Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Anees v. The State Govt of NCT (2024 INSC 368) - Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Anees v. The State Govt of NCT (2024 INSC 368) - Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Date: May 4, 2024
Affirmation of Murder Conviction: Comprehensive Application of Section 106 of the Evidence Act in Circumstantial Cases Introduction The case of Anees v. The State Govt of NCT (2024 INSC 368)...
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on the Applicability of IPC Section 149 in Murder Cases

Supreme Court Sets Precedent on the Applicability of IPC Section 149 in Murder Cases

Date: May 4, 2024
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on the Applicability of IPC Section 149 in Murder Cases Introduction The case of ALAUDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM (2024 INSC 376) addressed significant legal questions...
Supreme Court Upholds Extension of Time for Minor Deposit Errors in Pre-emption Suits

Supreme Court Upholds Extension of Time for Minor Deposit Errors in Pre-emption Suits

Date: May 4, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Extension of Time for Minor Deposit Errors in Pre-emption Suits Introduction The case of KANIHYA @ KANHI (D) TH:LRS. v. SUKHI RAM (2024 INSC 374) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Supreme Court Sets Landmark Precedent on Quashing Matrimonial Dowry Harassment Charges

Supreme Court Sets Landmark Precedent on Quashing Matrimonial Dowry Harassment Charges

Date: May 4, 2024
Supreme Court Sets Landmark Precedent on Quashing Matrimonial Dowry Harassment Charges Introduction In the case of Achin Gupta v. The State of Haryana (2024 INSC 369), the Supreme Court of India...
Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Lis Pendens Over Bona Fide Purchaser Protection in Property Dispute

Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Lis Pendens Over Bona Fide Purchaser Protection in Property Dispute

Date: May 4, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Lis Pendens Over Bona Fide Purchaser Protection in Property Dispute 1. Introduction The case of Chander Bhan (D) Through L.R. Sher Singh v. Mukhtiar Singh et al....
Supreme Court Upholds Strict Interpretation of 'Appear' in Section 319 CrPC: Shankar v. UP

Supreme Court Upholds Strict Interpretation of 'Appear' in Section 319 CrPC: Shankar v. UP

Date: May 3, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Strict Interpretation of 'Appear' in Section 319 CrPC: Shankar v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction In the landmark case of Shankar v. The State of Uttar Pradesh (2024 INSC...
Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Compliance with Special Recruitment Rules for SC/ST Reservations in State Universities

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Compliance with Special Recruitment Rules for SC/ST Reservations in State Universities

Date: May 3, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Compliance with Special Recruitment Rules for SC/ST Reservations in State Universities Introduction In the landmark case Chaitra Nagammanavar v. The State of Karnataka...
Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Invocation of Section 319 Cr.P.C in Shankar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Invocation of Section 319 Cr.P.C in Shankar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: May 3, 2024
Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Invocation of Section 319 Cr.P.C in Shankar v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The case of Shankar v. The State of Uttar Pradesh (2024 INSC 366)...
Supreme Court Upholds Reservation Rules in University Appointments: Chaitra Nagamannavar v. The State of Karnataka

Supreme Court Upholds Reservation Rules in University Appointments: Chaitra Nagamannavar v. The State of Karnataka

Date: May 3, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Reservation Rules in University Appointments: Chaitra Nagamannavar v. The State of Karnataka Introduction The landmark case Chaitra Nagamannavar v. The State of Karnataka (2024...
Vakil Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh Home Department Secretary: A Landmark Judgment on Chargesheet Compliance under Section 173(2) CrPC

Vakil Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh Home Department Secretary: A Landmark Judgment on Chargesheet Compliance under Section 173(2) CrPC

Date: May 2, 2024
Vakil Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh Home Department Secretary: A Landmark Judgment on Chargesheet Compliance under Section 173(2) CrPC Introduction The Supreme Court of India's judgment in Vakil...
Supreme Court Upholds Finality of Consolidation Officer's Orders Under the Consolidation Act in Land Possession Disputes

Supreme Court Upholds Finality of Consolidation Officer's Orders Under the Consolidation Act in Land Possession Disputes

Date: May 2, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Finality of Consolidation Officer's Orders Under the Consolidation Act in Land Possession Disputes Introduction The Supreme Court of India adjudicated the case of Ram Balak...
Enhancing Chargesheet Compliance under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.: Insights from SHARIF AHMAD v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY (2024 INSC 363)

Enhancing Chargesheet Compliance under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.: Insights from SHARIF AHMAD v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY (2024 INSC 363)

Date: May 2, 2024
Enhancing Chargesheet Compliance under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.: Insights from SHARIF AHMAD v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY (2024 INSC 363) Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Authority's Decisions: Ram Balak Singh v. State of Bihar

Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Authority's Decisions: Ram Balak Singh v. State of Bihar

Date: May 2, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Consolidation Authority's Decisions: Ram Balak Singh v. State of Bihar Introduction The Supreme Court of India's recent judgment in Ram Balak Singh v. State of Bihar (2024 INSC...
Strict Adherence to Refund Timelines under Section 38(3) of the Delhi VAT Act Confirmed

Strict Adherence to Refund Timelines under Section 38(3) of the Delhi VAT Act Confirmed

Date: May 2, 2024
Strict Adherence to Refund Timelines under Section 38(3) of the Delhi VAT Act Confirmed Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark case of Commissioner of Trade and Taxes v. FEMC...
Revolutionary Precedent in MPPSC Recruitment Process: Deependra Yadav v. State of M.P.

Revolutionary Precedent in MPPSC Recruitment Process: Deependra Yadav v. State of M.P.

Date: May 2, 2024
Revolutionary Precedent in MPPSC Recruitment Process: Deependra Yadav v. State of M.P. Introduction The case of Deependra Yadav and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024 INSC 362) presents a...
Supreme Court Upholds Normalization and Reservation Practices in Public Service Recruitment

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization and Reservation Practices in Public Service Recruitment

Date: May 2, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Normalization and Reservation Practices in Public Service Recruitment Introduction The case of Deependra Yadav v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024 INSC 362) addresses pivotal...
Mandatory Adherence to Refund Timelines under Section 38(3) of the Delhi VAT Act: Insights from COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES v. FEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE

Mandatory Adherence to Refund Timelines under Section 38(3) of the Delhi VAT Act: Insights from COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES v. FEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE

Date: May 2, 2024
Mandatory Adherence to Refund Timelines under Section 38(3) of the Delhi VAT Act: Insights from COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES v. FEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Strict Adherence to Order 22 Rule 5 CPC in Substitution of Legal Representatives

Strict Adherence to Order 22 Rule 5 CPC in Substitution of Legal Representatives

Date: May 1, 2024
Strict Adherence to Order 22 Rule 5 CPC in Substitution of Legal Representatives Introduction The case of Swami Vedvyasanand Ji Maharaj (D) Thr LRS v. Shyam Lal Chauhan (2024 INSC 352) adjudicated by...
Labeling as Manufacture: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BELAPUR v. JINDAL DRUGS LTD.

Labeling as Manufacture: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BELAPUR v. JINDAL DRUGS LTD.

Date: May 1, 2024
Labeling as Manufacture: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent in COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BELAPUR v. JINDAL DRUGS LTD. Introduction The landmark case of Commissioner of Central Excise Belapur v....
Supreme Court Validates 60% Depreciation in Insurance Claims: NIACL v. Tata Steel

Supreme Court Validates 60% Depreciation in Insurance Claims: NIACL v. Tata Steel

Date: May 1, 2024
Supreme Court Validates 60% Depreciation in Insurance Claims: NIACL v. Tata Steel Introduction The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in the case of New India Assurance Company Ltd....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert