Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Pilecki v. Circuit Court of Legnica: Clarifying Aggregated Sentences in European Arrest Warrants

Pilecki v. Circuit Court of Legnica: Clarifying Aggregated Sentences in European Arrest Warrants

Date: Feb 7, 2008
Pilecki v. Circuit Court of Legnica: Clarifying Aggregated Sentences in European Arrest Warrants Introduction Pilecki v. Circuit Court of Legnica, Poland ([2008] 4 All ER 445) is a pivotal case...
Premises Definition Clarified: Majorstake Ltd v. Curtis [2008]

Premises Definition Clarified: Majorstake Ltd v. Curtis [2008]

Date: Feb 7, 2008
Premises Definition Clarified: Majorstake Ltd v. Curtis [2008] Introduction Majorstake Ltd v. Curtis ([2008] 2 All ER 303) is a landmark decision by the United Kingdom House of Lords that delves into...
Inclusive Interpretation of 'Property' under the Proceeds of Crime Order: Re Maye [2008] NI 173

Inclusive Interpretation of 'Property' under the Proceeds of Crime Order: Re Maye [2008] NI 173

Date: Feb 7, 2008
Inclusive Interpretation of 'Property' under the Proceeds of Crime Order: Re Maye [2008] NI 173 Introduction The case of Maye, Re (Northern Ireland) [2008] NI 173 addresses pivotal issues concerning...
Revisiting Section 108 Procedures: Enhancing Fairness in Immigration Tribunal Proceedings

Revisiting Section 108 Procedures: Enhancing Fairness in Immigration Tribunal Proceedings

Date: Feb 2, 2008
Revisiting Section 108 Procedures: Enhancing Fairness in Immigration Tribunal Proceedings Introduction The case of MK (Family Reunion Policy: Scope) Somalia ([2007] UKIAT 00096) deals with crucial...
Ensuring Impartiality in Public Commissions: The Precedent Set by Duffy v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

Ensuring Impartiality in Public Commissions: The Precedent Set by Duffy v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

Date: Jan 31, 2008
Ensuring Impartiality in Public Commissions: The Precedent Set by Duffy v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Introduction The judicial decision in Duffy v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland...
House of Lords Establishes Broader Interpretation of "House" under Leasehold Reform Act 1967 in Boss Holdings Ltd v. Grosvenor West End Properties

House of Lords Establishes Broader Interpretation of "House" under Leasehold Reform Act 1967 in Boss Holdings Ltd v. Grosvenor West End Properties

Date: Jan 31, 2008
House of Lords Establishes Broader Interpretation of "House" under Leasehold Reform Act 1967 in Boss Holdings Ltd v. Grosvenor West End Properties Introduction The case of Boss Holdings Ltd v....
Hilali Re [2008] UKHL 3: Affirming Mutual Recognition and Limiting Habeas Corpus in European Arrest Warrants

Hilali Re [2008] UKHL 3: Affirming Mutual Recognition and Limiting Habeas Corpus in European Arrest Warrants

Date: Jan 31, 2008
Hilali Re [2008] UKHL 3: Affirming Mutual Recognition and Limiting Habeas Corpus in European Arrest Warrants Introduction The case of Hilali Re ([2008] UKHL 3) presents a significant judicial...
A v. Hoare: Redefining Limitation Periods for Sexual Abuse Claims

A v. Hoare: Redefining Limitation Periods for Sexual Abuse Claims

Date: Jan 31, 2008
A v. Hoare: Redefining Limitation Periods for Sexual Abuse Claims Introduction A v. Hoare ([2008] 1 AC 844) is a landmark judgment delivered by the United Kingdom House of Lords on January 30, 2008....
Extension of Reynolds Principles on Qualified Privilege in Defamation Law: Seaga v Harper

Extension of Reynolds Principles on Qualified Privilege in Defamation Law: Seaga v Harper

Date: Jan 31, 2008
Extension of Reynolds Principles on Qualified Privilege in Defamation Law: Seaga v Harper Introduction The case of Seaga v. Harper (Jamaica) ([2008] 1 All ER 965) revolves around a defamation action...
Clarifying Subsidiary Protection in Internal Armed Conflicts: HH & Others v Somalia CG [2008] UKAIT 00022

Clarifying Subsidiary Protection in Internal Armed Conflicts: HH & Others v Somalia CG [2008] UKAIT 00022

Date: Jan 29, 2008
Clarifying Subsidiary Protection in Internal Armed Conflicts: HH & Others v Somalia CG [2008] UKAIT 00022 Introduction The case of HH & Others v Somalia CG [2008] UKAIT 00022 is a landmark decision...
RZ (Eurodac Fingerprint Match Admissibility) Eritrea [2008] UKAIT 00007: A Comprehensive Commentary

RZ (Eurodac Fingerprint Match Admissibility) Eritrea [2008] UKAIT 00007: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jan 29, 2008
RZ (Eurodac Fingerprint Match Admissibility) Eritrea [2008] UKAIT 00007: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction The case of RZ (Eurodac Fingerprint Match Admissibility) Eritrea [2008] UKAIT 00007...
Time Limits for Disability Discrimination Claims under TUPE: Insights from Kingston Upon Hull City Council v Matuszowicz

Time Limits for Disability Discrimination Claims under TUPE: Insights from Kingston Upon Hull City Council v Matuszowicz

Date: Jan 29, 2008
Time Limits for Disability Discrimination Claims under TUPE: Insights from Kingston Upon Hull City Council v. Matuszowicz Introduction The case of Kingston Upon Hull City Council v. Matuszowicz...
Reaffirming Jurisdictional Priority under the Lugano Convention: Phillips & Anor v. Symes & Ors [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 918

Reaffirming Jurisdictional Priority under the Lugano Convention: Phillips & Anor v. Symes & Ors [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 918

Date: Jan 24, 2008
Reaffirming Jurisdictional Priority under the Lugano Convention: Phillips & Anor v. Symes & Ors [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 918 Introduction The case of Phillips & Anor v. Symes & Ors ([2008] 1 All ER...
Disapplication of Retrospective VAT Time Limits: Fleming v Revenue and Customs [2008] UKHL 2

Disapplication of Retrospective VAT Time Limits: Fleming v Revenue and Customs [2008] UKHL 2

Date: Jan 24, 2008
Disapplication of Retrospective VAT Time Limits: Fleming v Revenue and Customs [2008] UKHL 2 Introduction The case of Fleming (t/a Bodycraft) v Revenue and Customs ([2008] UKHL 2) addresses critical...
Comprehensive Commentary on Jumard v. Clywd Leisure Ltd & Ors ([2008] IRLR 345)

Comprehensive Commentary on Jumard v. Clywd Leisure Ltd & Ors ([2008] IRLR 345)

Date: Jan 22, 2008
Jumard v. Clywd Leisure Ltd & Ors: Establishing Nuances in Discrimination Compensation 1. Introduction Jumard v. Clywd Leisure Ltd & Ors ([2008] IRLR 345) is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Redefining "Exclusive Occupation" in UK Immigration Law: Insights from KJ v. Jamaica ([2008] UKAIT 6)

Redefining "Exclusive Occupation" in UK Immigration Law: Insights from KJ v. Jamaica ([2008] UKAIT 6)

Date: Jan 17, 2008
Redefining "Exclusive Occupation" in UK Immigration Law: Insights from KJ v. Jamaica ([2008] UKAIT 6) Introduction The case of KJ v. Jamaica ([2008] UKAIT 6) represents a pivotal moment in UK...
Exceptional Circumstances Permitting Extension of Review Time: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc v. The Competition Commission ([2008] CAT 1)

Exceptional Circumstances Permitting Extension of Review Time: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc v. The Competition Commission ([2008] CAT 1)

Date: Jan 10, 2008
Exceptional Circumstances Permitting Extension of Review Time: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc v. The Competition Commission ([2008] CAT 1) Introduction The case of British Sky Broadcasting Group...
Reaffirming Substantive Rules in Immigration Decisions: Insights from JF (Para 320 Refusal; Substantive Rule?) Bangladesh ([2008] UKAIT 8)

Reaffirming Substantive Rules in Immigration Decisions: Insights from JF (Para 320 Refusal; Substantive Rule?) Bangladesh ([2008] UKAIT 8)

Date: Jan 9, 2008
Reaffirming Substantive Rules in Immigration Decisions: Insights from JF (Para 320 Refusal; Substantive Rule?) Bangladesh ([2008] UKAIT 8) Introduction The case of JF (Para 320 Refusal; Substantive...
Mandatory Compliance with Rule 23(5)(a)(i) in Reconsideration Applications: RN Zimbabwe [2008] UKAIT 1 Commentary

Mandatory Compliance with Rule 23(5)(a)(i) in Reconsideration Applications: RN Zimbabwe [2008] UKAIT 1 Commentary

Date: Jan 5, 2008
Mandatory Compliance with Rule 23(5)(a)(i) in Reconsideration Applications: RN Zimbabwe [2008] UKAIT 1 Commentary Introduction The case of RN (rule 23(5): respondent’s duty) Zimbabwe ([2008] UKAIT 1)...
Re TR (reg 8(3) EEA Regs 2006): Interpreting 'Strictly Requires Personal Care' for Extended Family Members under EEA Regulations

Re TR (reg 8(3) EEA Regs 2006): Interpreting 'Strictly Requires Personal Care' for Extended Family Members under EEA Regulations

Date: Dec 29, 2007
Re TR (reg 8(3) EEA Regs 2006): Interpreting 'Strictly Requires Personal Care' for Extended Family Members under EEA Regulations 1. Introduction The case of TR (reg 8(3) EEA Regs 2006) ([2008] UKAIT...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert