Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE v. UKTRANTI MANDAL: Establishing Rigorous Compliance in Resignation Acceptance under the MEPS Act

SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE v. UKTRANTI MANDAL: Establishing Rigorous Compliance in Resignation Acceptance under the MEPS Act

Date: Apr 26, 2024
SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE v. UKTRANTI MANDAL: Establishing Rigorous Compliance in Resignation Acceptance under the MEPS Act Introduction In the landmark case of Shriram Manohar Bande v. Uktranti Mandal...
RAHUL KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF BIHAR: Landmark Judgment on Plea of Juvenility under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015

RAHUL KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF BIHAR: Landmark Judgment on Plea of Juvenility under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015

Date: Apr 26, 2024
RAHUL KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF BIHAR: Landmark Judgment on Plea of Juvenility under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015 Introduction The case of Rahul Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar (2024 INSC 359)...
Resignation Acceptance Effective Without Communication: Supreme Court's Decision in SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE v. UKTRANTI MANDAL

Resignation Acceptance Effective Without Communication: Supreme Court's Decision in SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE v. UKTRANTI MANDAL

Date: Apr 26, 2024
Resignation Acceptance Effective Without Communication: Supreme Court's Decision in SHRIRAM MANOHAR BANDE v. UKTRANTI MANDAL Introduction The case of Shriram Manohar Bande v. UKTranti Mandal (2024...
Madura Coats Decision: Reinforcing Principles of Natural Justice in Excise Adjudications

Madura Coats Decision: Reinforcing Principles of Natural Justice in Excise Adjudications

Date: Apr 26, 2024
Madura Coats Decision: Reinforcing Principles of Natural Justice in Excise Adjudications Introduction The Supreme Court of India's judgment in M/S MADURA COATS PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF...
Reaffirming the Finality of Tribunal Directions and Requirements of Prejudice in Appeal Adjudications: M/S Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Reaffirming the Finality of Tribunal Directions and Requirements of Prejudice in Appeal Adjudications: M/S Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise

Date: Apr 26, 2024
Reaffirming the Finality of Tribunal Directions and Requirements of Prejudice in Appeal Adjudications Introduction The case of M/S Madura Coats Private Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise (2024...
Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of Financial Creditor under IBC: Security Deposits with Interest Constitute Financial Debt

Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of Financial Creditor under IBC: Security Deposits with Interest Constitute Financial Debt

Date: Apr 26, 2024
Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of Financial Creditor under IBC: Security Deposits with Interest Constitute Financial Debt Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark judgment of...
Establishing Enhanced Compensation in Medical Negligence: Insights from JYOTI DEVI v. SUKET HOSPITAL AND ORS. (2024 INSC 330)

Establishing Enhanced Compensation in Medical Negligence: Insights from JYOTI DEVI v. SUKET HOSPITAL AND ORS. (2024 INSC 330)

Date: Apr 24, 2024
Establishing Enhanced Compensation in Medical Negligence: Insights from Jyoti Devi v. Suket Hospital and Ors. (2024 INSC 330) Introduction The case of Jyoti Devi v. Suket Hospital and Ors. (2024 INSC...
Reaffirmation of the Eggshell Skull Rule in Medical Negligence under the Consumer Protection Act: JYOTI DEVI v. SUKET HOSPITAL AND ORS.

Reaffirmation of the Eggshell Skull Rule in Medical Negligence under the Consumer Protection Act: JYOTI DEVI v. SUKET HOSPITAL AND ORS.

Date: Apr 24, 2024
Reaffirmation of the Eggshell Skull Rule in Medical Negligence under the Consumer Protection Act: JYOTI DEVI v. SUKET HOSPITAL AND ORS. Introduction The case of Jyoti Devi v. Suket Hospital and Ors....
Supreme Court Upholds Executing Court's Order in REHAN AHMED v. AKHTAR UN NISA: Reinforcing Execution Proceedings under Section 47 CPC

Supreme Court Upholds Executing Court's Order in REHAN AHMED v. AKHTAR UN NISA: Reinforcing Execution Proceedings under Section 47 CPC

Date: Apr 23, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Executing Court's Order in REHAN AHMED v. AKHTAR UN NISA: Reinforcing Execution Proceedings under Section 47 CPC Introduction The case of Rehan Ahmed (Deceased) versus Akhtar Un...
Unilateral Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations: Supreme Court Clarifies in Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Afreen Fatima Zaidi

Unilateral Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations: Supreme Court Clarifies in Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Afreen Fatima Zaidi

Date: Apr 23, 2024
Unilateral Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations: Supreme Court Clarifies in Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Afreen Fatima Zaidi Introduction The landmark case of Yash Raj Films...
Supreme Court Upholds Execution Order in Rehan Ahmed v. Akhtar Un Nisa: Clarification on Section 47 CPC Objections

Supreme Court Upholds Execution Order in Rehan Ahmed v. Akhtar Un Nisa: Clarification on Section 47 CPC Objections

Date: Apr 23, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Execution Order in Rehan Ahmed v. Akhtar Un Nisa: Clarification on Section 47 CPC Objections Introduction The case of Rehan Ahmed (Deceased) versus Akhtar Un Nisa (Deceased)...
No Contractual Obligation Arises from Promotional Trailers: Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Afreen Fatima Zaidi

No Contractual Obligation Arises from Promotional Trailers: Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Afreen Fatima Zaidi

Date: Apr 23, 2024
No Contractual Obligation Arises from Promotional Trailers: Yash Raj Films Private Limited v. Afreen Fatima Zaidi (2024 INSC 328) Introduction The landmark judgment in Yash Raj Films Private Limited...
Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Scrutiny of Bail Under Section 439 CrPC in Murder Cases

Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Scrutiny of Bail Under Section 439 CrPC in Murder Cases

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Scrutiny of Bail Under Section 439 CrPC in Murder Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Ramayan Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh (2024 INSC 323), the Supreme...
Supreme Court Declares Non-Solemnized Hindu Marriage Invalid Despite Registration in DOLY RANI v. MANISH KUMAR CHANCHAL

Supreme Court Declares Non-Solemnized Hindu Marriage Invalid Despite Registration in DOLY RANI v. MANISH KUMAR CHANCHAL

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Supreme Court Declares Non-Solemnized Hindu Marriage Invalid Despite Registration in DOLY RANI v. MANISH KUMAR CHANCHAL Introduction In the landmark case DOLY RANI v. MANISH KUMAR CHANCHAL (2024 INSC...
Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Appellate Review of Acquittals in Rudragoudar v. State of Karnataka

Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Appellate Review of Acquittals in Rudragoudar v. State of Karnataka

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Appellate Review of Acquittals in Rudragoudar v. State of Karnataka Introduction Rudragoudar v. The State of Karnataka (2024 INSC 320) is a landmark...
Emphasis on Appellate Restraint in Reviewing Acquittals: Insights from BABU SAHEBAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR v. State of Karnataka (2024 INSC 320)

Emphasis on Appellate Restraint in Reviewing Acquittals: Insights from BABU SAHEBAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR v. State of Karnataka (2024 INSC 320)

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Emphasis on Appellate Restraint in Reviewing Acquittals: Insights from BABU SAHEBAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR v. State of Karnataka (2024 INSC 320) Introduction The case of BABU SAHEBAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR v. THE...
Substitution of Penal Provisions: Supreme Court Reinforces Retrospective Application in Excise Regulations

Substitution of Penal Provisions: Supreme Court Reinforces Retrospective Application in Excise Regulations

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Substitution of Penal Provisions: Supreme Court Reinforces Retrospective Application in Excise Regulations Introduction In the landmark case of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. v. The State of Madhya...
Substitution of Rules and Retroactive Penalties: Analysis of PERNOD RICARD INDIA v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Substitution of Rules and Retroactive Penalties: Analysis of PERNOD RICARD INDIA v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Substitution of Rules and Retroactive Penalties: Analysis of PERNOD RICARD INDIA v. State of Madhya Pradesh Introduction PERNOD RICARD INDIA (P) LTD. v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (2024 INSC 327) is...
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines Against Duplicitous Filing of FIRs to Prevent Legal Harassment

Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines Against Duplicitous Filing of FIRs to Prevent Legal Harassment

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines Against Duplicitous Filing of FIRs to Prevent Legal Harassment Introduction In the landmark case of Parteek Bansal v. The State of Rajasthan (2024 INS...
Legislation by Incorporation vs. Reference: Insights from INSC v. Malu (2024)

Legislation by Incorporation vs. Reference: Insights from INSC v. Malu (2024)

Date: Apr 20, 2024
Legislation by Incorporation vs. Reference: Insights from INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA v. SATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU (2024 INSC 319) Introduction The Supreme Court of India delivered a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert