Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Legal Commentary on Rama Rao v. Raja Of Pittapur: Affirming the Limitations of Reversioner's Legal Standing

Legal Commentary on Rama Rao v. Raja Of Pittapur: Affirming the Limitations of Reversioner's Legal Standing

Date: Oct 3, 1918
Legal Commentary on Rama Rao v. Raja Of Pittapur: Affirming the Limitations of Reversioner's Legal Standing Introduction Rama Rao v. Raja Of Pittapur is a seminal case decided by the Madras High...
Kandasami Pillai v. Ramasami Mannadi: Affirming Lessee's Right to Possession in Agricultural Leases

Kandasami Pillai v. Ramasami Mannadi: Affirming Lessee's Right to Possession in Agricultural Leases

Date: Oct 1, 1918
Kandasami Pillai v. Ramasami Mannadi: Affirming Lessee's Right to Possession in Agricultural Leases Introduction The case Kandasami Pillai v. Ramasami Mannadi was adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Civil Court Jurisdiction and Appointment Procedures in Village Offices: Krishnaswami Naidu v. Akkulammal Avergal

Civil Court Jurisdiction and Appointment Procedures in Village Offices: Krishnaswami Naidu v. Akkulammal Avergal

Date: Jul 25, 1918
Civil Court Jurisdiction and Appointment Procedures in Village Offices: Krishnaswami Naidu v. Akkulammal Avergal Introduction The case of Krishnaswami Naidu v. Akkulammal Avergal adjudicated by the...
One-Year Limitation on Suits Following Refusal to Investigate Claims Under O.21, R.63: Madras High Court's Ruling in Machi Raju Venkataratnam v. Rajah Vadrevu

One-Year Limitation on Suits Following Refusal to Investigate Claims Under O.21, R.63: Madras High Court's Ruling in Machi Raju Venkataratnam v. Rajah Vadrevu

Date: Jul 24, 1918
One-Year Limitation on Suits Following Refusal to Investigate Claims Under O.21, R.63: Madras High Court's Ruling in Machi Raju Venkataratnam v. Rajah Vadrevu Introduction The case of Machi Raju...
Recognition and Limitations of Memoranda of Objections in Provincial Insolvency Appeals

Recognition and Limitations of Memoranda of Objections in Provincial Insolvency Appeals

Date: Apr 26, 1918
Recognition and Limitations of Memoranda of Objections in Provincial Insolvency Appeals Introduction The case A.L.A Alagappa Chettiar (9Th ). v. Chockalingam Chetty And Others, adjudicated by the...
Inheritance of Priestly Offices by Widows: Establishing Hereditary Succession in Annaya Tantri v. Ammakka Hengsu

Inheritance of Priestly Offices by Widows: Establishing Hereditary Succession in Annaya Tantri v. Ammakka Hengsu

Date: Apr 19, 1918
Inheritance of Priestly Offices by Widows: Establishing Hereditary Succession in Annaya Tantri v. Ammakka Hengsu Introduction The case of Annaya Tantri v. Ammakka Hengsu was adjudicated by the Madras...
Clarifying Personal Liability of Minor Members in Joint Hindu Family Businesses: A Precedent from Madras High Court (1918)

Clarifying Personal Liability of Minor Members in Joint Hindu Family Businesses: A Precedent from Madras High Court (1918)

Date: Apr 5, 1918
Clarifying Personal Liability of Minor Members in Joint Hindu Family Businesses: A Precedent from Madras High Court (1918) Introduction The case of The Official Assignee Of Madras And Messrs Wilson...
Recognition of High Court Decisions in Land Acquisition Appeals as Non-Judgments under Letters Patent

Recognition of High Court Decisions in Land Acquisition Appeals as Non-Judgments under Letters Patent

Date: Apr 4, 1918
Recognition of High Court Decisions in Land Acquisition Appeals as Non-Judgments under Letters Patent 1. Introduction The case of Manavikraman Tirumalpad (Claimant) v. The Collector Of The Nilgiris...
Empowering Women in Religious Leadership: Insights from Munnavaru Begam Sahibu v. Mir Mahapalli Sahib

Empowering Women in Religious Leadership: Insights from Munnavaru Begam Sahibu v. Mir Mahapalli Sahib

Date: Mar 21, 1918
Empowering Women in Religious Leadership: Insights from Munnavaru Begam Sahibu v. Mir Mahapalli Sahib Introduction The landmark case of Munnavaru Begam Sahibu v. Mir Mahapalli Sahib, adjudicated by...
Koti Reddi v. P. Subbiah: Clarifying Notice Requirements under section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code

Koti Reddi v. P. Subbiah: Clarifying Notice Requirements under section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code

Date: Mar 15, 1918
Koti Reddi v. P. Subbiah: Clarifying Notice Requirements under section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code Introduction Koti Reddi v. P. Subbiah, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on March 14, 1918, is...
Hajee Ismail v. Messes Wilson & Co.: Establishing the Measure of Damages in Non-Market Delivery Cases

Hajee Ismail v. Messes Wilson & Co.: Establishing the Measure of Damages in Non-Market Delivery Cases

Date: Feb 1, 1918
Hajee Ismail v. Messes Wilson & Co.: Establishing the Measure of Damages in Non-Market Delivery Cases Introduction The case of Hajee Ismail v. Messes Wilson & Co. adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Kannuswami Pillai And Another v. Jagathambal: Jurisdiction and Valuation Standards in Civil Procedure

Kannuswami Pillai And Another v. Jagathambal: Jurisdiction and Valuation Standards in Civil Procedure

Date: Jan 31, 1918
Kannuswami Pillai And Another v. Jagathambal: Jurisdiction and Valuation Standards in Civil Procedure Introduction The case of Kannuswami Pillai And Another v. Jagathambal, adjudicated by the Madras...
Clarification on Res Judicata and Conditional Sale Mortgages under Article 134: Muthaya Shetti v. Kanthappa Shetti

Clarification on Res Judicata and Conditional Sale Mortgages under Article 134: Muthaya Shetti v. Kanthappa Shetti

Date: Dec 18, 1917
Clarification on Res Judicata and Conditional Sale Mortgages under Article 134: Muthaya Shetti v. Kanthappa Shetti Introduction The case of Muthaya Shetti v. Kanthappa Shetti adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Customary Right to Thunduvaram: Kumarappa Reddi v. Manavala Goundan and Its Legal Implications

Establishing the Customary Right to Thunduvaram: Kumarappa Reddi v. Manavala Goundan and Its Legal Implications

Date: Nov 24, 1917
Establishing the Customary Right to Thunduvaram: Kumarappa Reddi v. Manavala Goundan and Its Legal Implications Introduction Kumarappa Reddi v. Manavala Goundan is a landmark judgment delivered by...
Madras High Court Clarifies Scope of CPC Order XVII Rules 2 and 3

Madras High Court Clarifies Scope of CPC Order XVII Rules 2 and 3

Date: Nov 22, 1917
Madras High Court Clarifies Scope of CPC Order XVII Rules 2 and 3 Introduction The case of Prativadi Bhayankaram Pichamma v. Kamisetti Sreeramulu adjudicated by the Madras High Court on November 21,...
Revivor of Prior Mortgages: Comprehensive Accounting for Principal, Interest, and Profits

Revivor of Prior Mortgages: Comprehensive Accounting for Principal, Interest, and Profits

Date: Nov 15, 1917
Revivor of Prior Mortgages: Comprehensive Accounting for Principal, Interest, and Profits Introduction Muthammal v. Razu Pillai is a pivotal decision rendered by the Madras High Court on November 14,...
Clarifying 'Intent to Annoy' under Section 441 IPC: Commentary on S. Vullappa v. S. Bheema Row

Clarifying 'Intent to Annoy' under Section 441 IPC: Commentary on S. Vullappa v. S. Bheema Row

Date: Nov 10, 1917
Clarifying 'Intent to Annoy' under Section 441 IPC: Commentary on S. Vullappa v. S. Bheema Row Introduction The case of S. Vullappa v. S. Bheema Row, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on November...
In E.D Smith Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party: Admissibility of Statements as Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act

In E.D Smith Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party: Admissibility of Statements as Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act

Date: Nov 9, 1917
In E.D Smith Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party: Admissibility of Statements as Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of E.D Smith Accused v. Emperor Opposite Party,...
Guardianship and Limitation in Ancestral Property Alienation: Ganesa Aiyar v. Amirthasami Odayar

Guardianship and Limitation in Ancestral Property Alienation: Ganesa Aiyar v. Amirthasami Odayar

Date: Oct 30, 1917
Guardianship and Limitation in Ancestral Property Alienation: Ganesa Aiyar v. Amirthasami Odayar Introduction The case of Ganesa Aiyar v. Amirthasami Odayar adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Rateable Distribution and Protective Measures Against Private Alienation under the Civil Procedure Code: An Analysis of Annamalai Chettiar v. Palamalai Pillai

Rateable Distribution and Protective Measures Against Private Alienation under the Civil Procedure Code: An Analysis of Annamalai Chettiar v. Palamalai Pillai

Date: Oct 27, 1917
Rateable Distribution and Protective Measures Against Private Alienation under the Civil Procedure Code: An Analysis of Annamalai Chettiar v. Palamalai Pillai Introduction Annamalai Chettiar v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert