Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Rajasthan High Court Case Commentaries

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Comprehensive Standards for Rendering Accounts by Statutory Agents

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Comprehensive Standards for Rendering Accounts by Statutory Agents

Date: Aug 18, 1960
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Comprehensive Standards for Rendering Accounts by Statutory Agents Introduction The case of The State Of Rajasthan v. Rao Manohar Singh Of Bedla is a landmark...
Rajasthan High Court Declares Rajasthan State Road Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1959 Ultra Vires Due to Defective Pre-Publication Process

Rajasthan High Court Declares Rajasthan State Road Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1959 Ultra Vires Due to Defective Pre-Publication Process

Date: May 11, 1960
Rajasthan High Court Declares Rajasthan State Road Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1959 Ultra Vires Due to Defective Pre-Publication Process Introduction In the landmark case of The...
Affirmation of Delegated Legislative Authority: Upholding the Appellate Authority's Constitution in Maula Bux v. Appellate Tribunal Of The S.T.A Jaipur

Affirmation of Delegated Legislative Authority: Upholding the Appellate Authority's Constitution in Maula Bux v. Appellate Tribunal Of The S.T.A Jaipur

Date: Mar 19, 1960
Affirmation of Delegated Legislative Authority: Upholding the Appellate Authority's Constitution in Maula Bux v. Appellate Tribunal Of The S.T.A Jaipur Introduction The case of Maula Bux v. Appellate...
Partial Ownership and Tenancy: Insights from Hari Pratap v. Ram Gopal

Partial Ownership and Tenancy: Insights from Hari Pratap v. Ram Gopal

Date: Jan 23, 1960
Partial Ownership and Tenancy: Insights from Hari Pratap v. Ram Gopal Introduction The case of Hari Pratap v. Ram Gopal, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on January 22, 1960, addresses...
Anandram v. Madholal: Upholding Effective Representation of Minors in Legal Proceedings

Anandram v. Madholal: Upholding Effective Representation of Minors in Legal Proceedings

Date: Dec 11, 1959
Anandram v. Madholal: Upholding Effective Representation of Minors in Legal Proceedings Introduction The case of Anandram And Another v. Madholal And Others Non-Petitioners adjudicated by the...
Rajasthan High Court’s Landmark Decision in Gyaniram v. Gulab Chand: Implications for Contractual Damages in Trade Transactions

Rajasthan High Court’s Landmark Decision in Gyaniram v. Gulab Chand: Implications for Contractual Damages in Trade Transactions

Date: Nov 20, 1959
Rajasthan High Court’s Landmark Decision in Gyaniram v. Gulab Chand: Implications for Contractual Damages in Trade Transactions Introduction The case of Gyaniram v. Gulab Chand adjudicated by the...
Non-Retroactivity of Jaipur Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1947: Insights from Mst. Mohari v. Mst. Chukli

Non-Retroactivity of Jaipur Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1947: Insights from Mst. Mohari v. Mst. Chukli

Date: Oct 25, 1959
Non-Retroactivity of Jaipur Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1947: Insights from Mst. Mohari v. Mst. Chukli Introduction The case of Mst. Mohari v. Mst. Chukli adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Abdul Gani v. Devi Lal: Expanding the Scope of "Preliminary Points" in Appellate Jurisprudence

Abdul Gani v. Devi Lal: Expanding the Scope of "Preliminary Points" in Appellate Jurisprudence

Date: Oct 6, 1959
Abdul Gani v. Devi Lal: Expanding the Scope of "Preliminary Points" in Appellate Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Abdul Gani And Another v. Devi Lal And Another, adjudicated by the Rajasthan...
Successor State Liability and Doctrine of Frustration: Insights from State Of Rajasthan v. Madanswarup (1959)

Successor State Liability and Doctrine of Frustration: Insights from State Of Rajasthan v. Madanswarup (1959)

Date: Aug 29, 1959
Successor State Liability and Doctrine of Frustration: Insights from State Of Rajasthan v. Madanswarup And Another (1959) Introduction State Of Rajasthan v. Madanswarup And Another, decided by the...
Acquisition of Limited Mortgagee Rights by Adverse Possession: Analysis of Lachhmi Narain v. Kalyan

Acquisition of Limited Mortgagee Rights by Adverse Possession: Analysis of Lachhmi Narain v. Kalyan

Date: Aug 1, 1959
Acquisition of Limited Mortgagee Rights by Adverse Possession: Analysis of Lachhmi Narain v. Kalyan Introduction Lachhmi Narain v. Kalyan is a landmark decision delivered by the Rajasthan High Court...
Invalidation of Municipal Elections Due to Unlawful Delimitation: Qurabali v. Government of Rajasthan

Invalidation of Municipal Elections Due to Unlawful Delimitation: Qurabali v. Government of Rajasthan

Date: Jul 29, 1959
Invalidation of Municipal Elections Due to Unlawful Delimitation: Qurabali v. Government of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Qurabali And Others v. Government Of Rajasthan And Others was...
Pre-Incorporation Agreements and Their Inapplicability to Successor States: The Landmark Judgment in Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. v. Union of India

Pre-Incorporation Agreements and Their Inapplicability to Successor States: The Landmark Judgment in Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: May 8, 1959
Pre-Incorporation Agreements and Their Inapplicability to Successor States: The Landmark Judgment in Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. v. Union of India Introduction The case of Maharaja Shree Umaid...
Judicial Experience Mandate for Transport Authorities: A Comprehensive Analysis of Badridass Kanhaiyalal v. Appellate Tribunal of State Transport Authority Rajasthan

Judicial Experience Mandate for Transport Authorities: A Comprehensive Analysis of Badridass Kanhaiyalal v. Appellate Tribunal of State Transport Authority Rajasthan

Date: Apr 28, 1959
Judicial Experience Mandate for Transport Authorities: A Comprehensive Analysis of Badridass Kanhaiyalal v. Appellate Tribunal of State Transport Authority Rajasthan Introduction The case of...
Defining Promissory Notes: Insights from Raghunath Prasad v. Seth Mangi Lal

Defining Promissory Notes: Insights from Raghunath Prasad v. Seth Mangi Lal

Date: Mar 7, 1959
Defining Promissory Notes: Insights from Raghunath Prasad v. Seth Mangi Lal Introduction The case of Raghunath Prasad v. Seth Mangi Lal, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on March 6, 1959,...
Defining Promissory Notes under the Negotiable Instruments Act and Stamp Act: Insights from Gordhansingh v. Suwalal

Defining Promissory Notes under the Negotiable Instruments Act and Stamp Act: Insights from Gordhansingh v. Suwalal

Date: Jan 6, 1959
Defining Promissory Notes under the Negotiable Instruments Act and Stamp Act: Insights from Gordhansingh v. Suwalal Introduction The case of Gordhansingh v. Suwalal decided by the Rajasthan High...
Ensuring Proper Representation in Partnership Litigation: Kesrimal v. Dalichand and Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act

Ensuring Proper Representation in Partnership Litigation: Kesrimal v. Dalichand and Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act

Date: Dec 23, 1958
Ensuring Proper Representation in Partnership Litigation: Kesrimal v. Dalichand and Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act Introduction Kesrimal v. Dalichand is a pivotal judgment delivered by the...
Reaffirmation of the Indian Succession Act's Supremacy over State Legislation in Probate Matters: Sheonath Singh v. Madanlal

Reaffirmation of the Indian Succession Act's Supremacy over State Legislation in Probate Matters: Sheonath Singh v. Madanlal

Date: Dec 13, 1958
Reaffirmation of the Indian Succession Act's Supremacy over State Legislation in Probate Matters: Sheonath Singh v. Madanlal Introduction The case of Sheonath Singh v. Madanlal adjudicated by the...
Permissibility of Pleading Amendments and Preservation of Civil Court Jurisdiction: Analysis of Kundan Mal v. Kamdar

Permissibility of Pleading Amendments and Preservation of Civil Court Jurisdiction: Analysis of Kundan Mal v. Kamdar

Date: Sep 24, 1958
Permissibility of Pleading Amendments and Preservation of Civil Court Jurisdiction: Analysis of Kundan Mal v. Kamdar Introduction The case of Kundan Mal v. Kamdar, Thikana Siyari adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Right of Appeal for Permit Holders under Section 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Insights from Heeralal v. State Of Rajasthan

Establishing the Right of Appeal for Permit Holders under Section 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Insights from Heeralal v. State Of Rajasthan

Date: Jul 23, 1958
Establishing the Right of Appeal for Permit Holders under Section 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Insights from Heeralal v. State Of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Heeralal v. State Of Rajasthan,...
Establishing the Principle of Presumed Consideration in Negotiable Instruments: Heerachand v. Jeevraj

Establishing the Principle of Presumed Consideration in Negotiable Instruments: Heerachand v. Jeevraj

Date: Mar 29, 1958
Establishing the Principle of Presumed Consideration in Negotiable Instruments: Heerachand v. Jeevraj Introduction The case of Heerachand v. Jeevraj And Another was adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert