Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Karnataka High Court Case Commentaries

Enhancing Procedural Fairness in PTCL Act Land Resumption: Insights from P. Kamala v. State Of Karnataka

Enhancing Procedural Fairness in PTCL Act Land Resumption: Insights from P. Kamala v. State Of Karnataka

Date: Jul 9, 2019
Enhancing Procedural Fairness in PTCL Act Land Resumption: Insights from P. Kamala v. State Of Karnataka Introduction The case of P. Kamala v. State Of Karnataka, Rep. By Its Secretary, Revenue...
Sarojamma v. Ram Rathan Sikhwal: Landmark Decision on Motor Vehicles Act, Section 163-A

Sarojamma v. Ram Rathan Sikhwal: Landmark Decision on Motor Vehicles Act, Section 163-A

Date: Jun 19, 2019
Sarojamma v. Ram Rathan Sikhwal: Landmark Decision on Motor Vehicles Act, Section 163-A Introduction The case of Sarojamma v. Ram Rathan Sikhwal is a pivotal decision delivered by the Karnataka High...
Karnataka High Court Upholds Director Disqualification Provisions under Companies Act, 2013

Karnataka High Court Upholds Director Disqualification Provisions under Companies Act, 2013

Date: Jun 13, 2019
Karnataka High Court Upholds Director Disqualification Provisions under Companies Act, 2013 Introduction The case of Yashodhara Shroff v. Union Of India adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on...
Affirmation of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Despite Mutual Agreement Procedure Adjustments: Insights from Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Affirmation of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Despite Mutual Agreement Procedure Adjustments: Insights from Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

Date: Jun 12, 2019
Affirmation of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Despite Mutual Agreement Procedure Adjustments: Insights from Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India Introduction The case of Toyota...
Arun & Others v. State of Karnataka: Establishing the Doctrine of Single Prosecution under Factories Act in Cases of Accidental Death

Arun & Others v. State of Karnataka: Establishing the Doctrine of Single Prosecution under Factories Act in Cases of Accidental Death

Date: May 29, 2019
Arun & Others v. State of Karnataka: Establishing the Doctrine of Single Prosecution under Factories Act in Cases of Accidental Death Introduction The case of Arun & Others v. State of Karnataka is a...
Affirmation of OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights Over State Admission Regulations – Pranav V. Deshpande v. State of Karnataka

Affirmation of OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights Over State Admission Regulations – Pranav V. Deshpande v. State of Karnataka

Date: Apr 11, 2019
Affirmation of OCI Cardholders’ Educational Rights Over State Admission Regulations Introduction The case of Pranav V. Deshpande v. State of Karnataka, adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on...
Establishing Occupier's Gross Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Insights from MELVIN KUMAR v. K S HARISHA

Establishing Occupier's Gross Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Insights from MELVIN KUMAR v. K S HARISHA

Date: Feb 1, 2019
Establishing Occupier's Gross Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Insights from MELVIN KUMAR v. K S HARISHA Introduction MELVIN KUMAR v. K S HARISHA is a significant judgment delivered by the...
Parental Income Determines Creamy Layer Status: Karnataka High Court Sets Precedent in State of Karnataka v. Smt Yogeshwari

Parental Income Determines Creamy Layer Status: Karnataka High Court Sets Precedent in State of Karnataka v. Smt Yogeshwari

Date: Nov 20, 2018
Parental Income Determines Creamy Layer Status: Karnataka High Court Sets Precedent in State of Karnataka v. Smt Yogeshwari Introduction The case of State of Karnataka v. Smt Yogeshwari adjudicated...
Karnataka High Court Upholds Strict Transfer Protocol for Government Servants

Karnataka High Court Upholds Strict Transfer Protocol for Government Servants

Date: Nov 14, 2018
Karnataka High Court Upholds Strict Transfer Protocol for Government Servants Introduction The case of Rajashekar M. v. State Of Karnataka Rep. By Its Principal Secretary Department Of Backward...
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Procedure for Raising Valuation and Court Fees Objections in Civil Suits

Karnataka High Court Clarifies Procedure for Raising Valuation and Court Fees Objections in Civil Suits

Date: Oct 27, 2018
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Procedure for Raising Valuation and Court Fees Objections in Civil Suits Introduction The case of Venkatesh R Desai v. Smt. Pushpa Hosmani And Others was adjudicated by...
Retrospective Application of Section 21 Amendment in Debt Recovery: Vijay Mallya v. State Bank Of India

Retrospective Application of Section 21 Amendment in Debt Recovery: Vijay Mallya v. State Bank Of India

Date: Oct 6, 2018
Retrospective Application of Section 21 Amendment in Debt Recovery: Vijay Mallya v. State Bank Of India Introduction The case of Vijay Mallya (Dr.) v. State Bank Of India was adjudicated by the...
Depreciation Allowance for Charitable Trusts Post Full Income Application: Insights from CIT v. M/s Green Wood High School

Depreciation Allowance for Charitable Trusts Post Full Income Application: Insights from CIT v. M/s Green Wood High School

Date: Aug 15, 2018
Depreciation Allowance for Charitable Trusts Post Full Income Application: Insights from CIT v. M/s Green Wood High School Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Another...
ITAT's Authority to Direct Fresh Enquiries Beyond Appellate Grounds

ITAT's Authority to Direct Fresh Enquiries Beyond Appellate Grounds

Date: Jul 24, 2018
ITAT's Authority to Direct Fresh Enquiries Beyond Appellate Grounds Introduction The case of Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by the...
Karnataka High Court's Landmark Ruling on RPT Filter and Comparables Selection in Transfer Pricing: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Misys Software (I) Pvt Ltd

Karnataka High Court's Landmark Ruling on RPT Filter and Comparables Selection in Transfer Pricing: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Misys Software (I) Pvt Ltd

Date: Jul 18, 2018
Karnataka High Court's Landmark Ruling on RPT Filter and Comparables Selection in Transfer Pricing: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Misys Software (I) Pvt Ltd Introduction The case of Commissioner...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s M PACT Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing New Precedents in Transfer Pricing and Deduction Computations

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s M PACT Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing New Precedents in Transfer Pricing and Deduction Computations

Date: Jul 12, 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s M PACT Technology Services Pvt. Ltd.: Establishing New Precedents in Transfer Pricing and Deduction Computations Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income Tax...
Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A

Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Karnataka High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Substantial Questions of Law in Tax Appeals under Section 260-A Introduction In the landmark case of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v....
Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others

Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others

Date: Jun 20, 2018
Insurer Liability Affirmed under Section 66(3)(p) of the Motor Vehicles Act: Analysis of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others Introduction The case of S.N. Kenchanna v. Anitha And Others adjudicated...
Section 14A and Rule 8D: Disallowance of Expenditures on Exempt Income - Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank Case

Section 14A and Rule 8D: Disallowance of Expenditures on Exempt Income - Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank Case

Date: May 29, 2018
Section 14A and Rule 8D: Disallowance of Expenditures on Exempt Income - Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank Case 1. Introduction The case of M/s Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank vs. Joint Commissioner of...
Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam

Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam

Date: Apr 20, 2018
Custody Rights of Natural Guardians Under Section 491 Cr.P.C: A Comprehensive Analysis of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay Thirugnanam Introduction The case of Manju Malini Seshachalam v. Vijay...
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Competent Authority in Disciplinary Proceedings under the Lokayukta Act

Karnataka High Court Clarifies Competent Authority in Disciplinary Proceedings under the Lokayukta Act

Date: Apr 14, 2018
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Competent Authority in Disciplinary Proceedings under the Lokayukta Act Introduction The case of Gopal Hanumanth Kase v. State Of Karnataka And Others, adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert