Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Clarifying 'Amount of Credit' in Consumer Credit Agreements: Insights from Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker & Anor

Clarifying 'Amount of Credit' in Consumer Credit Agreements: Insights from Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker & Anor

Date: Jul 8, 2010
Clarifying 'Amount of Credit' in Consumer Credit Agreements: Insights from Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker & Anor Introduction The case of Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker...
Tribunal's Discretion in Allowing Out-of-Time VAT Appeals: Insights from B Fairall Ltd (in Liquidation) v Revenue & Customs

Tribunal's Discretion in Allowing Out-of-Time VAT Appeals: Insights from B Fairall Ltd (in Liquidation) v Revenue & Customs

Date: Jul 7, 2010
Tribunal's Discretion in Allowing Out-of-Time VAT Appeals: Insights from B Fairall Ltd (in Liquidation) v Revenue & Customs Introduction The case of B Fairall Ltd (in Liquidation) v Revenue & Customs...
Establishing Windfall Justification in Age Discrimination Cases: Kraft Foods UK Ltd v. Hastie

Establishing Windfall Justification in Age Discrimination Cases: Kraft Foods UK Ltd v. Hastie

Date: Jul 7, 2010
Establishing Windfall Justification in Age Discrimination Cases: Kraft Foods UK Ltd v. Hastie ([2010] UKEAT 0024_10_0607) Introduction The case of Kraft Foods UK Ltd v. Hastie ([2010] UKEAT...
VAT Exemption for Electronic Lottery Ticket Vending Machines Established in Oasis Technologies (UK) Ltd v. Revenue & Customs

VAT Exemption for Electronic Lottery Ticket Vending Machines Established in Oasis Technologies (UK) Ltd v. Revenue & Customs

Date: Jul 2, 2010
VAT Exemption for Electronic Lottery Ticket Vending Machines Established in Oasis Technologies (UK) Ltd v. Revenue & Customs Introduction The case of Oasis Technologies (UK) Ltd v. Revenue & Customs...
Unified Approach to Mixed-Length Sentences under Criminal Justice Acts 1991 and 2003

Unified Approach to Mixed-Length Sentences under Criminal Justice Acts 1991 and 2003

Date: Jul 1, 2010
Unified Approach to Mixed-Length Sentences under Criminal Justice Acts 1991 and 2003 Introduction The case of Noone, R (on the application of) v. Governor of HMP Drake Hall & Anor ([2010] WLR 1743)...
Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Deployed Military Personnel Under the Human Rights Act 1998

Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Deployed Military Personnel Under the Human Rights Act 1998

Date: Jul 1, 2010
Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Deployed Military Personnel Under the Human Rights Act 1998 Introduction Smith, R (on the application of) v. Secretary of State for Defence & Anor ([2010]...
Clarifying Liability of Unincorporated Association Members in Employment Discrimination Cases: Nazir & Anor v. Asim & Anor ([2010] ICR 1225)

Clarifying Liability of Unincorporated Association Members in Employment Discrimination Cases: Nazir & Anor v. Asim & Anor ([2010] ICR 1225)

Date: Jun 30, 2010
Clarifying Liability of Unincorporated Association Members in Employment Discrimination Cases: Nazir & Anor v. Asim & Anor ([2010] ICR 1225) Introduction The case of Nur Nazir & Anor v. Aneela Asim &...
Compensation Valuation Under Land Compensation Act 1961: Potter v. London Borough of Hillingdon

Compensation Valuation Under Land Compensation Act 1961: Potter v. London Borough of Hillingdon

Date: Jun 29, 2010
Compensation Valuation Under Land Compensation Act 1961: Potter v. London Borough of Hillingdon Introduction Potter v. London Borough of Hillingdon ([2010] UKUT 212) is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Secure Tenancy Continuation Beyond Tenant's Death: Austin v Southwark Council

Secure Tenancy Continuation Beyond Tenant's Death: Austin v Southwark Council

Date: Jun 24, 2010
Secure Tenancy Continuation Beyond Tenant's Death: Austin v Southwark Council Introduction Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark is a landmark case addressed by the United...
Preservation of Anonymity Orders in Control Order Proceedings: Insights from Secretary of State v. AP (No.2) [2010] UKSC 26

Preservation of Anonymity Orders in Control Order Proceedings: Insights from Secretary of State v. AP (No.2) [2010] UKSC 26

Date: Jun 24, 2010
Preservation of Anonymity Orders in Control Order Proceedings: Insights from Secretary of State v. AP (No.2) [2010] UKSC 26 Introduction The case of Secretary of State for the Home Department v. AP...
Establishing Precedent on Unlawful Precautionary Suspension in Northern Ireland Schools

Establishing Precedent on Unlawful Precautionary Suspension in Northern Ireland Schools

Date: Jun 24, 2010
Establishing Precedent on Unlawful Precautionary Suspension in Northern Ireland Schools Introduction The case JR17 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) ([2010] NI 105) adjudicated by the United...
Enforcement Powers Under the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007: Insights from MD v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ([2011] AACR 5)

Enforcement Powers Under the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007: Insights from MD v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ([2011] AACR 5)

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Enforcement Powers Under the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007: Insights from MD v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ([2011] AACR 5) Introduction MD v. Secretary of State for Work...
Marks & Spencer Plc [2010] UKUT 213 (TCC): Establishing the No Possibilities Test for Group Relief Claims of Non-Resident Subsidiaries

Marks & Spencer Plc [2010] UKUT 213 (TCC): Establishing the No Possibilities Test for Group Relief Claims of Non-Resident Subsidiaries

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Marks & Spencer Plc [2010] UKUT 213 (TCC): Establishing the No Possibilities Test for Group Relief Claims of Non-Resident Subsidiaries Introduction The case of Marks & Spencer Plc ([2010] UKUT 213...
Legality of Specifying Destination in Removal Directions: MS (Palestinian Territories) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Legality of Specifying Destination in Removal Directions: MS (Palestinian Territories) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

Date: Jun 17, 2010
Legality of Specifying Destination in Removal Directions: MS (Palestinian Territories) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department Introduction MS (Palestinian Territories) v. Secretary of State...
Deprivation of Liberty in Control Orders: Insights from Secretary of State for the Home Department v. AP ([2010] UKSC 24)

Deprivation of Liberty in Control Orders: Insights from Secretary of State for the Home Department v. AP ([2010] UKSC 24)

Date: Jun 17, 2010
Deprivation of Liberty in Control Orders: Insights from Secretary of State for the Home Department v. AP ([2010] UKSC 24) Introduction The case of Secretary of State for the Home Department v. AP...
J v. DLA Piper UK LLP: Clarifying the Approach to Mental Impairment and Adverse Effects under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

J v. DLA Piper UK LLP: Clarifying the Approach to Mental Impairment and Adverse Effects under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

Date: Jun 16, 2010
J v. DLA Piper UK LLP: Clarifying the Approach to Mental Impairment and Adverse Effects under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 Introduction J v. DLA Piper UK LLP ([2010] ICR 1052) is a pivotal...
Liverpool City Council v Sillvote Limited [2010] UKUT 192 (LC): Revaluation Standards for Leasehold Enfranchisement

Liverpool City Council v Sillvote Limited [2010] UKUT 192 (LC): Revaluation Standards for Leasehold Enfranchisement

Date: Jun 15, 2010
Liverpool City Council v Sillvote Limited [2010] UKUT 192 (LC): Revaluation Standards for Leasehold Enfranchisement Introduction In the case of Liverpool City Council v Sillvote Limited ([2010] UKUT...
BT v OFCOM: Clarifying the Scope of Price Control Matters under the Communications Act 2003

BT v OFCOM: Clarifying the Scope of Price Control Matters under the Communications Act 2003

Date: Jun 12, 2010
BT v OFCOM: Clarifying the Scope of Price Control Matters under the Communications Act 2003 Introduction The case of British Telecommunications Plc v. Office of Communications & Ors ([2010] CAT 15)...
Hanover Company Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs: Tribunal Jurisdiction and VAT Assessment

Hanover Company Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs: Tribunal Jurisdiction and VAT Assessment

Date: Jun 10, 2010
Hanover Company Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs: Tribunal Jurisdiction and VAT Assessment Introduction The case of Hanover Company Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs ([2010] SFTD 1047) adjudicated by...
Separate Use and Disposal Not Prohibited by Occupancy Conditions: Key Insights from Wendels v. HMRC [2010] UKFTT 476 (TC)

Separate Use and Disposal Not Prohibited by Occupancy Conditions: Key Insights from Wendels v. HMRC [2010] UKFTT 476 (TC)

Date: Jun 9, 2010
Separate Use and Disposal Not Prohibited by Occupancy Conditions: Key Insights from Wendels v. HMRC [2010] UKFTT 476 (TC) Introduction The case of Wendels v. Revenue & Customs ([2010] UKFTT 476 (TC))...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert