Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Preservation of Existing Liabilities Post-Omission of Compounded Levy Scheme: Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Preservation of Existing Liabilities Post-Omission of Compounded Levy Scheme: Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Date: Oct 31, 2006
Preservation of Existing Liabilities Post-Omission of Compounded Levy Scheme Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner Of Central Excise And Another Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Date:...
Quashing of FIR in Mahalakshmi Spinners Ltd. v. State Of Haryana: A Landmark Judgment on Electricity Theft Prosecution

Quashing of FIR in Mahalakshmi Spinners Ltd. v. State Of Haryana: A Landmark Judgment on Electricity Theft Prosecution

Date: Oct 18, 2006
Quashing of FIR in Mahalakshmi Spinners Ltd. v. State Of Haryana: A Landmark Judgment on Electricity Theft Prosecution Introduction The case of Mahalakshmi Spinners Ltd. and Others v. State Of...
Deduction of Expenses and Treatment of Undisclosed Income in Block Assessment: Insights from M.R Singhal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Deduction of Expenses and Treatment of Undisclosed Income in Block Assessment: Insights from M.R Singhal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 17, 2006
Deduction of Expenses and Treatment of Undisclosed Income in Block Assessment: Insights from M.R Singhal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of M.R Singhal v. Assistant...
Comprehensive Commentary on Surjit Singh And Others v. Jagtar Singh And Other: Clarifying the Plaintiff's Right to Lead Evidence in Rebuttal under Order 18 Rule 3 CPC

Comprehensive Commentary on Surjit Singh And Others v. Jagtar Singh And Other: Clarifying the Plaintiff's Right to Lead Evidence in Rebuttal under Order 18 Rule 3 CPC

Date: Sep 30, 2006
Clarifying the Plaintiff's Right to Lead Evidence in Rebuttal under Order 18 Rule 3 CPC Introduction The case of Surjit Singh And Others v. Jagtar Singh And Other, adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana...
Redefining Business Expenditures and Income Computation under Section 80HHC: Analysis of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Avery Cycle Industries Ltd. (2006)

Redefining Business Expenditures and Income Computation under Section 80HHC: Analysis of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Avery Cycle Industries Ltd. (2006)

Date: Sep 13, 2006
Redefining Business Expenditures and Income Computation under Section 80HHC: Analysis of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Avery Cycle Industries Ltd. (2006) Introduction The case of Commissioner Of...
Strict Compliance Required Under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) for Penalty Immunity

Strict Compliance Required Under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) for Penalty Immunity

Date: Aug 26, 2006
Strict Compliance Required Under Explanation 5 to Section 271(1)(c) for Penalty Immunity Introduction The case of Ashok Kumar Gupta v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Alienability of 'Dohli' Tenure in Dharam Vir v. Bahadur Singh

Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Alienability of 'Dohli' Tenure in Dharam Vir v. Bahadur Singh

Date: Aug 26, 2006
Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Alienability of 'Dohli' Tenure in Dharam Vir v. Bahadur Singh Introduction The case of Dharam Vir v. Bahadur Singh And Another adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Ad Valorem Court Fees in Damages Suits: Insights from Ranjit Kaur v. Punjab State Electricity Board

Ad Valorem Court Fees in Damages Suits: Insights from Ranjit Kaur v. Punjab State Electricity Board

Date: Aug 12, 2006
Ad Valorem Court Fees in Damages Suits: Insights from Ranjit Kaur v. Punjab State Electricity Board Introduction The case of Ranjit Kaur and Others v. Punjab State Electricity Board and Another...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Parminder Singh in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Evidentiary Doubts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Parminder Singh in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Evidentiary Doubts

Date: Aug 8, 2006
Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Parminder Singh in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Evidentiary Doubts Introduction The case of Parminder Singh vs. State of Haryana revolves around the...
Adverse Inference and Burden of Proof in Ejectment Cases: Insights from Geeta Bhalla & Others v. Krishan Kumar

Adverse Inference and Burden of Proof in Ejectment Cases: Insights from Geeta Bhalla & Others v. Krishan Kumar

Date: Aug 8, 2006
Adverse Inference and Burden of Proof in Ejectment Cases: Insights from Geeta Bhalla & Others v. Krishan Kumar Introduction The case of Geeta Bhalla & Others v. Krishan Kumar adjudicated by the...
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Abhishek Industries Ltd.: Redefining Tax Avoidance and Subsidy Classification

Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Abhishek Industries Ltd.: Redefining Tax Avoidance and Subsidy Classification

Date: Aug 5, 2006
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Abhishek Industries Ltd.: Redefining Tax Avoidance and Subsidy Classification 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Abhishek Industries Ltd. heard by...
Reaffirming Fair Recruitment Practices under Articles 14 and 16: Analysis of Jagmal v. State of Haryana

Reaffirming Fair Recruitment Practices under Articles 14 and 16: Analysis of Jagmal v. State of Haryana

Date: Aug 2, 2006
Reaffirming Fair Recruitment Practices under Articles 14 and 16: Analysis of Jagmal v. State of Haryana Introduction The case of Jagmal v. State of Haryana And Others adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Genuineness of Gifts and the Onus of Proof: A Commentary on Subhash Chander Sekhri v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

Genuineness of Gifts and the Onus of Proof: A Commentary on Subhash Chander Sekhri v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Aug 1, 2006
Genuineness of Gifts and the Onus of Proof: A Commentary on Subhash Chander Sekhri v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Subhash Chander Sekhri v. Deputy Commissioner Of...
High Court Sets Precedent on Misuse of Section 498-A IPC in Matrimonial Disputes

High Court Sets Precedent on Misuse of Section 498-A IPC in Matrimonial Disputes

Date: Jul 27, 2006
High Court Sets Precedent on Misuse of Section 498-A IPC in Matrimonial Disputes 1. Introduction The case of Divya Alias Babli And Others vs. State Of Haryana And Another S, adjudicated by the Punjab...
Amendment of Written Statements and Withdrawal of Admissions: Insights from Gautam Sarup v. Anand Sarup And Others

Amendment of Written Statements and Withdrawal of Admissions: Insights from Gautam Sarup v. Anand Sarup And Others

Date: Jul 26, 2006
Amendment of Written Statements and Withdrawal of Admissions: Insights from Gautam Sarup v. Anand Sarup And Others Introduction The case of Gautam Sarup v. Anand Sarup And Others adjudicated by the...
Presumption of Negligence in Motor Accident Claims: Raju And Others v. Sukhwinder Singh And Others

Presumption of Negligence in Motor Accident Claims: Raju And Others v. Sukhwinder Singh And Others

Date: Jul 25, 2006
Presumption of Negligence in Motor Accident Claims: Raju And Others v. Sukhwinder Singh And Others Introduction The case of Raju And Others v. Sukhwinder Singh And Others, adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC Must Equal Duty: Commr. Of C. Ex. v. Illpea Paramount Pvt. Ltd.

Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC Must Equal Duty: Commr. Of C. Ex. v. Illpea Paramount Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Jul 22, 2006
Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC Must Equal Duty: Commr. Of C. Ex. v. Illpea Paramount Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) v. Illpea Paramount Pvt. Ltd....
Charan Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others: Enhancing Pension Rights for Employees of Privately Managed Aided Schools

Charan Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others: Enhancing Pension Rights for Employees of Privately Managed Aided Schools

Date: Jul 12, 2006
Charan Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others: Enhancing Pension Rights for Employees of Privately Managed Aided Schools Introduction Charan Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others is a landmark judgment...
Reaffirmation of Gram Panchayat's Ownership Over Shamilat Deh Lands under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961

Reaffirmation of Gram Panchayat's Ownership Over Shamilat Deh Lands under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961

Date: Jul 8, 2006
Reaffirmation of Gram Panchayat's Ownership Over Shamilat Deh Lands under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961 Introduction The case of Rama Sarup And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others...
Land Acquisition Compensation and Solatium: Comprehensive Analysis of Dr. Jagdish Parkash v. The Competent Authority

Land Acquisition Compensation and Solatium: Comprehensive Analysis of Dr. Jagdish Parkash v. The Competent Authority

Date: Jul 6, 2006
Land Acquisition Compensation and Solatium: Comprehensive Analysis of Dr. Jagdish Parkash v. The Competent Authority Introduction The case of Dr. Jagdish Parkash v. The Competent Authority...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert