Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Deductibility of State Compassionate-Assistance from Motor-Accident Compensation – Commentary on The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamlesh (2025)

Deductibility of State Compassionate-Assistance from Motor-Accident Compensation – Commentary on The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamlesh (2025)

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Full Deduction of Haryana Government’s “Financial Assistance to Dependants” from Motor-Accident Compensation: A Detailed Commentary on The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamlesh & Ors. (2025 INSC...
Presumption of Valid Consent in Long-Term Live-in Relationships – Commentary on Ravish Singh Rana v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 635)

Presumption of Valid Consent in Long-Term Live-in Relationships – Commentary on Ravish Singh Rana v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 635)

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Presumption of Valid Consent in Long-Term Live-in Relationships – A Commentary on Ravish Singh Rana v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 635) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Ravish...
Exclusivity of Trial-Court Remedy for Parties Challenging Compromise Decrees – Commentary on Sakina Sultanali Sunesara v. Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj (2025)

Exclusivity of Trial-Court Remedy for Parties Challenging Compromise Decrees – Commentary on Sakina Sultanali Sunesara v. Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj (2025)

Date: Apr 27, 2025
Exclusivity of Trial-Court Remedy for Parties Challenging Compromise Decrees (Commentary on Supreme Court decision in Sakina Sultanali Sunesara (Momin) v. Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj, 2025...
“Dual Remedies Under Order IX Rule 4 CPC Affirmed: Fresh Suit Possible Even After Failed Restoration”

“Dual Remedies Under Order IX Rule 4 CPC Affirmed: Fresh Suit Possible Even After Failed Restoration”

Date: Apr 27, 2025
Dual Remedies Under Order IX Rule 4 CPC Affirmed: Fresh Suit Possible Even After Failed Restoration Introduction Amruddin Ansari (Dead) through Legal Representatives v. Afajal Ali & Ors. (2025 INSC...
Supreme Court crystallises the “Continuing Supervisory Jurisdiction” doctrine in township-development disputes: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association v. Union of India (2025)

Supreme Court crystallises the “Continuing Supervisory Jurisdiction” doctrine in township-development disputes: Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association v. Union of India (2025)

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Doctrine of “Continuing Supervisory Jurisdiction” & Flexible Procedural Equity in Large-Scale Colony Disputes Commentary on Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association v. Union of India, (2025)...
“Patwa Doctrine” – Decoupling Administrative ‘Fraud’ Designations from Criminal Process under Indian Banking Law

“Patwa Doctrine” – Decoupling Administrative ‘Fraud’ Designations from Criminal Process under Indian Banking Law

Date: Apr 26, 2025
“Patwa Doctrine” – Decoupling Administrative ‘Fraud’ Designations from Criminal Process under Indian Banking Law 1. Introduction Central Bureau of Investigation v. Surendra Patwa & Ors. (2025 INSC...
“Benefit-Then-Disobey” Contempt:  Supreme Court Crystallises Strict Liability for Wilful Breach after Securing Interim Relief (M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association v. Shaji Augustine, 2025)

“Benefit-Then-Disobey” Contempt: Supreme Court Crystallises Strict Liability for Wilful Breach after Securing Interim Relief (M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association v. Shaji Augustine, 2025)

Date: Apr 26, 2025
“Benefit-Then-Disobey” Contempt: Supreme Court Crystallises Strict Liability for Wilful Breach after Securing Interim Relief (M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association v. Shaji Augustine, 2025...
Judicial Notice of Delegated Anti-Corruption Orders & the Constitutional Limit on Article 142: A Commentary on Dashrath v. State of Maharashtra (2025)

Judicial Notice of Delegated Anti-Corruption Orders & the Constitutional Limit on Article 142: A Commentary on Dashrath v. State of Maharashtra (2025)

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Judicial Notice of Delegated Anti-Corruption Orders & the Constitutional Limit on Article 142: A Commentary on Dashrath v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 654) 1. Introduction Citation: 2025 INSC...
Clarifying Limitation under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985:  Distinguishing Statutory from Non-Statutory Representations and the Non-Extendability of Cause of Action

Clarifying Limitation under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985: Distinguishing Statutory from Non-Statutory Representations and the Non-Extendability of Cause of Action

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Clarifying Limitation under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985: Distinguishing Statutory from Non-Statutory Representations and the Non-Extendability of Cause of Action Introduction The Supreme...
Heirs’ Right to Continue Eviction Proceedings: Supreme Court Affirms Automatic Substitution under Section 21(7) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act, 1972

Heirs’ Right to Continue Eviction Proceedings: Supreme Court Affirms Automatic Substitution under Section 21(7) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act, 1972

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Heirs’ Right to Continue Eviction Proceedings: Supreme Court Affirms Automatic Substitution under Section 21(7) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972...
“Revival of ‘Washed-Off’ Adverse Entries when Post-Promotion Misconduct Persists” – Comment on Raju Narayana Swamy v. State of Kerala (2025 INSC 563)

“Revival of ‘Washed-Off’ Adverse Entries when Post-Promotion Misconduct Persists” – Comment on Raju Narayana Swamy v. State of Kerala (2025 INSC 563)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
“Revival of ‘Washed-Off’ Adverse Entries when Post-Promotion Misconduct Persists” Commentary on Supreme Court Decision in Raju Narayana Swamy v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2025 INSC 563) 1. Introduction...
Prospective Accused Cannot Challenge Court-Ordered Transfer of Investigation – A Commentary on Ramachandraiah v. M. Manjula (2025 INSC 556)

Prospective Accused Cannot Challenge Court-Ordered Transfer of Investigation – A Commentary on Ramachandraiah v. M. Manjula (2025 INSC 556)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Prospective Accused Cannot Challenge Court-Ordered Transfer of Investigation Ramachandraiah & Anr. v. M. Manjula & Ors., 2025 INSC 556 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Ramachandraiah...
“When Cancellation Is the Core Relief” – Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation, Proof of Wills and Lis-Pendens in Rajeev Gupta v. Prashant Garg (2025)

“When Cancellation Is the Core Relief” – Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation, Proof of Wills and Lis-Pendens in Rajeev Gupta v. Prashant Garg (2025)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
“When Cancellation Is the Core Relief” – Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation, Proof of Wills and Lis-Pendens Commentary on Rajeev Gupta & Ors. v. Prashant Garg & Ors., Civil Appeal 11061/2024 (2025...
“One-Time Leave Encashment” Doctrine: Supreme Court Bars Second Encashment After Re-Employment – Comment on State of Sikkim v. Dr. Mool Raj Kotwal (2025)

“One-Time Leave Encashment” Doctrine: Supreme Court Bars Second Encashment After Re-Employment – Comment on State of Sikkim v. Dr. Mool Raj Kotwal (2025)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
“One-Time Leave Encashment” Doctrine: Supreme Court Bars Second Encashment After Re-Employment Commentary on State of Sikkim & Ors. v. Dr. Mool Raj Kotwal, 2025 INSC 559 1. Introduction The Supreme...
Reaffirming the “Plausible-View” Doctrine in Rape-Acquittal Appeals – Comment on State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sanjay Kumar (2025)

Reaffirming the “Plausible-View” Doctrine in Rape-Acquittal Appeals – Comment on State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sanjay Kumar (2025)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Reaffirming the “Plausible-View” Doctrine in Rape-Acquittal Appeals – A Detailed Commentary on State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sanjay Kumar (2025 INSC 561) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision...

“Minimal-Reason” Sufficiency for Cognizance Orders: Commentary on Pramila Devi v. State of Jharkhand (2025)

“Minimal-Reason” Sufficiency for Cognizance Orders: Commentary on Pramila Devi v. State of Jharkhand (2025)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
“Minimal-Reason” Sufficiency for Cognizance Orders: A Detailed Commentary on Pramila Devi & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand & Anr., 2025 INSC 560 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Pramila...
“Non-Authorised Officer Immunity” under the SARFAESI Act: A Commentary on Sivakumar v. Inspector of Police (2025 INSC 558)

“Non-Authorised Officer Immunity” under the SARFAESI Act: A Commentary on Sivakumar v. Inspector of Police (2025 INSC 558)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
“Non-Authorised Officer Immunity” under the SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Clarifies Criminal Liability of Bank Officials – A Commentary on Sivakumar v. Inspector of Police (2025 INSC 558) 1....
“The Residence-and-Specificity Test”: Supreme Court Tightens the Noose on Omnibus Allegations under Section 498-A IPC

“The Residence-and-Specificity Test”: Supreme Court Tightens the Noose on Omnibus Allegations under Section 498-A IPC

Date: Apr 24, 2025
“The Residence-and-Specificity Test”: Supreme Court Tightens the Noose on Omnibus Allegations under Section 498-A IPC 1. Introduction Muppidi Lakshmi Narayana Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025...
Mandatory Furnishing of Enquiry Reports & Curbs on the “Prejudice” Test – A Commentary on State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Prakash Singh (2025 INSC 555)

Mandatory Furnishing of Enquiry Reports & Curbs on the “Prejudice” Test – A Commentary on State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Prakash Singh (2025 INSC 555)

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Mandatory Furnishing of Enquiry Reports & Curbs on the “Prejudice” Test – Supreme Court Lays Down Robust Due-Process Norms Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram...
“Presumption of Prejudice”: Supreme Court Establishes Adverse Inference Rule for Withheld Departmental Records in Disciplinary Proceedings

“Presumption of Prejudice”: Supreme Court Establishes Adverse Inference Rule for Withheld Departmental Records in Disciplinary Proceedings

Date: Apr 24, 2025
“Presumption of Prejudice”: Supreme Court Establishes Adverse Inference Rule for Withheld Departmental Records in Disciplinary Proceedings 1. Introduction In Maharana Pratap Singh v. State of Bihar &...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert