Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Repute and Operator Licensing: Insights from Aspey Trucks Ltd v UKUT [2010] UKUT 367 (AAC)

Repute and Operator Licensing: Insights from Aspey Trucks Ltd v UKUT [2010] UKUT 367 (AAC)

Date: Oct 6, 2010
Repute and Operator Licensing: Insights from Aspey Trucks Ltd v UKUT [2010] UKUT 367 (AAC) Introduction The case of Aspey Trucks Ltd, Re ([2010] UKUT 367 (AAC)) presents a pivotal examination of the...
Interpretation of Section 29 of TMA 1970 Post-Self-Assessment: The Derek Hankinson Case

Interpretation of Section 29 of TMA 1970 Post-Self-Assessment: The Derek Hankinson Case

Date: Oct 1, 2010
Interpretation of Section 29 of TMA 1970 Post-Self-Assessment: The Derek Hankinson Case Introduction The case of Derek William Hankinson ([2010] BTC 1691) adjudicated by the Upper Tribunal (Tax and...
Reaffirming Discretionary Judgement under Paragraph 320(11) in UK Immigration Law

Reaffirming Discretionary Judgement under Paragraph 320(11) in UK Immigration Law

Date: Sep 29, 2010
Reaffirming Discretionary Judgement under Paragraph 320(11) in UK Immigration Law Introduction The case of PS (paragraph 320(11) discretion: care needed) India [2010] UKUT 440 (IAC) presents a...
Reaffirming Inclusive Assessment of Indiscriminate Violence Under Article 15(c): Comprehensive Commentary on HM and Others (Article 15(c)) Iraq CG ([2010] UKUT 331 (IAC))

Reaffirming Inclusive Assessment of Indiscriminate Violence Under Article 15(c): Comprehensive Commentary on HM and Others (Article 15(c)) Iraq CG ([2010] UKUT 331 (IAC))

Date: Sep 23, 2010
Reaffirming Inclusive Assessment of Indiscriminate Violence Under Article 15(c): Comprehensive Commentary on HM and Others (Article 15(c)) Iraq CG ([2010] UKUT 331 (IAC)) Introduction The case of HM...
Extension of Time for VAT Appeals: Balancing Fairness and Legal Certainty

Extension of Time for VAT Appeals: Balancing Fairness and Legal Certainty

Date: Sep 23, 2010
Extension of Time for VAT Appeals: Balancing Fairness and Legal Certainty Introduction The case of North Wiltshire District Council v. Revenue & Customs ([2010] UKFTT 449 (TC)) addresses the crucial...
Establishing Residence for Capital Gains Tax Relief: Moore v. Revenue & Customs

Establishing Residence for Capital Gains Tax Relief: Moore v. Revenue & Customs

Date: Sep 22, 2010
Establishing Residence for Capital Gains Tax Relief: Moore v. Revenue & Customs Introduction Moore v. Revenue & Customs ([2010] UKFTT 445 (TC)) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the First-tier...
Establishing Victimisation Through Negative References: Bullimore v. Pothecary Witham Weld Solicitors & Anor

Establishing Victimisation Through Negative References: Bullimore v. Pothecary Witham Weld Solicitors & Anor

Date: Sep 22, 2010
Establishing Victimisation Through Negative References: Bullimore v. Pothecary Witham Weld Solicitors & Anor Introduction The case of Bullimore v. Pothecary Witham Weld Solicitors & Anor ([2011] IRLR...
Enhancing Valuation Standards in Leasehold Enfranchisement: Insights from 31 Cadogan Square Freehold Ltd v. Cadogan

Enhancing Valuation Standards in Leasehold Enfranchisement: Insights from 31 Cadogan Square Freehold Ltd v. Cadogan

Date: Sep 17, 2010
Enhancing Valuation Standards in Leasehold Enfranchisement: Insights from 31 Cadogan Square Freehold Ltd v. Cadogan Introduction The case of 31 Cadogan Square Freehold Ltd v. Cadogan ([2010] UKUT 321...
Establishing Reliability of Professional Linguistic Analysis in Asylum Appeals: RB (Sprakab) Somalia [2010] UKUT 329 (IAC)

Establishing Reliability of Professional Linguistic Analysis in Asylum Appeals: RB (Sprakab) Somalia [2010] UKUT 329 (IAC)

Date: Sep 16, 2010
Establishing Reliability of Professional Linguistic Analysis in Asylum Appeals: RB (Sprakab) Somalia [2010] UKUT 329 (IAC) Introduction The case of RB (Linguistic evidence Sprakab) Somalia ([2010]...
Distinguishing Businessmen from Workers under the Ankara Agreement: Insights from [2010] UKUT 330 (IAC)

Distinguishing Businessmen from Workers under the Ankara Agreement: Insights from [2010] UKUT 330 (IAC)

Date: Sep 16, 2010
Distinguishing Businessmen from Workers under the Ankara Agreement: Insights from [2010] UKUT 330 (IAC) Introduction The case of R (Payir and others) v SSHD, as adjudicated in the Upper Tribunal...
Clarifying Restricted Securities under ITEPA 2003: UBS AG v. Revenue and Customs

Clarifying Restricted Securities under ITEPA 2003: UBS AG v. Revenue and Customs

Date: Sep 16, 2010
Clarifying Restricted Securities under ITEPA 2003: UBS AG v. Revenue and Customs Introduction The case UBS AG v. Revenue and Customs ([2010] UKFTT 366 (TC)) adjudicated by the First-tier Tribunal...
Defining Substantial Contribution to Crimes Against Humanity: Insights from SK (Article 1F(a) exclusion) Zimbabwe [2010] UKUT 327 (IAC)

Defining Substantial Contribution to Crimes Against Humanity: Insights from SK (Article 1F(a) exclusion) Zimbabwe [2010] UKUT 327 (IAC)

Date: Sep 16, 2010
Defining Substantial Contribution to Crimes Against Humanity: Insights from SK (Article 1F(a) exclusion) Zimbabwe [2010] UKUT 327 (IAC) Introduction The case of SK (Article 1F(a) exclusion) Zimbabwe...
Upper Tribunal Upholds Deportation Exception for Serious Young Offenders: BK (Deportation Exception UKBA 2007 Public Interest) Ghana ([2011] Imm AR 109)

Upper Tribunal Upholds Deportation Exception for Serious Young Offenders: BK (Deportation Exception UKBA 2007 Public Interest) Ghana ([2011] Imm AR 109)

Date: Sep 16, 2010
Upper Tribunal Upholds Deportation Exception for Serious Young Offenders: BK (Deportation Exception UKBA 2007 Public Interest) Ghana ([2011] Imm AR 109) Introduction The case of BK (Deportation...
Establishing Reasonable Excuse Through Consultant Reliance in CI Scheme Compliance

Establishing Reasonable Excuse Through Consultant Reliance in CI Scheme Compliance

Date: Sep 4, 2010
Establishing Reasonable Excuse Through Consultant Reliance in CI Scheme Compliance Introduction The case of R W Westworth Ltd v. Revenue & Customs ([2010] UKFTT 477 (TC)) presents a pivotal...
Regulation 10 Compliance in Redundancy During Maternity Leave: Simpson v. Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd & Ors

Regulation 10 Compliance in Redundancy During Maternity Leave: Simpson v. Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd & Ors

Date: Aug 28, 2010
Regulation 10 Compliance in Redundancy During Maternity Leave: Simpson v. Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd & Ors Introduction Simpson v. Endsleigh Insurance Services Ltd & Ors ([2011] ICR 75) is a...
Establishing Credibility in Refugee Claims: RR v Sri Lanka [2010] UKUT 274 (IAC)

Establishing Credibility in Refugee Claims: RR v Sri Lanka [2010] UKUT 274 (IAC)

Date: Aug 26, 2010
Establishing Credibility in Refugee Claims: RR v Sri Lanka [2010] UKUT 274 (IAC) Introduction The case of RR v Sri Lanka ([2010] UKUT 274 (IAC)) revolves around the appellant, a 31-year-old Sri...
Upper Tribunal Reinforces Primacy of Immigration Rules Over Home Office Guidance in Points-Based System Funding Requirements

Upper Tribunal Reinforces Primacy of Immigration Rules Over Home Office Guidance in Points-Based System Funding Requirements

Date: Aug 26, 2010
Upper Tribunal Reinforces Primacy of Immigration Rules Over Home Office Guidance in Points-Based System Funding Requirements Introduction The case of FA and AA (PBS effect of Pankina) Nigeria ([2010]...
Emblaze Mobility Solutions Ltd v. Revenue & Customs (2010): Establishing the 'Should Have Known' Standard in VAT MTIC Fraud Cases

Emblaze Mobility Solutions Ltd v. Revenue & Customs (2010): Establishing the 'Should Have Known' Standard in VAT MTIC Fraud Cases

Date: Aug 26, 2010
Emblaze Mobility Solutions Ltd v. Revenue & Customs (2010): Establishing the 'Should Have Known' Standard in VAT MTIC Fraud Cases Introduction The case of Emblaze Mobility Solutions Ltd v. Revenue &...
Bulkliner Intermodal Ltd v. Revenue & Customs: Unreasonable Conduct and Costs in Tax Proceedings

Bulkliner Intermodal Ltd v. Revenue & Customs: Unreasonable Conduct and Costs in Tax Proceedings

Date: Aug 21, 2010
Bulkliner Intermodal Ltd v. Revenue & Customs: Unreasonable Conduct and Costs in Tax Proceedings Introduction In the case of Bulkliner Intermodal Ltd v. Revenue & Customs ([2010] STI 2954), the...
Business Property Relief Affirmed for Composite Estate Business in HMRC v Brander

Business Property Relief Affirmed for Composite Estate Business in HMRC v Brander

Date: Aug 17, 2010
Business Property Relief Affirmed for Composite Estate Business in HMRC v Brander Introduction The case of HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) v. Andrew Michael Brander, adjudicated by the Upper Tribunal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert