Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Of India Case Commentaries

Beyond the 13-Percent Ceiling: Supreme Court on the True Reach of Note 3, Regulation 55, and Judicial Self-Restraint in Electricity Tariff Matters

Beyond the 13-Percent Ceiling: Supreme Court on the True Reach of Note 3, Regulation 55, and Judicial Self-Restraint in Electricity Tariff Matters

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Beyond the 13-Percent Ceiling: Supreme Court on the True Reach of Note 3, Regulation 55, and Judicial Self-Restraint in Electricity Tariff Matters 1. Introduction In The State of Himachal Pradesh v....
“Meaningful Scrutiny of Mitigation Reports Before Confirming a Death Sentence” – Commentary on BYLURU THIPPAIAH v. State of Karnataka (2025)

“Meaningful Scrutiny of Mitigation Reports Before Confirming a Death Sentence” – Commentary on BYLURU THIPPAIAH v. State of Karnataka (2025)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
“Meaningful Scrutiny of Mitigation Reports Before Confirming a Death Sentence” Commentary on BYLURU THIPPAIAH @ NAYAKARA THIPPAIAH v. State of Karnataka (2025 INSC 862) 1. Introduction The Supreme...
Reaffirming the Two-Step “Rarest of Rare” Test & Mandatory Mitigation Inquiry – Commentary on Jai Prakash v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 861)

Reaffirming the Two-Step “Rarest of Rare” Test & Mandatory Mitigation Inquiry – Commentary on Jai Prakash v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 861)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Reaffirming the Two-Step “Rarest of Rare” Test & Mandatory Mitigation Inquiry – Commentary on Jai Prakash v. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 861) I. Introduction In Jai Prakash v. State of...
“Temporary-Status Is Enough” – Supreme Court Unlocks Family Pension for Substitutes in Railway Service

“Temporary-Status Is Enough” – Supreme Court Unlocks Family Pension for Substitutes in Railway Service

Date: Jul 17, 2025
“Temporary-Status Is Enough” – Supreme Court Unlocks Family Pension for Substitutes in Railway Service Introduction In Mala Devi v. Union of India & Ors., 2025 INSC 855, the Supreme Court of India...
Safeguarding Against Wrongful Capital Convictions: The Supreme Court’s Clarion Call in Baljinder Kumar v. State of Punjab (2025)

Safeguarding Against Wrongful Capital Convictions: The Supreme Court’s Clarion Call in Baljinder Kumar v. State of Punjab (2025)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
Safeguarding Against Wrongful Capital Convictions: The Supreme Court’s Clarion Call in Baljinder Kumar @ Kala v. State of Punjab (2025) Introduction The decision of the Supreme Court of India in...
“ND” Equals Deemed Service: The New Rule on Registered Post Endorsements – Commentary on Krishna Swaroop Agarwal (D) thr. LR v. Arvind Kumar (2025 INSC 859)

“ND” Equals Deemed Service: The New Rule on Registered Post Endorsements – Commentary on Krishna Swaroop Agarwal (D) thr. LR v. Arvind Kumar (2025 INSC 859)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
“ND” Equals Deemed Service: The New Rule on Registered Post Endorsements Commentary on Supreme Court Judgment in Krishna Swaroop Agarwal (Dead) through LRs v. Arvind Kumar, 2025 INSC 859 1....

        No E-Service for Section 35 BNSS Notices: Supreme Court Reinforces Personal Service
        Requirement – A Commentary on Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I. (2025)

No E-Service for Section 35 BNSS Notices: Supreme Court Reinforces Personal Service Requirement – A Commentary on Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I. (2025)

Date: Jul 17, 2025
No E-Service for Section 35 BNSS Notices: Supreme Court Reinforces Personal Service Requirement Commentary on Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr., 2025 INSC 909 1....
“Availability for Appointment” Re-Interpreted: The Supreme Court Mandates Same-Cycle Substitution of Vacancies in U.P. Higher Judicial Service

“Availability for Appointment” Re-Interpreted: The Supreme Court Mandates Same-Cycle Substitution of Vacancies in U.P. Higher Judicial Service

Date: Jul 17, 2025
“Availability for Appointment” Re-Interpreted: The Supreme Court Mandates Same-Cycle Substitution of Vacancies in U.P. Higher Judicial Service 1. Introduction In Tosh Kumar Sharma v. High Court of...
“Child-Centric Review” – Supreme Court Allows Post-Judgment Facts to Re-open Final Custody Orders

“Child-Centric Review” – Supreme Court Allows Post-Judgment Facts to Re-open Final Custody Orders

Date: Jul 16, 2025
“Child-Centric Review” – Supreme Court Allows Post-Judgment Facts to Re-open Final Custody Orders 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Neethu B. @ Neethu Baby Mathew v. Rajesh Kumar (2025...
Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage as a Stand-Alone Ground for Divorce under Article 142 – An Exhaustive Commentary on Pradeep Bhardwaj v. Priya (2025 INSC 852)

Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage as a Stand-Alone Ground for Divorce under Article 142 – An Exhaustive Commentary on Pradeep Bhardwaj v. Priya (2025 INSC 852)

Date: Jul 16, 2025
Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage as a Stand-Alone Ground for Divorce under Article 142 – Commentary on Pradeep Bhardwaj v. Priya (2025 INSC 852) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in...

        “Regularisation Cannot Erase Criminal Conspiracy in Illegal Constructions” – 
        Commentary on G. Mohandas v. State of Kerala, 2025 INSC 854

“Regularisation Cannot Erase Criminal Conspiracy in Illegal Constructions” – Commentary on G. Mohandas v. State of Kerala, 2025 INSC 854

Date: Jul 16, 2025
“Regularisation Cannot Erase Criminal Conspiracy in Illegal Constructions” – Supreme Court’s New Benchmark in G. Mohandas v. State of Kerala (2025) Introduction In G. Mohandas v. The State of Kerala...
“Adjudication Order = Notice of Demand” – Supreme Court Clarifies Commencement of Interest under Section 28A SEBI Act

“Adjudication Order = Notice of Demand” – Supreme Court Clarifies Commencement of Interest under Section 28A SEBI Act

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Adjudication Order = Notice of Demand” – Supreme Court Clarifies Commencement of Interest under Section 28A SEBI Act 1. Introduction In Jaykishor Chaturvedi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India...
Power-of-Attorney Holders Are Agents, Not Executants: The Supreme Court’s Call to Revisit Rajni Tandon in G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala (2025)

Power-of-Attorney Holders Are Agents, Not Executants: The Supreme Court’s Call to Revisit Rajni Tandon in G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Power-of-Attorney Holders Are Agents, Not Executants: The Supreme Court’s Call to Revisit Rajni Tandon in G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala (2025) 1. Introduction On 15 July 2025, a two-judge Bench...
Mandatory Prior Board-Level Consultation Before Pension Reduction under Regulation 33: Commentary on Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India (2025)

Mandatory Prior Board-Level Consultation Before Pension Reduction under Regulation 33: Commentary on Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Mandatory Prior Board-Level Consultation Before Pension Reduction under Regulation 33 Introduction Case: Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India & Ors., 2025 INSC 848 Court: Supreme Court of India...
Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Chain-of-Custody Protocols for DNA Evidence – Commentary on “Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu” (2025 INSC 845)

Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Chain-of-Custody Protocols for DNA Evidence – Commentary on “Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu” (2025 INSC 845)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Supreme Court Mandates Uniform Chain-of-Custody Protocols for DNA Evidence – Commentary on “Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu” (2025 INSC 845) 1. Introduction In a landmark judgment...
Unity of Purpose over Separate Incorporation – Supreme Court’s Expanded Test for Clubbing Establishments under the EPF Act

Unity of Purpose over Separate Incorporation – Supreme Court’s Expanded Test for Clubbing Establishments under the EPF Act

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Unity of Purpose over Separate Incorporation – Supreme Court’s Expanded Test for Clubbing Establishments under the EPF Act 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in M/S Torino Laboratories Pvt....

        Supreme Court Introduces “Equitable Enhancement of Consideration” 
        in Decrees for Specific Performance – A Comment on Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur (2025)

Supreme Court Introduces “Equitable Enhancement of Consideration” in Decrees for Specific Performance – A Comment on Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Equitable Enhancement of Consideration in Specific Performance: A Detailed Commentary on Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur (Dead) through LRs., 2025 INSC 850 1. Introduction On 15 July 2025 the Supreme...
Exclusive DRT Jurisdiction & Evidentiary Burden for Unregistered Tenancies under the Post-2016 SARFAESI Regime – Commentary on PNB Housing Finance Ltd. v. Manoj Saha (2025)

Exclusive DRT Jurisdiction & Evidentiary Burden for Unregistered Tenancies under the Post-2016 SARFAESI Regime – Commentary on PNB Housing Finance Ltd. v. Manoj Saha (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
Exclusive DRT Jurisdiction & Evidentiary Burden for Unregistered Tenancies under the Post-2016 SARFAESI Regime – Commentary on PNB Housing Finance Ltd. v. Manoj Saha (2025) 1. Introduction The...
“The Muruganantham Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Universal Accessibility & Reasonable Accommodation for Prisoners with Disabilities (2025)

“The Muruganantham Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Universal Accessibility & Reasonable Accommodation for Prisoners with Disabilities (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“The Muruganantham Doctrine” – Supreme Court Mandates Universal Accessibility & Reasonable Accommodation for Prisoners with Disabilities (L. Muruganantham v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 INSC 844) 1....

"Nullus Commodum" over Procedure: Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC in
Binod Pathak v. Shankar Choudhary (2025)

"Nullus Commodum" over Procedure: Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC in Binod Pathak v. Shankar Choudhary (2025)

Date: Jul 15, 2025
“Nullus Commodum Capere Potest de Injuria Sua Propria” Triumphs Over Procedural Abatement A Commentary on Binod Pathak & Ors. v. Shankar Choudhary & Ors., 2025 INSC 842 1. Introduction The Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert