Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Ireland Case Commentaries

Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hughes [2020] IEHC 299: Upholding Extradition under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003

Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hughes [2020] IEHC 299: Upholding Extradition under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003

Date: Jun 13, 2020
Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hughes [2020] IEHC 299 Upholding Extradition under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 Introduction Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hughes (Approved)...
Cantrell v. Allied Irish Banks: New Precedent on Limitation Periods in Tort Claims for Investment Losses

Cantrell v. Allied Irish Banks: New Precedent on Limitation Periods in Tort Claims for Investment Losses

Date: Jun 13, 2020
Cantrell v. Allied Irish Banks: New Precedent on Limitation Periods in Tort Claims for Investment Losses Introduction Cantrell v. Allied Irish Banks & Others is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Reinforcing the O’Malley Test for Summary Judgment in Mortgage Loan Defaults

Reinforcing the O’Malley Test for Summary Judgment in Mortgage Loan Defaults

Date: Jun 13, 2020
Reinforcing the O’Malley Test for Summary Judgment in Mortgage Loan Defaults Introduction The case of AIB Mortgage Bank & Anor v. Hayden & Anor ([2020] IEHC 442) adjudicated in the High Court of...
Establishing Fair Dismissal Procedures During Probationary Periods: Insights from O'Donovan v. Over-C Technology Ltd & ANOR

Establishing Fair Dismissal Procedures During Probationary Periods: Insights from O'Donovan v. Over-C Technology Ltd & ANOR

Date: Jun 13, 2020
Establishing Fair Dismissal Procedures During Probationary Periods: Insights from O'Donovan v. Over-C Technology Ltd & ANOR Introduction The case O'Donovan v. Over-C Technology Ltd & ANOR ([2020]...
High Court Establishes Prosecutor General as Judicial Authority for EAWs in Minister for Justice and Equality v. Civinskas

High Court Establishes Prosecutor General as Judicial Authority for EAWs in Minister for Justice and Equality v. Civinskas

Date: Jun 12, 2020
High Court Establishes Prosecutor General as Judicial Authority for EAWs in Minister for Justice and Equality v. Civinskas Introduction The case of Minister for Justice and Equality v. Civinskas...
Clarifying Dependency Criteria under the Citizens’ Rights Directive: Rashid v. Minister for Justice and Equality

Clarifying Dependency Criteria under the Citizens’ Rights Directive: Rashid v. Minister for Justice and Equality

Date: Jun 11, 2020
Clarifying Dependency Criteria under the Citizens’ Rights Directive: Rashid v. Minister for Justice and Equality Introduction The case of Rashid & Anor v. The Minister for Justice and Equality...
Enhanced Accountability Standards for Fiduciaries: Best & Anor v. Ghose & Ors No.2 (Approved) [2020] IEHC 355

Enhanced Accountability Standards for Fiduciaries: Best & Anor v. Ghose & Ors No.2 (Approved) [2020] IEHC 355

Date: Jun 10, 2020
Enhanced Accountability Standards for Fiduciaries: Best & Anor v. Ghose & Ors No.2 (Approved) [2020] IEHC 355 Introduction The case of Best & Anor v. Ghose & Ors No.2 (Approved) [2020] IEHC 355...
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Child' in Family Reunification: Restricts to Biological and Adopted Children

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Child' in Family Reunification: Restricts to Biological and Adopted Children

Date: Jun 10, 2020
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Child' in Family Reunification: Restricts to Biological and Adopted Children Introduction In the landmark case of X v. Minister for Justice & Equality & ors (Unapproved)...
Clarifying the Scope of O.45 R.5 in Garnishee Proceedings: A-Data Ltd v. McMahon [2020] IEHC 440

Clarifying the Scope of O.45 R.5 in Garnishee Proceedings: A-Data Ltd v. McMahon [2020] IEHC 440

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Clarifying the Scope of O.45 R.5 in Garnishee Proceedings: A-Data Ltd v. McMahon [2020] IEHC 440 Introduction The case of A-Data Ltd v. McMahon ([2020] IEHC 440) adjudicated by the High Court of...
Procedural Compliance in Judicial Review and Non-Party Discovery: Insights from Barry v The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána [2020] IEHC 307

Procedural Compliance in Judicial Review and Non-Party Discovery: Insights from Barry v The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána [2020] IEHC 307

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Procedural Compliance in Judicial Review and Non-Party Discovery: Insights from Barry v. The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána [2020] IEHC 307 Introduction Barry v. The Commissioner of An Garda...
KBC Ireland PLC v. Branigan: Establishing Rigorous Criteria for Extensions of Time to Appeal under Article 34.5.4

KBC Ireland PLC v. Branigan: Establishing Rigorous Criteria for Extensions of Time to Appeal under Article 34.5.4

Date: Jun 9, 2020
KBC Ireland PLC v. Branigan: Establishing Rigorous Criteria for Extensions of Time to Appeal under Article 34.5.4 Introduction In the landmark case of KBC Ireland PLC v. Branigan ([2020] IESCDET 68),...
Morris v. An Bord Pleanála [2020] IEHC 276: Refining Judicial Review Standards for Strategic Housing Developments

Morris v. An Bord Pleanála [2020] IEHC 276: Refining Judicial Review Standards for Strategic Housing Developments

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Morris v. An Bord Pleanála [2020] IEHC 276: Refining Judicial Review Standards for Strategic Housing Developments Introduction Morris v. An Bord Pleanála (Approved) ([2020] IEHC 276) is a landmark...
Clarifying the Use of Corroborative Evidence in Multi-Victim Sexual Violence Cases: DPP v. Limen

Clarifying the Use of Corroborative Evidence in Multi-Victim Sexual Violence Cases: DPP v. Limen

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Clarifying the Use of Corroborative Evidence in Multi-Victim Sexual Violence Cases: Director of Public Prosecutions v. Limen Introduction The Supreme Court of Ireland's determination in Director of...
Reaffirming the Primacy of Public Hearings in the Administration of Justice: Health Service Executive v. Bradley (No.1) [2020] IEHC 280

Reaffirming the Primacy of Public Hearings in the Administration of Justice: Health Service Executive v. Bradley (No.1) [2020] IEHC 280

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Reaffirming the Primacy of Public Hearings in the Administration of Justice Health Service Executive v. Bradley (No.1) [2020] IEHC 280 Introduction The case of Health Service Executive (HSE) v....
Establishing the Bounds of Norwich Pharmacal Orders in Social Media Contexts: Parcel Connect v. Twitter International Company

Establishing the Bounds of Norwich Pharmacal Orders in Social Media Contexts: Parcel Connect v. Twitter International Company

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Establishing the Bounds of Norwich Pharmacal Orders in Social Media Contexts: Parcel Connect v. Twitter International Company Introduction The case of Parcel Connect Limited trading as Fastway...
Interlocutory Injunctions in Data Privacy Breaches: Health Service Executive v. Bradley (No.2) [2020] IEHC 281

Interlocutory Injunctions in Data Privacy Breaches: Health Service Executive v. Bradley (No.2) [2020] IEHC 281

Date: Jun 6, 2020
Interlocutory Injunctions in Data Privacy Breaches: Health Service Executive v. Bradley (No.2) [2020] IEHC 281 Introduction The case of Health Service Executive v. Bradley (No.2) ([2020] IEHC 281)...
Mandatory Obligations of Clinical Directors Under Section 13A: Insights from M.C. v Central Mental Hospital

Mandatory Obligations of Clinical Directors Under Section 13A: Insights from M.C. v Central Mental Hospital

Date: Jun 5, 2020
Mandatory Obligations of Clinical Directors Under Section 13A: Insights from M.C. v Central Mental Hospital Introduction The Supreme Court of Ireland’s judgment in M.C. v The Clinical Director of the...
Mandatory Enforcement of Conditional Discharge Orders: Supreme Court Clarifies Clinical Director's Obligations under the Mental Health Act 2006

Mandatory Enforcement of Conditional Discharge Orders: Supreme Court Clarifies Clinical Director's Obligations under the Mental Health Act 2006

Date: Jun 5, 2020
Mandatory Enforcement of Conditional Discharge Orders: Supreme Court Clarifies Clinical Director's Obligations under the Mental Health Act 2006 Introduction In the landmark case of M.C. v. The...
Kane v. Revenue Commissioners: Upholding Section 38(2)(b) Detention Criteria and Forfeiture Proceedings

Kane v. Revenue Commissioners: Upholding Section 38(2)(b) Detention Criteria and Forfeiture Proceedings

Date: Jun 5, 2020
Kane v. Revenue Commissioners: Upholding Section 38(2)(b) Detention Criteria and Forfeiture Proceedings Introduction Kane v. The Revenue Commissioners & ORS. ([2020] IEHC 275) is a significant...
O'Doherty v Minister for Health [2020] IEHC 274: Reinforcing 'Costs Follow the Event' in Public Interest Judicial Reviews

O'Doherty v Minister for Health [2020] IEHC 274: Reinforcing 'Costs Follow the Event' in Public Interest Judicial Reviews

Date: Jun 5, 2020
O'Doherty v Minister for Health [2020] IEHC 274: Reinforcing 'Costs Follow the Event' in Public Interest Judicial Reviews Introduction The case of O'Doherty and ANOR v. The Minister for Health and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert