Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Survivorship Prevails over Testamentary Dispositions in Joint Family Properties: Pandipati Subbarami Reddi v. Pandipati Ramamma

Survivorship Prevails over Testamentary Dispositions in Joint Family Properties: Pandipati Subbarami Reddi v. Pandipati Ramamma

Date: Apr 1, 1920
Survivorship Prevails over Testamentary Dispositions in Joint Family Properties: Pandipati Subbarami Reddi v. Pandipati Ramamma Introduction Pandipati Subbarami Reddi v. Pandipati Ramamma is a...
Succession Principles in Impartible Zamindari Estates under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Gurusami Pandiyan v. Sendattikalai Pandia Chinna Thambiar

Succession Principles in Impartible Zamindari Estates under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Gurusami Pandiyan v. Sendattikalai Pandia Chinna Thambiar

Date: Mar 13, 1920
Succession Principles in Impartible Zamindari Estates under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Gurusami Pandiyan v. Sendattikalai Pandia Chinna Thambiar Introduction The landmark case of Gurusami Pandiyan...
Admissibility of Consent-Based Evidence in Subsequent Proceedings: Jainab Bibi Saheba v. Hyderally Saheb

Admissibility of Consent-Based Evidence in Subsequent Proceedings: Jainab Bibi Saheba v. Hyderally Saheb

Date: Mar 6, 1920
Admissibility of Consent-Based Evidence in Subsequent Proceedings: Jainab Bibi Saheba v. Hyderally Saheb Introduction The case of Jainab Bibi Saheba v. Hyderally Saheb adjudicated by the Madras High...
Right to Re-Summon Witnesses in Security Proceedings: Yeluchuri Venkatachennaya v. Emperor

Right to Re-Summon Witnesses in Security Proceedings: Yeluchuri Venkatachennaya v. Emperor

Date: Feb 21, 1920
Right to Re-Summon Witnesses in Security Proceedings: Yeluchuri Venkatachennaya v. Emperor Introduction The case of Yeluchuri Venkatachennaya and v. Emperor adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Express Covenant for Title and Limitation Period in Property Transactions: Muhammad Ali Sheriff Sahib v. Budharaju Venkatapathi Raju

Express Covenant for Title and Limitation Period in Property Transactions: Muhammad Ali Sheriff Sahib v. Budharaju Venkatapathi Raju

Date: Jan 29, 1920
Express Covenant for Title and Limitation Period in Property Transactions: Muhammad Ali Sheriff Sahib v. Budharaju Venkatapathi Raju Introduction The case of Muhammad Ali Sheriff Sahib v. Budharaju...
Insanity and Inheritance Rights under Hindu Law: An Analysis of Muthusami Gurukkal v. Meenammal

Insanity and Inheritance Rights under Hindu Law: An Analysis of Muthusami Gurukkal v. Meenammal

Date: Nov 6, 1919
Insanity and Inheritance Rights under Hindu Law: An Analysis of Muthusami Gurukkal v. Meenammal Introduction The case of Muthusami Gurukkal v. Meenammal adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Limitation of Inherent Powers in Setting Aside Ex Parte Decrees: Gadi Neelaveni v. Marappareddigari Narayana Reddi

Limitation of Inherent Powers in Setting Aside Ex Parte Decrees: Gadi Neelaveni v. Marappareddigari Narayana Reddi

Date: Oct 2, 1919
Limitation of Inherent Powers in Setting Aside Ex Parte Decrees: Gadi Neelaveni v. Marappareddigari Narayana Reddi Introduction Gadi Neelaveni v. Marappareddigari Narayana Reddi is a landmark...
Establishing the Commencement of Limitation Periods in Property Sale Confirmations: Insights from Muthu Korakki Chetty v. Mahamad Madar Ammal

Establishing the Commencement of Limitation Periods in Property Sale Confirmations: Insights from Muthu Korakki Chetty v. Mahamad Madar Ammal

Date: Oct 2, 1919
Establishing the Commencement of Limitation Periods in Property Sale Confirmations: Insights from Muthu Korakki Chetty v. Mahamad Madar Ammal Introduction The case of Muthu Korakki Chetty v. Mahamad...
Subramania Aiyar v. Lakshmana Goundan: Clarifying Public Religious Endowments in Temple Governance

Subramania Aiyar v. Lakshmana Goundan: Clarifying Public Religious Endowments in Temple Governance

Date: Sep 26, 1919
Subramania Aiyar v. Lakshmana Goundan: Clarifying Public Religious Endowments in Temple Governance Introduction Subramania Aiyar v. Lakshmana Goundan is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras...
Comprehensive Commentary on Angamuthu Chetti v. Varatharajulu Chetti

Comprehensive Commentary on Angamuthu Chetti v. Varatharajulu Chetti

Date: Sep 4, 1919
Establishing the Validity of Widow's Property Surrender with Maintenance Provisions: Angamuthu Chetti v. Varatharajulu Chetti Introduction The case of Angamuthu Chetti v. Varatharajulu Chetti...
Madras High Court's Decision on Jurisdiction for Decree Execution

Madras High Court's Decision on Jurisdiction for Decree Execution

Date: Apr 25, 1919
Madras High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Precedence in Decree Execution Introduction The case of Seeni Nadan (Second Counter-Petitioner) v. Muthusamy Pillai And Nine Others, adjudicated by the...
Madras High Court Establishes Rights of Alienee Pendente Lite in Pending Suits under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act

Madras High Court Establishes Rights of Alienee Pendente Lite in Pending Suits under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act

Date: Apr 24, 1919
Madras High Court Establishes Rights of Alienee Pendente Lite in Pending Suits under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act Introduction In the landmark case of Policherla Veeraraghava Reddi v....
Antecedent Debt in Joint Family Mortgages: Insights from Armugham Chetty v. Muthu Koundan

Antecedent Debt in Joint Family Mortgages: Insights from Armugham Chetty v. Muthu Koundan

Date: Apr 11, 1919
Antecedent Debt in Joint Family Mortgages: Insights from Armugham Chetty v. Muthu Koundan Introduction The case of Armugham Chetty v. Muthu Koundan, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on April 10,...
Mandatoriness of Sect. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Affirmed by Madras High Court

Mandatoriness of Sect. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Affirmed by Madras High Court

Date: Feb 24, 1919
Mandatoriness of Sect. 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act Affirmed by Madras High Court Introduction The case of V.M. Assan Mahomed Sahib v. M.E. Rahiman Sahib, adjudicated by the Madras...
Misjoinder of Charges and Evidence Admissibility: Insights from Kumaramuthu Pillai v. Kandasami Pillai

Misjoinder of Charges and Evidence Admissibility: Insights from Kumaramuthu Pillai v. Kandasami Pillai

Date: Feb 8, 1919
Misjoinder of Charges and Evidence Admissibility: Insights from Kumaramuthu Pillai Petitioner v. Kandasami Pillai Petitioner Introduction The case of Kumaramuthu Pillai Petitioner (1st Accused) v....
Ammani Ammal v. Ramaswami Naidu: Clarifying the Boundaries of Bona Fide Purchaser Rights and Debt Liability

Ammani Ammal v. Ramaswami Naidu: Clarifying the Boundaries of Bona Fide Purchaser Rights and Debt Liability

Date: Jan 11, 1919
Ammani Ammal v. Ramaswami Naidu: Clarifying the Boundaries of Bona Fide Purchaser Rights and Debt Liability Introduction The case of Ammani Ammal v. Ramaswami Naidu, adjudicated by the Madras High...
Recognition of Worship Rights as Sufficient Interest under Section 92 CPC in T.R. Ramachandra Aiyar v. Parameswaran Unni

Recognition of Worship Rights as Sufficient Interest under Section 92 CPC in T.R. Ramachandra Aiyar v. Parameswaran Unni

Date: Nov 22, 1918
Recognition of Worship Rights as Sufficient Interest under Section 92 CPC in T.R. Ramachandra Aiyar v. Parameswaran Unni Introduction The case of T.R. Ramachandra Aiyar v. Parameswaran Unni...
Guardians Unable to Impose Personal Liabilities on Minors: Patchu Ramajogayya v. Vajjula Jagannadhan

Guardians Unable to Impose Personal Liabilities on Minors: Patchu Ramajogayya v. Vajjula Jagannadhan

Date: Nov 15, 1918
Guardians Unable to Impose Personal Liabilities on Minors: Patchu Ramajogayya v. Vajjula Jagannadhan Introduction Case Title: Patchu Ramajogayya v. Vajjula Jagannadhan Court: Madras High Court Date:...
Reliability and Admissibility of Business Accounts under Section 34 of the Evidence Act: Insights from M.S. Yesuvadiyan v. P.S.A. Subba Naicker

Reliability and Admissibility of Business Accounts under Section 34 of the Evidence Act: Insights from M.S. Yesuvadiyan v. P.S.A. Subba Naicker

Date: Nov 2, 1918
Reliability and Admissibility of Business Accounts under Section 34 of the Evidence Act: Insights from M.S. Yesuvadiyan v. P.S.A. Subba Naicker Introduction The case of M.S. Yesuvadiyan v. P.S.A....
Ramachandra Rao v. Ramachandra Rao: Affirming Absolute Gifts to Female Donees under Hindu Law

Ramachandra Rao v. Ramachandra Rao: Affirming Absolute Gifts to Female Donees under Hindu Law

Date: Oct 9, 1918
Ramachandra Rao v. Ramachandra Rao: Affirming Absolute Gifts to Female Donees under Hindu Law Introduction Ramachandra Rao v. Ramachandra Rao is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Madras High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert