Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Jharkhand High Court Case Commentaries

Offense-Centric Cognizance and Person-Centric Process Issuance: Insights from Amresh Kumar Dhiraj v. State of Jharkhand

Offense-Centric Cognizance and Person-Centric Process Issuance: Insights from Amresh Kumar Dhiraj v. State of Jharkhand

Date: Nov 28, 2019
Offense-Centric Cognizance and Person-Centric Process Issuance: Insights from Amresh Kumar Dhiraj v. State of Jharkhand 1. Introduction The case of Amresh Kumar Dhiraj And Others Petitioner(S) v....
Jharkhand High Court Upholds Principles of Natural Justice in Caste Certificate Issuance

Jharkhand High Court Upholds Principles of Natural Justice in Caste Certificate Issuance

Date: Apr 27, 2019
Jharkhand High Court Upholds Principles of Natural Justice in Caste Certificate Issuance Introduction The case of Jit Lal Ray v. State Of Jharkhand And Others adjudicated by the Jharkhand High Court...
Affirmation of Conviction under Sections 376, 323, and 341 of the IPC in Maheshwar Tigga v. State Of Jharkhand

Affirmation of Conviction under Sections 376, 323, and 341 of the IPC in Maheshwar Tigga v. State Of Jharkhand

Date: Dec 8, 2018
Affirmation of Conviction under Sections 376, 323, and 341 of the IPC in Maheshwar Tigga v. State Of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Maheshwar Tigga v. State Of Jharkhand is a significant judicial...
Mandate for On-Site Electricity Consumption Experiments in Central Excise Litigation: Stan Commodities Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Mandate for On-Site Electricity Consumption Experiments in Central Excise Litigation: Stan Commodities Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Date: Nov 22, 2017
Mandate for On-Site Electricity Consumption Experiments in Central Excise Litigation: Stan Commodities Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise Introduction In the landmark case of Stan...
Jharkhand High Court's Landmark Ruling on Partnership Firm Income Attribution

Jharkhand High Court's Landmark Ruling on Partnership Firm Income Attribution

Date: Oct 13, 2017
Jharkhand High Court's Landmark Ruling on Partnership Firm Income Attribution Introduction In the case of Prayag Tendu Leaves Processing Company v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, decided by the...
Doctrine of Equal Pay for Equal Work: Jharkhand High Court Upholds Uniform Pay Scale for University Readers

Doctrine of Equal Pay for Equal Work: Jharkhand High Court Upholds Uniform Pay Scale for University Readers

Date: Jun 21, 2017
Doctrine of Equal Pay for Equal Work: Jharkhand High Court Upholds Uniform Pay Scale for University Readers Introduction The case of Prashant Kumar Mishra v. State Of Jharkhand was adjudicated by the...
Quashing of Show-Cause Notice in Balashri Metals Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India: A Landmark Decision on Natural Justice and Evidentiary Standards

Quashing of Show-Cause Notice in Balashri Metals Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India: A Landmark Decision on Natural Justice and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Sep 1, 2016
Quashing of Show-Cause Notice in Balashri Metals Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India: A Landmark Decision on Natural Justice and Evidentiary Standards Introduction Balashri Metals Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India...
Affirmation of BSF Posting Regulations for Disabled Personnel in Shailendra Singh v. Union of India

Affirmation of BSF Posting Regulations for Disabled Personnel in Shailendra Singh v. Union of India

Date: Aug 26, 2015
Affirmation of BSF Posting Regulations for Disabled Personnel in Shailendra Singh v. Union of India Introduction The case of Shailendra Singh v. The Union of India was adjudicated by the Jharkhand...
Consent and Misconception in Sexual Offences: Insights from Arti Rai v. State Of Jharkhand

Consent and Misconception in Sexual Offences: Insights from Arti Rai v. State Of Jharkhand

Date: Jan 14, 2015
Consent and Misconception in Sexual Offences: Insights from Arti Rai v. State Of Jharkhand Introduction The Arti Rai v. State Of Jharkhand case, adjudicated by the Jharkhand High Court on January 13,...
Mandamus Judgment Enhances Due Process in Environmental Clearances

Mandamus Judgment Enhances Due Process in Environmental Clearances

Date: Nov 29, 2014
Mandamus Judgment Enhances Due Process in Environmental Clearances Introduction The case of Hindustan Copper Limited Through Its General Manager (Mines) Petitioner v. Union Of India Through Its...
Judgment Analysis: Paritran Trust v. Punjab National Bank – SARFAESI Act Implications

Judgment Analysis: Paritran Trust v. Punjab National Bank – SARFAESI Act Implications

Date: Oct 15, 2014
Paritran Trust v. Punjab National Bank – SARFAESI Act Implications 1. Introduction In the case of Paritran Trust Through Its Secretary, Jasidih, Deoghar, Jharkhand v. Punjab National Bank, Through...
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Against Deemed Agent: S. Aikat v. The State Of Jharkhand

Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Against Deemed Agent: S. Aikat v. The State Of Jharkhand

Date: Oct 9, 2014
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Against Deemed Agent: S. Aikat v. The State Of Jharkhand Introduction The case of S. Aikat Petitioner v. The State Of Jharkhand adjudicated by the Jharkhand High...
Doctrine of Election in Electricity Act: Analysis of M/S. Mars Marcantiles Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board

Doctrine of Election in Electricity Act: Analysis of M/S. Mars Marcantiles Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board

Date: Sep 20, 2014
Doctrine of Election in Electricity Act: Analysis of M/S. Mars Marcantiles Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board Introduction The case of M/S. Mars Marcantiles Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jharkhand State...
Gratuity Entitlements and Employer's Rights: Insights from Bokaro Steel Limited v. Shri Ram Naresh Singh & Ors.

Gratuity Entitlements and Employer's Rights: Insights from Bokaro Steel Limited v. Shri Ram Naresh Singh & Ors.

Date: Jan 25, 2014
Gratuity Entitlements and Employer's Rights: Insights from Bokaro Steel Limited v. Shri Ram Naresh Singh & Ors. Introduction The case of Bokaro Steel Limited v. Shri Ram Naresh Singh & Ors....
Assessing Undisclosed Income through Loose Sheets: An Analysis of Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. CIT (Appeals), Ranchi

Assessing Undisclosed Income through Loose Sheets: An Analysis of Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. CIT (Appeals), Ranchi

Date: Jan 10, 2014
Assessing Undisclosed Income through Loose Sheets: An Analysis of Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. CIT (Appeals), Ranchi Introduction The case of Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. Office Of The Commissioner Of Income...
Leave Encashment Rights Affirmed for Teachers in Non-Government Aided Minority Schools

Leave Encashment Rights Affirmed for Teachers in Non-Government Aided Minority Schools

Date: Jan 4, 2014
Leave Encashment Rights Affirmed for Teachers in Non-Government Aided Minority Schools Introduction The case of Mariyam Tirkey Petitioner v. The State Of Jharkhand & Ors. deliberated on whether...
Distinguishing Sections 126 and 135 of the Indian Electricity Act: Insights from M/S Shyam Lal Iron And Steel Co. v. Jharkhand State Electricity Board

Distinguishing Sections 126 and 135 of the Indian Electricity Act: Insights from M/S Shyam Lal Iron And Steel Co. v. Jharkhand State Electricity Board

Date: Apr 27, 2013
Distinguishing Sections 126 and 135 of the Indian Electricity Act: Insights from M/S Shyam Lal Iron And Steel Co. v. Jharkhand State Electricity Board 1. Introduction The case of M/S Shyam Lal Iron...
Jharkhand High Court Quashes Charges in Binod Kumar Sinha v. Madhu Koda

Jharkhand High Court Quashes Charges in Binod Kumar Sinha v. Madhu Koda

Date: Mar 8, 2013
Jharkhand High Court Quashes Charges in Binod Kumar Sinha v. Madhu Koda Introduction The case of Binod Kumar Sinha v. Madhu Koda adjudicated by the Jharkhand High Court on March 7, 2013, represents a...
Lease vs. Hire-Purchase: Tax Implications – Jharkhand HC in Commissioner of IT v. Tata Robins Fraser Ltd.

Lease vs. Hire-Purchase: Tax Implications – Jharkhand HC in Commissioner of IT v. Tata Robins Fraser Ltd.

Date: Sep 13, 2012
Lease vs. Hire-Purchase: Tax Implications – Jharkhand HC in Commissioner of IT v. Tata Robins Fraser Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ranchi v. M/S. Tata Robins Fraser...
Interpreting 'Registered Post' to Include 'Speed Post' under Income Tax Act Service Requirements

Interpreting 'Registered Post' to Include 'Speed Post' under Income Tax Act Service Requirements

Date: Jul 19, 2012
Interpreting 'Registered Post' to Include 'Speed Post' under Income Tax Act Service Requirements Introduction The case of Milan Poddar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Main...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert