Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Rajasthan High Court Case Commentaries

Restricting Appeal Rights to Parties in Election Petitions: Insights from Heer Singh v. Veerka

Restricting Appeal Rights to Parties in Election Petitions: Insights from Heer Singh v. Veerka

Date: Dec 10, 1957
Restricting Appeal Rights to Parties in Election Petitions: Insights from Heer Singh v. Veerka Introduction Heer Singh v. Veerka is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Rajasthan High Court on...
Invalid Unregistered Mortgages: The Hansia v. Bakhtawarmal Precedent

Invalid Unregistered Mortgages: The Hansia v. Bakhtawarmal Precedent

Date: Oct 9, 1957
Invalid Unregistered Mortgages: The Hansia v. Bakhtawarmal Precedent Introduction The case of Hansia v. Bakhtawarmal, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on October 8, 1957, presents a pivotal...
Dwarkachand v. Rajasthan: Prohibition of Repeated Departmental Enquiries Post-Exoneration

Dwarkachand v. Rajasthan: Prohibition of Repeated Departmental Enquiries Post-Exoneration

Date: Aug 3, 1957
Dwarkachand v. Rajasthan: Prohibition of Repeated Departmental Enquiries Post-Exoneration Introduction Dwarkachand v. State Of Rajasthan is a landmark judgment delivered by the Rajasthan High Court...
Representation Before Industrial Tribunals under Section 36: Insights from M/S. Duduwala & Company v. Industrial Tribunal

Representation Before Industrial Tribunals under Section 36: Insights from M/S. Duduwala & Company v. Industrial Tribunal

Date: Jul 30, 1957
Representation Before Industrial Tribunals under Section 36: Insights from M/S. Duduwala & Company v. Industrial Tribunal Introduction The case of M/S. Duduwala & Company v. Industrial Tribunal,...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 64(b) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Establishing the Right of Aggrieved Third Parties to Appeal – Jairamdas v. The Regional Transport Authority

Clarifying the Scope of Section 64(b) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Establishing the Right of Aggrieved Third Parties to Appeal – Jairamdas v. The Regional Transport Authority

Date: May 1, 1957
Clarifying the Scope of Section 64(b) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Establishing the Right of Aggrieved Third Parties to Appeal – Jairamdas v. The Regional Transport Authority, Jodhpur 1. Introduction...
Madanlal v. Durgadutt: Clarification on the Application of Articles 142 and 144 of the Limitation Act in Property Possession Suits

Madanlal v. Durgadutt: Clarification on the Application of Articles 142 and 144 of the Limitation Act in Property Possession Suits

Date: May 1, 1957
Madanlal v. Durgadutt: Clarification on the Application of Articles 142 and 144 of the Limitation Act in Property Possession Suits Introduction The judgment in Madanlal v. Durgadutt, delivered by the...
Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951: Upholding Trade Freedom under Article 301

Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951: Upholding Trade Freedom under Article 301

Date: Apr 20, 1957
Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951: Upholding Trade Freedom under Article 301 Introduction The case of Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. The State Of Rajasthan adjudicated by the...
The Union of India v. Askaran: Reinforcing the Validity of Service Termination Procedures under Para 148 of the Railway Establishment Code

The Union of India v. Askaran: Reinforcing the Validity of Service Termination Procedures under Para 148 of the Railway Establishment Code

Date: Apr 20, 1957
The Union of India v. Askaran: Reinforcing the Validity of Service Termination Procedures under Para 148 of the Railway Establishment Code Introduction The Union of India v. Askaran is a pivotal case...
Kanhaiyalal v. The State Of Rajasthan: Upholding Procedural Fairness in Civil Service Removals

Kanhaiyalal v. The State Of Rajasthan: Upholding Procedural Fairness in Civil Service Removals

Date: Apr 17, 1957
Kanhaiyalal v. The State Of Rajasthan: Upholding Procedural Fairness in Civil Service Removals Introduction Kanhaiyalal v. The State Of Rajasthan is a landmark judgment delivered by the Rajasthan...
Inherent Courthouse Powers in Setting Aside Fraudulent Sales: Mubarak Begam v. Sushil Kumar

Inherent Courthouse Powers in Setting Aside Fraudulent Sales: Mubarak Begam v. Sushil Kumar

Date: Dec 1, 1956
Inherent Courthouse Powers in Setting Aside Fraudulent Sales: Mubarak Begam v. Sushil Kumar Introduction Mubarak Begam v. Sushil Kumar is a landmark judgment delivered by the Rajasthan High Court on...
Rejection of Plaint Against Individual Defendants Constitutes Appealable Decree: Mst. Phool Sundari v. Gurbans Singh

Rejection of Plaint Against Individual Defendants Constitutes Appealable Decree: Mst. Phool Sundari v. Gurbans Singh

Date: Nov 21, 1956
Rejection of Plaint Against Individual Defendants Constitutes Appealable Decree: Mst. Phool Sundari v. Gurbans Singh Introduction Mst. Phool Sundari v. Gurbans Singh is a landmark decision delivered...
Bhuramal v. State Of Rajasthan: Broadening the Scope of 'Sale of Goods' in Building Contracts

Bhuramal v. State Of Rajasthan: Broadening the Scope of 'Sale of Goods' in Building Contracts

Date: Nov 21, 1956
Bhuramal v. State Of Rajasthan: Broadening the Scope of 'Sale of Goods' in Building Contracts 1. Introduction The case of Bhuramal v. State Of Rajasthan, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on...
Kanta Devi v. State Of Rajasthan: Upholding the Sanctity of Nomination Procedures in Municipal Governance

Kanta Devi v. State Of Rajasthan: Upholding the Sanctity of Nomination Procedures in Municipal Governance

Date: Nov 14, 1956
Kanta Devi v. State Of Rajasthan: Upholding the Sanctity of Nomination Procedures in Municipal Governance Introduction Kanta Devi v. State Of Rajasthan is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Establishing Mandatory Notice Period for Panchayat Elections: Anokhmal v. The Chief Panchayat Officer, Rajasthan

Establishing Mandatory Notice Period for Panchayat Elections: Anokhmal v. The Chief Panchayat Officer, Rajasthan

Date: Nov 8, 1956
Establishing Mandatory Notice Period for Panchayat Elections: Anokhmal v. The Chief Panchayat Officer, Rajasthan Introduction The case of Anokhmal v. The Chief Panchayat Officer, Rajasthan (Rajasthan...
Invalid Fixation of Minimum Wages in Mica Mines: N.K Jain v. The Labour Commissioner, Rajasthan

Invalid Fixation of Minimum Wages in Mica Mines: N.K Jain v. The Labour Commissioner, Rajasthan

Date: Aug 28, 1956
Invalid Fixation of Minimum Wages in Mica Mines: N.K Jain v. The Labour Commissioner, Rajasthan Introduction N.K Jain v. The Labour Commissioner, Rajasthan is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Temporary Employees and Article 311: Insights from Chiranjilal v. Union of India

Temporary Employees and Article 311: Insights from Chiranjilal v. Union of India

Date: Aug 7, 1956
Temporary Employees and Article 311: Insights from Chiranjilal v. Union of India (Rajasthan High Court, 1956) Introduction The case of Chiranjilal v. Union of India adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Government Responsibility in Vicarious Liability for Torts: Analysis of Gopal Singh v. Union Of India

Government Responsibility in Vicarious Liability for Torts: Analysis of Gopal Singh v. Union Of India

Date: May 11, 1956
Government Responsibility in Vicarious Liability for Torts: Analysis of Gopal Singh v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Gopal Singh v. Union Of India, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court...
Exclusive Remedy of Election Petition in Nomination Rejection: Tekchand v. Banwarilal

Exclusive Remedy of Election Petition in Nomination Rejection: Tekchand v. Banwarilal

Date: Apr 6, 1956
Exclusive Remedy of Election Petition in Nomination Rejection: Tekchand v. Banwarilal Introduction Tekchand v. Banwarilal is a landmark judgment delivered by the Rajasthan High Court on April 5,...
Anantram v. District Magistrate: Clarifying the Right to Appeal under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936

Anantram v. District Magistrate: Clarifying the Right to Appeal under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936

Date: Apr 5, 1956
Anantram v. District Magistrate: Clarifying the Right to Appeal under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Introduction The case of Anantram v. District Magistrate adjudicated by the...
Uniform Royalty Charges and Anti-Discrimination: Insights from Bherulal v. State Of Rajasthan

Uniform Royalty Charges and Anti-Discrimination: Insights from Bherulal v. State Of Rajasthan

Date: Mar 7, 1956
Uniform Royalty Charges and Anti-Discrimination: Insights from Bherulal v. State of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Bherulal v. State of Rajasthan, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on March...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert