([2006] WLR 3343) presents a...
Defining "Family Member" in Immigration Appeals: RK v UKAIT [2006] UKAIT 45

Defining "Family Member" in Immigration Appeals: RK v UKAIT [2006] UKAIT 45

Date: Apr 25, 2006
Defining "Family Member" in Immigration Appeals: RK v UKAIT [2006] UKAIT 45 Introduction The case of RK v United Kingdom Asylum and Immigration Tribunal [2006] UKAIT 45 involves an appellant from...
Arora v. Rockwell Automation Ltd: Extending the Time Limits for Unauthorized Wage Deductions under the Employment Rights Act 1996

Arora v. Rockwell Automation Ltd: Extending the Time Limits for Unauthorized Wage Deductions under the Employment Rights Act 1996

Date: Apr 22, 2006
Arora v. Rockwell Automation Ltd: Extending the Time Limits for Unauthorized Wage Deductions under the Employment Rights Act 1996 Introduction The case of Arora v. Rockwell Automation Ltd ([2006]...
MG (Christians, including Coptic Christians) Sudan CG Judgment Analysis

MG (Christians, including Coptic Christians) Sudan CG Judgment Analysis

Date: Apr 21, 2006
MG (Christians, including Coptic Christians) Sudan CG ([2006] UKAIT 47) Judgment: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of MG (Christians, including Coptic Christians) Sudan CG ([2006] UKAIT...
Reconsideration Scope under Section 103A: Implications from AH (Sudan) Judgment

Reconsideration Scope under Section 103A: Implications from AH (Sudan) Judgment

Date: Apr 20, 2006
Reconsideration Scope under Section 103A: Implications from AH (Sudan) Judgment Introduction The case of AH (Scope of s103A reconsideration) Sudan ([2006] UKAIT 38) presents a pivotal moment in the...
Strict Interpretation of Paragraph 289A Limits Discretion in Domestic Violence Asylum Claims

Strict Interpretation of Paragraph 289A Limits Discretion in Domestic Violence Asylum Claims

Date: Apr 19, 2006
Strict Interpretation of Paragraph 289A Limits Discretion in Domestic Violence Asylum Claims Introduction The case of RH (Para 289A/HC395, no discretion) Bangladesh ([2006] UKAIT 00043) presents a...
FN v UK: Defining Viable Options for Article 8 Claims in Removal to Eritrea

FN v UK: Defining Viable Options for Article 8 Claims in Removal to Eritrea

Date: Apr 19, 2006
FN v UK: Defining Viable Options for Article 8 Claims in Removal to Eritrea Introduction The case of FN (Article 8, Removal, Viable Options) Eritrea ([2006] UKAIT 00044) is a pivotal judgment by the...
RM (Kwok On Tong: HC395 para 320) India ([2006] UKAIT 00039): Establishing Credibility and Compliance Standards in Immigration Law

RM (Kwok On Tong: HC395 para 320) India ([2006] UKAIT 00039): Establishing Credibility and Compliance Standards in Immigration Law

Date: Apr 19, 2006
RM (Kwok On Tong: HC395 para 320) India ([2006] UKAIT 00039): Establishing Credibility and Compliance Standards in Immigration Law Introduction The case of RM (Kwok On Tong: HC395 para 320) India...
Mandatory Compliance with Redundancy Dismissal Procedures: Insights from Alexander & Anor v Bridgen Enterprises Ltd

Mandatory Compliance with Redundancy Dismissal Procedures: Insights from Alexander & Anor v Bridgen Enterprises Ltd

Date: Apr 13, 2006
Mandatory Compliance with Redundancy Dismissal Procedures: Insights from Alexander & Anor v. Bridgen Enterprises Ltd ([2006] ICR 1277) Introduction The case of Alexander & Anor v. Bridgen Enterprises...
BO and Others [2006] UKAIT 00035: Establishing Criteria for Extending Appeal Deadlines in Immigration Cases

BO and Others [2006] UKAIT 00035: Establishing Criteria for Extending Appeal Deadlines in Immigration Cases

Date: Apr 13, 2006
BO and Others [2006] UKAIT 00035: Establishing Criteria for Extending Appeal Deadlines in Immigration Cases Introduction The case of BO and Others (Extension of time for appealing) Nigeria ([2006]...
Clarifying the Non-Retrospective Application of s98A(2) in Unfair Dismissal Claims: Mason v. Ward End Primary School

Clarifying the Non-Retrospective Application of s98A(2) in Unfair Dismissal Claims: Mason v. Ward End Primary School

Date: Apr 13, 2006
Clarifying the Non-Retrospective Application of s98A(2) in Unfair Dismissal Claims: Mason v. Ward End Primary School Introduction Mason v. Ward End Primary School ([2006] UKEAT 0433_05_1204) is a...
Hemsley v. Information Commissioner: Upholding FOIA Exemptions for Public Safety in Speed Camera Data

Hemsley v. Information Commissioner: Upholding FOIA Exemptions for Public Safety in Speed Camera Data

Date: Apr 11, 2006
Hemsley v. Information Commissioner: Upholding FOIA Exemptions for Public Safety in Speed Camera Data Introduction Hemsley v. The Information Commissioner ([2006] UKIT EA_2005_0026) is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert