Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Ireland Case Commentaries

Defining "Member of Household" in EU Free Movement: Insights from S & Anor v. Minister for Justice (Unapproved) [2020] IESC 78

Defining "Member of Household" in EU Free Movement: Insights from S & Anor v. Minister for Justice (Unapproved) [2020] IESC 78

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Defining "Member of Household" in EU Free Movement: Insights from S & Anor v. Minister for Justice [2020] IESC 78 Introduction The case S & Anor v. Minister for Justice and Equality ([2020] IESC 78)...
Comprehensive Commentary on B. v. The Personal Representative of the Estate of S.H. [2020] IEHC 672

Comprehensive Commentary on B. v. The Personal Representative of the Estate of S.H. [2020] IEHC 672

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Future Assessment of Settlement Approvals Involving Minor Plaintiffs: Insights from B. v. The Personal Representative of the Estate of S.H. [2020] IEHC 672 Introduction The case of B. (A Minor Suing...
Supreme Court of Ireland Upholds Conditional Sale Order in Trinity College Dublin v. Kenny: A New Precedent in Judgment Mortgage Enforcement

Supreme Court of Ireland Upholds Conditional Sale Order in Trinity College Dublin v. Kenny: A New Precedent in Judgment Mortgage Enforcement

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Supreme Court of Ireland Upholds Conditional Sale Order in Trinity College Dublin v. Kenny: A New Precedent in Judgment Mortgage Enforcement Introduction Trinity College Dublin v. Kenny (Unapproved)...
Clarifying Discretion Under Article 17 and Medical Evidence in Transfer Decisions: Commentary on MG v. IPRAT & Ors [2020] IEHC 701

Clarifying Discretion Under Article 17 and Medical Evidence in Transfer Decisions: Commentary on MG v. IPRAT & Ors [2020] IEHC 701

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Clarifying Discretion Under Article 17 and Medical Evidence in Transfer Decisions: Commentary on MG v. IPRAT & Ors [2020] IEHC 701 Introduction The case MG v. The International Protection Appeals...
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Findings in Judicial Reviews: Tracey v. Judge Anderson

Appellate Deference to Trial Court Findings in Judicial Reviews: Tracey v. Judge Anderson

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Findings in Judicial Reviews: Tracey v. Judge Anderson Introduction The case of Kevin Tracey v. Judge Anderson ([2020] IESC 76) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Finality of Judgments and Pleading Standards Established in Tyrell v. Wright [2020] IEHC 705

Finality of Judgments and Pleading Standards Established in Tyrell v. Wright [2020] IEHC 705

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Finality of Judgments and Pleading Standards Established in Tyrell v. Wright [2020] IEHC 705 Introduction The High Court of Ireland delivered a significant judgment in the case of Tyrell v. Wright...
Affirmation of Cost Recovery Principles under LSRA 2015: J. v. Child and Family Agency [2020] IEHC 671

Affirmation of Cost Recovery Principles under LSRA 2015: J. v. Child and Family Agency [2020] IEHC 671

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Affirmation of Cost Recovery Principles under LSRA 2015: J. v. Child and Family Agency [2020] IEHC 671 Introduction The High Court of Ireland delivered a significant judgment on December 21, 2020, in...
Establishing the Strength of Mutual Trust in European Arrest Warrants: Minister for Justice and Equality v. Szucs (2020)

Establishing the Strength of Mutual Trust in European Arrest Warrants: Minister for Justice and Equality v. Szucs (2020)

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Establishing the Strength of Mutual Trust in European Arrest Warrants: Minister for Justice and Equality v. Szucs (2020) Introduction The case of Minister for Justice and Equality v. Szucs (Approved)...
Establishing the Boundaries of Strike-Out Motions in the Context of Receiver Appointments: Insights from Tyrell v. Wright [2020] IEHC 704

Establishing the Boundaries of Strike-Out Motions in the Context of Receiver Appointments: Insights from Tyrell v. Wright [2020] IEHC 704

Date: Dec 22, 2020
Establishing the Boundaries of Strike-Out Motions in the Context of Receiver Appointments: Insights from Tyrell v. Wright [2020] IEHC 704 Introduction In the landmark case of Tyrell v. Wright ([2020]...
James v. Watters: Establishing Standards for Prima Facie Misconduct in Solicitors' Disciplinary Proceedings

James v. Watters: Establishing Standards for Prima Facie Misconduct in Solicitors' Disciplinary Proceedings

Date: Dec 19, 2020
James v. Watters: Establishing Standards for Prima Facie Misconduct in Solicitors' Disciplinary Proceedings Introduction James v. Watters & ors (Approved) [2020] IEHC 688 is a significant judgment...
Landlord's Intention to Sell within Three Months for Early Termination: Gunn v. RTB [2020] IEHC 635

Landlord's Intention to Sell within Three Months for Early Termination: Gunn v. RTB [2020] IEHC 635

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Landlord's Intention to Sell within Three Months for Early Termination: Gunn v. RTB [2020] IEHC 635 Introduction The case of Gunn & anor v. Residential Tenancies Board (Approved) ([2020] IEHC 635)...
Judicial Review Not Justiciable in Trade Union Internal Disciplinary Matters: Kelly v. Gargan & Ors (2020)

Judicial Review Not Justiciable in Trade Union Internal Disciplinary Matters: Kelly v. Gargan & Ors (2020)

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Judicial Review Not Justiciable in Trade Union Internal Disciplinary Matters: Kelly v. Gargan & Ors (2020) Introduction Kelly v. Gargan & Ors (Approved) ([2020] IEHC 711) is a significant case...
Finality of Judicial Orders and Strict Criteria for Setting Aside Cost Orders: Analysis of Kirby v. Kane & Ors [2020] IEHC 679

Finality of Judicial Orders and Strict Criteria for Setting Aside Cost Orders: Analysis of Kirby v. Kane & Ors [2020] IEHC 679

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Finality of Judicial Orders and Strict Criteria for Setting Aside Cost Orders: Analysis of Kirby v. Kane & Ors [2020] IEHC 679 Introduction Kabery v. Kane & Ors [2020] IEHC 679 is a significant case...
Fennell v. Slevin & ors: High Court Clarifies Use of Hearsay Evidence in Receivership Interlocutory Applications

Fennell v. Slevin & ors: High Court Clarifies Use of Hearsay Evidence in Receivership Interlocutory Applications

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Fennell v. Slevin & ors: High Court Clarifies Use of Hearsay Evidence in Receivership Interlocutory Applications Introduction Case Title: Fennell v. Slevin & ors ([2020] IEHC 677) Court: High Court...
Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Direct High Court Appeals in Ishola v. Minister for Justice

Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Direct High Court Appeals in Ishola v. Minister for Justice

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Direct High Court Appeals in Ishola v. The Minister for Justice and Equality (2020) Introduction The case of Ishola v. The Minister for Justice and Equality...
Supreme Court of Ireland's Determination in Director of Public Prosecutions v. Kenny: Upholding Legal Standards in Evidence Admissibility

Supreme Court of Ireland's Determination in Director of Public Prosecutions v. Kenny: Upholding Legal Standards in Evidence Admissibility

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Supreme Court of Ireland's Determination in Director of Public Prosecutions v. Kenny: Upholding Legal Standards in Evidence Admissibility Introduction The case of Director of Public Prosecutions v....
Affirmation of 'Costs Follow the Event' Principle in Interlocutory Injunctions: Thompson & Anor v. Tennant & Anor [2020] IEHC 693

Affirmation of 'Costs Follow the Event' Principle in Interlocutory Injunctions: Thompson & Anor v. Tennant & Anor [2020] IEHC 693

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Affirmation of 'Costs Follow the Event' Principle in Interlocutory Injunctions: Thompson & Anor v. Tennant & Anor [2020] IEHC 693 Introduction The case of Thompson & Anor v. Tennant & Anor (Approved)...
Engineering Evidence Central to Determining Negligence: Smith v. Hanaphy

Engineering Evidence Central to Determining Negligence: Smith v. Hanaphy

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Engineering Evidence Central to Determining Negligence: Smith v. Hanaphy Introduction Smith v. Hanaphy ([2020] IEHC 696) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the High Court of Ireland on December 17,...
Van Dessel v. Connolly & Anor: Post-Liquidation Charge Invalidated under Section 602 of the Companies Act 2014

Van Dessel v. Connolly & Anor: Post-Liquidation Charge Invalidated under Section 602 of the Companies Act 2014

Date: Dec 17, 2020
Van Dessel v. Connolly & Anor: Post-Liquidation Charge Invalidated under Section 602 of the Companies Act 2014 Introduction The case of Van Dessel v. Connolly & Anor ([2020] IEHC 663) addresses...
Proportionality and Judicial Review in Deportation Cases: Insights from J.W. v. The Minister for Justice and Equality (No.2) [2020] IEHC 643

Proportionality and Judicial Review in Deportation Cases: Insights from J.W. v. The Minister for Justice and Equality (No.2) [2020] IEHC 643

Date: Dec 17, 2020
Proportionality and Judicial Review in Deportation Cases: Insights from J.W. v. The Minister for Justice and Equality (No.2) [2020] IEHC 643 Introduction The case of J.W. v. The Minister for Justice...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert