Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Ireland Case Commentaries

Promissory Estoppel and Personal Guarantees: High Court Ruling in Bank of Ireland v. McGettigan

Promissory Estoppel and Personal Guarantees: High Court Ruling in Bank of Ireland v. McGettigan

Date: Sep 16, 2021
Promissory Estoppel and Personal Guarantees: High Court Ruling in Bank of Ireland v. McGettigan Introduction The case of Bank of Ireland v. McGettigan & Anor ([2021] IEHC 622) addresses the complex...
Leave to Appeal Denied in Doyle v. Houston: Implications for Judicial Review and Public Importance

Leave to Appeal Denied in Doyle v. Houston: Implications for Judicial Review and Public Importance

Date: Sep 15, 2021
Leave to Appeal Denied in Doyle v. Houston: Implications for Judicial Review and Public Importance Introduction Doyle v. Houston ([2021] IESCDET 101) is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Supreme...
Clare County Council v. McDonagh: Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Proportionality Standards in Housing Authority Decisions

Clare County Council v. McDonagh: Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Proportionality Standards in Housing Authority Decisions

Date: Sep 15, 2021
Clare County Council v. McDonagh: Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Proportionality Standards in Housing Authority Decisions Introduction The Supreme Court of Ireland's determination in Clare County...
Criteria for Granting Leave to Appeal: Supreme Court of Ireland Upholds Established Principles in Launceston Property Finance DAC v. Wright

Criteria for Granting Leave to Appeal: Supreme Court of Ireland Upholds Established Principles in Launceston Property Finance DAC v. Wright

Date: Sep 15, 2021
Criteria for Granting Leave to Appeal: Supreme Court of Ireland Upholds Established Principles in Launceston Property Finance DAC v. Wright Introduction In the landmark case of Launceston Property...
Fox v. The Minister for Justice: Establishing the Temporal Boundaries of ECHR Obligations in Ireland

Fox v. The Minister for Justice: Establishing the Temporal Boundaries of ECHR Obligations in Ireland

Date: Sep 15, 2021
Fox v. The Minister for Justice: Establishing the Temporal Boundaries of ECHR Obligations in Ireland Introduction Fox v. The Minister for Justice and Equality (Approved) ([2021] IESC 61) is a...
Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Granting Leave to Appeal in Houston v. Barniville & Ors

Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Granting Leave to Appeal in Houston v. Barniville & Ors

Date: Sep 15, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds Strict Standards for Granting Leave to Appeal in Houston v. Barniville & Ors Introduction In the landmark determination of Houston v. Barniville & Ors ([2021] IESCDET 102), the...
Reinforcing the Integrity of Belief Evidence: Insights from DPP v Cassidy [2021] IESC 60

Reinforcing the Integrity of Belief Evidence: Insights from DPP v Cassidy [2021] IESC 60

Date: Sep 14, 2021
Reinforcing the Integrity of Belief Evidence: Insights from DPP v Cassidy [2021] IESC 60 Introduction The Director of Public Prosecutions v. Cassidy ([2021] IESC 60) is a landmark judgment delivered...
Affirming Enforcement of Adjudicator’s Decisions under the Construction Contracts Act 2013: Analysis of Aakon Construction Services LTD v. Pure Fitout Associated LTD [2021] IEHC 562

Affirming Enforcement of Adjudicator’s Decisions under the Construction Contracts Act 2013: Analysis of Aakon Construction Services LTD v. Pure Fitout Associated LTD [2021] IEHC 562

Date: Sep 14, 2021
Affirming Enforcement of Adjudicator’s Decisions under the Construction Contracts Act 2013: Analysis of Aakon Construction Services LTD v. Pure Fitout Associated LTD [2021] IEHC 562 Introduction The...
Enhanced Obligations on Decision-Makers in Refoulement Reviews under the International Protection Act 2015: ZB & Ors v Minister for Justice

Enhanced Obligations on Decision-Makers in Refoulement Reviews under the International Protection Act 2015: ZB & Ors v Minister for Justice

Date: Sep 14, 2021
Enhanced Obligations on Decision-Makers in Refoulement Reviews under the International Protection Act 2015: ZB & Ors v Minister for Justice Introduction The case of ZB & Ors v. Minister for Justice...
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: The Butler v. Bosod Precedent

Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: The Butler v. Bosod Precedent

Date: Sep 11, 2021
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: The Butler v. Bosod Precedent Introduction The Supreme Court of Ireland's decision in Michael and Thomas Butler Ltd & Ors v. Bosod Ltd & Ors (Approved) ([2021]...
EN v. Minister for Justice & Ors [2021] IEHC 585: Upholding the Balance of Probabilities Standard in Refoulement Decisions

EN v. Minister for Justice & Ors [2021] IEHC 585: Upholding the Balance of Probabilities Standard in Refoulement Decisions

Date: Sep 10, 2021
EN v. Minister for Justice & Ors [2021] IEHC 585: Upholding the Balance of Probabilities Standard in Refoulement Decisions Introduction The case of EN v. Minister for Justice & Ors [2021] IEHC 585...
Supreme Court Upholds 'Real and Sensible Risk' Standard for Excluding Expert Witnesses in Sweeney & Anor v. VHI

Supreme Court Upholds 'Real and Sensible Risk' Standard for Excluding Expert Witnesses in Sweeney & Anor v. VHI

Date: Sep 10, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds 'Real and Sensible Risk' Standard for Excluding Expert Witnesses in Sweeney & Anor v. VHI Introduction The case of Sweeney & Anor v. VHI (Approved) ([2021] IESC 58) addresses...
Refoulement Decisions and the Balance of Probabilities: An Analysis of IN v. Minister for Justice & Ors [2021] IEHC 586

Refoulement Decisions and the Balance of Probabilities: An Analysis of IN v. Minister for Justice & Ors [2021] IEHC 586

Date: Sep 10, 2021
Refoulement Decisions and the Balance of Probabilities: An Analysis of IN v. Minister for Justice & Ors [2021] IEHC 586 Introduction IN v. Minister for Justice & Ors ([2021] IEHC 586) is a pivotal...
High Court Upholds Ministerial Direction for Joint Retail Strategy Coordination in Cork County Council v. Minister for Housing

High Court Upholds Ministerial Direction for Joint Retail Strategy Coordination in Cork County Council v. Minister for Housing

Date: Sep 8, 2021
High Court Upholds Ministerial Direction for Joint Retail Strategy Coordination in Cork County Council v. Minister for Housing Introduction The case of Cork County Council v. Minister for Housing,...
Minister for Justice v. Maciulskas: Upholding European Arrest Warrant Surrender Criteria and Addressing Prison Condition Concerns

Minister for Justice v. Maciulskas: Upholding European Arrest Warrant Surrender Criteria and Addressing Prison Condition Concerns

Date: Sep 7, 2021
Minister for Justice v. Maciulskas: Upholding European Arrest Warrant Surrender Criteria and Addressing Prison Condition Concerns Introduction The case of Minister for Justice v. Maciulskas...
Enhanced Procedural Safeguards in European Arrest Warrant Surrender: Insights from Minister for Justice v. Spika

Enhanced Procedural Safeguards in European Arrest Warrant Surrender: Insights from Minister for Justice v. Spika

Date: Sep 7, 2021
Enhanced Procedural Safeguards in European Arrest Warrant Surrender: Insights from Minister for Justice v. Spika ([2021] IEHC 587) Introduction The case of Minister for Justice v. Spika ([2021] IEHC...
Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hoamea: Upholding Surrender under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003

Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hoamea: Upholding Surrender under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003

Date: Sep 7, 2021
Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hoamea: Upholding Surrender under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 Introduction In the landmark case of Minister for Justice and Equality v. Hoamea (Approved)...
Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for 'Leapfrog' Appeals: Sheehan & O’Neill v. Link Asset Services & Ors [2021]

Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for 'Leapfrog' Appeals: Sheehan & O’Neill v. Link Asset Services & Ors [2021]

Date: Sep 7, 2021
Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for 'Leapfrog' Appeals: Sheehan & O’Neill v. Link Asset Services & Ors [2021] Introduction The case of Sheehan & O’Neill v. Link Asset Services & Ors [2021]...
Protection of Tenant Rights Pending Statutory Appeal: Insights from Carroll v. Residential Tenancies Board

Protection of Tenant Rights Pending Statutory Appeal: Insights from Carroll v. Residential Tenancies Board

Date: Sep 4, 2021
Protection of Tenant Rights Pending Statutory Appeal: Insights from Carroll v. Residential Tenancies Board Introduction The case of Carroll v. Residential Tenancies Board (Approved) ([2021] IEHC 561)...
Defining Consumers and Creditors under the Consumer Credit Act: Insights from US Mainstream Renewable Power Inc v. McGinnis [2021] IEHC 615

Defining Consumers and Creditors under the Consumer Credit Act: Insights from US Mainstream Renewable Power Inc v. McGinnis [2021] IEHC 615

Date: Sep 4, 2021
Defining Consumers and Creditors under the Consumer Credit Act: Insights from US Mainstream Renewable Power Inc v. McGinnis [2021] IEHC 615 Introduction The case of US Mainstream Renewable Power Inc...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert