Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Chaudhary Tractor Company v. State of Haryana: Restriction on Imposition of Interest under Section 25(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973

Chaudhary Tractor Company v. State of Haryana: Restriction on Imposition of Interest under Section 25(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973

Date: May 30, 2006
Chaudhary Tractor Company v. State of Haryana: Restriction on Imposition of Interest under Section 25(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 Introduction The case of Chaudhary Tractor Company...
Requirement of Reasoned Orders in Quasi-Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Roadmaster Industries of India P. Ltd. v. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Requirement of Reasoned Orders in Quasi-Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Roadmaster Industries of India P. Ltd. v. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: May 30, 2006
Requirement of Reasoned Orders in Quasi-Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Roadmaster Industries of India P. Ltd. v. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction In the landmark case...
Landlord's Right to Evict on Bona Fide Personal Necessity in Commercial Tenancies: S.P Sethi v. R.R Gulati and Others

Landlord's Right to Evict on Bona Fide Personal Necessity in Commercial Tenancies: S.P Sethi v. R.R Gulati and Others

Date: May 25, 2006
Landlord's Right to Evict on Bona Fide Personal Necessity in Commercial Tenancies: S.P Sethi v. R.R Gulati and Others Introduction The case of S.P Sethi Petitioner v. R.R Gulati And Others...
Imposition of Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act: Insights from Rajesh Chawla v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Imposition of Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act: Insights from Rajesh Chawla v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: May 23, 2006
Imposition of Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act: Insights from Rajesh Chawla v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Rajesh Chawla v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Gratuity Act Applicability to Extra Departmental Agents: An Analysis of Sr. Supdt. Of Post Offices v. Smt. Sham Dulari And Ors.

Gratuity Act Applicability to Extra Departmental Agents: An Analysis of Sr. Supdt. Of Post Offices v. Smt. Sham Dulari And Ors.

Date: May 19, 2006
Gratuity Act Applicability to Extra Departmental Agents: An Analysis of Sr. Supdt. Of Post Offices v. Smt. Sham Dulari And Ors. Introduction The case of Sr. Supdt. Of Post Offices v. Smt. Sham Dulari...
Revenue Expenditure vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Swaraj Engines Ltd.

Revenue Expenditure vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Swaraj Engines Ltd.

Date: May 19, 2006
Revenue Expenditure vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Swaraj Engines Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Swaraj Engines Ltd.,...
Enforcement of Central Board Circulars and Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law: Insights from Bandi Co-Operative Labour & Construction Society v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Enforcement of Central Board Circulars and Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law: Insights from Bandi Co-Operative Labour & Construction Society v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: May 17, 2006
Enforcement of Central Board Circulars and Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law: Insights from Bandi Co-Operative Labour & Construction Society v. Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The...
National Insurance Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur: Clarifying Income Threshold for Compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act

National Insurance Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur: Clarifying Income Threshold for Compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act

Date: May 12, 2006
National Insurance Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur: Clarifying Income Threshold for Compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act Introduction This commentary explores the landmark judgment in...
Section 80J(6A) of the IT Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Judgment in Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahalaxmi Rice Factory

Section 80J(6A) of the IT Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Judgment in Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahalaxmi Rice Factory

Date: May 4, 2006
Section 80J(6A) of the IT Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court's Landmark Judgment in Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahalaxmi Rice Factory Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mahalaxmi...
Bharti Engg. Corpn. v. Union Of India: Landmark Ruling on Refund Procedures and Statutory Compliance

Bharti Engg. Corpn. v. Union Of India: Landmark Ruling on Refund Procedures and Statutory Compliance

Date: May 3, 2006
Bharti Engg. Corpn. v. Union Of India: Landmark Ruling on Refund Procedures and Statutory Compliance Introduction The case of Bharti Engineering Corporation v. Union of India (UOI) And Ors.,...
Affirming State Discretion in Municipal Boundary Extensions: Indian Sucrose Limited v. Secretary

Affirming State Discretion in Municipal Boundary Extensions: Indian Sucrose Limited v. Secretary

Date: May 2, 2006
Affirming State Discretion in Municipal Boundary Extensions: Indian Sucrose Limited v. Secretary Introduction The case of Indian Sucrose Limited v. The Secretary, Department Of Local Bodies And Four...
Section 47 Clearance Does Not Bar Seizure Under Customs Act: Mapsa Tapes Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Section 47 Clearance Does Not Bar Seizure Under Customs Act: Mapsa Tapes Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India

Date: Apr 29, 2006
Section 47 Clearance Does Not Bar Seizure Under Customs Act: Mapsa Tapes Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Maps Tapes Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Mandatory Observance of Waiting Period under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act: Analysis of Charanjit Singh v. Neelam Maan

Mandatory Observance of Waiting Period under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act: Analysis of Charanjit Singh v. Neelam Maan

Date: Apr 4, 2006
Mandatory Observance of Waiting Period under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act: Analysis of Charanjit Singh v. Neelam Maan Introduction Charanjit Singh v. Neelam Maan is a notable judgment...
Ensuring Due Process in Eviction Proceedings: Rajinder Lal v. Gopal Krishan

Ensuring Due Process in Eviction Proceedings: Rajinder Lal v. Gopal Krishan

Date: Apr 1, 2006
Ensuring Due Process in Eviction Proceedings: Rajinder Lal v. Gopal Krishan Introduction The case of Rajinder Lal v. Gopal Krishan adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on March 31, 2006,...
Expansion of Section 319 CPC: Rajbir Singh v. State Of Haryana

Expansion of Section 319 CPC: Rajbir Singh v. State Of Haryana

Date: Mar 30, 2006
Expansion of Section 319 CPC: Rajbir Singh v. State Of Haryana Introduction The case of Rajbir Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on March 29, 2006,...
Comprehensive Commentary on Santa Singh v. Binder Singh And Others: Establishing the Necessity of Demonstrating Readiness and Willingness in Specific Performance Suits

Comprehensive Commentary on Santa Singh v. Binder Singh And Others: Establishing the Necessity of Demonstrating Readiness and Willingness in Specific Performance Suits

Date: Mar 30, 2006
Comprehensive Commentary on Santa Singh v. Binder Singh And Others Establishing the Necessity of Demonstrating Readiness and Willingness in Specific Performance Suits 1. Introduction The case of...
Bikkar Singh v. State Of Punjab: Upholding Investigative Integrity and Burden of Proof in NDPS Possession Cases

Bikkar Singh v. State Of Punjab: Upholding Investigative Integrity and Burden of Proof in NDPS Possession Cases

Date: Mar 23, 2006
Bikkar Singh v. State Of Punjab: Upholding Investigative Integrity and Burden of Proof in NDPS Possession Cases Introduction The case of Bikkar Singh v. State Of Punjab adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Corroboration in Bribery Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pargat Singh v. State Of Punjab

Corroboration in Bribery Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pargat Singh v. State Of Punjab

Date: Mar 9, 2006
Corroboration in Bribery Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pargat Singh v. State Of Punjab Introduction Pargat Singh v. State Of Punjab is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Adverse Possession as a Defensive Doctrine: Insights from Bhim Singh v. Zile Singh (Punjab & Haryana High Court, 2006)

Adverse Possession as a Defensive Doctrine: Insights from Bhim Singh v. Zile Singh (Punjab & Haryana High Court, 2006)

Date: Mar 4, 2006
Adverse Possession as a Defensive Doctrine: Insights from Bhim Singh v. Zile Singh (Punjab & Haryana High Court, 2006) Introduction The case of Bhim Singh and Others v. Zile Singh and Others...
Affirmation of Private Partition and Its Impact on Pre-emption Rights: Ajmer Singh v. Dharam Singh

Affirmation of Private Partition and Its Impact on Pre-emption Rights: Ajmer Singh v. Dharam Singh

Date: Mar 2, 2006
Affirmation of Private Partition and Its Impact on Pre-emption Rights Ajmer Singh v. Dharam Singh Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Date: March 1, 2006 Introduction The case of Ajmer Singh v. Dharam...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert