Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Rajasthan High Court Case Commentaries

Promissory Estoppel in University Admissions: Upholding Student Rights in Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University v. Rajesh Kumar Makhija

Promissory Estoppel in University Admissions: Upholding Student Rights in Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University v. Rajesh Kumar Makhija

Date: Feb 15, 2006
Promissory Estoppel in University Admissions: Upholding Student Rights in Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University v. Rajesh Kumar Makhija Introduction The case of Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University, Udaipur v....
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Proportional Deduction Principle under Section 80HHC in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sharda Gum And Chemicals

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Proportional Deduction Principle under Section 80HHC in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sharda Gum And Chemicals

Date: Jan 25, 2006
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Proportional Deduction Principle under Section 80HHC in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sharda Gum And Chemicals Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Rajasthan High Court Reaffirms Necessity of Legally Sanctioned Educational Qualifications for Government Employment

Rajasthan High Court Reaffirms Necessity of Legally Sanctioned Educational Qualifications for Government Employment

Date: Jan 21, 2006
Rajasthan High Court Reaffirms Necessity of Legally Sanctioned Educational Qualifications for Government Employment Introduction The case of State Of Rajasthan (The) & Ors. v. Firdos Tarannum...
Enhancing the Accused's Right to Access Evidence: Insights from Neelesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan

Enhancing the Accused's Right to Access Evidence: Insights from Neelesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Dec 21, 2005
Enhancing the Accused's Right to Access Evidence: Insights from Neelesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan Introduction Neelesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Rajasthan...
Prioritizing Substantive Compliance in MODVAT Credit Claims: Insights from Rajasthan High Court's Decision in Union Of India v. M/S Grasim Industries Ltd.

Prioritizing Substantive Compliance in MODVAT Credit Claims: Insights from Rajasthan High Court's Decision in Union Of India v. M/S Grasim Industries Ltd.

Date: Dec 15, 2005
Prioritizing Substantive Compliance in MODVAT Credit Claims: Insights from Rajasthan High Court's Decision in Union Of India v. M/S Grasim Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of Union Of India v....
Rajasthan High Court Clarifies Scope of Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) for Intangible Assets

Rajasthan High Court Clarifies Scope of Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) for Intangible Assets

Date: Dec 4, 2005
Rajasthan High Court Clarifies Scope of Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) for Intangible Assets Introduction The case Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Jodhpur v. M/S. Mishrimal Soni adjudicated by the...
Bhanwar Lal Verma v. Sharad Tholia & Ors.: Reevaluating FIR Requirements in Motor Accident Claims

Bhanwar Lal Verma v. Sharad Tholia & Ors.: Reevaluating FIR Requirements in Motor Accident Claims

Date: Nov 19, 2005
Bhanwar Lal Verma v. Sharad Tholia & Ors.: Reevaluating FIR Requirements in Motor Accident Claims 1. Introduction The case of Bhanwar Lal Verma v. Sharad Tholia & Ors. adjudicated by the Rajasthan...
Tribunals' Discretion to Admit Additional Grounds in IT Appeals Without Limitation: A Commentary on Commissioner of Income Tax v. Zakir Hussain

Tribunals' Discretion to Admit Additional Grounds in IT Appeals Without Limitation: A Commentary on Commissioner of Income Tax v. Zakir Hussain

Date: Nov 8, 2005
Tribunals' Discretion to Admit Additional Grounds in IT Appeals Without Limitation: A Commentary on Commissioner of Income Tax v. Zakir Hussain Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax And...
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Procedural Flexibility in Section 32AB Compliance

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Procedural Flexibility in Section 32AB Compliance

Date: Aug 9, 2005
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Procedural Flexibility in Section 32AB Compliance Introduction The case of Cit, Jodhpur v. Dr. Shri L.M Singhvi, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on August 8,...
Presumption of Document Production in Tax Assessments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Paras Cotton Co.

Presumption of Document Production in Tax Assessments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Paras Cotton Co.

Date: Aug 5, 2005
Presumption of Document Production in Tax Assessments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Paras Cotton Co. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Paras Cotton...
Ultra Vires Challenge of Rule 8(3) in Lucid Colloids Limited v. Union Of India: A Comprehensive Commentary

Ultra Vires Challenge of Rule 8(3) in Lucid Colloids Limited v. Union Of India: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Aug 4, 2005
Ultra Vires Challenge of Rule 8(3) in Lucid Colloids Limited v. Union Of India: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction The case of Lucid Colloids Limited v. Union Of India adjudicated by the...
Establishing Burden of Proof in Share Capital Investments: Insights from Shree Barkha Synthetics Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Establishing Burden of Proof in Share Capital Investments: Insights from Shree Barkha Synthetics Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Aug 3, 2005
Establishing Burden of Proof in Share Capital Investments: Insights from Shree Barkha Synthetics Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Shree Barkha Synthetics Ltd. v....
Distinguishing 'Production' and 'Manufacture' Under Section 80-IB: Insights from D.D Shah and Bros. v. Union of India

Distinguishing 'Production' and 'Manufacture' Under Section 80-IB: Insights from D.D Shah and Bros. v. Union of India

Date: Jul 19, 2005
Distinguishing 'Production' and 'Manufacture' Under Section 80-IB: Insights from D.D Shah and Bros. v. Union of India Introduction The case of D.D Shah and Bros. v. Union of India And Another...
Rajasthan High Court's Suo Moto Action Reinforces Swift Justice and Victim Protection in Sexual Offence Cases

Rajasthan High Court's Suo Moto Action Reinforces Swift Justice and Victim Protection in Sexual Offence Cases

Date: Jun 2, 2005
Rajasthan High Court's Suo Moto Action Reinforces Swift Justice and Victim Protection in Sexual Offence Cases Introduction The case of Suo Moto v. State of Rajasthan adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Ganesh Raj v. State of Rajasthan: Clarifying the Boundaries for Subsequent Anticipatory Bail Applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Ganesh Raj v. State of Rajasthan: Clarifying the Boundaries for Subsequent Anticipatory Bail Applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Date: Apr 2, 2005
Ganesh Raj v. State of Rajasthan: Clarifying the Boundaries for Subsequent Anticipatory Bail Applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Introduction Ganesh Raj v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. is a landmark...
Reaffirming Best Judgment Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sunil Talwar Murlidhar And Party

Reaffirming Best Judgment Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sunil Talwar Murlidhar And Party

Date: Mar 31, 2005
Reaffirming Best Judgment Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sunil Talwar Murlidhar And Party Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sunil Talwar Murlidhar And...
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainability under Article 227: Insights from Ramesh Chand Tiwari v. Board Of Revenue & Ors.

Intra-Court Appeal Maintainability under Article 227: Insights from Ramesh Chand Tiwari v. Board Of Revenue & Ors.

Date: Mar 25, 2005
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainability under Article 227: Insights from Ramesh Chand Tiwari v. Board Of Revenue & Ors. Introduction The case of Ramesh Chand Tiwari v. Board Of Revenue & Ors. adjudicated...
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Precedent on Dowry Death and Co-Accused Liability in State v. Virendra Kumar And Ors.

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Precedent on Dowry Death and Co-Accused Liability in State v. Virendra Kumar And Ors.

Date: Mar 17, 2005
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Precedent on Dowry Death and Co-Accused Liability in State v. Virendra Kumar And Ors. Introduction The case of State v. Virendra Kumar And Ors. adjudicated by the...
Inclusion of 'Investigation' under Section 267 CrPC: An Analysis of State of Rajasthan v. Santosh Yadav

Inclusion of 'Investigation' under Section 267 CrPC: An Analysis of State of Rajasthan v. Santosh Yadav

Date: Feb 23, 2005
Inclusion of 'Investigation' under Section 267 CrPC: An Analysis of State of Rajasthan v. Santosh Yadav 1. Introduction The case of State of Rajasthan v. Santosh Yadav adjudicated by the Rajasthan...
Rajasthan High Court Upholds Established Teacher Selection Practices in Emarata Ram Pooniya v. State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court Upholds Established Teacher Selection Practices in Emarata Ram Pooniya v. State Of Rajasthan

Date: Feb 16, 2005
Rajasthan High Court Upholds Established Teacher Selection Practices in Emarata Ram Pooniya v. State Of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Emarata Ram Pooniya v. State Of Rajasthan adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert