Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Ireland Case Commentaries

“Competent-Management” as an Implied Pre-Condition in Earn-Out Turnover Warranties – Commentary on Key Pest Ltd & Anor v Walsh [2025] IEHC 415

“Competent-Management” as an Implied Pre-Condition in Earn-Out Turnover Warranties – Commentary on Key Pest Ltd & Anor v Walsh [2025] IEHC 415

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Competent-Management” as an Implied Pre-Condition in Earn-Out Turnover Warranties – Commentary on Key Pest Ltd & Anor v Walsh [2025] IEHC 415 1. Introduction Key Pest Limited and its associated...
The “Semen-Analysis” Distinction: High Court Clarifies When Laboratory Testing Crosses the Line into Veterinary Diagnosis

The “Semen-Analysis” Distinction: High Court Clarifies When Laboratory Testing Crosses the Line into Veterinary Diagnosis

Date: Jul 2, 2025
The “Semen-Analysis” Distinction: High Court Clarifies When Laboratory Testing Crosses the Line into Veterinary Diagnosis 1. Introduction Veterinary Council of Ireland v Beavon ([2025] IEHC 387)...
Wolinska v. Commissioner of An Garda Síochána: A Refined Test for Balancing Public-Interest and Legal-Advice Privilege in Malicious-Prosecution Discovery

Wolinska v. Commissioner of An Garda Síochána: A Refined Test for Balancing Public-Interest and Legal-Advice Privilege in Malicious-Prosecution Discovery

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Wolinska v. Commissioner of An Garda Síochána & Ors – A Refined Test for Balancing Public-Interest and Legal-Advice Privilege in Malicious-Prosecution Discovery 1. Introduction The High Court of...
Hybrid Habitual Residence & Influenced Objections: The A.X. v. R.X. Clarification

Hybrid Habitual Residence & Influenced Objections: The A.X. v. R.X. Clarification

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Hybrid Habitual Residence & Influenced Objections: The A.X. v. R.X. Clarification 1. Introduction A.X. v. R.X. ([2025] IEHC 432) is a High Court of Ireland decision arising from the second set of...

Doctrine of Finality Prevails: Kennedy J Limits the Use of “Parallel” Plenary Proceedings to Stall Bankruptcy – A Commentary on Doherty v Blessville UnLtd Company [2025] IEHC 368

Doctrine of Finality Prevails: Kennedy J Limits the Use of “Parallel” Plenary Proceedings to Stall Bankruptcy – A Commentary on Doherty v Blessville UnLtd Company [2025] IEHC 368

Date: Jul 1, 2025
Doctrine of Finality Prevails: Kennedy J Limits the Use of “Parallel” Plenary Proceedings to Stall Bankruptcy Commentary on Doherty v Blessville UnLtd Company [2025] IEHC 368 1. Introduction Doherty...

        “Proportionality Where Fraud Vitiates EU Residence Rights” – Commentary on Imran v. Minister for Justice [2025] IESC 29

“Proportionality Where Fraud Vitiates EU Residence Rights” – Commentary on Imran v. Minister for Justice [2025] IESC 29

Date: Jun 28, 2025
“Proportionality Where Fraud Vitiates EU Residence Rights” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Imran v. Minister for Justice [2025] IESC 29 1. Introduction In Imran v. Minister for Justice the Irish...
Kaploniak v Minister for Justice – High Court Clarifies the “Inferred-Waiver” Test for Trials in Absentia under Section 45 of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003

Kaploniak v Minister for Justice – High Court Clarifies the “Inferred-Waiver” Test for Trials in Absentia under Section 45 of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Kaploniak v Minister for Justice – High Court Clarifies the “Inferred-Waiver” Test for Trials in Absentia under Section 45 of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 Introduction The judgment in...
Beades v KBC & Ors – Definitive Guidance on Strike-Out Motions, Henderson Abuse, and Limited Isaac Wunder Orders

Beades v KBC & Ors – Definitive Guidance on Strike-Out Motions, Henderson Abuse, and Limited Isaac Wunder Orders

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Beades v KBC & Others: High Court Clarifies Strike-Out Threshold, Henderson abuse, and Scope of Isaac Wunder Orders 1. Introduction This extensive decision of Mr Justice Conor Dignam, delivered on 27...
The Dinnegan Principle: The Dominance of Objective Evidence over Evolving Allegations in School-yard Personal-Injury Litigation

The Dinnegan Principle: The Dominance of Objective Evidence over Evolving Allegations in School-yard Personal-Injury Litigation

Date: Jun 28, 2025
The Dinnegan Principle: The Dominance of Objective Evidence over Evolving Allegations in School-yard Personal-Injury Litigation Introduction Dinnegan v Trustees and Board of Management of Loughegar...
The Bradley Principle: Confirming Testamentary Capacity Despite Documented Cognitive Impairment

The Bradley Principle: Confirming Testamentary Capacity Despite Documented Cognitive Impairment

Date: Jun 28, 2025
The Bradley Principle: Confirming Testamentary Capacity Despite Documented Cognitive Impairment Introduction Citation: Re: The Estate of Margaret Bradley (Approved) [2025] IEHC 365, High Court of...
“Facts-at-Time” Test for Receiver Sales: Ryan v. Promontoria (Aran) Ireland Ltd [2025] IEHC 362

“Facts-at-Time” Test for Receiver Sales: Ryan v. Promontoria (Aran) Ireland Ltd [2025] IEHC 362

Date: Jun 28, 2025
“Facts-at-Time” Test for Receiver Sales: Ryan v. Promontoria (Aran) Ireland Ltd & Ors – A Comprehensive Commentary 1. Introduction Ryan v Promontoria (Aran) Ireland Ltd & Ors ([2025] IEHC 362)...
“The Everyday Mishap” Doctrine & the Precision-in-Pleadings Rule: Commentary on Lawless v Keatley [2025] IEHC 364

“The Everyday Mishap” Doctrine & the Precision-in-Pleadings Rule: Commentary on Lawless v Keatley [2025] IEHC 364

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“The Everyday Mishap” Doctrine & the Precision-in-Pleadings Rule Commentary on Lawless v Keatley [2025] IEHC 364 1. Introduction Lawless v Keatley is a High Court appeal from the Circuit Court in...
High Court Discretion to Admit Fresh Evidence on Section 37 Appeals – Comment on S v E [2025] IEHC 377

High Court Discretion to Admit Fresh Evidence on Section 37 Appeals – Comment on S v E [2025] IEHC 377

Date: Jun 27, 2025
High Court Discretion to Admit Fresh Evidence on Section 37 Appeals – Comment on S v E [2025] IEHC 377 1. Introduction Parties: The wife (S) as applicant/respondent in the Circuit Court and appellant...
“Frivolity Re-Defined” – Ward v DPP and the New Low Threshold for Mandamus to Compel a Case Stated

“Frivolity Re-Defined” – Ward v DPP and the New Low Threshold for Mandamus to Compel a Case Stated

Date: Jun 26, 2025
“Frivolity Re-Defined” – Ward v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 355 and the New Low Threshold for Mandamus to Compel a Case Stated 1. Introduction Ward v DPP is the latest High Court...
The Engagement-Duty Costs Rule: P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor and the Proportional Reduction of Costs for Inadequate Pre-Litigation Engagement

The Engagement-Duty Costs Rule: P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor and the Proportional Reduction of Costs for Inadequate Pre-Litigation Engagement

Date: Jun 26, 2025
The Engagement-Duty Costs Rule: P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor and the Proportional Reduction of Costs for Inadequate Pre-Litigation Engagement 1. Introduction P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor ([2025] IEHC 354) is a High...
Section 160 Injunctions Cannot Be Used to Collaterally Attack Planning Permissions –  Malone v Laois County Council & Ors ([2025] IEHC 345)

Section 160 Injunctions Cannot Be Used to Collaterally Attack Planning Permissions – Malone v Laois County Council & Ors ([2025] IEHC 345)

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Section 160 Injunctions Cannot Be Used to Collaterally Attack Planning Permissions – Malone v Laois County Council & Ors ([2025] IEHC 345) 1. Introduction In Malone & McEvoy v Laois County Council,...
Keane v. Clerk of the Dáil – Clarifying Who May Inspect “Sealed” Election Materials under ss.129-130 of the Electoral Act 1992

Keane v. Clerk of the Dáil – Clarifying Who May Inspect “Sealed” Election Materials under ss.129-130 of the Electoral Act 1992

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Keane v. Clerk of the Dáil – Clarifying Who May Inspect “Sealed” Election Materials under ss.129-130 of the Electoral Act 1992 High Court of Ireland – Ms. Justice Emily Egan – 19 June 2025 – [2025]...
Non‑validated Biomarkers and Conference Posters Can Render a Dosing Regimen Obvious: The High Court’s Sandoz v Bayer (Rivaroxaban OD) Decision

Non‑validated Biomarkers and Conference Posters Can Render a Dosing Regimen Obvious: The High Court’s Sandoz v Bayer (Rivaroxaban OD) Decision

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Non‑validated Biomarkers and Conference Posters Can Render a Dosing Regimen Obvious: The High Court’s Sandoz v Bayer (Rivaroxaban OD) Decision Introduction In Sandoz AG & Rowex Ltd v Bayer...

        Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges

Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges Introduction In Bord na Móna Biomass...
Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 1. Introduction The High Court’s decision in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert