Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

The Strict-Compliance Doctrine under the IBC: Supreme Court Orders Liquidation in Kalyani Transco v. Bhushan Power & Steel (2025)

The Strict-Compliance Doctrine under the IBC: Supreme Court Orders Liquidation in Kalyani Transco v. Bhushan Power & Steel (2025)

Date: May 3, 2025
The Strict-Compliance Doctrine under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Kalyani Transco v. Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd., 2025 INSC 621) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment dated 2 May...
“When Does the Clock Start Ticking?” – Supreme Court Clarifies that a Single-Judge’s Direction to Place a Matter Before the Contempt Bench Itself Initiates Proceedings under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

“When Does the Clock Start Ticking?” – Supreme Court Clarifies that a Single-Judge’s Direction to Place a Matter Before the Contempt Bench Itself Initiates Proceedings under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Date: May 2, 2025
“When Does the Clock Start Ticking?” – Supreme Court Clarifies that a Single-Judge’s Direction to Place a Matter Before the Contempt Bench Itself Initiates Proceedings under Section 20 of the...
Licensed Stamp-Vendors Are “Public Servants”, But Proof of Demand Remains Sine Qua Non: Commentary on Aman Bhatia v. State (GNCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 618

Licensed Stamp-Vendors Are “Public Servants”, But Proof of Demand Remains Sine Qua Non: Commentary on Aman Bhatia v. State (GNCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 618

Date: May 2, 2025
Licensed Stamp-Vendors Are “Public Servants”, But Proof of Demand Remains Sine Qua Non — Detailed Commentary on Aman Bhatia v. State (GNCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 618 1. Introduction In a landmark...
Arbitral Tribunals May Implead Non-Signatories on Their Own Motion –  A Commentary on ASF Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 616)

Arbitral Tribunals May Implead Non-Signatories on Their Own Motion – A Commentary on ASF Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 616)

Date: May 2, 2025
Arbitral Tribunals May Implead Non-Signatories on Their Own Motion – Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Judgment in ASF Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. (2025 INSC 616) 1....
“Earnest” vs “Advance”: Supreme Court Clarifies Valid Forfeiture & Mandatory Pleading for Refund – Commentary on K.R. Suresh v. R. Poornima (2025)

“Earnest” vs “Advance”: Supreme Court Clarifies Valid Forfeiture & Mandatory Pleading for Refund – Commentary on K.R. Suresh v. R. Poornima (2025)

Date: May 2, 2025
“Earnest” vs “Advance”: Supreme Court Clarifies Valid Forfeiture & Mandatory Pleading for Refund Commentary on K.R. Suresh v. R. Poornima & Ors., (2025) INSC 617 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Police Fabrication & Suo-Motu FIR Duty: The Precedent set in K.P. Tamilmaran v. State (2025)

Police Fabrication & Suo-Motu FIR Duty: The Precedent set in K.P. Tamilmaran v. State (2025)

Date: May 2, 2025
Police Fabrication & Suo-Motu FIR Duty: The Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling in K.P. Tamilmaran v. The State (2025 INSC 576) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in K.P. Tamilmaran v. The...
Chunni Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025): The Supreme Court’s Mandate to Trial Courts to Actively Probe Mens Rea and Mental Capacity under Section 165 Evidence Act

Chunni Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025): The Supreme Court’s Mandate to Trial Courts to Actively Probe Mens Rea and Mental Capacity under Section 165 Evidence Act

Date: May 2, 2025
Chunni Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025): The Supreme Court’s Mandate to Trial Courts to Actively Probe Mens Rea and Mental Capacity under Section 165 Evidence Act 1. Introduction The Supreme...
“Full-Copy Rule” for Departmental Test Reports & Strict Provisional-Assessment Protocol under Rule 9B – A Commentary on Oswal Petrochemicals Ltd. v. CCE (2025)

“Full-Copy Rule” for Departmental Test Reports & Strict Provisional-Assessment Protocol under Rule 9B – A Commentary on Oswal Petrochemicals Ltd. v. CCE (2025)

Date: May 2, 2025
“Full-Copy Rule” for Departmental Test Reports & Strict Provisional-Assessment Protocol under Rule 9B Commentary on M/s Oswal Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II (2025...
“Extension of Time” and “Liquidated Damages” Can Co-Exist: Narrowing Judicial Review under Section 34 – Commentary on Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd. v. Software Technology Parks of India (2025)

“Extension of Time” and “Liquidated Damages” Can Co-Exist: Narrowing Judicial Review under Section 34 – Commentary on Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd. v. Software Technology Parks of India (2025)

Date: May 2, 2025
“Extension of Time” and “Liquidated Damages” Can Co-Exist: Narrowing Judicial Review under Section 34 – Commentary on Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd. v. Software Technology Parks of India...
“Ground-Based” Requirement Reaffirmed: Supreme Court Narrows Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act Applicability and Reasserts Joint Liability in Gang-Rape – Commentary on Raju @ Umakant v. State of M.P. (2025 INSC 615)

“Ground-Based” Requirement Reaffirmed: Supreme Court Narrows Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act Applicability and Reasserts Joint Liability in Gang-Rape – Commentary on Raju @ Umakant v. State of M.P. (2025 INSC 615)

Date: May 2, 2025
“Ground-Based” Requirement Reaffirmed: Supreme Court Narrows Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act Applicability and Reasserts Joint Liability in Gang-Rape Commentary on Raju @ Umakant v. The State of Madhya...
Engineering & Technical Service Fees as Dutiable Components of Transaction Value – A Commentary on M/s Coal India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Port) Kolkata, (2025) INSC 609

Engineering & Technical Service Fees as Dutiable Components of Transaction Value – A Commentary on M/s Coal India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Port) Kolkata, (2025) INSC 609

Date: May 2, 2025
Engineering & Technical Service Fees as Dutiable Components of Transaction Value – A Commentary on M/s Coal India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Port) Kolkata, (2025) INSC 609 1. Introduction In...
Retrospective Extension of Assessment Limitation under the Punjab VAT Act and the Narrowing of “Nokia”: A Supreme Court Re-Calibration (M/s. Naresh Kumar Gupta v. State of Punjab, 2025 INSC 719)

Retrospective Extension of Assessment Limitation under the Punjab VAT Act and the Narrowing of “Nokia”: A Supreme Court Re-Calibration (M/s. Naresh Kumar Gupta v. State of Punjab, 2025 INSC 719)

Date: May 2, 2025
Retrospective Extension of Assessment Limitation under the Punjab VAT Act and the Narrowing of “Nokia”: A Supreme Court Re-Calibration (M/s. Naresh Kumar Gupta v. State of Punjab & Ors., 2025 INSC...
“Proximity & Mens Rea in Abetment of Suicide”: A Comment on Shenbagavalli v. Inspector of Police (2025 INSC 607)

“Proximity & Mens Rea in Abetment of Suicide”: A Comment on Shenbagavalli v. Inspector of Police (2025 INSC 607)

Date: May 1, 2025
“Proximity & Mens Rea in Abetment of Suicide”: Supreme Court Clarifies the Threshold for Quashing under Section 482 CrPC 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Shenbagavalli & Ors. v....
“The Keshav Principle” – Re-calibrating the ‘Sterling Witness’ Test in Rape Prosecutions

“The Keshav Principle” – Re-calibrating the ‘Sterling Witness’ Test in Rape Prosecutions

Date: May 1, 2025
“The Keshav Principle” – Re-calibrating the ‘Sterling Witness’ Test in Rape Prosecutions 1. Introduction Case: Keshav v. State of Maharashtra (2025 INSC 604, Supreme Court of India, 30 April 2025)...
The Doctrine of “Limited Judicial Modification” under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – A Commentary on Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd. (2025)

The Doctrine of “Limited Judicial Modification” under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – A Commentary on Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd. (2025)

Date: May 1, 2025
The Doctrine of “Limited Judicial Modification” under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Commentary on the Constitution Bench decision in Gayatri Balasamy v. M/s ISG Novasoft Technologies...
“Pragya Prasun v. Union of India”: Establishing the Fundamental Right to Accessible Digital-KYC for Persons with Disabilities

“Pragya Prasun v. Union of India”: Establishing the Fundamental Right to Accessible Digital-KYC for Persons with Disabilities

Date: May 1, 2025
“No one left offline” – The Supreme Court Declares Accessible Digital-KYC a Constitutional Mandate 1. Introduction The consolidated decision in Pragya Prasun & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2025...
“The Holistic Welfare Test” – Supreme Court’s New Guideline on Interim Child-Custody (Commentary on Arathy Ramachandran v. Bijay Raj Menon, 2025 INSC 587)

“The Holistic Welfare Test” – Supreme Court’s New Guideline on Interim Child-Custody (Commentary on Arathy Ramachandran v. Bijay Raj Menon, 2025 INSC 587)

Date: May 1, 2025
“The Holistic Welfare Test” – Supreme Court’s New Guideline on Interim Child-Custody Commentary on Arathy Ramachandran v. Bijay Raj Menon (2025 INSC 587) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India,...
Supreme Court Clarifies Valid Service of Section 8 IBC Demand Notice: Delivery on Key Managerial Personnel at Registered Office Suffices

Supreme Court Clarifies Valid Service of Section 8 IBC Demand Notice: Delivery on Key Managerial Personnel at Registered Office Suffices

Date: May 1, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies Valid Service of Section 8 IBC Demand Notice: Delivery on Key Managerial Personnel at Registered Office Suffices 1. Introduction In Visa Coke Limited v. Mesco Kalinga Steel...
Decoupling Cross-Subsidy Surcharge from Tariff Orders – Commentary on Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. v. Rajasthan Textile Mills Association (2025 INSC 592)

Decoupling Cross-Subsidy Surcharge from Tariff Orders – Commentary on Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. v. Rajasthan Textile Mills Association (2025 INSC 592)

Date: May 1, 2025
Decoupling Cross-Subsidy Surcharge from Tariff Orders: Supreme Court Clarifies Independent Determination in Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. v. Rajasthan Textile Mills Association (2025 INSC 592) 1....
“Reasonable-Time Limitation” under the Karnataka PTCL Act: Supreme Court clarifies that restoration petitions must be filed within a reasonable period

“Reasonable-Time Limitation” under the Karnataka PTCL Act: Supreme Court clarifies that restoration petitions must be filed within a reasonable period

Date: May 1, 2025
“Reasonable-Time Limitation” under the Karnataka PTCL Act: Supreme Court clarifies that restoration petitions must be filed within a reasonable period 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert