Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Ritika Sharan v. Sujoy Ghosh (2020): A Landmark Judgment on Child Custody and Parental Relocation

Ritika Sharan v. Sujoy Ghosh (2020): A Landmark Judgment on Child Custody and Parental Relocation

Date: Oct 29, 2020
Ritika Sharan v. Sujoy Ghosh (2020): A Landmark Judgment on Child Custody and Parental Relocation 1. Introduction Ritika Sharan v. Sujoy Ghosh is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying Remedies for Obstructed Mining Leases in Eco-Sensitive Zones: Insights from Dharmendra Kumar Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh

Clarifying Remedies for Obstructed Mining Leases in Eco-Sensitive Zones: Insights from Dharmendra Kumar Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Oct 29, 2020
Clarifying Remedies for Obstructed Mining Leases in Eco-Sensitive Zones: Insights from Dharmendra Kumar Singh v. State Of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The Supreme Court of India's judgment in...
Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment on Parental Relocation and Child Custody: RITIKA SHARAN v. SUJOY GHOSH

Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment on Parental Relocation and Child Custody: RITIKA SHARAN v. SUJOY GHOSH

Date: Oct 29, 2020
Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment on Parental Relocation and Child Custody: RITIKA SHARAN v. SUJOY GHOSH Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the case of RITIKA SHARAN v. SUJOY GHOSH,...
Establishing Custodial Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA v. PERRY KANSAGRA

Establishing Custodial Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA v. PERRY KANSAGRA

Date: Oct 29, 2020
Establishing Custodial Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA v. PERRY KANSAGRA Introduction The Supreme Court of India's judgment in Smriti Madan Kansagra v. Perry Kansagra...
Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act Enforcement Despite Technical Notice Defects: L&T Housing Finance Ltd. v. Trishul Developers

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act Enforcement Despite Technical Notice Defects: L&T Housing Finance Ltd. v. Trishul Developers

Date: Oct 28, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Act Enforcement Despite Technical Notice Defects: L&T Housing Finance Ltd. v. Trishul Developers Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark judgment of...
Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Notice Validity Despite Minor Technical Defects: L&T Housing Finance Ltd vs Trishul Developers

Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Notice Validity Despite Minor Technical Defects: L&T Housing Finance Ltd vs Trishul Developers

Date: Oct 28, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds SARFAESI Notice Validity Despite Minor Technical Defects: L&T Housing Finance Ltd vs Trishul Developers Introduction The case of L&T Housing Finance Limited (S) v. Trishul...
Enhanced Protection Measures for Victims' Families in High-Profile Cases: Analysis of Satyama Dubey And Others v. Union Of India

Enhanced Protection Measures for Victims' Families in High-Profile Cases: Analysis of Satyama Dubey And Others v. Union Of India

Date: Oct 28, 2020
Enhanced Protection Measures for Victims' Families in High-Profile Cases: Analysis of Satyama Dubey And Others v. Union Of India 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India's judgment in Satyama Dubey...
Establishing Locus Standi in Government License Resettlement: Suresh Chandra v. Joga Singh Bisht

Establishing Locus Standi in Government License Resettlement: Suresh Chandra v. Joga Singh Bisht

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Establishing Locus Standi in Government License Resettlement: Suresh Chandra v. Joga Singh Bisht Introduction The Supreme Court of India's judgment in Suresh Chandra (S) v. Joga Singh Bisht And...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Conviction in Raveen Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh: A Landmark on NDPS Act Appellate Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Conviction in Raveen Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh: A Landmark on NDPS Act Appellate Jurisdiction

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Conviction in Raveen Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh: A Landmark on NDPS Act Appellate Jurisdiction Introduction The judgment in Raveen Kumar v. The State of...
Supreme Court Upholds Deferred Implementation of OBC Reservation in All India Quota Medical Admissions in Tamil Nadu

Supreme Court Upholds Deferred Implementation of OBC Reservation in All India Quota Medical Admissions in Tamil Nadu

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Deferred Implementation of OBC Reservation in All India Quota Medical Admissions in Tamil Nadu Introduction The case of State Of Tamil Nadu (S) v. Union Of India And Others (S)....
Clarification on Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC in NDPS Act Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Indefeasible Right

Clarification on Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC in NDPS Act Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Indefeasible Right

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Clarification on Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC in NDPS Act Cases: Supreme Court Upholds Indefeasible Right Introduction The landmark judgment in M. Ravindran v. Intelligence Officer,...
Reversal of Acquittal under NDPS Act: Insights from Raveen Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Reversal of Acquittal under NDPS Act: Insights from Raveen Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Reversal of Acquittal under NDPS Act: Insights from Raveen Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh Introduction The case of Raveen Kumar (S) v. State Of Himachal Pradesh (S) (2020 INSC 606) adjudicated by...
Establishing the Indefeasible Right to Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC: Insights from M RAVINDRAN v. DIP DIRRII

Establishing the Indefeasible Right to Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC: Insights from M RAVINDRAN v. DIP DIRRII

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Establishing the Indefeasible Right to Default Bail under Section 167(2) CrPC: Insights from M RAVINDRAN v. the Intelligence Officer Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Introduction In the landmark...
Rajesh Dhiman v. State of Himachal Pradesh: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Presumption of Bias in NDPS Act Cases

Rajesh Dhiman v. State of Himachal Pradesh: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Presumption of Bias in NDPS Act Cases

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Rajesh Dhiman v. State of Himachal Pradesh: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Presumption of Bias in NDPS Act Cases Introduction The landmark case of Rajesh Dhiman v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020 INSC...
Supreme Court Upholds Continued Service of University Professors Until End of Academic Year

Supreme Court Upholds Continued Service of University Professors Until End of Academic Year

Date: Oct 17, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Continued Service of University Professors Until End of Academic Year Introduction The case of Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal (S) v. State Of Uttarakhand And Others (S) [2020 INSC...
Umesh Kumar Sharma v. State Of Uttarakhand: Upholding the Rigorous Standards for Transfer of Criminal Cases under Section 406 CrPC

Umesh Kumar Sharma v. State Of Uttarakhand: Upholding the Rigorous Standards for Transfer of Criminal Cases under Section 406 CrPC

Date: Oct 17, 2020
Umesh Kumar Sharma v. State Of Uttarakhand: Upholding the Rigorous Standards for Transfer of Criminal Cases under Section 406 CrPC Introduction The case of Umesh Kumar Sharma v. State Of Uttarakhand...
Upholding the Principles of Natural Justice in Administrative Tender Cancellations: Insights from State Of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh

Upholding the Principles of Natural Justice in Administrative Tender Cancellations: Insights from State Of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh

Date: Oct 17, 2020
Upholding the Principles of Natural Justice in Administrative Tender Cancellations: Insights from State Of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh And Others (2020 INSC 603) Introduction In the landmark case of...
Enhanced Protections under Section 167(2) CrPC: Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Saravanan v. State

Enhanced Protections under Section 167(2) CrPC: Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Saravanan v. State

Date: Oct 16, 2020
Enhanced Protections under Section 167(2) CrPC: Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Saravanan v. State Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Saravanan v. State (2020 INSC 600),...
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Shared Household' under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Shared Household' under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

Date: Oct 16, 2020
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Shared Household' under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Introduction The Supreme Court of India addressed a pivotal issue regarding the...
Supreme Court Clarifies Conditions for Default Bail Under Section 167(2), Cr.P.C.

Supreme Court Clarifies Conditions for Default Bail Under Section 167(2), Cr.P.C.

Date: Oct 16, 2020
Supreme Court Clarifies Conditions for Default Bail Under Section 167(2), Cr.P.C. Introduction The case of Saravanan v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police represents a pivotal moment in Indian...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert