Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Sodexo Ltd v Gutridge: Defining Time Limits for Equal Pay Claims Post-TUPE Transfer

Sodexo Ltd v Gutridge: Defining Time Limits for Equal Pay Claims Post-TUPE Transfer

Date: Aug 1, 2008
Sodexo Ltd v Gutridge: Defining Time Limits for Equal Pay Claims Post-TUPE Transfer Introduction The case of Sodexo Ltd v Gutridge & Ors ([2009] ICR 70) adjudicated by the United Kingdom Employment...
Rule of Law and Prosecutorial Discretion in the Face of National Security Threats: Corner House Research v. Serious Fraud Office

Rule of Law and Prosecutorial Discretion in the Face of National Security Threats: Corner House Research v. Serious Fraud Office

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Rule of Law and Prosecutorial Discretion in the Face of National Security Threats: Corner House Research v. Serious Fraud Office Introduction The case of Corner House Research & Ors, R (On The...
M v Slough Borough Council: Defining "Care and Attention" under the National Assistance Act 1948

M v Slough Borough Council: Defining "Care and Attention" under the National Assistance Act 1948

Date: Jul 31, 2008
M v Slough Borough Council: Defining "Care and Attention" under the National Assistance Act 1948 Introduction The case of M, R (On The Application of) v. Slough Borough Council ([2008] 1 WLR 1808)...
Doherty & Ors v Birmingham City Council: Defining the Scope of Article 8 Defences in Local Authority Possession Proceedings

Doherty & Ors v Birmingham City Council: Defining the Scope of Article 8 Defences in Local Authority Possession Proceedings

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Doherty & Ors v Birmingham City Council: Defining the Scope of Article 8 Defences in Local Authority Possession Proceedings Introduction Doherty & Ors v Birmingham City Council ([2008] UKHRR 1022) is...
Interpretation of "A Part of a Trade" under Section 18(2) of the Capital Allowances Act 1990: Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v. Revenue and Customs ([2008] STC 2594)

Interpretation of "A Part of a Trade" under Section 18(2) of the Capital Allowances Act 1990: Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v. Revenue and Customs ([2008] STC 2594)

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Interpretation of "A Part of a Trade" under Section 18(2) of the Capital Allowances Act 1990 Introduction The case of Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v. Revenue and Customs ([2008] STC 2594)...
Protection of Public Offices from Executive Interference: Insights from Inniss v. The Attorney General of Saint Christopher & Nevis

Protection of Public Offices from Executive Interference: Insights from Inniss v. The Attorney General of Saint Christopher & Nevis

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Protection of Public Offices from Executive Interference: Insights from Inniss v. The Attorney General of Saint Christopher & Nevis Introduction The case of Inniss v. The Attorney General of Saint...
Reaffirmation of Police Immunity in Civil Liability: Insights from Hertfordshire Police v. Van Colle and Smith

Reaffirmation of Police Immunity in Civil Liability: Insights from Hertfordshire Police v. Van Colle and Smith

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Reaffirmation of Police Immunity in Civil Liability: Insights from Hertfordshire Police v. Van Colle and Smith Introduction The landmark case, Hertfordshire Police v. Van Colle ([2008] 3 WLR 593),...
Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & Anor v. Cobbe: Reinforcing the Limits of Proprietary Estoppel in Commercial Negotiations

Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & Anor v. Cobbe: Reinforcing the Limits of Proprietary Estoppel in Commercial Negotiations

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & Anor v. Cobbe: Reinforcing the Limits of Proprietary Estoppel in Commercial Negotiations Introduction The case of Yeoman's Row Management Ltd & Anor v. Cobbe ([2008] WLR...
Extradition Proceedings and Abuse of Process in Plea Bargaining: Insights from McKinnon v. USA [2008]

Extradition Proceedings and Abuse of Process in Plea Bargaining: Insights from McKinnon v. USA [2008]

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Extradition Proceedings and Abuse of Process in Plea Bargaining: Insights from McKinnon v. The United States of America & Anorr [2008] Table of Contents Introduction Summary of the Judgment Analysis...
Heffernan v The Rent Service: Establishing Principles for Determining 'Locality' in Housing Benefit

Heffernan v The Rent Service: Establishing Principles for Determining 'Locality' in Housing Benefit

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Heffernan v The Rent Service: Establishing Principles for Determining 'Locality' in Housing Benefit Introduction The case of Heffernan v The Rent Service ([2008] 1 WLR 1702) was adjudicated by the...
Exclusion of Exclusive Religious Premises from Non-Domestic Rating Exemption: Gallagher v Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints [2008] WLR 1852

Exclusion of Exclusive Religious Premises from Non-Domestic Rating Exemption: Gallagher v Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints [2008] WLR 1852

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Non-Qualification of Exclusive Religious Sanctuaries for Non-Domestic Rate Exemption Introduction Gallagher (Valuation Officer) v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints ([2008] WLR 1852) is a...
Caldarelli v. Court of Naples: Landmark Clarification on European Arrest Warrant Classification

Caldarelli v. Court of Naples: Landmark Clarification on European Arrest Warrant Classification

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Caldarelli v. Court of Naples: Landmark Clarification on European Arrest Warrant Classification Introduction Caldarelli v. Court of Naples ([2008] 1 WLR 1724) is a pivotal judgment delivered by the...
Baiai v. Secretary of State for the Home Department: Strengthening the Right to Marry under ECHR Article 12

Baiai v. Secretary of State for the Home Department: Strengthening the Right to Marry under ECHR Article 12

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Baiai v. Secretary of State for the Home Department: Strengthening the Right to Marry under ECHR Article 12 Introduction The case of Baiai & Ors, R (On The Application of) v. Secretary of State For...
Defining Justifiable Age Discrimination in Redundancy Schemes: Loxley v. BAE Systems Land Systems

Defining Justifiable Age Discrimination in Redundancy Schemes: Loxley v. BAE Systems Land Systems

Date: Jul 30, 2008
Defining Justifiable Age Discrimination in Redundancy Schemes: Loxley v. BAE Systems Land Systems Introduction Loxley v. BAE Systems Land Systems (Munitions & Ordnance) Ltd ([2008] Pens LR 353) is a...
Establishing Legal Connection: Reinterpreting Employment Requirements under Paragraph 159A

Establishing Legal Connection: Reinterpreting Employment Requirements under Paragraph 159A

Date: Jul 26, 2008
Establishing Legal Connection: Reinterpreting Employment Requirements under Paragraph 159A Introduction The case of DD (paragraph 159A: connection, employment) Sri Lanka ([2008] UKAIT 60) adjudicated...
Continuity of Employment and Unfair Dismissal: Insights from Haritaki v. South East England Development Agency

Continuity of Employment and Unfair Dismissal: Insights from Haritaki v. South East England Development Agency

Date: Jul 23, 2008
Continuity of Employment and Unfair Dismissal: Insights from Haritaki v. South East England Development Agency Introduction The case of Haritaki v. South East England Development Agency ([2008] UKEAT...
Age-Based Redundancy Payment Schemes: A Critical Analysis of MacCulloch v. Imperial Chemical Industries Plc

Age-Based Redundancy Payment Schemes: A Critical Analysis of MacCulloch v. Imperial Chemical Industries Plc

Date: Jul 23, 2008
Age-Based Redundancy Payment Schemes: A Critical Analysis of MacCulloch v. Imperial Chemical Industries Plc ([2008] IRLR 846) Introduction The case of MacCulloch v. Imperial Chemical Industries Plc...
Cumulative Impairments Constitute Disability: Insights from Ministry of Defence v Hay

Cumulative Impairments Constitute Disability: Insights from Ministry of Defence v Hay

Date: Jul 22, 2008
Cumulative Impairments Constitute Disability: Insights from Ministry of Defence v Hay Introduction Ministry of Defence v Hay ([2008] ICR 1247) is a landmark case adjudicated by the United Kingdom...
Proper Application of EEA Regulation 17(4) in Residence Card Issuance: Insights from YB (EEA reg 17(4), proper approach) Ivory Coast ([2008] UKAIT 62)

Proper Application of EEA Regulation 17(4) in Residence Card Issuance: Insights from YB (EEA reg 17(4), proper approach) Ivory Coast ([2008] UKAIT 62)

Date: Jul 12, 2008
Proper Application of EEA Regulation 17(4) in Residence Card Issuance: Insights from YB (EEA reg 17(4), proper approach) Ivory Coast ([2008] UKAIT 62) Introduction The case of YB (EEA reg 17(4),...
Reaffirming the Standard for Obviousness in Patent Law: Conor Medsystems Inc v. Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc & Ors ([2008] RPC 28)

Reaffirming the Standard for Obviousness in Patent Law: Conor Medsystems Inc v. Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc & Ors ([2008] RPC 28)

Date: Jul 10, 2008
Reaffirming the Standard for Obviousness in Patent Law: Conor Medsystems Inc v. Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc & Ors ([2008] RPC 28) Introduction The case of Conor Medsystems Inc v. Angiotech...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert