Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Case Commentaries

Clarification on Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c) – VIP Industries Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Clarification on Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c) – VIP Industries Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Date: Mar 21, 2009
Clarification on Penalty Imposition under Section 271(1)(c) – VIP Industries Ltd. Judgment Analysis Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle 32, Mumbai v. VIP...
Skoda Auto India v. CIT: Nuanced Application of TNMM in Transfer Pricing and Upholding of 5% Variation under Section 92C(2)

Skoda Auto India v. CIT: Nuanced Application of TNMM in Transfer Pricing and Upholding of 5% Variation under Section 92C(2)

Date: Mar 13, 2009
Skoda Auto India v. CIT: Nuanced Application of TNMM in Transfer Pricing and Upholding of 5% Variation under Section 92C(2) 1. Introduction The case of Skoda Auto India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant...
Parity Principle Enforced in Section 10B for Export Turnover and Total Turnover

Parity Principle Enforced in Section 10B for Export Turnover and Total Turnover

Date: Mar 7, 2009
Parity Principle Enforced in Section 10B for Export Turnover and Total Turnover Introduction The judgment in Income-tax Officer, Company Ward-VI(1), Chennai v. Sak Soft Ltd., delivered by the Income...
Clarification on Section 80-IA Deduction for Rail Systems and Inland Container Depots: CONCOR v. Income Tax Authority

Clarification on Section 80-IA Deduction for Rail Systems and Inland Container Depots: CONCOR v. Income Tax Authority

Date: Feb 28, 2009
Clarification on Section 80-IA Deduction for Rail Systems and Inland Container Depots: CONCOR v. Income Tax Authority Introduction The case of Container Corporation of India Ltd. (CONCOR) versus...
Non Obediente Clause of Section 44: Insights from Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Non Obediente Clause of Section 44: Insights from Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Feb 28, 2009
Non Obediente Clause of Section 44: Insights from Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction In the landmark case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Assistant...
Gopal Purohit v. CIT: Defining Investment vs. Trading Activities in Share Transactions

Gopal Purohit v. CIT: Defining Investment vs. Trading Activities in Share Transactions

Date: Feb 11, 2009
Gopal Purohit v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax: Defining Investment vs. Trading Activities in Share Transactions Introduction The case of Gopal Purohit v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,...
Deemed Dividend Implications on Inter-Corporate Deposits and Capital Gains on Self-Generated Brands: Insights from Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Deemed Dividend Implications on Inter-Corporate Deposits and Capital Gains on Self-Generated Brands: Insights from Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jan 23, 2009
Deemed Dividend Implications on Inter-Corporate Deposits and Capital Gains on Self-Generated Brands: Insights from Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The...
Recognition of Secondment Agreements as Employment Relations: IDS Software Solutions v. Income-tax Officer

Recognition of Secondment Agreements as Employment Relations: IDS Software Solutions v. Income-tax Officer

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Recognition of Secondment Agreements as Employment Relations: IDS Software Solutions v. Income-tax Officer Introduction The case of IDS Software Solutions (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer...
Acchyalal Shaw v. Income-tax Officer: Establishing the Legitimacy of Off-Market Share Transactions

Acchyalal Shaw v. Income-tax Officer: Establishing the Legitimacy of Off-Market Share Transactions

Date: Jan 17, 2009
Acchyalal Shaw v. Income-tax Officer: Establishing the Legitimacy of Off-Market Share Transactions Introduction The case of Acchyalal Shaw v. Income-tax Officer adjudicated by the Income Tax...
Recognition of Non-Compete Fee as an Intangible Asset Eligible for Depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act

Recognition of Non-Compete Fee as an Intangible Asset Eligible for Depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act

Date: Jan 17, 2009
Recognition of Non-Compete Fee as an Intangible Asset Eligible for Depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Income-tax Officer (OSD), Company Circle IV(2),...
Revival of Original Assessments in s.153C Proceedings: Insights from Meghmani Organics Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Revival of Original Assessments in s.153C Proceedings: Insights from Meghmani Organics Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Jan 17, 2009
Revival of Original Assessments in s.153C Proceedings: Insights from Meghmani Organics Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Meghmani Organics Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner...
Non-Retrospective Application of Section 292BB in Tax Assessment Proceedings: ITAT's Interpretation

Non-Retrospective Application of Section 292BB in Tax Assessment Proceedings: ITAT's Interpretation

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Non-Retrospective Application of Section 292BB in Tax Assessment Proceedings: ITAT's Interpretation 1. Introduction The case of Kuber Tobacco Products (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax,...
Mythri Transport Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Clarifying Sub-Contractor Responsibilities under Section 194C(2)

Mythri Transport Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Clarifying Sub-Contractor Responsibilities under Section 194C(2)

Date: Jan 10, 2009
Mythri Transport Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Clarifying Sub-Contractor Responsibilities under Section 194C(2) 1. Introduction The case of Mythri Transport Corporation v....
DTAA Guidelines on Profits from Permanent Establishments: In-depth Analysis of Deputy Commissioner v. Mideast India Ltd.

DTAA Guidelines on Profits from Permanent Establishments: In-depth Analysis of Deputy Commissioner v. Mideast India Ltd.

Date: Jan 10, 2009
DTAA Guidelines on Profits from Permanent Establishments In-depth Analysis of Deputy Commissioner v. Mideast India Ltd. Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-7,...
Recognition of Family Settlements as Analogous to Partition under Section 49(1): Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Baldev Raj Charla

Recognition of Family Settlements as Analogous to Partition under Section 49(1): Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Baldev Raj Charla

Date: Dec 30, 2008
Recognition of Family Settlements as Analogous to Partition under Section 49(1): Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Baldev Raj Charla Introduction The case of Assistant...
ITAT Agra Judgment: Admissions Insufficient Alone for Income Tax Additions – Ravi Agricultural Industries Case

ITAT Agra Judgment: Admissions Insufficient Alone for Income Tax Additions – Ravi Agricultural Industries Case

Date: Dec 27, 2008
ITAT Agra Judgment: Admissions Insufficient Alone for Income Tax Additions – Ravi Agricultural Industries Case Introduction In the landmark case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, 4(1), Agra v....
Interpretation of 'Operation of Ships' under Article 8 of India-Brazil DTAA: Limits on Tax Relief for Shipping Enterprises

Interpretation of 'Operation of Ships' under Article 8 of India-Brazil DTAA: Limits on Tax Relief for Shipping Enterprises

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Interpretation of 'Operation of Ships' under Article 8 of India-Brazil DTAA: Limits on Tax Relief for Shipping Enterprises Introduction The case of Deputy Director of Income-tax (International...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 80-IA: Exclusion of Trading Profits from Eligible Deductions

Clarifying the Scope of Section 80-IA: Exclusion of Trading Profits from Eligible Deductions

Date: Nov 25, 2008
Clarifying the Scope of Section 80-IA: Exclusion of Trading Profits from Eligible Deductions 1. Introduction The case of Emerson Network Power India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax,...
Clarifying the Scope of "Shareholder" Under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act

Clarifying the Scope of "Shareholder" Under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act

Date: Nov 20, 2008
Clarifying the Scope of "Shareholder" Under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act Introduction The judicial landscape surrounding the interpretation of "shareholder" under section 2(22)(e) of the...
Aggregate Treatment of Losses and Unabsorbed Depreciation under Section 115JB: Amline Textiles (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer

Aggregate Treatment of Losses and Unabsorbed Depreciation under Section 115JB: Amline Textiles (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer

Date: Nov 5, 2008
Aggregate Treatment of Losses and Unabsorbed Depreciation under Section 115JB Introduction The case of Amline Textiles (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 3(1)-1, Mumbai adjudicated by the Income...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert