Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Rajasthan High Court Case Commentaries

Bhagwan Das Mittal v. State Of Rajasthan: Establishing Limits on Transfer Orders

Bhagwan Das Mittal v. State Of Rajasthan: Establishing Limits on Transfer Orders

Date: Apr 13, 2007
Bhagwan Das Mittal v. State Of Rajasthan: Establishing Limits on Transfer Orders Introduction The case Bhagwan Das Mittal v. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. was adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on...
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Exclusive Jurisdiction for Pre-Election Disqualification Adjudication

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Exclusive Jurisdiction for Pre-Election Disqualification Adjudication

Date: Apr 3, 2007
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Exclusive Jurisdiction for Pre-Election Disqualification Adjudication Introduction In the landmark case of Sameera Bano (Smt.) v. State Of Rajasthan & Ors., decided...
Aditya Cement v. Union of India: Expanding the Definition and Eligibility of Capital Goods for Modvat Credit

Aditya Cement v. Union of India: Expanding the Definition and Eligibility of Capital Goods for Modvat Credit

Date: Mar 23, 2007
Aditya Cement v. Union of India: Expanding the Definition and Eligibility of Capital Goods for Modvat Credit Introduction The case of Aditya Cement v. Union of India, adjudicated by the Rajasthan...
Civil Court Jurisdiction Bar under Securitisation Act, 2002 – Mohan Lal v. Dwarka Prasad

Civil Court Jurisdiction Bar under Securitisation Act, 2002 – Mohan Lal v. Dwarka Prasad

Date: Feb 16, 2007
Civil Court Jurisdiction Bar under Securitisation Act, 2002 – Mohan Lal v. Dwarka Prasad Introduction The case of Mohan Lal & Anr. v. Dwarka Prasad & Ors. deliberated on the interplay between civil...
Clarifying the Applicability of Rule 57CC on Modvat Credit: Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. Union Of India

Clarifying the Applicability of Rule 57CC on Modvat Credit: Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Jan 24, 2007
Clarifying the Applicability of Rule 57CC on Modvat Credit: Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. Union Of India was adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Burden of Proof in Railway Untoward Incident Cases: Union of India v. Hari Narayan Gupta

Burden of Proof in Railway Untoward Incident Cases: Union of India v. Hari Narayan Gupta

Date: Nov 16, 2006
Burden of Proof in Railway Untoward Incident Cases: Union of India v. Hari Narayan Gupta Introduction The case of Union of India v. Hari Narayan Gupta & Anr. adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court...
Expansive Interpretation of Rule 6DD(j) under Section 40A(3): Smt. Harshila Chordia v. Income-Tax Officer

Expansive Interpretation of Rule 6DD(j) under Section 40A(3): Smt. Harshila Chordia v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Nov 8, 2006
Expansive Interpretation of Rule 6DD(j) under Section 40A(3): Smt. Harshila Chordia v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of Smt. Harshila Chordia v. Income-Tax Officer adjudicated by the...
Brij Lal Bundel v. State Of Rajasthan: Entitlement to Annual Grade Increments During Suspension

Brij Lal Bundel v. State Of Rajasthan: Entitlement to Annual Grade Increments During Suspension

Date: Oct 11, 2006
Brij Lal Bundel v. State Of Rajasthan: Entitlement to Annual Grade Increments During Suspension Introduction The case of Brij Lal Bundel v. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Presumption of Death and Family Pension Rights: Analysis of Indira Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

Presumption of Death and Family Pension Rights: Analysis of Indira Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

Date: Oct 6, 2006
Presumption of Death and Family Pension Rights: Analysis of Indira Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Introduction The case of Indira Devi (Smt.) v. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. adjudicated by the...
Engagement of Eminent Senior Advocates under SC & ST Prevention of Atrocities Act: Satki Devi v. Tikam Singh

Engagement of Eminent Senior Advocates under SC & ST Prevention of Atrocities Act: Satki Devi v. Tikam Singh

Date: Aug 30, 2006
Engagement of Eminent Senior Advocates under SC & ST Prevention of Atrocities Act: Satki Devi v. Tikam Singh Introduction The case of Satki Devi (Smt.) & Anr. v. Tikam Singh & Ors. adjudicated by the...
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Clarity on Section 44AB Audit Obligations in Bajrang Oil Mills v. Income-Tax Officer

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Clarity on Section 44AB Audit Obligations in Bajrang Oil Mills v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Aug 3, 2006
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Clarity on Section 44AB Audit Obligations in Bajrang Oil Mills v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction In the landmark case of Bajrang Oil Mills v. Income-Tax Officer, the...
Evaluation of Admissions in Tax Assessment: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ashok Kumar Soni

Evaluation of Admissions in Tax Assessment: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ashok Kumar Soni

Date: Jul 29, 2006
Evaluation of Admissions in Tax Assessment: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ashok Kumar Soni Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ashok Kumar Soni adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Clarification on Limitation Period for Penalty Imposition under Sections 271D and 271E: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Hissaria Bros.

Clarification on Limitation Period for Penalty Imposition under Sections 271D and 271E: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Hissaria Bros.

Date: Jul 22, 2006
Clarification on Limitation Period for Penalty Imposition under Sections 271D and 271E: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Hissaria Bros. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Murder Convictions: Shakti Singh & Anr. v. State Of Rajasthan

Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Murder Convictions: Shakti Singh & Anr. v. State Of Rajasthan

Date: May 30, 2006
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Murder Convictions: Shakti Singh & Anr. v. State Of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Shakti Singh & Anr. v. State Of Rajasthan adjudicated by...
Limitation on Recovery Proceedings for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Cit, Jodhpur v. M/S Munni Lal & Company

Limitation on Recovery Proceedings for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Cit, Jodhpur v. M/S Munni Lal & Company

Date: May 10, 2006
Limitation on Recovery Proceedings for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source: Cit, Jodhpur v. M/S Munni Lal & Company Introduction The case of Cit, Jodhpur v. M/S. Munni Lal & Company adjudicated by the...
Judicial Interpretation of Reassessment Procedures under Section 148: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Uttam Chand Nahar

Judicial Interpretation of Reassessment Procedures under Section 148: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Uttam Chand Nahar

Date: Apr 26, 2006
Judicial Interpretation of Reassessment Procedures under Section 148: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Uttam Chand Nahar Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v....
Interpretation of Section 91 CPC and Section 172(3) CPC: Comprehensive Commentary on Dhananjay Kumar Singh v. State Of Rajasthan

Interpretation of Section 91 CPC and Section 172(3) CPC: Comprehensive Commentary on Dhananjay Kumar Singh v. State Of Rajasthan

Date: Apr 20, 2006
Interpretation of Section 91 CPC and Section 172(3) CPC: Comprehensive Commentary on Dhananjay Kumar Singh v. State Of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Dhananjay Kumar Singh v. State Of Rajasthan...
Refundability of Excess Central Excise Duty Under Section 11B: Insights from Collector Of Central Excise v. M/S. Jupiter Industries & Anr.

Refundability of Excess Central Excise Duty Under Section 11B: Insights from Collector Of Central Excise v. M/S. Jupiter Industries & Anr.

Date: Apr 8, 2006
Refundability of Excess Central Excise Duty Under Section 11B: Insights from Collector Of Central Excise v. M/S. Jupiter Industries & Anr. Introduction The case of Collector Of Central Excise v. M/S....
Restricting Legal Representatives from Reagitating Previously Rejected Pleas: Prem Singh v. Savitri Devi & Ors.

Restricting Legal Representatives from Reagitating Previously Rejected Pleas: Prem Singh v. Savitri Devi & Ors.

Date: Apr 8, 2006
Restricting Legal Representatives from Reagitating Previously Rejected Pleas: Prem Singh v. Savitri Devi & Ors. Introduction The case of Prem Singh (Deceased) Through His Legal Representatives v....
Buddhi & Ors. v. State Of Rajasthan: Clarifying the Limits of Self-Defense in Clashing Armed Parties

Buddhi & Ors. v. State Of Rajasthan: Clarifying the Limits of Self-Defense in Clashing Armed Parties

Date: Mar 23, 2006
Buddhi & Ors. v. State Of Rajasthan: Clarifying the Limits of Self-Defense in Clashing Armed Parties 1. Introduction Buddhi & Ors. v. State Of Rajasthan is a pivotal judgment rendered by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert