Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Enhanced Scrutiny on Prosecution's Duty to Examine Material Witnesses: DAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB (2023)

Enhanced Scrutiny on Prosecution's Duty to Examine Material Witnesses: DAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB (2023)

Date: Jun 23, 2023
Enhanced Scrutiny on Prosecution's Duty to Examine Material Witnesses: Davinder Singh v. The State of Punjab (2023 INSC 585) Introduction The case of Davinder Singh v. The State of Punjab (2023 INSC...
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Evidence Evaluation in IPC Section 376 Cases: DAVINDER SINGH v. State of Punjab

Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Evidence Evaluation in IPC Section 376 Cases: DAVINDER SINGH v. State of Punjab

Date: Jun 23, 2023
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof and Evidence Evaluation in IPC Section 376 Cases: DAVINDER SINGH v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of DAVINDER SINGH v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB adjudicated by the...
STATE OF PUNJAB v. KEWAL KRISHAN: Supreme Court Validates High Court's Acquittal and Evidentiary Standards

STATE OF PUNJAB v. KEWAL KRISHAN: Supreme Court Validates High Court's Acquittal and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Jun 22, 2023
STATE OF PUNJAB v. KEWAL KRISHAN: Supreme Court Validates High Court's Acquittal and Evidentiary Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Punjab v. Kewal Krishan, decided by the...
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Compassionate Appointments in BANK OF BARODA v. BALJIT SINGH

Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Compassionate Appointments in BANK OF BARODA v. BALJIT SINGH

Date: Jun 22, 2023
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Compassionate Appointments in BANK OF BARODA v. BALJIT SINGH Introduction In the landmark case of BANK OF BARODA v. BALJIT SINGH, decided by the Supreme...
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from State of Punjab v. Kewal Krishan

Establishing Rigorous Standards for Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from State of Punjab v. Kewal Krishan

Date: Jun 22, 2023
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Circumstantial Evidence: Insights from State of Punjab v. Kewal Krishan (2023 INSC 583) Introduction The case of State of Punjab v. Kewal Krishan (2023 INSC 583)...
Compassionate Appointment as a Concession, Not a Right: Supreme Court Rules in Bank of Baroda v. Baljit Singh

Compassionate Appointment as a Concession, Not a Right: Supreme Court Rules in Bank of Baroda v. Baljit Singh

Date: Jun 22, 2023
Compassionate Appointment as a Concession, Not a Right: Supreme Court Rules in Bank of Baroda v. Baljit Singh Introduction The case of Bank of Baroda v. Baljit Singh (2023 INSC 584) presents a...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Directions for Deployment of Central Forces to Ensure Free and Fair Elections in West Bengal

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Directions for Deployment of Central Forces to Ensure Free and Fair Elections in West Bengal

Date: Jun 21, 2023
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Directions for Deployment of Central Forces to Ensure Free and Fair Elections in West Bengal Introduction The case State Of West Bengal And Others Petitioner(s) v....
Supreme Court Upholds Competition Act's Applicability to State-Owned Monopolies: COAL India Ltd v. CCI (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Competition Act's Applicability to State-Owned Monopolies: COAL India Ltd v. CCI (2023)

Date: Jun 16, 2023
Supreme Court Upholds Competition Act's Applicability to State-Owned Monopolies: COAL India Ltd v. CCI (2023) Introduction In the landmark case of Coal India Ltd v. Competition Commission of India...
Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel vs Ambika Food Products Pvt. Ltd: Establishing [New Legal Principle]

Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel vs Ambika Food Products Pvt. Ltd: Establishing [New Legal Principle]

Date: Jun 16, 2023
Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel vs Ambika Food Products Pvt. Ltd: Establishing the Principle of [Insert Title Reflecting the Legal Principle] 1. Introduction The case of Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel v....
Enhancing Judicial Integrity: The Role of Accurate FIR Documentation and Witness Credibility in Criminal Convictions

Enhancing Judicial Integrity: The Role of Accurate FIR Documentation and Witness Credibility in Criminal Convictions

Date: Jun 16, 2023
Enhancing Judicial Integrity: The Role of Accurate FIR Documentation and Witness Credibility in Criminal Convictions Introduction The Supreme Court of India's judgment in Mohd. Muslim v. State of...
Supreme Court Establishes Protection of Third-Party Rights in Partition Suits: Trinity Infraventures Ltd. v. M. S. Murthy

Supreme Court Establishes Protection of Third-Party Rights in Partition Suits: Trinity Infraventures Ltd. v. M. S. Murthy

Date: Jun 16, 2023
Supreme Court Establishes Protection of Third-Party Rights in Partition Suits Introduction The landmark case of M/S. Trinity Infraventures Ltd. v. M. S. Murthy (2023 INSC 581) adjudicated by the...
Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel v. Ambika Food Products Pvt. Ltd. (2023): Upholding Directors' Discretion in Authorized Capital Increase and Share Allotment in Private Companies

Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel v. Ambika Food Products Pvt. Ltd. (2023): Upholding Directors' Discretion in Authorized Capital Increase and Share Allotment in Private Companies

Date: Jun 16, 2023
Hasmukhlal Madhavlal Patel v. Ambika Food Products Pvt. Ltd. (2023): Upholding Directors' Discretion in Authorized Capital Increase and Share Allotment in Private Companies Introduction Hasmukhlal...
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Administrative Review Powers for Expunction of Adverse Remarks in Police Services under Punjab Police Rules

Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Administrative Review Powers for Expunction of Adverse Remarks in Police Services under Punjab Police Rules

Date: Jun 15, 2023
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Administrative Review Powers for Expunction of Adverse Remarks in Police Services under Punjab Police Rules Introduction The case of Aish Mohammad v. State of...
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Service Termination Procedures in Aish Mohammad vs. State of Haryana

Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Service Termination Procedures in Aish Mohammad vs. State of Haryana

Date: Jun 15, 2023
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Service Termination Procedures in Aish Mohammad vs. State of Haryana Introduction In the landmark case of Aish Mohammad vs. State of Haryana, decided by the Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Authority in Administrative Reviews: Aish Mohammad v. State of Haryana

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Authority in Administrative Reviews: Aish Mohammad v. State of Haryana

Date: Jun 15, 2023
Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Authority in Administrative Reviews: Aish Mohammad v. State of Haryana Introduction The case of Aish Mohammad v. State of Haryana And Others delves into the intricate...
Supreme Court Affirms State's Authority to Regulate Aggregators under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Supreme Court Affirms State's Authority to Regulate Aggregators under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Date: Jun 13, 2023
Supreme Court Affirms State's Authority to Regulate Aggregators under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in its judgment dated June 12, 2023,...
Summoning of Co-Accused Under Section 319 CrPC: Insights from Jitendra Nath Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Summoning of Co-Accused Under Section 319 CrPC: Insights from Jitendra Nath Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Jun 3, 2023
Summoning of Co-Accused Under Section 319 CrPC: Insights from Jitendra Nath Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction Jitendra Nath Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023 INSC 576) is a...
Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Application of Section 319 CrPC in Unnamed Accused Cases under UAPA

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Application of Section 319 CrPC in Unnamed Accused Cases under UAPA

Date: Jun 3, 2023
Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Application of Section 319 CrPC in Unnamed Accused Cases under UAPA Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark judgment of Jitendra Nath Mishra v....
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Validity of Sale and License Agreements in Property Possession Cases

Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Validity of Sale and License Agreements in Property Possession Cases

Date: Jun 3, 2023
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Validity of Sale and License Agreements in Property Possession Cases Introduction The case of Ghaneshyam vs. Yogendra Rathi was adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Robust Circumstantial Evidence: Prakash Nishad v. The State of Maharashtra

Reaffirming the Necessity of Robust Circumstantial Evidence: Prakash Nishad v. The State of Maharashtra

Date: May 20, 2023
Reaffirming the Necessity of Robust Circumstantial Evidence: Prakash Nishad v. The State of Maharashtra Introduction The Supreme Court of India in Prakash Nishad @ Kewat Zinak Nishad v. The State Of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert