Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Karnataka High Court Case Commentaries

Karnataka High Court's Landmark Ruling on RPT Filter and Comparables Selection in Transfer Pricing: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Misys Software (I) Pvt Ltd

Karnataka High Court's Landmark Ruling on RPT Filter and Comparables Selection in Transfer Pricing: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Misys Software (I) Pvt Ltd

Date: Jul 18, 2018
Karnataka High Court's Landmark Ruling on RPT Filter and Comparables Selection in Transfer Pricing: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Misys Software (I) Pvt Ltd Introduction The case of Commissioner...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s M PACT Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing New Precedents in Transfer Pricing and Deduction Computations

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s M PACT Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing New Precedents in Transfer Pricing and Deduction Computations

Date: Jul 12, 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s M PACT Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing New Precedents in Transfer Pricing and Deduction Computations Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax...
Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A

Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A Introduction In the landmark case of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v....
Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others

Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others

Date: Jun 20, 2018
Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others Introduction The case of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others adjudicated...
Section 14A and Rule 8D: Disallowance of Expenditures on Exempt Income - Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank Case

Section 14A and Rule 8D: Disallowance of Expenditures on Exempt Income - Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank Case

Date: May 29, 2018
Section 14A and Rule 8D: Disallowance of Expenditures on Exempt Income - Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank Case 1. Introduction The case of M/s Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank vs. Joint Commissioner of...
Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam

Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam

Date: Apr 20, 2018
Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam Introduction The case of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay...
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Competent Authority in Disciplinary Proceedings under the Lokayukta Act

Karnataka High Court Clarifies Competent Authority in Disciplinary Proceedings under the Lokayukta Act

Date: Apr 14, 2018
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Competent Authority in Disciplinary Proceedings under the Lokayukta Act Introduction The case of Gopal Hanumanth Kase v. State Of Karnataka And Others, adjudicated by...
Setting Compensation Limits in Motor Accident Claims: Analysis of Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Laxmi

Setting Compensation Limits in Motor Accident Claims: Analysis of Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Laxmi

Date: Mar 21, 2018
Setting Compensation Limits in Motor Accident Claims: Analysis of Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Laxmi Introduction The case of Shriram General Insurance Company Limited v. Smt. Laxmi...
Reimbursement vs. Service Fees: Clarifying Section 194J Applicability in Corporate Agreements

Reimbursement vs. Service Fees: Clarifying Section 194J Applicability in Corporate Agreements

Date: Feb 13, 2018
Reimbursement vs. Service Fees: Clarifying Section 194J Applicability in Corporate Agreements Introduction The case of THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. M/S KALYANI STEELS LTD adjudicated by the...
Interpreting 'Purpose Not Allowed by Permit' Under Section 149(2) Motor Insurance Act: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Jayamma

Interpreting 'Purpose Not Allowed by Permit' Under Section 149(2) Motor Insurance Act: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Jayamma

Date: Jan 26, 2018
Interpreting 'Purpose Not Allowed by Permit' Under Section 149(2) Motor Insurance Act: Insights from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Jayamma Introduction The case of The Divisional Manager,...
Clarity on Insurer Liability in Tractor Accidents: Insights from Gadhilingappa v. K. Guleppa

Clarity on Insurer Liability in Tractor Accidents: Insights from Gadhilingappa v. K. Guleppa

Date: Jan 3, 2018
Clarity on Insurer Liability in Tractor Accidents: Insights from Gadhilingappa v. K. Guleppa Introduction The case of Gadhilingappa @ Gadhilinga S/O Ulluru Mallappa @ v. K. Guleppa S/O K Kingappa...
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Special Courts under MMDR Act and IPC: Insights from Sri Vivek v. State of Karnataka

Jurisdictional Boundaries of Special Courts under MMDR Act and IPC: Insights from Sri Vivek v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 16, 2017
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Special Courts under MMDR Act and IPC: Insights from Sri Vivek v. The State Of Karnataka Introduction The case of Sri Vivek and Another v. The State Of Karnataka, By...
Kasaramaadhana Scheme 2017: Establishing Priority in Tax Settlement Adjustments

Kasaramaadhana Scheme 2017: Establishing Priority in Tax Settlement Adjustments

Date: Nov 15, 2017
Kasaramaadhana Scheme 2017: Establishing Priority in Tax Settlement Adjustments Introduction The case of M/S. Ws Retail Services Private Limited v. The State Of Karnataka adjudicated by the Karnataka...
Comprehensive Commentary on Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd: Affirming Section 10A Deduction for Export-Oriented Undertakings

Comprehensive Commentary on Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd: Affirming Section 10A Deduction for Export-Oriented Undertakings

Date: Oct 31, 2017
Affirming Section 10A Deduction for Export-Oriented Undertakings: Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hewlett Packard...
Strict Adherence to Section 35(1) of POCSO: Karnataka High Court in VINAY v. State of Karnataka

Strict Adherence to Section 35(1) of POCSO: Karnataka High Court in VINAY v. State of Karnataka

Date: Jul 14, 2017
Strict Adherence to Section 35(1) of POCSO: Karnataka High Court in VINAY v. State of Karnataka Introduction The case of VINAY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA was adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on...
Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Denied for Interest Income from Co-operative Banks: Totagars Co-operative Sale Society Judgment Analysis

Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Denied for Interest Income from Co-operative Banks: Totagars Co-operative Sale Society Judgment Analysis

Date: Jun 17, 2017
Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Denied for Interest Income from Co-operative Banks: Totagars Co-operative Sale Society Judgment Analysis Introduction The case of Prl. Commissioner of Income Tax vs....
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65-B: M.R. Hiremath v. State

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65-B: M.R. Hiremath v. State

Date: Apr 28, 2017
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65-B: M.R. Hiremath v. State Introduction The case of M.R. Hiremath v. State adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on April 27, 2017, revolves...
Rational Classification in Taxation: Upholding State's Discretion in Liquor Taxation

Rational Classification in Taxation: Upholding State's Discretion in Liquor Taxation

Date: Mar 23, 2017
Rational Classification in Taxation: Upholding State's Discretion in Liquor Taxation 1. Introduction The case of M/S Renukamba v. The State of Karnataka adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on...
Karnataka High Court Refines Criteria for Depositing Disputed Income Tax Demands: A New Precedent

Karnataka High Court Refines Criteria for Depositing Disputed Income Tax Demands: A New Precedent

Date: Feb 24, 2017
Karnataka High Court Refines Criteria for Depositing Disputed Income Tax Demands: A New Precedent Introduction The case of Flipkart India Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax...
Mandating Judicial Scrutiny in Taking Cognizance: Mallikarjuna v. State Of Karnataka

Mandating Judicial Scrutiny in Taking Cognizance: Mallikarjuna v. State Of Karnataka

Date: Feb 3, 2017
Mandating Judicial Scrutiny in Taking Cognizance: Mallikarjuna v. State Of Karnataka Introduction In the case of Mallikarjuna v. State Of Karnataka, adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court's Dharwad...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert