Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Jharkhand High Court Case Commentaries

Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from SHIVSHANKAR PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Introduction The case of Shivshankar Paswan v. The State of Jharkhand, adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B: Analysis of Basudeo Mahto v. State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Basudeo Mahto alias Basu Dev Mahato v. The State of Jharkhand...
Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand

Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Strict Adherence to Section 65B for Electronic Evidence Admissibility: Insights from AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of AJIT DAS ALIAS CHOTTA DAS v. The...
High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
High Court of Jharkhand Sets Precedent on Authentication of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction The case of Sharat Gope alias Sarat Gope v. The State of Jharkhand...
Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Jharkhand High Court Establishes Strict Admissibility Standards for Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act Introduction In the landmark case of Sonu Lal v. The State of Jharkhand,...
Jharkhand High Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act

Jharkhand High Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Jharkhand High Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of The State of Jharkhand v. Ramai Karua and Others...
Jharkhand High Court Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B

Jharkhand High Court Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Jharkhand High Court Sets New Precedent on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence under Section 65B Introduction The case of Shoaib Akhtar v. The State of Jharkhand marks a significant turning point in...
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Enhancing the Integrity of Electronic Evidence: Insights from GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Introduction The case of GOPAL TIRIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND adjudicated by the Jharkhand High...
Strengthening Electronic Evidence Standards: Analysis of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand

Strengthening Electronic Evidence Standards: Analysis of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Strengthening Electronic Evidence Standards: Analysis of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Sanjay Diggi v. The State of Jharkhand adjudicated by the Jharkhand High Court...
Reaffirming Section 65B's Role in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand

Reaffirming Section 65B's Role in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand

Date: Apr 6, 2023
Reaffirming Section 65B's Role in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Arup Kumar Bose A-14 v. The State of Jharkhand...
Conversion from CPF to GPF-Cum-Pension Scheme: Jharkhand High Court Upholds Deemed Migration

Conversion from CPF to GPF-Cum-Pension Scheme: Jharkhand High Court Upholds Deemed Migration

Date: Sep 15, 2022
Conversion from CPF to GPF-Cum-Pension Scheme: Jharkhand High Court Upholds Deemed Migration Introduction The case of The Union of India through its Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v....
Judicial Scrutiny of Amendment Applications in Public Law Appeals: Insights from State Of Jharkhand v. Shivam Iron & Steel Co.

Judicial Scrutiny of Amendment Applications in Public Law Appeals: Insights from State Of Jharkhand v. Shivam Iron & Steel Co.

Date: Feb 23, 2022
Judicial Scrutiny of Amendment Applications in Public Law Appeals: Insights from State Of Jharkhand v. Shivam Iron & Steel Company Limited Introduction The case of State Of Jharkhand Through The...
Clarifying Liability under RTI Act: Public Authority vs. Public Information Officer

Clarifying Liability under RTI Act: Public Authority vs. Public Information Officer

Date: Feb 4, 2022
Clarifying Liability under RTI Act: Public Authority vs. Public Information Officer Introduction The case of State Of Jharkhand, Through The Principal Secretary, Health And Family Welfare And Another...
Acquittal in Criminal Proceedings and Its Non-binding Effect on Departmental Enquiries: Ashok Kumar Nonia v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Acquittal in Criminal Proceedings and Its Non-binding Effect on Departmental Enquiries: Ashok Kumar Nonia v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Date: Nov 3, 2021
Acquittal in Criminal Proceedings and Its Non-binding Effect on Departmental Enquiries: Ashok Kumar Nonia v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Introduction The case of Ashok Kumar Nonia v. Bharat Coking Coal...
Reaffirmation of Employment Rights: Raj Kumar Bhadani v. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited

Reaffirmation of Employment Rights: Raj Kumar Bhadani v. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited

Date: Sep 28, 2021
Reaffirmation of Employment Rights: Raj Kumar Bhadani v. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Introduction Raj Kumar Bhadani v. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing...
Judicial Non-Interference in State’s Policy on Age Cut-Offs for Civil Service Examinations: Reena Kumari v. JPSC

Judicial Non-Interference in State’s Policy on Age Cut-Offs for Civil Service Examinations: Reena Kumari v. JPSC

Date: Aug 26, 2021
Judicial Non-Interference in State’s Policy on Age Cut-Offs for Civil Service Examinations: Reena Kumari v. JPSC Introduction The case of Reena Kumari v. Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC)...
High Court Upholds NGT Directives on Environmental Compliance in Real Estate Development: Insights and Implications

High Court Upholds NGT Directives on Environmental Compliance in Real Estate Development: Insights and Implications

Date: May 14, 2021
High Court Upholds NGT Directives on Environmental Compliance in Real Estate Development: Insights and Implications Introduction The case of Confederation Of Real Estate Developers Association Of...
Jharkhand High Court Quashes Termination Order Based on Improper Grounds in Sushma Kumari v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court Quashes Termination Order Based on Improper Grounds in Sushma Kumari v. State of Jharkhand

Date: Feb 18, 2021
Jharkhand High Court Quashes Termination Order Based on Improper Grounds in Sushma Kumari v. State of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Sushma Kumari Alias Sushma Kumari Devi v. State Of Jharkhand...
Termination of Contractual Employment: Insights from Anita Prasad v. State Of Jharkhand

Termination of Contractual Employment: Insights from Anita Prasad v. State Of Jharkhand

Date: Jan 7, 2021
Termination of Contractual Employment: Insights from Anita Prasad v. State Of Jharkhand Introduction The case of Anita Prasad v. State Of Jharkhand Through The Secretary, Human Resources Development...
Strict Liability and Onus of Proof on Railways in Determining Bona Fide Passenger Status: Shanti Devi v. Union Of India

Strict Liability and Onus of Proof on Railways in Determining Bona Fide Passenger Status: Shanti Devi v. Union Of India

Date: Jul 8, 2020
Strict Liability and Onus of Proof on Railways in Determining Bona Fide Passenger Status: Shanti Devi v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Shanti Devi v. Union Of India, adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert